29 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Yeah, Celebitchy (The Owner) unlike Kaiser doesn't seem TOO bad. Her sharing her story had nothing to do with pity and everything to do with her being someone who'd been through something horrid and having a space to do it in her website. Maybe even healing. I dislike everything about Celebitchy, BUT the fact that they talk about that sort of thing. All the writers but Kaiser, seem like they are actually nice well traveled women. Kaiser is too hateful and obsessive, or at least her persona is.

29 9 / 2018

strangeflapoperastudent asked: "Pity victim comments". How very disgusting of OP. The site really helped me at one time. Women of celebitchy used to share their stories of sexual abuse, and violence long before it became a powerful metoo trend. I wrote and shared my own, and i got sympathy and support from complete strangers on celebitchy. For me, the site was therapeutic, because i could talk about my experiences without any shame. No one is looking for "Pity comments". Apart from "royal"/celeb stories, CB is a great place.

CB is a negative place, and while it provides safe space for people to share their stories  ( if they meet with Kaiser’s approval), then  many  of the same people then turn around and slam other posters and other female celebrities on other posts. Is that healthy? It cannot be a great place when it is so hypocritical.

Don’t forget that Celebitchy is a commercial place and they are after clicks. They provide a safe place for women to share their stories, and that is good. But they don’t do it out of goodness of their hearts, they are selling you advertisement at the same time, and your daily serving of Kardashians, and Kate- and Taylor Swift hate, and a few other things. It is not a wholesome place, and what bothers me. It purposely attracts vulnerable people to make money on them .

And then they also pick and choose which stories are OK to share, and which they are going to block because they don’t conform to Kaiser’s views of the moment.

28 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: "they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism." This is so true on the Meghan posts. They only like Meghan so much because it gives them a chance to tear into Kate. I'm 100% positive if Meghan was fully white, they would be ripping into her about everything just like they do with Kate at every turn. I don't like reading their faux support towards Meghan Markle because in every comment they end up shading Kate at the same time. They aren't real Meghan fans.

28 9 / 2018

jecajo asked: Celebitchy today told her story about rape. She need pitty victim comments.

I don’t know if she wanted pity, or she is just finally ready to admit to herself what happened to her. Anyway, I am not going to judge her for it. No matter what her motivation is, the women who dealt with assault need to be supported, whether we like them or not.

Having said that, I also think Celebitchy is a site which intentionally attracts vulnerable and traumatized people, but not to help them, but for clicks and to make money off them, And THAT I find disgusting. They started as a gossip site and now they turned into a site which takes advantage of people. They also figured out that they could do this with people who are strongly anti-Trump. They give them an emotional outlet, and in exchange they get clicks. But Celebitchy is not  a healthy place for that, either. It feeds negativity, instead of doing something constructive.

27 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: So what is the takeaway about Kate as regards to Meghan? Is she competitive and jealous (what about meeeee)? Or is she relieved and keen to stay home because Meghan takes the spotlight off of her? Kaiser managed to mix both messages in the same story. And in any other case, we'd all be cheering that someone got a proper maternity leave of proper length, yes?

The way they resent maternity leave make me think that most of the posters are Americans, brainwashed Americans, who don’t see maternity leave as a basic human right. Then why are they so obsessed with Kate and her lack of “work ethics” to begin with. If they were British taxpayers, then it would be more understandable.

27 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: The Gisele Bundchen post today. Boy oh boy is Kaiser passive aggressive.

27 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: If all these CB'ers are survivors of rape/sexual assault, why do they re-traumatize themselves by deliberately watching emotional interviews/testimonies? (That is, instead of just reading text.) As someone who works in the mental health field. we encourage people to AVOID known triggers if they can.

25 9 / 2018

jecajo asked: Can ask a question? Its possible to report about CELEBITCHY.COM. Because what she doing its not correct.

What they they are doing is not ethical, but it is not illegal, so nothing can really be done other than spreading the word about it. This information does damage their reputation and ensures they never become a real new site, like, for example, Huffington Post, and will forever remain in the dumpster of gossip sites.

25 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: "So many of the Jennifer Aniston defenders act like I was smoking crack because I dared to believe that Justin Theroux and Jennifer’s wedding was real & that it’s suspicious and shady AF that we haven’t heard one word about either of them filing for divorce." Yeah that totally sounds like a journalist and not an unhinged lunatic. A comment from the same article- Comments “tearing down physical appearance” are VERY mild on this site compared to most others places on the internet." Yeah nope!

25 9 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Never been banned before but have seen comments I submitted that mysteriously disappeared. I’m tired of Kaiser and company claiming they’re progressive when really they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism. I’ve seen commenters argue that white privilege doesn’t exist. I’ve also argued with users who comment in a post about a female celebrity and insult their looks. One user slowsnow pops up in every Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift post to belittle them.