Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

October 2018

I got banned completely from celebitchy some time ago through not following the party line, and daring to disagree with various articles, particularly about the royals. I think they put your ip address on the hit list. So I went on through the Opera browser which has a free vpn services, changed my name slightly - several of us have done the same! 1/2
Oct 9, 2018 1 note
2/2 However, I posted on the Taylor Swift article saying that there must be a different culture between the US and the UK because celebs in the UK get called out often for voicing their political views. I went on to say that I see no reason why a celeb should be expected to air their political view - that is not their job or what they get paid to do. I posted it vpn under a different name. It appeared for a short while then disappeared, presumably because I wasn't following their party line! :)
Oct 9, 2018
“The man [Kanye] has legit mental health issues, and it’s not helpful for all of us to follow his every move and really analyze what he’s saying and doing” kaiser says as she does literally just that.
Oct 9, 2018
A Dumpster Fire

Celebitchy has a been an absolute dumpster fire last few days. Where do I even start. First Celebitchy regulars had to eat crow when Emily R. and Amy Schumer went out to protest Kavanaugh nomination  and actually got arrested, while what did holier than you Celebitchy regulars do? Nothing. Kitten commented something along the lines that she always had a lot of snark for those two women, but what they did was good. Really, Kitten? You think they care about your “snark”. They are out there living their lives and doing their thing and not caring about your snark at all. They are bigger women than you are. They don’t get off on putting other women down.

Today’s Taylor Siwft post went pretty much the same way. Many posters twisting themselves into pretzels to avoid owning up their irrational hatred for Taylor. She gets more criticism than MAGA Kanye, despite everything good that she has done.

Then there was Kaiser slut shaming Barbara Bush for marrying too soon, in her opinion. Thankfully most posters didn’t agree with Kaiser.

And then to top it of the Keira and Kate post where majority of commenters went out of their way to miss the point Keira was making about patriarchy and the crazy expectations for women, and instead talked about their “different” experiences. If you judge by Celebitchy comments, apparently it is completely normal for a woman to be dressed up for a photo call hours after birth. Well, I don’t care how different they are, I felt like I was hit by a truck, and I had one of those “easy” births. These women internalized patriarchy to such extent, they don’t even realize what is normal and what is not normal anymore.Thankfully there were some reasonable commenters on that thread as well, I especially liked the one who said that we never get to see “the other side” of women’t choices. We see women dressed up and made up and we should respect that as their choice, but why don’t we see women in the public eye making another choice? That is patriarchy for you. 

I almost forgot, they also think Susan Sarandon who supports Bernie Sanders, is worse than Trump. Wow, just wow. For a site which claims to support women they really do have irrational levels of hate for some women.

Oct 8, 2018 7 notes
#ban #celebitchy
I honestly don't get all the hate against Kate and the defense squad of Megan. Sometimes they talk as if Megan is saving the world and her was life was pretty hard before Harry showing up. And it clearly shows that some there have no interest in learning the differences between american and british culture. Changing the subject I once made a comment about an actress that Kaiser likes and she blocked. It was not even disrespectfull, something about me not thinking that she is so good.
Oct 8, 2018
Kaiser seems a little bit obessessed with Jennifer Aniston and her marriage or whatever that was with Justin Theroux. I commented a few weeks ago that in Hollywood there are much worse things to talk about than an actress lieing she was married. Guess what? Blocked.
Oct 8, 2018
Kaiser said this about Brad Pitt. "Nah, girl. He literally just did a Netflix movie (War Machine, which everyone hated) and he hasn’t starred in a hit movie in years. He’s no Robert Redford. " And i thought By the sea was a hit. LOL
Oct 8, 2018
Kaiser was forced today to write a positive post about Taylor Swift as she is making headlines because of finally making her political views public. I tried to post about what my speculation of why Taylor refused to call out those white supr*macists from 2 years ago who tried to claim her as their ideal for a female star. In my post I wrote how I think that Taylor refused to share any of her fame with this sc*m because by distancing they would have received a platform.Kaiser censored my comment.

