14 6 / 2017

OMG. What an awful blog on Tinashe. I won’t go there because I am not qualified. But all those people denying her experience, it is just so hurtful.The Original TC and QQ are the worst.

14 6 / 2017

Ha, Kaiser was just told ever so politely that Joe Alwyn is not getting work because of Swift but due to his own qualifications. We know nothing about this guy but Kaiser already hates him by association. She has really strong feelings about Swift.

“ Alba says:

June 14, 2017 at 9:56 am

I see, but this article sort of says Alwyn wasn’t getting work. I think thats a slight misrepresentation . He is a guy who graduated recently from a very distinguished drama school in London ( The Royal Central School-Judi Dench, Vanessa Redgrave and tons of great actors from that school, most recently Andrew Garfield who is earning rave reviews for Angels in America at The National Theatre ). He has already scored jobs with Oscar winning/nominated directors such as Lee and Lanthimos and worked with some stellar actors in that year since he graduated, so hes way ahead of the heap of recent graduates already. The fact that such good directors cast him as an unknown makes me think he must have something. Lee is an actors director.”


For what it is worth, I think Alwyn is very handsome, and if he has any sort of talent on top of it, he’ll go far. 

He and Swift also seem to look strangely similar. This must be a real thing, if that is possible with Taylor Swift. I noticed that many people get really attached to people who look like them.

13 6 / 2017

I just saw this comment under the Sessions article. What an excellent comment. Well said.


Manzur says:

June 13, 2017 at 5:51 pm

There are SO many other things to comment on besides appearance. Can we just stop? It brings the discussion down to junior high level. And YES i KNOW Trump has picked on physical appearance but does that mean we ALL have to now too? Is that mature reasoning? I despise that. Who cares what Sessions looks like? Who cares what about his accent? Just because the mean kids on the playground throw insults about appearance around does not mean the entire school should start. It dumbs down the conversation. Ivanka sleeps with her father. Eric Trump is ugly. Melanie sounds funny. Trump is Cheeto. There. Now we’re all five years old. It’s like a bad Saturday Night Live skit. Funny for the first 10 seconds and then lame and groan worthy as it drones on. Let’s all rise above. We are too good for this.

13 6 / 2017

Anonymous asked: What is with all the super hate and slut shaming of ScarJo on CB lately? It's super disappointing and disturbing. I have been reading that site for 10+ years and honestly I have never seen the writers go after a woman so hard for being sex positive. Thoughts?

I don’t get it either.You would think a self-proclaim feminist site would support a woman coming out and saying what she really thinks. Yes. monogamy is not for everyone. If it works for someone, great, if not, fine. 

Also, relationships are hard work and there are enough people who feel that the benefits they get from stable relationships are not worth the work required to maintain them.

I think Kaiser always disliked ScarJo, but now she can openly dislike her because of the whitewashing controversy with the Ghost in a Shell. 

On top of that there is a certain racial bias purposely cultivated on the site. You will see comments along the lines that so and so is white and pretty and skinny and for this reason doesn’t have to struggle like the others, and it is a strike against that person. And ScarJo happens to be white, pretty and skinny. The only women who seem to be exempt from this criticism are Angelina and Katy Perry. And possibly Naomi Watts. Naomi is so likeable, people just can’t find it in themselves to criticize her.

12 6 / 2017

Discussions of Vilkander and Fassbender bring back disturbing memories of Hunterbatch 2015. That was my first encounter with so-called “fans” viciously attacking a woman for her relationship with their internet boyfriend, and idle bystanders cheering them on from the sidelines, just for the fun of it.

Now, the second time around, I recognize all the signs.

*Claims that he (the internet boyfriend) looks unhappy and is just not the same, not attractive anymore. Yes, Kaiser, that is in reference to your comment “ He just seems so neutered with Vikander. “.

*That she (the woman) has abuse issues, snobby, unfriendly, unaccomplished.

*That the relationship is fake.

*That something just seems off.

*Bystanders claiming that this is no big deal, this is just regular gossip. I remember how lilacflower’s  “Comet Sophie” references used to drive me mad during Hunterbatch.  She didn’t care about it one way or another, she is a Hiddleston fan, or should I say “stan”. But she still went on and continued pouring gas on the fire, just for the fun of it. With Vilkander the same thing is going on. 

In fairness, there are a couple of posters with factual information who refute the made up stories. But they drown in the sea of  awfulness.

