Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

November 2018

2) Kaiser is the last person who should address social issues about race or women. CB is not diverse. All of the women of color left a long time ago. She wants to appear woke and she isn't. BTW Ted Cruz is only half white Cuban, his mother is American. Marco Rubio is a white Cuban but he is fully Hispanic. No one I know in my community thinks of Cruz as a Latino. He does everything he can to distance himself from us and hurt us legislatively.
Nov 9, 2018 1 note
1)As to your comment about Kaiser being progressive. I don't think she is progressive at all. She was deleting comments from progressives or any criticisms about Clinton during the campaign even before the primaries. It steadily got worse. Her comments about the percentage of white women voting for GOP isn't totally wrong. She just isn't well enough informed and lacks the logic and ability to address the issue intelligently.

It is a difficult issue to discuss. But I want to brag a little bit about my county, and the black girl magic and hopefully lighten the mood a little bit. ))) We did good -  19 black women elected judges out of 19 that ran in my county. Not all of Texas is deep red, and not all of it is hopeless.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/08/black-women-texas-judge-harris-county

Nov 9, 2018 1 note
So if Meghan gets a pass for everything.... why did they feel the need to rip Kate to shreds and constantly attack her on previous occasions - going back years? Isn't that a bit hypocritical? It just screams of envy, jealousy, and miserable bitterness towards Kate imo.
Nov 9, 2018
This is a total 180 from her previous stance - somebody called them out for their horrible stance on the maternity leave convo and she changed her view. Another example: Whenever posters rightly criticise MM for her excessive spending, they always flip flop, twist themselves into knots to try and justify, essentially, what they have been slagging off in Kate for a number of years.
Nov 9, 2018
I know ppl might get fed up of all the Kate asks, but this seems to be one of a few places where people can talk about the double standards and hypocrisy which run rife in the Royal comment section. For example, one of the "Kate does NOT deserve maternity leave - she needs to get back to work NOW" posters, is now flip flopping by commenting that she thinks every woman does deserve maternity leave/rest regardless of whether women work or not.
Nov 9, 2018
It's not only Celebitchy that goes with the speech "white women" are responsible for the patriarchy. This is a speech that is becoming bigger in every place and although there is responsability on white women that support a misogynistic system, that way of thinkingt take the attention from white men that created and keep working hard to keep the system.

I really don’t believe anybody should be held  responsible for other people’s choices just because they share the same skin color. But every decent person, regardless of their skin color, should be helping those who are oppressed or disadvantaged.

Nov 8, 2018 1 note

“A says:

November 7, 2018 at 3:34 pm

I really hate to be the ahole here, because I know that a great deal of you in Texas and in other parts worked very hard on these elections and with getting the vote out and educating people on issues. And far be it from me to bring race into this conversation so quickly, but exit polls indicate that roughly 60% of white women in Texas who voted, voted for Ted Cruz. The numbers are even worse for the governor’s election in Georgia, where 76% of the white women who voted voted for Kemp over Stacey Abrams.”

I really don’t understand how something like this is helpful, and this is peak Celebitchy right here. What is point of this comment? I am a white woman in Texas who voted for Beto, I knew it was a long shot, this is Texas after all. But I did my part in bringing the vote to only 3% difference between Beto and Cruz.  And, of course, I was disappointed that it wasn’t enough.

So, now let’s beat women like me, who are already facing the uphill battle in  Texas, over the head with the fact that Texas is a deep red state where a lot of people vote Republican. Because that is going to make me feel so much better! 

And this is not even about race. Beto is a white American, while Cruz is hispanic. Cruz is actually a minority here. This is about class  - rich vs. poor. Wealthy people vote Republican, evangelicals vote Republican, and yes, most of those people are white. 

Sometimes progressives in the US don’t see the forest for the trees. Some of them are conditioned to see everything in terms of racial or sexual discrimination and they are completely oblivious to the main societal struggle  -  the wealth inequality struggle. And this CB comment is a prime example of that.

