04 6 / 2018

Anonymous asked: The Bill Clinton post makes me want to throw up. I will say OF COURSE we should still be holding the current president's feet to the fire for his words and actions, but Kaiser's hypocritical and antifeminist words about Bill Clinton are making me sick. It's okay to say both men were wrong, you know. It's true Monica was technically an adult but she was not only a very young adult, i.e. a college student, but she was an intern, an employee, and he was the most powerful man in the world.

I could not believe what I was reading on the Bill Clinton thread today. This is a classic sexual harassment case. But, of course, our lawyer-in-residence  lilacflowers could not recognize it. Neither could the chief-feminist-in-residence otaku fairy. Kitten, of course, would excuse anyone with the last name Clinton. The whol thread was unbelievable. Only towards the end of it some sane people showed up and started asking “Really? “

04 6 / 2018

Anonymous asked: They should just rename the damn site "All whiteys are racist, y'all", except St. Hillary. Now they're hoping Melania Trump is in need of a kidney transplant - sick. Also, kinda surprised Kaiser (who says she has Indian heritage, I think) kept her user name. After all, you'd think she'd want to avoid anything reminding anyone of Germany since she also loves labeling people Nazis!

Melania’s threads are all sick. Sure, she supported the birther nonsense, but the way they treat her you would think she is a serial killer or something.

But what irritates me most is -  these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS.  What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished. As per feminism, shouldn’t a woman be free to do what she wants, regardless of who her husband is?

They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything.

03 6 / 2018

I just saw this comment under the Benedict’s article

Danielle says:

June 3, 2018 at 7:04 pm

If this had happened back in 2014 there would have been hundreds of comments on this story and it would have quickly descended into insanity. Good times!! Someone should do a study into how Bendy killed off his fanclub so rapidly!

ROFL! It is not Bendy, it is Kaiser! Bendy is doing just fine. Kaiser ran off all of Bendy’s fans off the site with her peddling of conspiracy theories and PR accusations when Bendy got married.

03 6 / 2018

Kaiser has always moderated me out, even when someone made an identical comment to me, my post always disappeared, I have no idea why, she is entirely capricious, blatantly biased and frankly not very bright. The wit and humour have been sucked out of the site. A pity, it used to be good natured messaging from women (mainly) from all over the world, now it’s just a gang of deranged cronies spewing out bile, I won’t be going back.

03 6 / 2018

thisloveisreadyforit asked: (continuation) the Princess of Wales, later on Queen of the UK, and Meghan will always be a Duchess, and as such she will have more freedom, but less relevance in the future when the fascination lessens. The couple of times I tried to make this point in several of their posts, all of them were deleted.

I think I did not get the beginning of this message. Posting what I got, sorry.

31 5 / 2018

Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney. 

They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.

They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).

29 5 / 2018

Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.

And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?

notasugarhere says:

May 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm

Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.

28 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: What I find amusing about CB is that the second half of it's name implies not just latitude in criticizing famous people, but an expectation of same. But if you criticize someone Kaiser likes, suddenly you have "violated commenting guidelines". It's really only about who Kaiser likes and dislikes, so the commenting "guidelines" are a complete sham.

When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say -  this is why this site is  called “bitchy”.

However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay  ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines -  why are you commenting on this person  if you don’t like him/ her, you could  just skip the post.

The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.

28 5 / 2018

Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.

And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty. 

28 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: @response to the "famewhore" issue, we'll have to agree to disagree. We are agreed that MM wouldn't have looked at Harry if his name hadn't been "Windsor" with the global fame she stood to gain. To me, agreeing to that "Vanity Fair" article, which we all know that she would never have gotten without dating him, says it all. She's always looking for the cameras, and to me it seems clear that her whole life has been dedicated to becoming a AAA+ lister. Well, now she is-through her marriage.

Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.