This Taylor post today made me absolutely livid. Even now Kaiser continues calling her a snake, and not a single poster called her out on it! Some feminists there are ! Or maybe they did and were blocked.

So, let’s take a look -  on one hand we have Kaiser, an anonymous gossip writer and on the other hand we have Taylor Swift, a successful performer and a business woman, who took a person who groped her to court, who contributes to various charities and feminist causes and who came out in support of Democrats, while Kaiser did what?  Kaiser is a coward with no principles, and she doesn’t get to call anybody a snake because she contributes nothing positive to society herself.

Oct 8, 2018
One question I have been wondering about for a while now: Is it likely that sites such as celebitchy or also Lainey get paid by a celeb's PR so that they start posting always positively about them. I just wonder because some celebs always always get praised. Even when posting about negative stories Kaiser is apologetic. Is this simple favoritism or is there a financial interest.

I am pretty sure Celebitchy is paid by Kardashians. There is absolutely no reason otherwise for Kaiser to write 2 Kardashian stories a day and continue giving passes to Kanye and his MAGA rants.

Oct 8, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
Chat Submission

In reading the stories I notice that all the comments are about seething hatred for Pitt…and then someone writes the following “Ops the comment i was replying to got deleted” so that does show how each comment must be constantly monitored ..erasing all room for dissent. yikes!

Oct 8, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Wow, RoyalSparkle is a real psychopath. Her hate for everything Middleton is crazy, even for Celebitchy.

Yeah, this person doesn’t sound stable at all. I noticed her comments today as well.

Oct 3, 2018 2 notes
Oh, the Kate Hate and shaming is back after one appearance! From people diagnosing her as being anorexic/bulimic, talking about her slutty jeggings, and telling her to cover herself haha.... not understanding that maternity leave actually means MATERNITY LEAVE! What is with these women? I'm from Europe, we have a year year off or more. I feel sorry for new American mothers when they have to rush back to work! But they take everything to the extreme with this Duchess. Freakin' bizarre.
Oct 3, 2018 1 note
Does Kaiser moderate comments in real time? I'm asking because I was just on the Royal threads posting normal things, but as soon as I said a few things against the preferred narrative, my comments stopped going through. That is really weird and unhealthy for her to mod royal threads so incessantly! I'm British so we view things differently when it comes to the Royals. There's no hate or unpopularity, but when I point out positive things, i'm told to go away so everyone can keep on hating!

Yes, she moderates in real time. I’ve seen comments disappear very quickly. And once they deleted a couple of your comments, they put you in a permanent moderation and they only let through what they decide to let through.

That also means that if a nasty comment is not moderated it is not that Kaiser hasn’t seen it. It means that she agrees with it, or leaves it be to create more drama and more clicks.

Oct 3, 2018 1 note
PITY COMMENTS. SORRY MY ENGLISH.

To Anon that share her point of view.
I fully understand your about that comment seeker .who actually was me.I didn’t mean with that view that you are saying.
Like Kaiser i was abused /raped more than once by men and women.Because of that i cannot have babies.
Fortunately i had a great institution who helped me and still help me today everyday.
I told my story and continue to tell my story in group support.Everyone who have being throw a situation like this reacts differently. I lost many things in that period of time but did not lost my opinion.
My pity comments is i (in my opinion)i personally don’t like to share my story with in my “work place” like Kaiser and have comments i feel sorry for you .I had that experience and the look for people look at and feel sorry for you everyday and looks at you and remember the story and cried (like i say is my experience).
Like Kaiser i don’t feel happy with this Kavanaugh and Ford situation and others stories But i don’t see EVERYTHING BLACK AND WHITE.
In my opinion Kaiser bravely told her story like others who aren’t heard.The difference is CB is not victim support site and don’t have the skills and the education and professionaly to help.Like me and others she remember by personally experience what going through .
Kaiser was interesting site well write site but in couple months had being bullying people harshly and only her opinion counts only and that is not fare.Blocking moderation comments was created to inappropiate language (like my pity comment ,whore ,bitch and others) .
The way she present her story and previous story was like she giving justification why she acts and blocked comments that what she does.
I truly apologize this situation and comment.I truly apologize to @bannedfromcelebitchy.i will be always responsible by my actions.i fully support and respect if want block me and do not and keep contact.
I TRULY RESPECT THE VICTIMS AND HISTORY.BUT EVERYONE DEAL DIFFERENTLY ITS 11 YEARS SINCE IT HAPPENS IN MY.I LIVED BY THE DAY.I WAKE AND GO TO SLEEP EVERYDAY WITH THIS SITUATION.

