Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

June 2018

I was banned years ago for correcting something Kaiser had written. Of course she'll never admit to being wrong, so *poof* my comment went, followed by a permanent ban. She was harking on about the reader numbers having dropped a few months back - is it any wonder why? Why can't the site owner see that she's bad for business? Sure, she puts out a lot of stories, but it's no fun when there's only the same old regulars commenting ... (part 1 of 2)
Jun 15, 2018 4 notes
Banned

Was banned for saying judges don’t threaten to take away custody for no reason. I guess now I know why the posts are so pro-Jolie! Kaiser bans anyone who says otherwise

Jun 14, 2018 4 notes
Part 2. I'm starting to worry about the collective mental health of that site. What they say isn't based in reality. Its delusional...
Jun 14, 2018 3 notes
My comment got deleted on the Meghan markle and queen thread. All I said is there was a photo of the queen and kate that looked exactly the same as the one with Meghan and the queen, and how cute it was. But that doesn't go along with their narrative that Meghan is the queen's favorite person and this is the most she's ever smiled. They even said this is why sophie wore EW. To be passive aggressive since she's not the favorite anymore. The queen smiled a ton with kate on their first engagements.
Jun 14, 2018 3 notes
I got banned today for saying that parental alienation was a form of abuse and that Angelina was creating a cycle of her own childhood most likely out of fear/pain. How does that warrant a ban??? Celebitchy is a nutso site

Saying or implying something negative about Angelina will get you banned immediately on CB. I don’t know why Kaiser takes any criticism of Angelina very personally, but she does.

I saw your comment. And I agree that possibly Angelina has her own unresolved issues with her father and might be replaying  the same scenario over and over.

This is, actually, the concept of karma -  we  are presented with the same issues /situations over and over and over until we learn and find a way to deal with those issues in a positive way. Only then we can move on from our past and grow.

Jun 13, 2018 5 notes
#ban #'celebitchy

Bella said that Kate is using her height and looks as a weapon against Meg!Ha Ha Ha!

People are pissed that Kate is tall and wears heels!  Also do they all wake up early waiting for the next post? The same people are always the first to comment.

This is hilarious and they think they are so clever. Hat of doom? How cringey. Sounds like something Kaiser would splatter a million of times in a paragraph or tweet! As she does with “Keen” and “Buttons” when truth are she’s the only one obessed with those things. 

This is the same poster who said Kate is throwing “Micro agressions toward Meghan” (?) and none of the “woke” commenters called her out for using a serious topic for POC in a obsurd disillusioned way.

Saying she’s using basically her natural body to…hurt Meghan? And why does Bella feel this way? Body language. You know, the thing we can read for Kate but are told not to do for Meghan. 

Not only is it sexist, disgusting and a insult to both women, but it’s a insult to all women.

We shouldn’t wear heels or hats or be too noticeable because what about “so and so?“ 

Guys, newsflash! Our natural height,heels and presences are weapons against poor Meghan.

Kate isn’t a witch and Meghan is a strong ass black woman, who doesn’t need a bunch of women trying to save her from Kate.

And I don’t feel bad that people are calling this out. Since they think they can judge women based off barely anything, I can judge them based off their words. Which unlike thier unhinged comments about Meg and Kate are actual things that are based in reality.I don’t have to speculate the hate and negativity. It’s right in my face. I don’t have to rely on shady sources or bias. I can see it.

—————————————————————————————

The whole discussion about Kate’s height today was nuts. They were all trying catch Kate on a “lie”, as if it was her who lied in the first place. I doubt Kate made any official statements about her height. Notasugar claimed that Kate could not be more than 5′6′’, which is ridiculous.

I think Kate is more like 5′8-5′9′’. I am 5′7′’ and Kate looks a couple inches taller than I am. Not that any of it matters.

Jun 13, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission
I've noticed when I reply to certain people my comments get moderated out? Why is this? Are they moderators too?

I am not sure.  It is possible, now that I think of it. Or maybe these are all Kaiser’s fake accounts.Or these are the commentors that Kaiser reads.

Jun 13, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I have to admit I giggled today reading the post complaining about the biased Kate-defenders in the media. How Kate must always be praised and how she must never be compared with the Duchess of Sussex unless it's obvious that Kate comes out on top. It was such a looking-glass version of CB! Do they really have so little self-awareness that they don't see they're describing themselves, only in reverse? (Personally, I have nothing against Kate or Meghan either one)

Very true.

Jun 12, 2018 3 notes

I just wanted to echo one of the submissions from a few days ago. Notasugar, LAK and others go on and on about how lazy Kate is. But given the time they spend on her posts one has to wonder - what it is they do the whole day? They seem to have plenty of spare time on their hands.

Jun 12, 2018 5 notes
#celebitchy #ban
I don't understand Notasugar's obsession with saying that it doesn't matter if William and Kate didn't have children. She says it nearly every royal post, and she harps on it to the extreme. Sure, the queen's father unexpectedly became king, but why ignore that it was a fluke, and that it shakes the stability of the institution. Now she's banging on about evil W&K having a second and third baby! Well the queen had four, where's the outrage?

