31 5 / 2018

Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney. 

They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.

They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).

29 5 / 2018

Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.

And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?

notasugarhere says:

May 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm

Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.

28 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: What I find amusing about CB is that the second half of it's name implies not just latitude in criticizing famous people, but an expectation of same. But if you criticize someone Kaiser likes, suddenly you have "violated commenting guidelines". It's really only about who Kaiser likes and dislikes, so the commenting "guidelines" are a complete sham.

When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say -  this is why this site is  called “bitchy”.

However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay  ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines -  why are you commenting on this person  if you don’t like him/ her, you could  just skip the post.

The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.

28 5 / 2018

Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.

And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty. 

28 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: @response to the "famewhore" issue, we'll have to agree to disagree. We are agreed that MM wouldn't have looked at Harry if his name hadn't been "Windsor" with the global fame she stood to gain. To me, agreeing to that "Vanity Fair" article, which we all know that she would never have gotten without dating him, says it all. She's always looking for the cameras, and to me it seems clear that her whole life has been dedicated to becoming a AAA+ lister. Well, now she is-through her marriage.

Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.

28 5 / 2018

I see posters on CB are so concerned with feminists issues that there are only 20-30 posts on the #MeToo related topics but 200-300 each of the royal posts and there are 5-6 of them a day. // sarcasm

CB turned into a nastier version of Mirror.  

28 5 / 2018

Wow,I  just went to the  Kate’s maternity leave thread and it is NASTY.

What is this, for example ( a post by Lizbeth )

“ While I think leave is fine, I’m not buying the idea that proper bonding requires her to be home with the baby 24/7. While Kate’s “on leave” she’s not available 24/7 to the baby nor are “ordinary hands-on” moms who do things like clean the house, grocery shop, go to church, engage in their regular charitable activities, have a night out with dad, etc. all while “on leave.” “


Let me tell you something, “Lizbeth”, a  new baby wakes up every 2 hours to feed. And if you breastfeed, it does not matter how many nannies you have, you still have to wake up every 2 hours. You get no sleep for the first 3-4 months, you become a zombie. 

Cleaning? What cleaning? Grocery shopping an cooking - the husband can do it.  Believe it or not, even in regular households women get help, and they are still struggling.

28 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Kaiser's hatred of Kate Middleton is pathological and she can try blaming it on Kate being "lazy" from now till Kingdom Come, I don't believe her. I'm only waiting for her blame the weather on Kate. IMHO Kaiser hates Kate because she is a white English girl. If Meghan had been white Kaiser would have hung her out to dry for using dating Harry to get herself a "Vanity Fair" cover and talking about their relationship inside. Mention "Meghan" and "famewhore" on Celebitchy and watch the fur fly.

I don’t think Meghan is a famewhore, but I am pretty sure if Harry wasn’t a rich royal she wouldn’t have given him a second look. But this goes for many women. I don’t think Meghan  is worse than any other regular woman, but she is not an activist, feminist etc.  that Celebitchy posters are making her out to be. If she were, she would have never married into the royal family to begin with.

22 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I stopped reading celebitchy today. I got really offended by their blatant hypocrisy. How can they preach feminism when half the time they are putting down select women? Kaiser has some serious vitriol. I pray she gains some soul.

The hypocrisy is unbearable. When it is a woman they like, any missteps are excused. When it is a woman they don’t like every misstep is treated like a crime against humanity.

I, personally, have an issue with how much Meghan’s dresses cost. 100K per dress is way, way too much for someone who is supposed to be all about helping people. I remember CB used to go on and on about the cost of Kate’s wardrobe. They have been silent on the subject for months. And in case of Meghan, even when the price is brought up, the posters “choose” to talk about how lovely she looks instead. They are not fooling anyone. 

The same with Meghan curtsying and wearing tights. They find an excuse after an excuse, but they do not afford the same courtesy when it comes to celebrities they don’t like,

17 5 / 2018

I can’t believe the demonization that’s going on with Meghan Markle’s father.  The man had a massive heart attack a week ago and is now recovering from having three stents inserted.  Yet Celebitchy has completely demonized him.  He’s ruined her wedding, is white trash, should be totally cut out of her life, and has had a heart attack because Karma, etc.  It’s sick.

————————————————————————————-

The way the royal family mismanaged the relationships with Meghan’s extended family is ridiculous. I am no aristocrat ( all my knowledge of British aristocracy is comes from Jane Austin, lol ), but even I know that it does nobody any favors to have family fighting openly in the media. They should have foreseen it and placated her family. I get it that some of them are not nice people, all the same, smart people would’ve reached out to them early on and helped them financially. It is pretty clear her family is struggling,while Meghan is marrying into royalty. It just does not compute and was always going to be an issue.