04 12 / 2017

My friend who reads CB & Loved it, just told me that an few months back she got banned on an RBF post.
She was first put in moderation for the first time after agreeing with someone standing up for Kate, then she was put on moderation again and her comment was deleted in an JenAnniston post.
Finally, she was banned outright. She said she wrote CB an email 2 days in a row and got no response. Then the next RBF post she said that Kaiser made references to her email in the actual article.Mocking her.

No surpise that my friend was an black regular on CB. They seem to have no issue just disgarding us.

————————————————————————————————

Oh, that is the worst when Kaiser uses insider information to mock people over very real issues they bring up. This is hitting below the belt. When people send private messages they expect their privacy to be respected.

I remember her doing it last year during Taylor Swift vs. Kanye West drama. She made references to some people sending emails and dismissed anyone who was defending Swift as her fangirls, while she was making excuses for Kanye. But the thing people took issue with was Kanye’s misogyny. and it had nothing to do with being a fan of Taylor.

04 12 / 2017

Anonymous asked: So I just posted that I was getting burnt out on MM stories and guess what it was taken down. As this is my first offence, i.e. being deleted, I don't think I've been banned. But kaiser herself on an earlier story said she worried about people burning out on her. As for MM if I were her I would worry about people burning out on stories about me.

02 12 / 2017

300 comments discussing Meghan Markle’s coat -  too long, too short, not tailored enough or whatever. Who cares? Even for a gossip site this is too much. Is that all there is to Meghan? Her coat and her hair? She is going to be just another person to take apart -  her clothes, her hair, her looks. 

How does this compute in people’s heads? First, they are excited about a bi-racial American entering the Royal family and then they basically reduce her to a cloth hanger. She is starting to get the same treatment as Kate. I think it is not Kate who is the issue here,or Meghan or any other woman with whom CB posters take an issue, it is the posters. They are unable to see a person as a person. Everyone is dehumanized and dissected.

Personally, I think it is such a dull, fake life - forever smiling, shaking hands, being judged, being an ornament or a token at endless ribbon-cutting ceremonies. I would never want that life for myself. I’d run away screaming after 15 min of that. And I feel a bit sorry for both Kate and Meghan.

30 11 / 2017

QQ commented on the Jay Z post and it was up for an few hours before it was deleted.

30 11 / 2017

29 11 / 2017

I have a couple things on my mind today in light of the Lauer’s debacle.

First, his co-hosts were crying about it and then I saw an article in the Guardian about how we have to reconcile horrible actions by a well loved man. And I thought -  give me a f*ing break! I don’t need to reconcile anything. The guy is a dirtbag and that is that. The fact that he worked for an organization you approve of doesn’t make him more palatable. In fact, the said organization (NBC) clearly enabled him, because there were enough warning signs.

In connection to this I came across the Lauer’s interview with Anne Hathway from 2012 where he pestered her about inappropriate photos of her taken by paps and he was clearly set to humiliate and diminish her. How was that ever considered to be an acceptable behavior by an interviewer? 

Anne handled it like a professional that she is, and kudos to Anne. Yes, kudos to Anne,  who Kaiser also tried to diminish so many times. And you know what, Anne comes out of this looking like a queen. And all her critics look petty and immature.

29 11 / 2017

If anyone is interested in gossiping about the site or just gossip in general about the topics on CB, without it getting modded out, I think it’d be really cool if all the ex readers could come to GossipBucket and comment under the stories where they can’t be deleted or modded out.

here’s an link for an example, http://gossipbucket.com/celebitchy/1247644/duchess-kate-stepped-out-for-a-keen-visit-to-a-london-school-this-morning/

28 11 / 2017

Anonymous asked: follow up on Malia post: two comments criticizing the coverage were deleted! I was wondering how they got through in the first place.

28 11 / 2017

Anonymous asked: The post about Malia Obama today was insane. The title was “Malia Obama smokes and has a douchebag boyfriend, and it’s none of our business” while the post proceeds to detail the photos and pictures people are leaking of her. Including TMZ videos. Wtf?! If it’s nobody’s obusiness, don’t cover her!

I didn’t read that post exactly for this reason - none of my business.

28 11 / 2017

Anonymous asked: The worse commenters on celebitchy seem to be not a sugar and princesss k who tryed to justify harrys racist comments in the past a just wanting to fit in with friends

Notasugar is Kate’s hater and by some bizzare logic she now likes Harry because he is with Meghan Markle and Meghan is not Kate.