Additionally, according to  the stats 71% of white men voted for Cruz, and 59% of white women, So, actually more men voted for Cruz , but in the usual Celebitchy fashion, it is only women who get grief.

Nov 7, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Do you ever tire of all the questions being about Kate or Meghan? Lol. I sincerely don't know why anyone cares anymore. These two women lead pampered lives of luxury provided by the UK taxpayer. If I had to choose I guess I am partial to Meghan but it doesn't mean I dislike Kate at all. In fact I think royalty is a ridiculous institution in 2018. I really don't understand why so many come here and complain about CB and how they are about Kate. It has been years of this. It is nothing new.

The Kate hate is nothing new, but it did get more vicious since Meghan appeared.

I know why people come here -  they want to voice their opinion. And they are not allowed to do so on CB. Since this is why I created this blog to begin with, I am completely fine with that.

As far as royalty is concerned, I think it is an insult to all of us who are not aristo. I mentioned this before, - accepting aristocracy and royalty as normal means you accept that your station in life is lower than theirs simply because you weren’t born to the “right” parents, and that some people are simply better than others because of their genes. I will never accept that. It might upset some people, but this line of thinking is not far from racism and has no place in the modern world.

Nov 7, 2018
How is Kaiser dumb enough not to realise "people tell me to give the baby booze to get her to sleep haha" is a JOKE? Does she genuinely think Brits habitually get newborns drunk??

Yeah, I don’t know. It is obviously a joke.

Nov 7, 2018

What happened to the post where Kaiser said something along the lines that braids are inappropriate for Sam Johnson’s  age and statue? I wanted to check it out again, and I can’t find it. Is it gone? 

Anyway, I loved Sam’s braids and her dress. And, yeah. Kaiser your shouldn’t be telling women what is appropriate and what is not “for their age”. I also loved Emily Blunt’s dress -  it is comfortable and interesting at the same time. It is something I would wear.

Nov 6, 2018
PS. MM is one of only several "working royals". This means she is officially on the payroll, in a way, and is an agent of the Crown. She is not just a "royal".
Nov 6, 2018
Re MM voting. I 100% agree. It would be a PR nightmare if it turns out she did. The backlash will be strong. Also there would be some legal questions, as she now represents the British head of state! In other words, it is not just about US law; it is mostly about English law. For me, much of the current cult following is an expression of national pride and sentiment -- as she is seen as the American who "took over" the british crown. This is worrying, especially in the current political climate.
Nov 6, 2018

A couple thoughts on whether Meghan voted or not -  if she is still a US citizen then she technically could, but I don’t think she did. It just wouldn’t be proper.

As a naturalized US citizen I had to take an Oath of Allegiance, which is sort of assumed for people born in the US. Among other things it has a part which states “I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty “, and Meghan is literally married to a foreign prince.

I think Meghan’s American fans see her as an American, but Meghan is no longer an American, she gave it up.

Also, I think long-term Meghan will not be able to keep the US citizenship. Some people don’t realize but the US is different from all other countries when it comes to taxes and financial reporting. The US taxes worldwide income, which no other developed country does, so Meghan would have to declare all her income from the British crown, all the presents, all her foreign bank accounts, and then pay US taxes on that income. This is the reason so many Americans living abroad are renouncing the US citizenship. I am just not sure the BRF would like that long-term, I doubt they like the IRS having an inside look at their books and having authority to audit them through Meghan being a US citizen.  I am sure all of this had been discussed and agreed upon with Meghan before marriage. 

