Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

December 2018

It’s kind of weird that Kaiser is so harsh about Nick and Priyanka. I thought Kaiser was part-Indian so you would think she would be more understanding of the over-the-topness of their wedding which is super typical in Indian culture. It’s weird, right?

I think she is half-Indian who was raised as white. At least that is my impression.  Earlier I thought she was lying about the half-Indian part, as she seems pretty ignorant about the Indian culture and traditions.

If I remember correctly she always disliked Priyanka for something. Is Pryianka Amal Clooney’s friend?

Dec 5, 2018
The British tabloids have found a lovely niche - easily riled up Americans. Most of the interest in the royal family comes from these Americans. I am guessing a lot of the disgusting Daily Mail comments also come from Americans. And then you have gossip sites like Celebitchy with their faux outrage over everything - while citing and linking to DM. The hypocrisy is unreal. 1/3
Dec 5, 2018 1 note
And one more thing! As one commentator said (and I am not sure how come Kaiser let that comment stand) - if you want an American people's princess then pay for your own royal family - you didn't want ours! I wanted to applaud that commentator, but alas I am banned.
Dec 5, 2018
Why does Celebitchy constantly cite Daily Mail if the racism and sexism is so disgusting? Why are they sending traffic and clicks to that disgusting site? Likewise, why do these woke feminist commentators go to those sites and give them clicks? Disgusting. 2/3
Dec 5, 2018
Lastly I am sick of Kaiser and her minions conflating "the British press" with the tabloids, and also with the British public. The British press and the British public do not give a crap about the royal family. It's the tabloids that are feeding into the frenzy (created by readership that includes a lot of Americans btw). The outrage over the so called "anti-Americanism" is so hilarious to me. 3/3

Yep, they claim to never read Daily Mail and then half of the comments are about whatever was said on the Daily Mail. 

True British press are the Guardian and the BBC (the rest like Financial Times are behind a paywall), and they barely have anything about the BRF. That is how much British public really cares about the BRF.

Dec 5, 2018
Celebitchy is disgusting. Now Kate is copying Meghan by...wearing trousers. Some posters are even "really angry" about it! Because apparently Kate wearing trousers is somehow a dig at Meghan. They say all this like it's not totally bonkers. Kaiser is simply awful. She states as fact that the Cambridges have been smearing Meghan. All of this would be fine on a gossip blog if counter arguments were allowed, but the censoring is insane.
Dec 5, 2018 1 note
Lol, the new theory is that Will is attracted to Meghan and that this is the source of tension. Good one, "Bella." Because every relation a woman has truns on whether the man is attracted to her or not. The question is not even if she is attracted to him. The only active actor is the man. The woman she has no role in it.

I saw that one yesterday and that one is the craziest theory of them all.

Dec 4, 2018 3 notes
Kaiser banned me because I mentioned that Melissa Toubati who she hates is actually from an Arab background & may have a different reason for disliking Meghan than simply being a racist. I have partial Arab heritage and wanted to share what I knew. And she banned me for it because it went against her narrative. Someone else made a somewhat similar comment & got attacked by others who claimed North Africans are actually white. Like wtf? The faux wokeness on there is hilarious & pathetic.

They also tend to forget that Lebanese Amal Clooney is a POC as well. 

Dec 4, 2018 1 note
The conspiracy theories in the royal threads are crazy. Megan is a saint, everybody else is evil. And the stupidity of deleting comments they don't agree with... no words. That actually make people stopping to post and check the site. One comment that disagree with others in a polite way can actually increase the clicks on the article, because people tend to check the answers to their comments. Stupid.
Dec 4, 2018 1 note
Celebitchy are adamant that kate and will are responsible for the negstive stories about meghan its like when will used to get blamed for everything harry did
Dec 4, 2018
Kaiser is really going overboard with this “Will and Kate are behind all the Meg stories”. She’s looking crazier every day.
Dec 4, 2018
Today's Royal Threads

Two interesting posts on December 3rd.  In the Carole Middleton article, posters were mocking Kate’s looks and stating she will age to Carole’s beady eyes, thin lips, etc. One response not deleted (yet):

Berries says:

December 3, 2018 at 5:49 pm

Sweet Jesus, and you call yourselves “feminists” here?? 🙄

In the Vanity Fair Meghan article, one response that has yet to be deleted:

jiminy says:

December 3, 2018 at 10:28 am

However would Celebitchy keep going without the Royals.