I AM TRULY TO ALL OF YOU.IF DON’T BELIEVE THAT IS FINE.💓

———————————————————————————————-

I hear you. I don’t necessarily agree with everything you say. I think a part of the confusion is that it was Celebitchy (the site owner) who posted her assault story, not Kaiser. Even though it is mostly Kaiser who writes for that site, and it is Kaiser who moderates and demonstrates hypocrisy at every turn. Though, Celebitchy, as the site owner is ultimately responsible for what goes on there as well.

You also make a good point that they are not professionals, and should be very careful about how they approach such sensitive subjects.

Ultimately, what I wish for everyone who has been through such a terrible experience  is to be able to share their hurt and let go of it, and heal. It is a hard road, and it is different for everyone. HUGS.

Oct 3, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission
I am chuckling about the comments re: Kaiser. Kaiser states that she has a degree in Philosophy. The thing is,Philosophy and understanding basic logic are intertwined; a course in Logic ( with a passing grade) is a requirement for any Philosophy major. Kaiser clearly doesn't understand the relationship between a false premise(s) and a false conclusion. So, facts,chains of reasoning etc are not part of what she thinks/write. That's a good reason for not reading CB.

Understanding philosophy requires an open mind, and willingness to consider other opinions, understanding difficult and often even contradictory concepts. Kaiser doesn’t have this skill, I imagine she wasn’t very good at philosophy. May be this is why she ended up where she is, and not working for McKinsey or Boston Consulting Group.

Oct 2, 2018 1 note

I am fully aware that the Celebitchy website is a buisness, after all. A buisness owned by a woman. There obviously will be advertisements, she doesn’t owe me anything. I’ve been a reader of that site since its beginning. No ads back then.

I am also aware of Kaiser-the toad being a bully. As a commenter, she used to engage in unnecessary arguments all day, every day. She was very vulgar, too. Weird obsession with Michael Fassbender’s “dong”. So when the fangirl became the site’s head writer, things changed rapidly. The readership increased and improved, because she focussed on Kate Middleton. CB was one of the few websites which didn’t indulge in sycophancy which was probably refreshing for its new audience. (Later, it evolved into full on hate and obsession) Kaiser cleverly chose her subjects. From just another celeb gossip site, it now focussed on issues that its readership face: domestic violence, molestation, assault. For a young girl like me, it was a safe space.

I got molested by a member of my school staff. I cried for days, didn’t sleep properly, and i was terrified. After sharing my story on CB, i was encouraged by a commenter to seek help. I told my parents. He got fired. My school headmistress listened, and believed me.

As far as i know, CB is, and as of yet, continues to be a safe space for women wanting to share their stories. Without men cyber bullying/threatening them, or other women calling them “Pity comment” seekers. But the rate with which Kaiser is banning and silencing - that would eventually change.

CB isn’t a charity, either. Like every business, hypocrisy is a policy they all follow. But, It is the very few women in the comment section which matter. If/when they get banned, I’d stop reading that site.