Nov 6, 2018 1 note
2/2 "If you prefer to embrace the bitch within where Kate's concerned, head over to Celebitchy then, where they're perfectly out n proud about ripping Kate to shreds for every single action, speech, hairstyle, accessory and clothing choice. You can rip right into her a feel nary an ounce of guilt nor the need to justify or apologise for your way of thinking. I'm not a Kate fan by any measure, but the level of woman hatred on sites like that are at Gilead levels."
Nov 6, 2018
1/2 I just wanted to share a comment from another site on here about the extreme Insane Kate Hatred on CB where everything she does is deemed terrible. "This site is one of the precious few that don't indulge in character assassinations of most of the subjects of the posts -Kate included. In this sense, it's a sanctuary for those of us who want to indulge in the glam/horror, without reading unnecessarily nasty, snarky comments below, those of us who just enjoy genuine observations and remarks."
Nov 6, 2018 1 note
I agree with your opinion on Disney movies. It took me too much time to realise the imprinted messages there and small girls get those messages from all the world around them. Family, school, comercials, films. That has to change. I believe they could watch it, but the parents should know how to show different point of views while that. I like Disney, but I don't get all the hype americans have for it and its films after I grew up.
Nov 5, 2018

I want to chime in on the criticism of Keira’s and her opinion  that Disney princess movies are damaging.

I grew up outside of the US, in a different culture, and I didn’t watch Disney movies until I was pretty much an adult. And …. I found them boring, silly and irrelevant. I do think they can be damaging to a young child who cannot process them critically.

Speaking specifically about Hans Andersen’s fairy tales, my favorite one is about the Ice Queen, Hans and Gerda. Gerda is the young girl who embarks on a journey through tundra and  through unknown lands to save Hans from the Ice Queen, and  when she finds him , she melts his frozen heart with love. This is a wonderful story where a girl has agency, she is brave, strong, capable and loving. She gets to ride a polar bear, how cool is that? ))) I wonder why Disney never thought of animating it?

Women who say that they grew up with Disney and  they turned out fine, in my opinion, don’t fully understand how young children learn. Children absorb what they see as sponges and what they see is  “normal” to them. You can’t really have critical conversations about  pros and cons with young children.  Sure, it is possible to overcome those messages we received as young children, but  why do it if  it is possible to avoid damaging messages?  As I said, I didn’t watch Disney as a child and I think I am better for it. So, I am with Keira on this one.

Nov 5, 2018 1 note
Omg first time posting on here. But Kaiser just posted about Rebel Wilson blocking people who disapprove and disagree with her!! HELLO pot meet kettle. We all know that she blocked black followers on celebitchy when they were getting on to her about not posting about the BET awards and now she has the audacity to get onto Rebel. I really can’t right now.
Nov 5, 2018 1 note
"Rebel Wilson blocked black critics on Twitter rather than apologize for a mistake" Kaiser is "Do what I say, Not what I do" personified.
Nov 5, 2018 1 note
Kate is pretty scandal free if that is really all they can say.... she doesn't bring the drama and the majority of Brits like her. Contrary to the opinions on CB, she is popular and fulfils her role quite well. The polls show it. In the CB universe, every Brit dislikes her, the RF members hate her, nobody respects her, they thinks she is incredibly lazy and doesn't work. Oh, and she purposely keeps her kids away from the wider Royal family. Reality vs fanfiction on CB is laughable.
Nov 4, 2018
All they can ever say about Duchess Kate is that she is boring, lazy, dresses matronly or dresses girly. Rinse and Repeat for 6+ plus years! Kate partying her 20's away is seen as scandalous hahah. oh, yes, their fave is her "inappropriate wardrobe choices for Duchessing" and also Kate spends the most amount of taxpayer money within the RF! Such a lie.
Nov 4, 2018

Ha! I liked that most posters disagreed with Kaiser’s assessment of the Gwyneth’s dress as “basic”. It is an elegant. classic dress,  well suited for the character of the wedding.

As I said earlier, Kaiser doesn’t really have fashion sense. She only pretends to be a fashion expert so that she can use it as a weapon in her “fight” against those she doesn’t like.