Either Kaiser is slipping or they’re backing off the fanatical censoring. Probably the former. 

Dec 3, 2018 2 notes

Barely 20 comments on the very important topic of Michele Obama addressing the Lean In nonsense. I always thought the Lean In advice was damaging. It is exactly the wrong thing to do if you are working for a company which is an old boys club, which happens to be the most companies out there.

Yet we have 200+ comments on some royal conspiracy nonsense post, which I am yet to read.

Celebitchy and Kaiser must realize by now how pathetic the site has become.

Dec 3, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Behold the comments from the feminists over at Celebitchy on the Carole Middleton post. These people disgust me.

I  am going to read it now, but I can guess what it is about -  Carole being the evil mastermind of everything that is wrong with the BRF.

Dec 3, 2018 4 notes

Not sure if this groping story is something that happened in Bush’s late years but have learned in working in nursing homes that dementia does not have a filter but emotions are intact..sometimes a person with dementia is reaching out for a loved one (lost one)…or is regressing..a lot. anyway, I did not read the whole story on CB as I tend not to read it anymore but just something I learned about dimentia recently.

Thank you for the information, this is really good to know. I appreciate the insight.

Dec 3, 2018 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
They speculate all the time without fact but when its time to gossip about Harry and Meghan the speculation isn't allowed, lol. So much policing going on in the royal threads now. "Don't gossip about things without fact! You don't know the truth, why are you gossiping and spreading rumours?" LOL. It's called CeleBitichy but they obviously don't like it when Meghan is the topic. Rumours, speculation and opinions aren't allowed on the Sussex's! Feel free to talk crap about the Cambridge's, though.

Right. Baseless speculation is only allowed when it is celebrities they don’t like. Then they hide behind the site being a bitchy, gossip site. But they quickly forget about it when it is their faves.

Dec 3, 2018 2 notes
If I had $10 for every post Kaiser blocked since the anti-Meghan PR, and Kaiser's "The Cambridges did it!" stuff came out, I could probably retire early.

Lol. 

Dec 3, 2018 1 note
The people who justify workplace abuse are the same people who shame a woman for taking the parental leave to which she is legally entitled. They are also the same people who think getting to work at 7am when you are the boss (setting example and expectations) is a badge of honour.
Dec 3, 2018 3 notes

Chaine says:

December 2, 2018 at 8:26 am

The real moral of this story is that any celebrity in the future that hires Melissa Toubatti is now fully warned: she can’t handle a high pressure job, and she will quit and then sell all sorts of dirt about you to the tabloids.

The real story is that Meghan’s fans will excuse workplace abuse in order to protect Meghan. Gee, do they even read what they are writing?

It is said that people don’t quit companies, they quit bad managers. It is possible that Meghan is just a bad manager and needs to learn.

Dec 2, 2018 3 notes
#ban #'celebitchy

The PA was almost certainly someone who didn’t have the skills or competency required to work for a skilled and competent Meghan, was bitter about being asked to step up or step out and wanted to get her revenge in the worst way possible.


OMG, the comments on the Meghan’s article. I just started reading.

So, let me get this straight, an experienced and vetted PA doesn’t have the skills and is clearly at fault, rather than Meghan, who never held a managerial job and there is no certainty that she actually knows how to manage staff. 

Managing people is a skill in itself, and most people are very bad at it. This is why there are very few good managers, Managing people is HARD.

