13 6 / 2017
I just saw this comment under the Sessions article. What an excellent comment. Well said.
Manzur says:
There are SO many other things to comment on besides appearance. Can we just stop? It brings the discussion down to junior high level. And YES i KNOW Trump has picked on physical appearance but does that mean we ALL have to now too? Is that mature reasoning? I despise that. Who cares what Sessions looks like? Who cares what about his accent? Just because the mean kids on the playground throw insults about appearance around does not mean the entire school should start. It dumbs down the conversation. Ivanka sleeps with her father. Eric Trump is ugly. Melanie sounds funny. Trump is Cheeto. There. Now we’re all five years old. It’s like a bad Saturday Night Live skit. Funny for the first 10 seconds and then lame and groan worthy as it drones on. Let’s all rise above. We are too good for this.
12 6 / 2017
Discussions of Vilkander and Fassbender bring back disturbing memories of Hunterbatch 2015. That was my first encounter with so-called “fans” viciously attacking a woman for her relationship with their internet boyfriend, and idle bystanders cheering them on from the sidelines, just for the fun of it.
Now, the second time around, I recognize all the signs.
*Claims that he (the internet boyfriend) looks unhappy and is just not the same, not attractive anymore. Yes, Kaiser, that is in reference to your comment “ He just seems so neutered with Vikander. “.
*That she (the woman) has abuse issues, snobby, unfriendly, unaccomplished.
*That the relationship is fake.
*That something just seems off.
*Bystanders claiming that this is no big deal, this is just regular gossip. I remember how lilacflower’s “Comet Sophie” references used to drive me mad during Hunterbatch. She didn’t care about it one way or another, she is a Hiddleston fan, or should I say “stan”. But she still went on and continued pouring gas on the fire, just for the fun of it. With Vilkander the same thing is going on.
In fairness, there are a couple of posters with factual information who refute the made up stories. But they drown in the sea of awfulness.
*
I just noticed this comment by Skylark got deleted. I wondered how did it make it through -)).
—————————————————————-
Let’s not forget that the CB writer who used to wet her knickers over everything (single) Fassbinder did has actively encouraged this deeply unpleasant madness purely because Fassy has taken up with a woman who is not her.
Make no mistake, that’s at the absolute root of it. Click on ‘Michael Fassbender’ for a history.
—————————————————————
07 6 / 2017
Why does Celebitchy have an issue with men talking about objectification of men? I remember Kit Harrington talking about it and the CB commenters ridiculing him for it. Now Sam Clafin talks about it and it is a similar reaction, though a milder one.
Just because women have it worse, it doesn’t mean men should just shut up and take it when it happens to them. When both men and women talk about it then it only makes it the cause stronger.
Maybe it is because CB itself loves to indulge into objectification of men and this hits a bit close to home?
06 6 / 2017
Well, I’ve noticed Kaiser is trying to build up Taylor Swift to be the new Kate Middleton. It doesn’t seem to take. While there are a number of posters who seem to have irrational hatred of Swift, there aren’t enough of them. Swift posts can’t even break 100 comments.
I found it a bit surreal how in today’s comments people were blaming Swift for being immature and so on because she is still ‘beefing’ with Perry. Except Swift hasn’t said anything in years, it is all from ‘sources’. I guess it is fun, building a strawman and then pummeling it to death.
04 5 / 2017
For May 3rd the most commented articles were the one about Hiddleston vs. Fassbender and then Brad &Angelina. The usual click-bait.
o I am surprised so many poster there don’t think Fassbender is handsome. As far as looks go he has a strong jaw and a proportionate face. I am not one of his fans but I think Fassbender is better looking and a better actor than Hiddleston. At the same time Hiddleston’s fans were very amusing with their over-the-top defense.
o Brad vs. Angelina - I see Kaiser couldn’t find anything to spin in his interview so she just left it for posters to rip him apart. And rip him apart they did. I don’t dislike either Brad or Angelina. They both seem like good people, so I am just going to stay away from this one and not take sides.
Three Trump articles for the day, we are getting desperate, are we?
A Kate Middleton article. There was one comment that got under my skin. The one that slammed Will for bringing up Diana’s death in the paparazzi trial. Who are the posters to tell whether he should be still affected by his mother’s death and the paparazzi behavior or not? I don’t necessarily like him and I am against the monarchy, but I know that this kind of trauma stays with people for their whole lives and I am not going to deny how it affected him just because I don’t like him. And people twisting themselves into pretzels trying to make it look like the pictures taken in France by the paparazzi are somehow Will &Kate’s fault, just stop. Laws are laws. You don’t argue against the laws and common decency just because you don’t like somebody.
Netflix ’13 Reasons’ show sounds like a big and dangerous mess. But I don’t watch, so no opinion there.
Susan Sarandon article – Celebitchy posters are Hillary supporters and Susan Sarandon committed an unforgivable sin of disliking Hillary and supporting Bernie. That means it is an open season on Susan Sarandon on the site. I think Susan Sarandon probably knows Hillary personally and is a better judge of who Hillary truly is than Celebitchy posters who don’t know either woman.
My own opinion of Hillary is very much in line with the post below. The only thing I don’t agree with is that it calls Hillary’s followers ‘bots’. Everyone is entitled to support whoever they like, it doesn’t make them a bot. Though acting that it is impossible for a rational person to understand why people don’t support Hillary even though other posters explained it over and over again does come over as willful denial.