Nov 4, 2018 2 notes
Angelina Jolie fixation

I got banned twice because I don’t worship Angelina nor hate Duchess Kate. We all know how much Kaiser hates Kate for no reason, but I think her adoration of Angelia Jolie is way unhealthier. She is some kind of untouchable goddess there and Brad Pitt is more monster than Weinstein. Most commentors on all these Jolie-Pitt stories sound deranged: Maya!
Jolie posts are even more creepy than the royal posts.
Kaiser only cares for the unholy trio Jolie, Kate and Meghan.

Nov 4, 2018 1 note
Thank you to the anon who mentioned GoFugYourself. I just looked up their Royal posts and it was nice for the sites owners to tell people to simmer down! Their posters offer insightful posts. Nice commentary over there, I will have to check it out more often, they don't seem as angry/bitter as the CB lot!! Just regular balanced comments from each side. And the writer is much better than Kaiser hehe.
Nov 4, 2018
The entire Kate vs Meghan competition on CB is a huge circle jerk of posters claiming one is better than the other. If somebody compliments Meg, someone else has to chime in and tear down Kate in the next sentence. If one compliments Kate, someone else will butt in and tell you that Meg is far superior in every way - Kate is a useless human being and waste of space. Lol, they are unhinged. 1
Nov 4, 2018 1 note
Why can't people like both Duchesses without trying to put each one down in every breath? I realize liking both ladies isn't an option on CB because Kaiser leads the narrative.. K/W = bad, evil. M/H = good, genuine angels. She sets the tone, the posters continue on and there is no in-between to post different opinions. 2

Very true.

Nov 4, 2018 1 note
Culture differences are interesting.Once my uncles hosted a foreigner student and she started calling women from our country sl*ts because of the bikinis' sizes and because we hug/kiss each other on the cheek when we are introduced in a social event. Later that week, my aunt caught her having sex with my cousin, that she only met a few hours before that day. She thought sex with someone she barely knew was ok, but hugging and kissing on the cheek was too intimative. Lol

Thanks for sharing, exactly!

Nov 3, 2018
you know what, maybe Kaiser and the commentators talked about on here love they are receiving attention. I know people "hate read" CB, however, not giving CB clicks is the better option. It's such a shit storm of extremely distasteful views against women. The negative energy pouring out of the posters is off the chart. Maybe a lot of the women posting aren't leading happy lives, so they go their to vent. Not reading (even if it's just to laugh at the comments) seems like a good idea for myself.

Maybe, but that is the choice people can make for themselves. I think having an outlet like this actually might help women to let go of CB. They can talk it out, and let go.

And just to add, another important function of this blog is to shine the light on the gaslighting that Kaiser subjected people for years, by banning them for simply disagreeing with her. Many of these people were completely bewildered and also hurt by the experience. They didn’t understand what did they do wrong. They did nothing wrong, and that is important to give them an outlet for their stories.

Nov 3, 2018
Haha, oh my word, the belly cupping was insane! But I don't think the comments were racist? I'm not sure, seemed like a difference in opinion. I guess for some women belly cupping is natural but for other pregnant women it isn't a natural instinct. But Holding your belly whilst pregnant is considered gauche and tacky? Yeah, that was out of line. Reminds me when ppl shame women for breastfeeding in public.

There is nothing wrong with belly cupping. Sure, it  might seem a bit cheesy, but so what? We don’t know what Meghan was thinking doing it, so I’d rather not assign intent, and assume it was done for attention. Cultures are different. Brits generally are more reserved than Americans and to some of them it might seem a little bit too much, but it is not Meghan’s fault.

When I moved to the US I realized that Americans, for example, are often very uncomfortable with nudity. Some women got mad at me for not being fully covered up in  the women-only sauna.Oh, the horror, they saw another women’s breasts, lol !!! 