On top of it, in case of Meghan,  there are significant cultural differences to account for. It takes years to  understand another culture and stop making unintentional faux pas. It took me 5 years to adjust to the American culture, and Americans are very accepting and  tolerant of foreigners, much more than Brits. Meghan never lived in Britain and it appears she is flying blind. She is in  desperate need of someone British, who she can rely on to help her to understand differences between British and American cultures, what is acceptable and what is not.

For example, while American think getting up at 4 AM to work out and getting to work by 7AM is a badge of honor, most Europeans think it is nuts. I tend to agree with Europeans. )))

Dec 2, 2018 2 notes
Kaiser wrote a post today about Bush 41 and had the bad taste to include a statement about his groping. Bush had Parkinson's and was quite elderly. We don't know if there was also a dementia diagnosis. I suspect there was as this kind of behavior is common in the elderly. But, anyone with a modicum of humanity would not have included this issue in a post.

Or, she could’ve skipped  the whole topic all together.

The groping scandal , I think, can be explained by dementia, in part. But I think the more likely thing is that it was “normal” to treat women like this in the days of Bush, and he simply revered back to this type of behavior, once some of the natural breaks were removed due to his illness. The issue here is not with Bush himself, but with abuse of women which was clearly rampant 50-60 years ago and how Bush is just one example of it.

I’ll be honest, I can’t stand Bushes because I cannot stand their type of hypocrisy and privilege, and I cannot put aside the negative impact they had on the course of the US history. So, I probably would’ve ignored the whole topic to be true to myself. There is nothing good I can say about any of Bushes, no matter how nice they are as people.

The old school politeness teaches - about the dead good or nothing. And sure, we can do that for a few days during mourning. But I am not OK with whitewashing of crimes by politicians, just because they are dead. You can see these attempts at whitewashing with John McCain, for example.

Dec 2, 2018 3 notes
It's funny how they all choose to believe tabloid stories and "reputable" sources when the topic is Kate&Will. Without questioning the source, they will believe everything about W&K, and spin their own narratives, which are all SO TRUE in their minds... Meghan&Harry are treated with kid gloves on CB. Not even a mild critique is allowed! Every article & source is fake-news, bs, and lies when it comes to H&M, but they will use the SAME source, or tabloid to speculate and gossip about W&K lives.
Dec 2, 2018 3 notes
1/1 Re. Meghan's assistant Melissa Toubati. We don't know whether the story is 100% true or not, but I would like to have my say, however, Kasier won't let my comments go through because they go against their narrative. Going on an insane moderating/deleting comments spree is hilarious and sad at the same time.
Dec 2, 2018 1 note
2/2 Everyone keeps mentioning her surname, not realising she is a fellow woman of colour. Nice try for them to be calling her White. Typical ignorance/xenophobia of CBitches. Toubati is a French woman of North African Ethnicity. Now, if Meghan was really rude to her, and broke her down, why is it bad for Toubati to tell her side of the story?
Dec 2, 2018 1 note
3/3 Her boss, a high profile member of the BRF, is a jerk and treats the “help” like crap. Allegedly. I thought with the metoo movement, people would like these stories to be out. No one deserves bad treatment, especially when they’re working for Royalty. Most posters are Hypocrites because I know what the comments would look like if this was someone else, or a man!
Dec 2, 2018 1 note
May have been posted below, but if you want to stir it there but have been banned, just go through a vpn (or use another ip address) then post something under a made up email address and name. 😜
Dec 1, 2018 1 note

November 2018

Wow, what a great comment. Well said.

Killjoy says:

November 30, 2018 at 2:53 pm

If the British taxpayers really cared about wasted money on this nonsense, they’d dissolve the monarchy. Instead, they (and the commenters on this site) act like they get their value when Kate does x more appearances a month, or when she finally cuts an inch or two off her hair. 

Like the millions spent on this would be worth it if she just acted in accordance to Joe Schmoe’s idea of how many appearances she should do, and how broadly she needs to smile, blah blah blah. I think people – especially us gossip lovers – are just looking for excuses to tear someone down and feel superior (“if I were a royal, I’d surely x, y, z! The nerve!”).