Kaiser was clever enough to attract an impressive readership, but too dumb to sustain it. I doubt her current dedicated minions read your page. Policing Kate sugars, and blessing Meghan devotees keeps them pretty busy. Quite entertaining to watch.

I am not a Kaiser fan, I enjoy it when you people call her out. She is an unhinged bully toad. But I felt offended by “Looking for pity comments” ask. Katie is very brave, and that bravery needs to celebrated rather than questioned.

I read and follow you, too. Thanks for creating this Tumblr page. I bet Kaiser reads it, too. I was banned for writing a nice comment on a Taylor Swift article. Oh well. CB is following the daily Mail model of business. Selling hate, and creating false narratives. When applied to celebrities, I couldn’t care less. In 1% -ers universe, we don’t exist.

Sorry for writing you an essay, please don’t ban me:)

————————————————————————————————–

I am very happy you found support and help. Lots of love and hugs for you . You are right, there are some very good people who pass through that site. Too bad CB cannot keep them, and even bans some on purpose.  

I would never ban you. I haven’t banned anyone, actually. This thought didn’t even cross my mind. I am not the one to shut down any opinion, and I actually agree with what your wrote. Again, lots of love. It is very sad that so many women are still targeted, assaulted and are taken advantage of. But I truly believe that with the #MeToo movement the tide finally started  to turn. 

And what is more, because you were so brave and spoke up, you probably saved other girls at your school from going through the same.You might not think you are a hero, but you are.

Oct 2, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban #submission
CBer's are obviously reading this site. Gals, 1) if you don't want to look "hysterical", maybe you shouldn't compare Kavanaugh to Ted Bundy unless there are corpses found. 2) you really should restructure the site as a support for sexual/physical/emotional abuse survivors and just have "gossip" as a sub-forum. Do better by being honest about it.

For starters, they should stop moderating everybody who doesn’t follow the party line. Then they wouldn’t have to come here in order to find out what people really think. What does this remind me of? Ah, that is right, the Soviet Union and the Iron Curtain.

Oct 1, 2018 4 notes
#celebitchy #ban
The Lindsay Lohan story is terrible, TERRIBLE. But it sounds like mental illness to me, some kind of psychotic break. Or manic episode. I'm not a psychiatrist, so I'm not equipped to diagnose even if I had been there. But Kaiser just calls it "white saviorism and privilege of this b-tch." Which... maybe that comes into it. But I'm not so sure this is simple bad celebrity behavior and normal gossip fodder. This is bad, but it's not LL's usual brand of bad. she needs help

Agree.

Oct 1, 2018 1 note

September 2018

Re: Celebitchy (the site owner, not the site) - I saw something on Twitter the other day that really bothered me. I don’t follow her, but someone else commented on it so that’s how I saw it. She’d taken a screenshot of a comment (which wasn’t let through moderation, I don’t think), with a snarky comment of her own. I thought it was so petty and unprofessional. Delete the comment, fine, but don’t post it elsewhere mocking one of your readers, real name or not! IDK if I can post links here, but

This definitely crosses the line.

Sep 30, 2018 7 notes
2) this is the post I’m referring to, just in case links are allowed through (or for you to refer to before posting my comment here). Maybe I’m being overly sensitive since after all CB is “just” a gossip website, but considering she runs the site, I thought it was unnecessarily rude and crossed a line. PS Just realized links aren’t allowed here, but it was the day of the post earlier this week in which Michelle Obama was told to “sit down” by Tomi Lauren.)
Sep 30, 2018
Yeah, Celebitchy (The Owner) unlike Kaiser doesn't seem TOO bad. Her sharing her story had nothing to do with pity and everything to do with her being someone who'd been through something horrid and having a space to do it in her website. Maybe even healing. I dislike everything about Celebitchy, BUT the fact that they talk about that sort of thing. All the writers but Kaiser, seem like they are actually nice well traveled women. Kaiser is too hateful and obsessive, or at least her persona is.
Sep 29, 2018 1 note
"Pity victim comments". How very disgusting of OP. The site really helped me at one time. Women of celebitchy used to share their stories of sexual abuse, and violence long before it became a powerful metoo trend. I wrote and shared my own, and i got sympathy and support from complete strangers on celebitchy. For me, the site was therapeutic, because i could talk about my experiences without any shame. No one is looking for "Pity comments". Apart from "royal"/celeb stories, CB is a great place.

