30 8 / 2018
Submission
My comment on yesterday’s Salma Hayek post got deleted. All I said was that I thought it was demeaning to refer to her as a “trophy wife” but alas, the poster didn’t agree with my feedback
—————————————————————————————————-
I agree with you. Salma Hayek might be attracted to power and money, but so are most people. That alone doesn’t make her a trophy wife. Otherwise, by the same argument, Meghan Markle is a trophy wife too.
28 8 / 2018
Anonymous asked: First time poster here. Just to spread a little mischief - find a browser such as opera and activate the free VPN then post something on celebitchy with a new name and an imaginary but realistic looking email addressI! I tried it after being banned and it works.
VPN works even against Chinese government censorship. )))
27 8 / 2018
So, after the trainwreck of the Cassel’s post I got to the Krainski’s post. And people are annoyed at him praising his wife. Really? Wow. Now, ask yourself, if a woman was saying something like that about her more famous husband, would we think anything amiss? Of course, not! But, when the genders are reversed, people are uncomfortable with it. They internalized the patriarchy and they don’t even know it about themselves.
27 8 / 2018
Today’s post about Vincent Cassel is so lame. And right there you know that Kaiser has no convictions of her own. She doesn’t know what to say, how people will react, and so she hedges.
Let me tell you, Kaiser, how you should react when a powerful 51 y.o. man marries a woman 30 years his junior, whom he groomed since she was 18 y.o. You should be outraged, and the man should be “cancelled”.
And the same goes for the CB commenters, who also didn’t know how to react without Kaiser telling them, and chose to talk about how pretty the woman is , and how she looks older, and her dress, and anything else, other than the issue at hand.They were so pathetically avoided it, it was ridiculous.
Thankfully, towards the end some sane people showed up and put it to rights. I liked the post which reminded everyone about their reaction to Priyanka and Nick, and how everybody thinks 11 years difference is too much. But, here , apparently, 30 y.o. difference with a power imbalance is just OK.
Also, allow me to remind you about their reaction to Karlie’s engagement, and how people pointed out that she started dating her fiance when she was 18 y.o. and he was 26 y.o. People said it was gross, and I tend to agree. But, hey, that was easy, that was Karlie and Kushner, whom Kaiser doesn’t like, so it was easy for posters to know how to react.
22 8 / 2018
Stats
I’ve been promising to look at the stats. I use Alexa.com, which is a free tool. Last time I looked at the stats was a long time ago. From what I am seeing since then Celebitchy.com rankings both in the US and globally are up about 2 thousand points, in comparison to other sites. Last time they were ranked in the 8th thousand and now they are in the 6th thousand in the US.
So, what do I know . )))
The funny thing is their traffic pattern matches almost exactly with the Daily Mail. Maybe people are just reading more gossip.

21 8 / 2018
I was just reading the post on Amal vs. Angelina and kept saying to myself - what? what? in what universe does this make any sense? But one thing does make sense now - the irrational dislike of Amal on Celebitchy. She is Angelina’s competition in their eyes!
It was also funny how posters kept addressing their posts to Brad, as if he reads Celebitchy, lol.
21 8 / 2018
On Madonna
Wow they really like to go the ageist route when it comes to Madonna. I heard old while lady, hag, has-been, comments about her puffy face. Dang, the woman is 60 and in the worst industry that scrutinizes a woman’s appearance. Kaiser really doesn’t get the pressure of being in the public eye as opposed to sitting at home writing blog posts in sweatpants dragging women who achieved 100x what she has for stupid crap like fashion and hair choices.
Madonna was there as a fan of Aretha Franklin, so told her story from an inspired fan’s perspective. She didn’t break into a rendition of RESPECT or anything. And if you were outraged, blame MTV who chose her to do it. But don’t make awful ageist comments about her appearance and act like Madonna never did anything worth a damn.
I’m amazed these women who support women, these woke feminists are so ageist.
Also they seem to wait for a way the narrative is going to go in the comments to chime in, because days ago they were calling Madonna an icon. Depending on the day and the outrage about cultural appropriation, Madonna is either a washed up old hag or a pop icon. Ridiculous.
—————————————————————————————————
My first reaction was - why Madonna? I mean, really, they could not find a respect black musician to do it? I have absolutely nothing against Madonna, but it just didn’t make any sense, even on the surface. But it is not Madonna’s fault, you are right about that. This decision is on MTV.
I also noticed that when CB commenters don’t like someone, they attack the person’s looks, even though they know better than that. I remember reading something really nasty about Ivanka’s looks a few days ago.And I thought - , really, is that is what important? It is so petty. Plus, what about people who resemble Ivanka’s looks? Her look is not that uncommon in Eastern Europe. Are we going to call all those women “strange looking” too, just because they look like Ivanka?
And, triple yes to the groupthink observation. Kaiser herself is like that. Half of the time she doesn’t know what to think on issues and takes lead from people she thinks are “woke”. Either people on other sites or on CB. On top of it the merciless moderating out of people with any kind of independent opinions also naturally leads to groupthink.
20 8 / 2018
Ha-ha-ha. I just read the post where Meghan’s father said that the BRF as like a secret cult, and then the comments below. Quite surreal, I must say.
You know what, he is right. The BRF, as an institution, is old, secretive, has many skeletons in the closet, and I am sure, is guilty of covering up many crimes. As recently as Andrew’s involvement with Epstein.
You can feel whatever way you want about Meghan, and her extended family, but let’s not whitewash the BRF, just because you like Meghan. Remember, this is the same family that Diana couldn’t wait to get out of. This is an institution which should’ve been gone 200 years ago, at least.
It is telling that the posters go on and on about how awful he is, but don’t address the core of this claim, which is actually true. They can’t bring themselves to admit that they were seduced by the Cinderella story to the point where they are willing to overlook quite the real harm that the BRF inflicts on the society.
09 8 / 2018
So, I visited CB today and my first thought after scanning today’s posts was - what a sewer! It is a perfect reflection of Kaiser now. It used to be somewhat sophisticated. But today - it is a gazillion posts about Brad and Angelina divorce, something about Bieber, something about Real Housewives, Lohan, Omarosa, Di Caprio’s new girlfriend, a mandatory Meghan post ( I guess the royalty is cool now, that Meghan joined them, and let’s forget centuries of oppression) and so on. Yuck.
02 8 / 2018
I have a problem with people going after the 15 y.o. daughter of Katherine Zeta-Jones. She is 15! Give her a break.
And another positive article about Kim Kardashian. Even the regular posters are not buying what Kaiser is selling