It’s like we feel like we’ve gotten a free pass to police these women in ways we don’t typically do to other women in 2018, and justify it based on “this is what they signed up for.” It doesn’t make what we’re doing right. If the monarchy shouldn’t exist, it shouldn’t exist. But let’s not act like a leg slit is going to be the downfall of the free world.

Nov 30, 2018 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
I posted a link of this tumblr and got super banned. Before, I was getting moderated and my comments were disappearing. Now I can't post anything at all. I knew this would happen and I don't care lol.

Thanks!

Nov 30, 2018 2 notes
There are no comments on non-royal posts. I can't believe it used to be a good site, now it's just boring Meghan stans whipping themselves into a frenzy about whatever. It used to be that the Jolie threads were insane so I used to avoid it but now I think I will avoid the whole site.
Nov 30, 2018 1 note
In response to the post about Melania. Doesn't everyone have a past? Melania was 25 when these "art" photos were published in a French magazine. At 25 I admit to doing some things, I wouldn't have done at 30. She may not be Eleanor Roosevelt, but she is a devoted mother. If one reads biographies, it's clear that many people have done things when young that are not admirable. Methinks life is a learning experience.

I am with you there. People are mad at Trump and they take it out on Melania. I am not really all that excited about further promotion of the stereotype of Eastern European women as shady escorts and more. And Melania shouldn’t even have been in the firing range, so to speak. She is not a public figure.It was forced on her, She didn’t run for a president. Politicians families should be out of limits.

And that cuts both ways, by the way. I also  despise politicians who drag their wives and children out to protect them, when they are accused of sexual misconduct. 

Politicians families shouldn’t be pawns or lightning rods in the political games.  Being a politician is a job, and the family should be left out of it.

Nov 30, 2018 1 note
It bothers me so much how Kaiser intentionally picks the most unflattering pictures of Kate on purpose. She touts herself as a feminist, but to be so juvenile and bully-like to another woman is just hypocrisy at its best. The amount of energy it must take her to be so petty 🙄

Kaiser does it with all celebrities she doesn’t like. She also misrepresents things on purpose to create additional controversy.

She was called out on it once by one of the regulars, and offered an unconvincing explanation as to why she chose the pictures she did, and then kept on doing it.

Nov 29, 2018 2 notes
So it's pretty pathetic over there now. The royal posts have a couple hundred or so comments and the rest don't even break 100. Honestly it is sad that a community that was smart and close knit was destroyed. It could have been so much more (yes I know it's just gossip but you do need a place to unwind), but for one woman's control freakery lol.

I noticed it too. Five royal posts a day, talking about the same thing, with hundreds of comments. And the other posts barely have any comments.

As someone said earlier, Celebitchy might as well rebrand itself as a royal blog. 

Nov 27, 2018 1 note
I have to agree about the office of FLOTUS. It is archaic. Maybe after the ridiculousness of Melania, who isn't even educated, the entire role will be eradicated. Sure a supportive spouse is good but if a woman were to become POTUS would anyone expect her husband to do the same tasks? All you have to do is imagine a man say Be Best it is clear how utterly absurd i is. Can you pictture a man with a soft porn past being the spouse of a woman president? She wouldn't even get elected.
Nov 27, 2018 1 note
"I feel like Celebitchy is dieing." They are now doing sponsored posts with amazon affiliate links. That could be a sign they need other ways to make money. It also looks like there are less comments on average.

I am pretty sure they also take money from some celebrities to promote them. They also have ads on their site, but maybe these are google ads, I am not sure.They can’t be making that much money from clicks. 

Only royal posts have any decent traffic from Meghan’s fans. Before Meghan appeared they spend half a year doing anti-Trump posts, but now it is over. In a few months they will have to find another hot topic or they will be in real trouble.

Nov 26, 2018 2 notes
Oh, I hope people don't start the rudeness with Meghan's maternity leave. The discussions surrounding Kate's maternity leave were awful, truly awful. Every mother deserves months and months off for maternity leave. It doesn't matter if a mum is a SAHM or works full/part-time. American maternity leave and the mindset it creates amongst women is dangerous. Funny how the CBitches talk so much about feminism but they get so viscous and envious of mothers when maternity leave is brought up!