CB is a negative place, and while it provides safe space for people to share their stories  ( if they meet with Kaiser’s approval), then  many  of the same people then turn around and slam other posters and other female celebrities on other posts. Is that healthy? It cannot be a great place when it is so hypocritical.

Don’t forget that Celebitchy is a commercial place and they are after clicks. They provide a safe place for women to share their stories, and that is good. But they don’t do it out of goodness of their hearts, they are selling you advertisement at the same time, and your daily serving of Kardashians, and Kate- and Taylor Swift hate, and a few other things. It is not a wholesome place, and what bothers me. It purposely attracts vulnerable people to make money on them .

And then they also pick and choose which stories are OK to share, and which they are going to block because they don’t conform to Kaiser’s views of the moment.

Sep 29, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
"they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism." This is so true on the Meghan posts. They only like Meghan so much because it gives them a chance to tear into Kate. I'm 100% positive if Meghan was fully white, they would be ripping into her about everything just like they do with Kate at every turn. I don't like reading their faux support towards Meghan Markle because in every comment they end up shading Kate at the same time. They aren't real Meghan fans.
Sep 28, 2018 4 notes
Celebitchy today told her story about rape. She need pitty victim comments.

I don’t know if she wanted pity, or she is just finally ready to admit to herself what happened to her. Anyway, I am not going to judge her for it. No matter what her motivation is, the women who dealt with assault need to be supported, whether we like them or not.

Having said that, I also think Celebitchy is a site which intentionally attracts vulnerable and traumatized people, but not to help them, but for clicks and to make money off them, And THAT I find disgusting. They started as a gossip site and now they turned into a site which takes advantage of people. They also figured out that they could do this with people who are strongly anti-Trump. They give them an emotional outlet, and in exchange they get clicks. But Celebitchy is not  a healthy place for that, either. It feeds negativity, instead of doing something constructive.

Sep 28, 2018 6 notes
#celebitchy #ban
So what is the takeaway about Kate as regards to Meghan? Is she competitive and jealous (what about meeeee)? Or is she relieved and keen to stay home because Meghan takes the spotlight off of her? Kaiser managed to mix both messages in the same story. And in any other case, we'd all be cheering that someone got a proper maternity leave of proper length, yes?

The way they resent maternity leave make me think that most of the posters are Americans, brainwashed Americans, who don’t see maternity leave as a basic human right. Then why are they so obsessed with Kate and her lack of “work ethics” to begin with. If they were British taxpayers, then it would be more understandable.

Sep 27, 2018 2 notes
#ban celebitchy
The Gisele Bundchen post today. Boy oh boy is Kaiser passive aggressive.
Sep 27, 2018 1 note
If all these CB'ers are survivors of rape/sexual assault, why do they re-traumatize themselves by deliberately watching emotional interviews/testimonies? (That is, instead of just reading text.) As someone who works in the mental health field. we encourage people to AVOID known triggers if they can.
Sep 27, 2018 3 notes
Can ask a question? Its possible to report about CELEBITCHY.COM. Because what she doing its not correct.

What they they are doing is not ethical, but it is not illegal, so nothing can really be done other than spreading the word about it. This information does damage their reputation and ensures they never become a real new site, like, for example, Huffington Post, and will forever remain in the dumpster of gossip sites.