*

I just noticed this comment by Skylark got deleted. I wondered how did it make it through -)).

—————————————————————-

June 9, 2017 at 3:18 pm

Let’s not forget that the CB writer who used to wet her knickers over everything (single) Fassbinder did has actively encouraged this deeply unpleasant madness purely because Fassy has taken up with a woman who is not her.

Make no mistake, that’s at the absolute root of it. Click on ‘Michael Fassbender’ for a history.

—————————————————————

08 6 / 2017

Anonymous asked: I am not american, so I don't know how much the americans are suffering with Trump in power. BUT why a site of celebrity gossip needs to talk everyday about Trump ou Ivana? Really why politics everyday?,.. that's why I prefer Lainey or Ohnotheydidnt. when Obama was in power they almost never talked bad about Obamas. I know Trump sounds a nightmare, but god, it's a celebrity gossip.

I think it is just a way to drive traffic to the site because traffic means more advertisement revenue for the site and more money for the owners. Trump posts are the ones getting the most comments. A lot of people hate Trump with passion. Though, I don’t know how they don’t get tired of talking about him every day for hours. It is the same thing over and over.

#ban #celebitchy

07 6 / 2017

Why does Celebitchy have an issue with men talking about objectification of men? I remember Kit Harrington talking about it and the CB commenters ridiculing him for it. Now Sam Clafin talks about it and it is a similar reaction, though a milder one. 

Just because women have it worse, it doesn’t mean men should just shut up and take it when it happens to them. When both men and women talk about it then it only makes it the cause stronger.

Maybe it is because CB itself loves to indulge into objectification of men and this hits a bit close to home?

06 6 / 2017

Well, I’ve noticed Kaiser is trying to build up Taylor Swift to be the new Kate Middleton. It doesn’t seem to take. While there are a number of posters who seem to have irrational hatred of Swift, there aren’t enough of them. Swift posts can’t even break 100 comments.

I found it a bit surreal how in today’s comments people were blaming Swift for being immature and so on because she is still ‘beefing’  with Perry. Except Swift hasn’t said anything in years, it is all from ‘sources’. I guess it is fun, building a strawman and then pummeling it to death.

01 6 / 2017

So I got banned and after getting banned, I decided to go on Twitter and ask Kaiser why.

Because I didn’t do anything wrong, I didn’t break any rules, I read the rules and I was following them.

And I came across a tweet of her saying “Swifty fans” were “butthurt” (her favorite insult) and basically pissed off. Because in today’s thread (the Katy Vs Taylor Thread) people weren’t on Kaiser’s side about the “dated” (another word K uses to death) beef that Katy keeps bringing up.

And it made me laugh because you’re butthurt that people aren’t here for petty old dusty beef? We get that you hate Taylor Swift, but really? Am I as a black woman, supposed to stand up for Katy who was accused by a black rapper of saying the N word (multiple times)? Or someone who made fun of someone having a mental breakdown?

But no, let’s  get pissed at T Swift for making love/hate songs about boyfriends and that Kanye bullshit.

It’s stupid and I love how Kaiser is so bent out of shape that she went to Twitter to complain about her readers not agreeing with the  pettiness between two petty women.

But that’s okay, stick up for problematic Katy because she hates Taylor Swift.

You are so basic Kaiser.

Honestly. I love how you can ignore things that go against the “beliefs” you so call hold, because you hate someone that much. Kaiser did bring up people saying Katy was “trash” but not why people were saying it. They were saying the song is trash, Katy’s is like Kaiser who says one thing and does another. I’m way more offended by the few things Katy’s done then anything TS has ever done.

And I say this as a fan of neither, I’d take a immature, stunt queen, over a fake woke problematic Katy any day.

Because I don’t let hate overshadow my beliefs.

I’m sorry for the rant but it pissed me off and made me laugh.

23 5 / 2017

Anonymous asked: Are you sure you have been *banned* properly? I would assume that an automated message would appear, telling you so. If it's just about some of your messages not being approved (ridiculous in itself), I don't think it constitutes banning properly. Anyway, it would be a good idea to give visitors (here) the opportunity to comment (you can always approve the comments or not). You might find that many people are very much "over" CB. :)

I am quite sure this is how banning works on CB. Some other sites do it this way as well. They put your IP address or the name/ email on the blocked list. And your post just goes into limbo and never gets published.

I think on Disquis you do get a message that you are banned, but it is not the case with many other ‘comments’ applications.