I completely agree, but I already saw something on CB about Meghan’s case being different. 

Americans are raised to be workaholics, and for many the job is their raison d’etre. They work themselves to death and cannot understand why others think it is crazy. In fact, they tend to think that anyone no willing to work themselves to death is “lazy”. American corporations sure love this kind of mentality.

Nov 26, 2018 1 note

Here is a good article explaining why the first lady role and expectations that come with it is harmful for women.

“ Michelle ObamaMrs Obama made a great job of being first spouse. But why the need to play consort? “

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/25/michelle-obama-made-a-great-job-of-first-spouse

Nov 25, 2018
I applaud all our first ladies in recent memory in that Hilary Clinton worked hard at trying to geta healthcare bill passed The Bush women fit a a certain more demure role but turns out Barbara Bush was the matriarch outside of the White House. Michelle Obama was too subdued as I wanted her to use all her brain power but I know she also had children to raise. Melania is a mother and is doing her best. If the roles were reversed, would these women have made better presidents? Food for thought!
Nov 20, 2018 1 note
Re: Melania post and FLOTUS office...but other first ladies did use this office well. Betty Ford brought the issue of addiction out of the closet; she also advocated for equal rights for women. Eleanor Roosevelt's accomplishments are too numerous to mention. Hillary wanted to function as a co-POTUS and that is another issue. Michelle may be very likeable,but she CHOSE long before Barack's election to be a "traditional" wife. I don't think she was" forced" to do so.
Nov 20, 2018
That Bill Maher/Stan Lee article and some of the comments were beyond insulting. The so called woke women talk about not stereotyping yet they love to stereotype. Adult men who like comic books and Star Wars are deadbeat dads who caused Trump to be the president? Lol what? That site is so freaking toxic and weird. I love how they add the caveat "don't get mad it's my opinion." Well most of their opinions are shit... not mad juts honest.
Nov 20, 2018
In response to the post about Melania. I admit to being more traditional and don't have an issue with the office of First Lady. I think the "soft approach" of this office can be useful in many ways. Re: her public call for the ouster of Mira Ricardel, I think this was acting out behavior on her part. Ricardel was Bolten's person and Bolten currently has Trump's ear. 1/2

I don’t really agree that the office of the First Lady is useful in any way, Smart and capable women like Michele and Hillary were forced to hide their true nature, and pretend to have little ambition. What is good about that? And those who are not qualified at all, like  Melania, shouldn’t be in the position to influence anything. Also,don’t forget Michele also didn’t want to the the first lady and had to sacrifice a lot for the sake of her husband’s career. I don’t think it is right.

Nov 16, 2018
2/2 Also, Kelly, the POTUS's Chief of Staff probably did play some games with the FLOTUS's office and this was Melania's means of going around him too...I don't think this showed sexism on his part. He just doesn't value the powerpuff issue that Melania is spending her time on. He does value very smart capable women like Kirsten Nielsen and will go to the mat for her. I would've loved to have been a fly in the room when he and Bolten went at it!
Nov 16, 2018

I’d like to thank Melania Trump  for demonstrating so well why the un-elected, archaic office of the US first lady shouldn’t exist.  The fact that the other first ladies wielded the power and influence behind the closed doors and more diplomatically doesn’t make it any better. None of them were elected and shouldn’t have been involved in the politics at all.

As for calling Melania silly names like Malaria, it is just silly. Here we have  a woman who never wanted to be the first lady, the position was foisted on her. And then people are unhappy with her?  What  they should be unhappy about is that in this day and age so many Americans still consider the wife just a free addition to her husband. Who should stand by his side, look nice and smile prettily.