Sep 25, 2018 1 note
"So many of the Jennifer Aniston defenders act like I was smoking crack because I dared to believe that Justin Theroux and Jennifer’s wedding was real & that it’s suspicious and shady AF that we haven’t heard one word about either of them filing for divorce." Yeah that totally sounds like a journalist and not an unhinged lunatic. A comment from the same article- Comments “tearing down physical appearance” are VERY mild on this site compared to most others places on the internet." Yeah nope!
Sep 25, 2018
Never been banned before but have seen comments I submitted that mysteriously disappeared. I’m tired of Kaiser and company claiming they’re progressive when really they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism. I’ve seen commenters argue that white privilege doesn’t exist. I’ve also argued with users who comment in a post about a female celebrity and insult their looks. One user slowsnow pops up in every Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift post to belittle them.
Sep 25, 2018
Can we call out specific users? I’m constantly reading pretentious comments from a user named slowsnow. I’ve read posts from them where they discuss the existence of postmodernism and on a celebrity gossip site of all places! I started arguing with them in a fashion post and their response was to laugh at me. I couldn’t post a defense bc I was moderated. Mods claim they censor rude responses but that’s not the case. They’ll defend pretentious asshats like slowsnow because they’re regulars.

Slowsnow must be new, or an old user under a new name, because I don’t remember this nic. I think if you bring a comment of a person from Celebitchy, as a quote with the time, then it is a fair game to discuss it, given that you would be discussing an actual post, not just some hearsay. Whatever is posted in public domain is a fair game.

Sep 25, 2018
I got banned for trying to defend myself against a regular poster. I called them out but then they edited their post so that it seemed less sexist. Then my post didn’t make sense, which gave them the chance to mock me for my “mistake” so when I tried to submit a rebuttal Kaiser denied it. I try not to return to that hellscape of a website but I feel I have to post because I think it’s disgusting that Kaiser and her ilk get away with calling themselves progressive when they’re anything but.

That is why started this site. The regular posters will on purpose misinterpret what you’ve said, but when you try to clarify and call them out on it, you comments get moderated!

Nobody gets to moderate me here ))).

Sep 25, 2018 1 note
I've gotten in trouble on CB sometimes because I wouldn't take a "side." I love Angelina, but I like Jennifer, and why oh why did they have to be linked eternally? I found Brandi and LeeAnn both vile, although I liked LeeAnn's song when she was a teenager. Honestly, I kind of like both duchesses. I do love Meghan, I admit, but I see nothing wrong with Kate. It's antifeminist to pit woman against woman, but that's promoted on Celebitchy time and again. You aren't allowed to mention it.
Sep 21, 2018 3 notes
1 poster actually said the reason Kate gets so much vitriol thrown at her on CB is because "she doesnt work as much as we'd like her too". So,constantly putting her down, telling her she doesn't need maternity leave, slut/party shaming her; saying she's utterly useless, calling her a mattress, saying she doesnt have a mind of her own, being really spiteful/negative about her. Basically nitpicking at absolutely everything she does.. is perfect fine because she doesnt "work". LOL They're American!

It is pretty clear that the  “work” is just an excuse to allow them to discard their “feminist” robes for a while and be themselves. Especially since the most vitriolic critics seem to be Americans, who don’t pay British taxes and seem to have no problem with many other member of the royal family, whether they work or not. 

Sep 21, 2018 1 note
Not sure how this works, but I have quit reading anything on CB that is on the Pitt-Jolie saga. Or on Saint Megan. I would in no way call Kaiser a journalist. She is so biased against Pitt and adoring of Markle. I can't comment on there anymore so I guess I got banned when I told her she is very biased re Pitt-Jolie. lol
Sep 20, 2018 2 notes
Hi:In response to my post of 9/19... Hall wrote the phrase: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". It's really a matter of freedom of speech and if we don't have that, we can't learn about different views. Re: the Kavanaugh/Ford issue, from my professional work and personal experience (I was a victim of physical assault), her story raises many questions and the Dems have certainly manipulated things. Both should be heard/questioned.
Sep 20, 2018

Ok so today’s post was about Meghan at the launch of her book accompanied by Harry and her mother. Oh the accolades! I couldn’t read them all, it was so nauseating. If Carole was ever to accompany her daughter to an official event, we would never hear the end of it, like, “She can’t do anything without her mother”! So much hypocrisy on that site, and they are all parrots.