25 4 / 2017
Oh my. All the race baiting going on in and under the Rachel Dolezal article. “Peak white supremacy”, really?
For example this part, what is that about?
“It is a bit extreme, but it is in no way new for white people to take what they want from other cultures in the name of love and respect, while distorting or discarding the remainder of that culture for their comfort”
Is that about so-called cultural appropriation? Cultures always borrowed from one another and adapted what they borrowed to their tastes. It makes cultures richer. I’ll go even further and say that this is how the human society progresses, through synthesis. It is not a bad thing.
And are some of the regular posters seriously arguing that race is a biological trait and not a social construct?
25 4 / 2017
Melania Trump is another woman “Celebitchers” love to hate. I think they are so free with derision of her because she is a wife of “the enemy”. And they feel free to engage into some “therapeutical steam release” using her as a target dummy. There is nothing about Melania herself to justify this level of derision.
Almost every comment under the article starts with “ I don’t feel sorry for her”, “she made her choice” and so on.
As someone who grew up outside of the US I also find the US office of First lady to be archaic and patriarchal. And this is not a new position for me. I always thought so. For Europeans this concept of a whole family representing their country is too similar to monarchy. In addition, the office of the First lady is not official, unelected and is unpaid. The First Lady is treated as a property of her husband. And that is just not right. I don’t see how American feminists square the concept of the First Lady with women rights. No woman should be treated as a property or pressured into doing something she doesn’t want to just because of who her husband is. Again, for Europeans this is unthinkable.
Here is one of very few balanced comments on Melania I tend agree with. Especially about the bitchiness she provokes in others.

And here is another one, which is more representative of what you see BTL at Celebitchy.

Doesn’t any capitalist society operate on this principle? Especially one such as the US, which practices unrestrained laissez-faire capitalism? So it is OK that everyone else does it, just Melania is not allowed? Celebitchy is a wrong name for his site. It should be called Hypocrisy by any other name.
23 4 / 2017
Bullcrap
It’s funny how “white cis males/women” are the enemy over at CeleBITCHY, yet Kaiser writes a thread dedicated to picking at Kate Middleton’s accent and not even being clever about it, because they ALL HAVE SUBTITLES.
So you hate this woman so much or you love hate clicks so much that you have to make two posts a day just to trash her for no reason.
I love all the skinny shaming in the comments about KM (by Lainey no less) and I kept imagining, “if someone were overweight, would they allow anyone to talk about how unhealthy they are? That’s rude and wrong right?’
So why do they do it so freely to skinny women? As a overweight women myself I would never comment on another woman’s weight, because it’s a senstive topic.
I wouldn’t comment on anyone’s weight tbh.
I swear CeleBITCHY is one of the most backwards hypothetical websites I have ever been on.Writers who call themselves Feminist, but more often then not are more racists,sexist and judgemental than the people that are the so called enemy.
As a black woman, I find CeleBITCHY as a whole to be a negative counterproductive place.
On every level.
They are casually racists, sexist, shaming and often accuse men of being gay in a discriminatory way.
Backwards.
——————————-
It is clear that Kate Middleton is a pure click-bait. Just like Tom Hiddleston. The only difference is that Tom Hiddleston is a click-bait for his fans and Kate Middleton is a click-bait for people who love to demean her and I am actually not sure what they find in it.
I am against the monarchy myself. But that is what I would talk about. Not the color of Kate’s shoes.
No, these women derive some sick pleasure in ripping someone apart. And I guess they don’t feel guilty about doing it to Kate Middleton because she is privileged. Privileged or not, it is still very wrong. She is still a human being. Not to mention that everyone in the royal family is privileged but Celebitchy only loves to hate Kate.
19 4 / 2017
Submission
ha ha! i can’t believe how ultra sensitive kaiser is regarding Angelina Jolie.
twice i submitted this in response to the AJ and Tom Ford post:
can he teach her how to use HD makeup?
she needs help.
REJECTED. TWICE!
i took a screen cap of it the 2nd time because i had the sneaking suspicion she just didn’t care for the joke and everything else i posted today went through after moderation.
13 4 / 2017
I see Melania Trump won her defamation case against Daily Mail. The news was in all major newspapers yesterday. But Celebitchy is mum on this.
They sure loved dragging Melania through the mud when Daily Mail printed their story about her being an escort. But now that it is retracted all you hear from Kaiser is crickets.
This is just another instance of faux-feminism.