25 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Can we call out specific users? I’m constantly reading pretentious comments from a user named slowsnow. I’ve read posts from them where they discuss the existence of postmodernism and on a celebrity gossip site of all places! I started arguing with them in a fashion post and their response was to laugh at me. I couldn’t post a defense bc I was moderated. Mods claim they censor rude responses but that’s not the case. They’ll defend pretentious asshats like slowsnow because they’re regulars.

Slowsnow must be new, or an old user under a new name, because I don’t remember this nic. I think if you bring a comment of a person from Celebitchy, as a quote with the time, then it is a fair game to discuss it, given that you would be discussing an actual post, not just some hearsay. Whatever is posted in public domain is a fair game.

25 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I got banned for trying to defend myself against a regular poster. I called them out but then they edited their post so that it seemed less sexist. Then my post didn’t make sense, which gave them the chance to mock me for my “mistake” so when I tried to submit a rebuttal Kaiser denied it. I try not to return to that hellscape of a website but I feel I have to post because I think it’s disgusting that Kaiser and her ilk get away with calling themselves progressive when they’re anything but.

That is why started this site. The regular posters will on purpose misinterpret what you’ve said, but when you try to clarify and call them out on it, you comments get moderated!

Nobody gets to moderate me here ))).

21 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I've gotten in trouble on CB sometimes because I wouldn't take a "side." I love Angelina, but I like Jennifer, and why oh why did they have to be linked eternally? I found Brandi and LeeAnn both vile, although I liked LeeAnn's song when she was a teenager. Honestly, I kind of like both duchesses. I do love Meghan, I admit, but I see nothing wrong with Kate. It's antifeminist to pit woman against woman, but that's promoted on Celebitchy time and again. You aren't allowed to mention it.

21 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: 1 poster actually said the reason Kate gets so much vitriol thrown at her on CB is because "she doesnt work as much as we'd like her too". So,constantly putting her down, telling her she doesn't need maternity leave, slut/party shaming her; saying she's utterly useless, calling her a mattress, saying she doesnt have a mind of her own, being really spiteful/negative about her. Basically nitpicking at absolutely everything she does.. is perfect fine because she doesnt "work". LOL They're American!

It is pretty clear that the  “work” is just an excuse to allow them to discard their “feminist” robes for a while and be themselves. Especially since the most vitriolic critics seem to be Americans, who don’t pay British taxes and seem to have no problem with many other member of the royal family, whether they work or not. 

20 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Not sure how this works, but I have quit reading anything on CB that is on the Pitt-Jolie saga. Or on Saint Megan. I would in no way call Kaiser a journalist. She is so biased against Pitt and adoring of Markle. I can't comment on there anymore so I guess I got banned when I told her she is very biased re Pitt-Jolie. lol

20 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Hi:In response to my post of 9/19... Hall wrote the phrase: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". It's really a matter of freedom of speech and if we don't have that, we can't learn about different views. Re: the Kavanaugh/Ford issue, from my professional work and personal experience (I was a victim of physical assault), her story raises many questions and the Dems have certainly manipulated things. Both should be heard/questioned.

20 9 / 2018

Ok so today’s post was about Meghan at the launch of her book accompanied by Harry and her mother. Oh the accolades! I couldn’t read them all, it was so nauseating. If Carole was ever to accompany her daughter to an official event, we would never hear the end of it, like, “She can’t do anything without her mother”! So much hypocrisy on that site, and they are all parrots.

20 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I need to stop reading Celebitchy because its unfair to Meghan merkle,im starting to dislike her because so many downlow racists and sexist like her on CB. That's not right. As a black person i see a bunch of faux love for her. Some people only like her because they hate Kate, which is why they bring Kate up every Meghan post. The "POC" sound liked fake accounts. It's all creepy really, I don't want your support at the expense of hating someone else.

I feel the same way. When they start putting Kate down in comparison, I want to defend her. And it creates negative feelings towards Meghan. But Meghan has nothing to do with any of it!

19 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I have been twice banned from CB... Re: Kaiser, some have referred to her as a journalist/writer and I have to disagree with this. A journalist deals with facts, not supposition and their personal biases as Kaiser does. The current issue with Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford is an example. The Judge is apparently guilty because he is male and has been accused by a female. I am interested in the facts of this matter and finding the truth and that's not on CB.

Kaiser doesn’t know the first thing about writing or journalism. It would make CB a better place if she were to get some training in that area. There are plenty of free classes available online.

As for the judge, I hear what you are saying, but his professional history doesn’t bode well for women’s rights, so I won’t be sorry if he gets derailed. At the very least he comes off as very entitled.

And have you seen how the right wing press went after the woman and her family? They are doing all they can to discredit her. That is not in relationship to the CB, I don’t condone stooping to the same level, but the Republicans definitely fight very, very dirty here. And that makes me less inclined to be impartial in this case. If they think it is OK to go after a woman and her family like that, then I am not even going to bother giving them the benefit of a doubt.

19 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: From today's article on Lady Gabriella Windsor: "In case you’re wondering, Ella is 37 years old. And she’s an expert at branding?" I'm baffled by this comment. Is she saying that she's too young, or too old? Why? WTF does Kaiser know about branding or how "brand-positioning platforms" work, or how old their staff should be? She's so arrogant. She makes unnecessary, catty swipes like this constantly, on dubious and unsubstantiated grounds, because she isn't accountable for her anonymous bull---t.