01 11 / 2018

Anonymous asked: But I can still be amazed by the level of criticism of this woman. I noticed the new thing now is, well if she did more work we wouldn't talk about her clothing. But I don't buy that. Perhaps the reasons she is disliked are generally legit but just the relentlessness of the criticism, it just goes on and on, and I find that alarming. 3/4

01 11 / 2018

Anonymous asked: It's as if everyone just wants to come here and vent and have a go. Is this what smart gossip is supposed to be? 4/4

01 11 / 2018

Anonymous asked: "What is alarming is coming up with statements about the intentions and character of people simply based on the fact they disagree with your personal opinion. Differing opinions from your own doesn’t make her passive aggressive or a bad person." An objective comment from the messy Royal posts.

I saw it too, and I completely agree.

31 10 / 2018

Today Kate in her inoffensive blue dress warranted 100+ posts, and some are sure she must’ve had a boob job. She couldn’t be possibly breastfeeding. So, on one hand the posters are  “feminists” who think women should be in control of their bodies, on the other hand they make accusations and insinuations about plastic surgery? Why is plastic surgery bad if you think women should have freedom of choice?

On the Taylor’s post the discussion is again about the color of her eyes and whether it is natural, and possible plastic surgery, not her recent political activism. And I kept thinking -  who cares if it is contacts that make her eyes so blue? Do you really begrudge somebody looking well  because you don’t like that person? How bitter do you have to be?

31 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Believe me, there are plenty of Black, Biracial, and Asian etc women out here and we don't share similar views on the Duchess of Sussex. I know women who adore her, and I also know women who think she might not be as genuine as she portrays. Shrugs. But calling women extremely racist when they criticise Meghan for her outrageous spending, her love of non British labels, the fit of her clothes, inappropriate clothes for official engagements, or whatever else, is dangerous territory.

31 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: 2. We do pay for the Royals, so we should be allowed to share our thoughts. As long as the criticism is fair, there's nothing wrong with discussing DoS and pointing out things which could have been better. There are always going to be die hard DoS stans who can't take the slightest critique, but this comes with being Royal -they have all been called out. Celebitchy posters turn every comment into "they're nitpicking/complaining because they don't like the colour of her skin", which is wrong imo.

31 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: It’s funny, I just came here to comment about NotASugarHere and the top post was about her! I ventured back onto CB briefly and while LAK seems to be gone (?), Nota is Nota-ing in full force. I’ve actually considered that she works for Charles’s office and suspect I know who she is on Twitter as well. She is far too militant in her comments to simply be a royal-watcher and she clearly has an agenda and A LOT of time to dedicate to this. Her posts are always praising Charles & Camilla. Thoughts?

But would Charles really put it with someone who hates his daughter-in-law so much? Charles might be a prat, but I don’t see him as being that devious.

31 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: One more quick observation about NOTA — she states her opinions, even about minor things, as fact. For example, she just said today that when Charles becomes King, he will “remain” at Clarence House and split his time between there and Windsor. How is this possibly something that an outside observer could claim to know? She is either employed somehow by Clarence House or she’s seriously disturbed (or both!).

31 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: It's really sad that NOTA talks all that shit about Kate, yet it seems she spends hours of her day hating her. I don't like to generalize, but from what I've seen, she seems to search the web for royal posts just to talk about Kate all day. That's a obsession. How does she find the time? At least Kaiser gets something out of hating Kate. Nota gets nothing. It's sad really. I hope people from CB see that they are enabling someone with a sick obsession. (At least I think)

31 10 / 2018

Anonymous asked: NIC919: "Yep. Perhaps if she read the letters to children or something this may have more value as an engagement. This seems tacked on and pretty empty." Yep, this is me shaming...