15 6 / 2018
Anonymous asked: I was banned years ago for correcting something Kaiser had written. Of course she'll never admit to being wrong, so *poof* my comment went, followed by a permanent ban. She was harking on about the reader numbers having dropped a few months back - is it any wonder why? Why can't the site owner see that she's bad for business? Sure, she puts out a lot of stories, but it's no fun when there's only the same old regulars commenting ... (part 1 of 2)
14 6 / 2018
Banned
Was banned for saying judges don’t threaten to take away custody for no reason. I guess now I know why the posts are so pro-Jolie! Kaiser bans anyone who says otherwise
14 6 / 2018
Anonymous asked: Part 2. I'm starting to worry about the collective mental health of that site. What they say isn't based in reality. Its delusional...
14 6 / 2018
Anonymous asked: My comment got deleted on the Meghan markle and queen thread. All I said is there was a photo of the queen and kate that looked exactly the same as the one with Meghan and the queen, and how cute it was. But that doesn't go along with their narrative that Meghan is the queen's favorite person and this is the most she's ever smiled. They even said this is why sophie wore EW. To be passive aggressive since she's not the favorite anymore. The queen smiled a ton with kate on their first engagements.
13 6 / 2018
Anonymous asked: I got banned today for saying that parental alienation was a form of abuse and that Angelina was creating a cycle of her own childhood most likely out of fear/pain. How does that warrant a ban??? Celebitchy is a nutso site
Saying or implying something negative about Angelina will get you banned immediately on CB. I don’t know why Kaiser takes any criticism of Angelina very personally, but she does.
I saw your comment. And I agree that possibly Angelina has her own unresolved issues with her father and might be replaying the same scenario over and over.
This is, actually, the concept of karma - we are presented with the same issues /situations over and over and over until we learn and find a way to deal with those issues in a positive way. Only then we can move on from our past and grow.
13 6 / 2018
Bella said that Kate is using her height and looks as a weapon against Meg!Ha Ha Ha!
People are pissed that Kate is tall and wears heels! Also do they all wake up early waiting for the next post? The same people are always the first to comment.
This is hilarious and they think they are so clever. Hat of doom? How cringey. Sounds like something Kaiser would splatter a million of times in a paragraph or tweet! As she does with “Keen” and “Buttons” when truth are she’s the only one obessed with those things.
This is the same poster who said Kate is throwing “Micro agressions toward Meghan” (?) and none of the “woke” commenters called her out for using a serious topic for POC in a obsurd disillusioned way.
Saying she’s using basically her natural body to…hurt Meghan? And why does Bella feel this way? Body language. You know, the thing we can read for Kate but are told not to do for Meghan.
Not only is it sexist, disgusting and a insult to both women, but it’s a insult to all women.
We shouldn’t wear heels or hats or be too noticeable because what about “so and so?“
Guys, newsflash! Our natural height,heels and presences are weapons against poor Meghan.
Kate isn’t a witch and Meghan is a strong ass black woman, who doesn’t need a bunch of women trying to save her from Kate.
And I don’t feel bad that people are calling this out. Since they think they can judge women based off barely anything, I can judge them based off their words. Which unlike thier unhinged comments about Meg and Kate are actual things that are based in reality.I don’t have to speculate the hate and negativity. It’s right in my face. I don’t have to rely on shady sources or bias. I can see it.
—————————————————————————————
The whole discussion about Kate’s height today was nuts. They were all trying catch Kate on a “lie”, as if it was her who lied in the first place. I doubt Kate made any official statements about her height. Notasugar claimed that Kate could not be more than 5′6′’, which is ridiculous.
I think Kate is more like 5′8-5′9′’. I am 5′7′’ and Kate looks a couple inches taller than I am. Not that any of it matters.
13 6 / 2018
Anonymous asked: I've noticed when I reply to certain people my comments get moderated out? Why is this? Are they moderators too?
I am not sure. It is possible, now that I think of it. Or maybe these are all Kaiser’s fake accounts.Or these are the commentors that Kaiser reads.
12 6 / 2018
Anonymous asked: I have to admit I giggled today reading the post complaining about the biased Kate-defenders in the media. How Kate must always be praised and how she must never be compared with the Duchess of Sussex unless it's obvious that Kate comes out on top. It was such a looking-glass version of CB! Do they really have so little self-awareness that they don't see they're describing themselves, only in reverse? (Personally, I have nothing against Kate or Meghan either one)
Very true.
12 6 / 2018
I just wanted to echo one of the submissions from a few days ago. Notasugar, LAK and others go on and on about how lazy Kate is. But given the time they spend on her posts one has to wonder - what it is they do the whole day? They seem to have plenty of spare time on their hands.
12 6 / 2018
mayamaeposts asked: I don't understand Notasugar's obsession with saying that it doesn't matter if William and Kate didn't have children. She says it nearly every royal post, and she harps on it to the extreme. Sure, the queen's father unexpectedly became king, but why ignore that it was a fluke, and that it shakes the stability of the institution. Now she's banging on about evil W&K having a second and third baby! Well the queen had four, where's the outrage?
Having children is pretty much the JOB of every woman in any hereditary monarchy, no matter how enlightened and modern it pretends to be. This is another reason the monarchy needs to be abolished. It is so patriarchal. A woman’s value is measured by whether she can have healthy beautiful children.
CB posters all go on about Kate being “lazy”, but as far as the BRF concerned Kate is doing a great job. She gave the BRF the next generation of heirs.
Only deluded CB posters think that sponsoring charities, cutting ribbons and looking pretty at events has any real value. Whether royals do 5 or 5000 of them, it doesn’t have any real impact. The only true benefit is to the royal family in keeping themselves relevant.
A regular working as a nurse delivers much more benefit to the world than any of the royals.