Nov 3, 2018
Me again. Just to explain -- This week several used this platform to label us MM haters. These attacks are all framed the same: "I feel so uncomfortable visiting this page lately....with all the vicious critiques of poor Meghan". Not here for it. On Gofugyourself, several posts along this line were posted this week. The community quickly reacted, thankfully, referring the offended to Celebitchy!
Nov 3, 2018
Replying to a comment: Getting off one of the planes, Meghan's dress was flapping in the wind and could've gone up if she hadn't been holding it. Couple of years ago,the same thing happened with Kate and everyone complained so much by saying people got an eyeful! Oh, the horror. She was also holding George obviously she couldn't hold down her skirt with the other hand. It's wind, nobody can control the weather, clothes can accidental fly up, but these women don't seem to understand that fact.
Nov 2, 2018
Lol. There was also a takeover attempt on Gofugyourself this week. Luckily, fug nationals (and the site's own Heather and Jessica) nipped it in the bud... Gurrl power!

To be honest, I have no idea what this is about, sorry! ))). Posting this just because there doesn’t seem to be a reason not too. 

Nov 2, 2018
The whole skinny jeans shaming might be down to age. Skinny trousers/jeans paired with blouses, blazers, heels and boots are the norm for myself and my peers. I don't believe the majority of ladies posting on there have a clue about dressing - based on their comments that is. What they call boring on Kate is polished, tailored, timeless/classic to my eyes. 1/2

That is my impression as well. The majority of commenters posting, starting with Kaiser,  don’t really have fashion sense, they simply use fashion to criticize whoever they don’t like.

Nov 2, 2018
Would they like her to dress in a burqa to satisfy their own ideas of modesty and appropriateness? No offence to any Muslim reading! I just mean, they wouldn't be satisfied with anything she does or wears - they always end up nitpicking her to death. I hope they criticize Trump and Melania with the same anger, hatred and passion!

The whole “modesty” policing is ridiculous. We are not in Saudi Arabia. It used to be only on Kate’s posts, now it also migrated to Meghan’s posts.

Nov 2, 2018
Is this a Kate fanblog/Meghan hate blog or just about Celebitchy in general?

It is about Celebitchy, but because 80% of Celebitchy is about Meghan and Kate these days, it is reflected here as well.Kaiser is just phoning in, she keeps posting on the same 3-4 topics, which get the most clicks, no research required from her side.

Nov 2, 2018 1 note
My GOD the racists have come out in force in the Meghan photo post. I can't stop LOLing at the poster claiming she never touched her bump when she was pregnant "but then I'm a very educated person from a good family." That comment has to be a spoof, no one could be that stupid and out of touch.
Nov 2, 2018
As for Nota, she goes quiet when she can't openly criticize Meghan for the things she constantly drags Kate for, such as; high hemlines, see through clothes, high heels, skinny pants and windy skirts/dresses accidentally going up. Whenever Kate does any of these things, her and her hateful cronies can't stop going on and on and on about it - with Meghan, they're silent. I don't even think these ladies should be dragged for this silly stuff but its amusing to read! Pearl clutching much?!
Nov 1, 2018 2 notes
Apparently, Meghan's Tour wardrobe cost is around £117,000? LOL. Imagine if Kate had spent this amount during a tour!! The usual hypocrisy is showing itself in the comment section.. "It's a made up number, all false". They instantly believe Kate's wardrobe numbers listed in the DM, but Meghan gets a pass, I guess?
Nov 1, 2018
This is what I wrote and was moderated instantly: So let me get this straight. This is about a DM article about a VF article about Katie's style or lack thereof? It seems like another excuse to just bash her without her having actually done anything? There's also a lot of complaining about her not being a woman of substance and some very harsh criticism of her fashion choices (because fashion matters a lot then, not just substance?). 1/4
Nov 1, 2018
Some very bitter complaints about the tightness of her clothing, goodness me. I just find it amazing to read the royal threads here, whereas there is some really good and progressive writing and commentary on politics, feminism, etc. but all this doesn't seem to apply to the royal threads.I'm against the monarchy so I'm not a fan of any of the royals. 2/4
Nov 1, 2018
But I can still be amazed by the level of criticism of this woman. I noticed the new thing now is, well if she did more work we wouldn't talk about her clothing. But I don't buy that. Perhaps the reasons she is disliked are generally legit but just the relentlessness of the criticism, it just goes on and on, and I find that alarming. 3/4
Nov 1, 2018 1 note
It's as if everyone just wants to come here and vent and have a go. Is this what smart gossip is supposed to be? 4/4
Nov 1, 2018
"What is alarming is coming up with statements about the intentions and character of people simply based on the fact they disagree with your personal opinion. Differing opinions from your own doesn’t make her passive aggressive or a bad person." An objective comment from the messy Royal posts.