Sep 20, 2018 1 note
I need to stop reading Celebitchy because its unfair to Meghan merkle,im starting to dislike her because so many downlow racists and sexist like her on CB. That's not right. As a black person i see a bunch of faux love for her. Some people only like her because they hate Kate, which is why they bring Kate up every Meghan post. The "POC" sound liked fake accounts. It's all creepy really, I don't want your support at the expense of hating someone else.

I feel the same way. When they start putting Kate down in comparison, I want to defend her. And it creates negative feelings towards Meghan. But Meghan has nothing to do with any of it!

Sep 20, 2018 3 notes
I have been twice banned from CB... Re: Kaiser, some have referred to her as a journalist/writer and I have to disagree with this. A journalist deals with facts, not supposition and their personal biases as Kaiser does. The current issue with Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford is an example. The Judge is apparently guilty because he is male and has been accused by a female. I am interested in the facts of this matter and finding the truth and that's not on CB.

Kaiser doesn’t know the first thing about writing or journalism. It would make CB a better place if she were to get some training in that area. There are plenty of free classes available online.

As for the judge, I hear what you are saying, but his professional history doesn’t bode well for women’s rights, so I won’t be sorry if he gets derailed. At the very least he comes off as very entitled.

And have you seen how the right wing press went after the woman and her family? They are doing all they can to discredit her. That is not in relationship to the CB, I don’t condone stooping to the same level, but the Republicans definitely fight very, very dirty here. And that makes me less inclined to be impartial in this case. If they think it is OK to go after a woman and her family like that, then I am not even going to bother giving them the benefit of a doubt.

Sep 19, 2018 2 notes
From today's article on Lady Gabriella Windsor: "In case you’re wondering, Ella is 37 years old. And she’s an expert at branding?" I'm baffled by this comment. Is she saying that she's too young, or too old? Why? WTF does Kaiser know about branding or how "brand-positioning platforms" work, or how old their staff should be? She's so arrogant. She makes unnecessary, catty swipes like this constantly, on dubious and unsubstantiated grounds, because she isn't accountable for her anonymous bull---t.
Sep 19, 2018 1 note
I know that most talk is about Kaiser, but I noticed yesterday in some of the Emmys posts, that Celebitchy herself was leaving snarky comments. Like Kaiser with bangs & buttons, she seems to have arbitrary rules about what women do with their bodies. Guess what, I put eyeliner on my bottom lid- bite me CB! I think it's why she doesn't care that Kaiser acts the way she does. I once subtweeted that CB & LaineyGossip were toxic sites. BOTH CB & Kaiser blocked me, Lainey didn't. I didn't tag anyone.
Sep 19, 2018
It's really funny reading the Cumberbatch threads now, since they get about 24 comments and many tearing the piss out of the deranged loons on Tumblr who think the marriage is fake and the babies all plastic dolls. I wonder if Kaiser ever regrets feeding the crazies and ramping up the Sophie hate so much? Or if she regrets that she can't do that anymore?

The latter, because she tried reigniting it a couple of times but it didn’t take. She loved all those clicks.

Sep 19, 2018

A couple thoughts on today’s posts. Kaiser is out again with her bangs “disorder”, that is what I am going to call it. There is nothing wrong with bangs. They look especially good on women with oval faces or women with high foreheads. And aren’t we all about letting women do what they want and be who they are? If they like bangs, so be it, and who is to say otherwise?

I also think Brie Larson looks fine as Captain Marvel. And I am not a fan of hers by any stretch, but maybe I will become one. ))) I especially liked one comment by someone who said, this is the first fully clothed female superhero. I am fully on board with that, I think we need more of that - more strong women who don’t have to be half dressed to hold attention. More women like Grace Jones.

