12 6 / 2018
mayamaeposts asked: I don't understand Notasugar's obsession with saying that it doesn't matter if William and Kate didn't have children. She says it nearly every royal post, and she harps on it to the extreme. Sure, the queen's father unexpectedly became king, but why ignore that it was a fluke, and that it shakes the stability of the institution. Now she's banging on about evil W&K having a second and third baby! Well the queen had four, where's the outrage?
Having children is pretty much the JOB of every woman in any hereditary monarchy, no matter how enlightened and modern it pretends to be. This is another reason the monarchy needs to be abolished. It is so patriarchal. A woman’s value is measured by whether she can have healthy beautiful children.
CB posters all go on about Kate being “lazy”, but as far as the BRF concerned Kate is doing a great job. She gave the BRF the next generation of heirs.
Only deluded CB posters think that sponsoring charities, cutting ribbons and looking pretty at events has any real value. Whether royals do 5 or 5000 of them, it doesn’t have any real impact. The only true benefit is to the royal family in keeping themselves relevant.
A regular working as a nurse delivers much more benefit to the world than any of the royals.