04 6 / 2018

Anonymous asked: They should just rename the damn site "All whiteys are racist, y'all", except St. Hillary. Now they're hoping Melania Trump is in need of a kidney transplant - sick. Also, kinda surprised Kaiser (who says she has Indian heritage, I think) kept her user name. After all, you'd think she'd want to avoid anything reminding anyone of Germany since she also loves labeling people Nazis!

Melania’s threads are all sick. Sure, she supported the birther nonsense, but the way they treat her you would think she is a serial killer or something.

But what irritates me most is -  these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS.  What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished. As per feminism, shouldn’t a woman be free to do what she wants, regardless of who her husband is?

They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything.

03 6 / 2018

I just saw this comment under the Benedict’s article

Danielle says:

June 3, 2018 at 7:04 pm

If this had happened back in 2014 there would have been hundreds of comments on this story and it would have quickly descended into insanity. Good times!! Someone should do a study into how Bendy killed off his fanclub so rapidly!

ROFL! It is not Bendy, it is Kaiser! Bendy is doing just fine. Kaiser ran off all of Bendy’s fans off the site with her peddling of conspiracy theories and PR accusations when Bendy got married.

03 6 / 2018

Kaiser has always moderated me out, even when someone made an identical comment to me, my post always disappeared, I have no idea why, she is entirely capricious, blatantly biased and frankly not very bright. The wit and humour have been sucked out of the site. A pity, it used to be good natured messaging from women (mainly) from all over the world, now it’s just a gang of deranged cronies spewing out bile, I won’t be going back.

03 6 / 2018

thisloveisreadyforit asked: (continuation) the Princess of Wales, later on Queen of the UK, and Meghan will always be a Duchess, and as such she will have more freedom, but less relevance in the future when the fascination lessens. The couple of times I tried to make this point in several of their posts, all of them were deleted.

I think I did not get the beginning of this message. Posting what I got, sorry.

01 6 / 2018

Anonymous asked: @"Another woman"-LOL Wait till their beloved Megs dumps Jessica Mulroney for Amal. After all, Amal is married to fabulously wealthy actor George Clooney (who by all odds plans to run for high office in America at some point); the Clooneys have a huge estate outside London, and it's London that counts now, not Toronto. Can't wait.

31 5 / 2018

Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney. 

They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.

They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).

30 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: So Kaiser (expert political scientist) says she HOPES Obama was plotting with people to bring down Trump. Why would anyone ever hope that? Especially if they were against Trump? Something like that could come out and muddy the waters, possibly unravel the case against the Trumps? Sometimes people get so angry they don't think.

30 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: @ha ha ha - Notasugar is just possibly the most hysterical of the fraus on Celebitchy. Her mission in life is to defend Meghan from any and all criticism and to demonize Kate and Prince William. Her comment is ludicrous: naturally it's not on the BRF's web site. How disingenuous! The heirs are supposed to "represent" middle-class family life-it's hard to do that without kids. The line is rarely broken for "convenience". Projection of family life is the unspoken bit of their job. She hates Kate.

29 5 / 2018

Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.

And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?

notasugarhere says:

May 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm

Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.

29 5 / 2018

Anonymous asked: This site is gold. Glad to have found it. Kaiser is garbage with her hypocrisy as are her followers, wouldn’t surprise me if the pathetic lunatic actually created sockpuppet accounts to agree with herself as many online think she does. Wonder how long Sara’s comment about the love/adoration from supposedly everyone of the Royals for K/CB idol Meghan being lovely fanfiction will be left up? Relying on the Daily Fail and anonymous sources that supposedly praise Meghan for accuracy are we Kaiser?🙄