20 10 / 2018

sailorlf asked: why is it that in a post yesterday about the royal Kate, who wore the comments are about how she is rapidly aging with the general thread agreeing that its due to her cigarette smoking, with comments like "I blame too much sun, cigarettes and small children." On the same page, Meghan is praised again for being professional and polished with comments like "Her work is much more important and should really overwhelm whatever she chooses to wear. " Just interesting.

The whole discussion about Kate (or any other woman for that matter) looking older is nonsense. On one hand, they judge women for having plastic surgery to look younger or prettier, on the other hand they judge women for looking older. They can’t help themselves, they are hypocrites.

19 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: 3) You should never stop what you are doing here as long as that blog is there. People who have been treated like crap by them need to know what is going on and others should avoid it. There was a time when it was a fun diverse community. Not anymore. That is what happens when a stan gets to ban and moderate. Celebitchy is lazy and let it happen so she is guilty too. Reading through Liana Thinks it has been going on for years. Finally they are getting what they deserve. Bye CB! I won't be back.

19 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: 2) Kaiser's obsessive unhinged feelings about certain women has become scary and I have seen people around the internet refer to her as psycho. It used to be just the Angie Jo articles but it is everything now. I am not a royal fan but she acts like commenters opinions are personal and then she moderates like she is invested in them. I have never seen such unhealthy behavior on any forum or blog I have ever visited. I would warn people who aren't mentally healthy to stay away from there.

19 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: 1)I took a look at the post counts at CB and they are lower than I have ever seen them. That is what happens when people are banned and moderated to death. Whether I agreed or disagreed with the regulars, they were the reason people came to the site. It wasn't for the shoddy journalism for sure. I was a long timer and I have no reason to ever go back. That site has been gaining an even bigger reputation for being toxic and notorious for Kaiser's behavior and banning innocent people.

19 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I hate Kaiser. She took a website that was once fun to read and turned it to absolute junk. Even if you didn't like or agree with what was being said, you still had an opportunity to say it. Now, if you don't agree with Kaiser or her idiot followers, you get pounced on and deleted. What happened to intelligent conversation? I don't care if people don't agree with me, I welcome opposing opinions because that's how I learn or consider something i hadn't before. Obviously not CB's credo.

Hate might be too strong of a word for this situation, but I am with you -  Kaiser ran that website into the ground.

19 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I have never seen the response numbers on celebitchy be so low. A few years ago there would be hundreds of posts but now even Royal (aka Meghan) posts are barely passing 150 on a good day. Is it b/c she's "banning" people or is it b/c people who used to go there are sick of her bullsh*t? Or maybe more competition? One thing for sure is Kaiser is unbalanced. I still can't figure out why she hasn't been fired from her "job". I think she's the reason the website is on the decline.

18 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Kaiser should really not talk about things like childbirth or pregnancy, she sounds like an ignorant asshole. She offended me so much with her takes on morning sickness- have one of the writers who are moms do those stories. I had a 9 lb 9 oz baby, 8 lb 6 oz is nothing compared to mine! She is obsessed with talking about how painful women's labors must be with these so called huge babies. I'm sure her commentary on Meghan's baby will be cringe worthy.

17 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Me again. All I am saying is that Harry has a role to play in the reconstruction of his mother qua image. This was not the case with Kate who projects a very different image. This is not to say this image cannit be critically assessed. Of course it can and should. But this resurection of Diana is...

I don’t really read much about Meghan anymore, I am on  Meghan overload. I don’t dislike her, but I feel I already know everything there is to know about her. 

Anyway, i haven’t seen comparisons to Diana yet. Diana had unique charisma, people either have it or not. Neither Kate nor Meghan have it , and I wish people would stop comparing them and setting them up for a fail.

On the other hand, Eugenie’s wedding was lovely. I never cared about the York girls because I can’t stand their father, but now I came to see them as persons apart from their family, and they are quite likeable. After all, they didn’t choose their parents.

17 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: I'm surprised that several die-hard Kate haters were banned. I guess they said something that was less hateful and Kaiser couldn't handle it.

17 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Glad to see others here thought the post about Pippa crossed a line. I’m not even a fan of Pippa’s but FGS, bashing her for going to a wedding while pregnant?! Anyway I was coming here to see if anyone read the most recent post about Pippa — am I the only one who doesn’t even understand WTF Kaiser was saying? What is an “absolute unit?” And I’m sure Kate has seen the baby by now, she just didn’t publicize it. Give me a break.