I saw it too, and I completely agree.

Nov 1, 2018 2 notes

October 2018

Today Kate in her inoffensive blue dress warranted 100+ posts, and some are sure she must’ve had a boob job. She couldn’t be possibly breastfeeding. So, on one hand the posters are  “feminists” who think women should be in control of their bodies, on the other hand they make accusations and insinuations about plastic surgery? Why is plastic surgery bad if you think women should have freedom of choice?

On the Taylor’s post the discussion is again about the color of her eyes and whether it is natural, and possible plastic surgery, not her recent political activism. And I kept thinking -  who cares if it is contacts that make her eyes so blue? Do you really begrudge somebody looking well  because you don’t like that person? How bitter do you have to be?

Oct 31, 2018 7 notes
Believe me, there are plenty of Black, Biracial, and Asian etc women out here and we don't share similar views on the Duchess of Sussex. I know women who adore her, and I also know women who think she might not be as genuine as she portrays. Shrugs. But calling women extremely racist when they criticise Meghan for her outrageous spending, her love of non British labels, the fit of her clothes, inappropriate clothes for official engagements, or whatever else, is dangerous territory.
Oct 31, 2018 13 notes
2. We do pay for the Royals, so we should be allowed to share our thoughts. As long as the criticism is fair, there's nothing wrong with discussing DoS and pointing out things which could have been better. There are always going to be die hard DoS stans who can't take the slightest critique, but this comes with being Royal -they have all been called out. Celebitchy posters turn every comment into "they're nitpicking/complaining because they don't like the colour of her skin", which is wrong imo.
Oct 31, 2018 2 notes
It’s funny, I just came here to comment about NotASugarHere and the top post was about her! I ventured back onto CB briefly and while LAK seems to be gone (?), Nota is Nota-ing in full force. I’ve actually considered that she works for Charles’s office and suspect I know who she is on Twitter as well. She is far too militant in her comments to simply be a royal-watcher and she clearly has an agenda and A LOT of time to dedicate to this. Her posts are always praising Charles & Camilla. Thoughts?

But would Charles really put it with someone who hates his daughter-in-law so much? Charles might be a prat, but I don’t see him as being that devious.

Oct 31, 2018 1 note
One more quick observation about NOTA — she states her opinions, even about minor things, as fact. For example, she just said today that when Charles becomes King, he will “remain” at Clarence House and split his time between there and Windsor. How is this possibly something that an outside observer could claim to know? She is either employed somehow by Clarence House or she’s seriously disturbed (or both!).
Oct 31, 2018
It's really sad that NOTA talks all that shit about Kate, yet it seems she spends hours of her day hating her. I don't like to generalize, but from what I've seen, she seems to search the web for royal posts just to talk about Kate all day. That's a obsession. How does she find the time? At least Kaiser gets something out of hating Kate. Nota gets nothing. It's sad really. I hope people from CB see that they are enabling someone with a sick obsession. (At least I think)
Oct 31, 2018 1 note
NIC919: "Yep. Perhaps if she read the letters to children or something this may have more value as an engagement. This seems tacked on and pretty empty." Yep, this is me shaming...
Oct 31, 2018 1 note
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December