Sep 18, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I agree that the CB worship is stupid, but Meghan didn’t just write the foreword, she came up with the idea of doing a cookbook and put it together with the women.

Thank you. As I read more of today’s comments which weren’t there yesterday I saw that. Sorry for overreacting. It is a nice thing she did, but it is blown way out of proportions on CB.

Sep 18, 2018 1 note
Chat Submission

Couldn’t believe the hate on the Kate posts. And I think Meghan is headed for sainthood.

—————————————————————————————————–

Lol, so yesterday I went and read the post about Meghan’s cookbook and the comments and I was just dying from laughter. The posters sound like teenage Taylor Swift fans, or Hanna Montana fans of a decade ago.

They all went and bought the book immediately on Amazon.. Yay! Why stop there, buy 5  copies, like Taylor’s fans. There is nothing wrong with it, I just thought it is funny they behave like that on a site that hates Taylor. Actually Meghan reminds me of Taylor so much in her manner and body language.

And all Meghan did, apparently, was writing the foreword for the book, or rather her PR person did, with Meghan’s input. It is such hard work, or as one person said “this is a modern, thinking royal”. I almost burst out laughing. No kidding.

Sep 18, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Chat Submission

I was banned from celebitchy..and just realized it. I think it was because I did not agree with all the Angelina Jolie saga..and I guess that is why I was banned. I was thinking it was becoming very one sided when it comes to certain celebrities. but I thought the tone was getting dark and very mean spirited.

————————————————————————————————–

And now you know why it is so one sided. Because everybody else is banned.

Sep 18, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I'm disgusted with everyone in those royal posts. The way Nosugarhere went at this one poster really disturbed me. And Nosugarhere does this all the time and Kaiser does nothing. She and Nic919 bully people, and kaiser does nothing. Because she wants them to spread the extreme sexism and hate that she has for Kate Middleton. That site truly is a vile place pretending to be a place for women to talk gossp, "smart" but really is a place to be sexist, racist and bullies.
Sep 18, 2018

Compare, if can stomach it, the Meghan and Kate articles today. 150 ish comments each. Meghan’s are all good and Kate’s are all bad. It would be funny it it wasn’t so obvious. Now I don’t really think either of these inituatives are exactly perfect but come on, please see yourselves people, they are clearly pandering to Meghan.


————————————————————————————————

Just last week I was so angry when I saw comments judging Kate for not working because she was on maternity leave. It is maternity leave , not vacation! Honestly, we wouldn’t let men get away with ignorant comments like that. But  when it is women doing it, it is OK?!!! 

No, it is not OK. I am in the US, I worked until the day my contractions started, and that is normal in the US. We are treated like livestock here, and that is not OK. And people who don’t see that because it is more important for them to disparage Kate than to defend women’t rights, I don’t have words for them ….

Anyway, the next day I saw that Kate was out with her own charity, and, apparently, was not just lolling about during her maternity leave (Urggghhhh.) I did wonder how the Kate-haters were going to spin that.

Sep 17, 2018 1 note
#celebotchy #ban #submission
I self-banned myself from Celebitchy ever since Herr K*ser took over, not only has she always been an egomaniac dating back to her days as a commentator but she’s always been a s/h/i/t and unoriginal writer as well. Today after months of not visiting, during my lunch break I went to the site out of boredom & that killed my brain cells. I find it laughable that HK & her Kronies are condemning body shaming in the Jameela Jamil post, those hypocrites always body shame celeb women they don’t like.
Sep 17, 2018
Seems at CB that it's "racist" if you believe Soon-Yi (defending the evil white man) but ALSO "racist" if you think she was groomed and exploited by him (WTF?) That thread also raised some interesting questions about Mia Farrow that wouldn't be allowed about St. Angelina...
Sep 17, 2018
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December