Nov 14, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban

Gigi La Moore says:

November 14, 2018 at 9:26 am

I have had to rethink my opinion about W., especially since Trump. No, I don’t agree with him about everything and he authorized some things that were damaging and we are feeling the effects to this day. However, I have never questioned the man’s humanity, so I can see why Michelle likes him. It is crazy that Kanye could be so bold to call W. out yet be onboard with Trump. Sigh…what crazy times

——————————————————————————-

OK, what is WRONG  with some people? No, W. Bush is not better than Trump. W. Bush is directly responsible for millions of innocent civilians deaths. Trump, as awful as he is, cannot be accused of being responsible for millions of innocent people’s deaths yet.  So, even if you are using Trump is a measuring stick, W. Bush is a monster many times over.  If he wasn’t a monster, he wouldn’t be able to live with himself after what he’s done and would be doing everything he can to help civilians suffering from wars, like the one in Yemen, for example.

Nov 14, 2018 1 note
#Celebitchy' #ban
I was on the comment section for the post on Meghan today. There were some interesting comments which I responded too. Then when I went back, all the comments were gone! I was so surprised because nothing was vicious, mean spirited or hurtful. How often does this happen? Do these comments appear for an hour and people complain and then they are taken down? It seems so absurd.

Nobody complains, Kaiser moderates everything she doesn’t like, and usually it happens in 10-15 min, or even sooner.

Nov 13, 2018 1 note

In the Kanye vs. Lorde set design drama. whose side Kaiser automatically takes? Kanye’s, of course! Have to earn that Kardashian money.

Nov 13, 2018

Ocasio-Cortez post is such a trainwreck, You would think CB posters be supportive of a progressive WOC making name for herself and bringing up important issues, which matter to regular people. But, nope. Apparently her  “Bernie stench” ruins it for them. Un-freaking-believable. 

Nov 12, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
I simply posted a comment saying I hope Kaiser covers the recent gossip about Meghan having a tantrum over a tiara and my comment was deleted within minutes lol. Another person's comment about the tiara tantrum is still there though. I think the difference was that I said I prefer to hear about this gossip rather than the Saint Meghan stuff. So... I guess my comment implied a vague criticism of Kaiser's Meghan coverage so I was moderated? God is this chick thin skinned!

When I read the tiara gossip, I thought - is that the kind of ridiculous palace intrigue Meghan has to put up with now, and then keep on smiling and thanking everyone involved, including the back stabbers? Her acting skills sure will come handy. Hopefully she knew what she was getting into. 

Nov 11, 2018
I feel like Celebitchy is dieing. I wonder if the thing of blocking and deleting comments is one of the reasons? I've been reading the sites for a few years now and I never saw offensive comments and I noticed the ones deleted merely disagreed with them, principally with Kaiser and I wonder if she is the one responsible for blocking even on articles written by others. I used to like Hecate's sense of humor, but they rarely write for the site now.

It is a combination of blocking of long time readers, thus cutting repeating visits to their site and destroying the existing community, and Kaiser’s lazy writing,  which means it is hard to attract new readers,

Nov 10, 2018
I’m just a random anonymous internet commentator but I just want to Thank You for creating and taking the time out of your busy schedule to run this blog. I hope you continue *fingers crossed* and *fingers and legs crossed* that the garbage site Celebitchy and K@1$er really do “go down in flames” soon as Taylor Swift says in Blank Space. That would be some sort of poetic justice *evil laugh* Thanks Again for creating this Ban-Free Zone in the meantime here’s some e-flowers 💐🌷🌹🌺

Thank you for the kind words!

Nov 10, 2018 1 note
I'm not going to be posting anymore, but I wanted to thank you for having given me the chance to vent here away from the censorship and hyper-emotionality of CB. Good luck to you in all your future endeavors!

You are welcome! And thank you.

I was just thinking today that maybe my blog is not needed anymore. CB seems dead. A Tom Hiddleston post with only 30 comments? That never happened before. A Mary Poppins post got all of 2 comments. The only posts that get any attention is Meghan and Trump posts, of which there are 3 a day. But eventually people will move on.

Nov 9, 2018 2 notes
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December