Having children is pretty much the JOB of every woman in any hereditary monarchy, no matter how enlightened and modern it pretends to be. This is another reason the monarchy needs to be abolished. It is so patriarchal. A woman’s value is measured by whether she can have healthy beautiful children.

CB posters all go on about Kate being “lazy”, but as far as the BRF concerned Kate is doing a great job. She gave the BRF the next generation of heirs.

Only deluded CB posters think that sponsoring charities, cutting ribbons and looking pretty at events has any real value.  Whether royals do 5 or 5000 of them, it doesn’t have any real impact. The only true benefit is to the royal family in keeping themselves relevant.

A regular working as a nurse delivers much more benefit to the world than any of the royals.

Jun 12, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
So, the DM has an article up talking about Closer Mag appealing the fine they got for taking long-lens photos of Kate topless, claiming that "other members of the BRF are happy with sexy photos" & the BRF are "like any other celebrities". Who does DM use as an example? A video of MM stripping off in her actress career-just before MM heads to Chester with TQ! So I put a post up on CB condemning DM for using the story to trash MM's image-moderated out. Any bets on CB putting the story up?!
Jun 12, 2018 2 notes
Ooohhh the CB crowd is soooo annoyed at those photos of Kate out with the kids at William's first polo event! It's just to steal some of Meghan's thunder after her (tacky) appearance on the balcony of Buck House in a suit showing bathing suit strap marks by an American designer on this most British of royal calendar days! At this point, every breath Kate takes by their lights is dictated by jealousy of Meghan Markle. These people are ill.
Jun 11, 2018 1 note
The Kate thread have descended into almost delusion. They rip her a part for literally everything. She took pics of her kids, shared them, and they ripped on her. She works more, they rip on her. Now, apparently her entire existence is about attacking Meghan. They're asserting her polo match pictures are a shot at Meghan despite the fact that she's been every year long before Meghan. How has it descended into this false reality? I can't be the only on that sees the double standard.

When posts start hitting over 300+ comments you know it is time to run for cover. The crazy fanfics, the claims of lips reading, body language reading and so on are very reminiscent of the Cumberbatch craziness that went on a few years ago.

Jun 11, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
I hate how personal it feels...

So I’m postive nosugarhere is Kaiser. I’m also postive that a lot of the anti Kate people have alt accounts.So.do the anti Meghan people.

But why is it that the same people comment on every royal post, all day going through post after post writing “corrections”?

Do they work? They complain that Kate doesn’t work and is  attention hungry but they all pay so much attention to every little thing about her.

It’s a case study. I can feel the personal deep hate that some truly have for these mostly female celebs, and to be honest, I never feel like anyone is that passionate about actual horrible.people. I feel like some say “generic statements number 200”

Trump.is the only person that I feel like the hate is legit and personal

 Everything else rings hallow. Maybe it’s because.all the grandstanding that CB does. I’ve seen so much hypocrisy that I no longer believe when .they are actually serious. I’ve seen a rules change so much for certain celebs.

But with Kate and some other women it’s a hostility that seems so personal and so angry. That I barely see on Celebitchy these days toward actual harmful people.

Maybe I’m wrong

————————————————————–

That is an excellent point you made. I also feel that they have far more hate for someone generally harmless like Taylor Swift or Kate Middleton than for some truly awful people like Weinstein. Weinstein is over and forgotten but we get a daily scoop on Kate. 

You also correctly observed that the worst hate is always reserved for women. Even in case of Trump I think they hate Melania and Ivanka more than Trump.

Jun 11, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban #submission
I'm going to have some fun tomorrow with their coverage of Trooping the Color. They have always criticized Kate's "sausage curls" and her "obsession with buttons". And Meghan had both today! (I think she looked lovely, but it Will be fjnnf to see what do they do and say tomorrow!)

Lol

Jun 9, 2018 1 note
Trooping the Colour-just caught it on BBC. Kate looks stunning, Meghan's hair is messy and her off the shoulder dress shows bathing suit strap marks; a tad inappropriate? Watch Nota and LAK and Kaiser sneer at Kate's elegant outfit and exclaim over MM's poise, beauty, sexy dress, hair, etc., and pretend that she doesn't look not only less elegant but somewhat diminished next to Kate. I'd put $ on it but I'm already heavily committed to Powerball this weekend.
Jun 9, 2018 3 notes
Obessed with ppl you don't know

Nosugarhere needs help. So does concern trolling Nic.

The most disgusting comments on the site are the royal posts.

A regular said Pippa is like Meghan sister. Which is a hell of a reach. This same commenter plays woke but beats up on certain women for sport.

Jun 8, 2018
Part 3: Why can't they humble themselves and realize that A) there are no guarantees in life and B) people have EVERY RIGHT by now to be skeptical of which information to trust. Just because they choose differently doesn't mean they're racist Nazis who don't give a crap about anyone else.

Celebitchy and humble ? Yeah, that does not happen. )))  Though, I have to say, I personally trust information that is peer reviewed by scientists over claims by celebrities.

Jun 8, 2018
(cont'd) due to poor agricultural practices and/or being genetically modified, people being on multi-drug cocktails for long periods of time, etc. Some of these Celebitches want to sue "anti-vaxxers", which would give Big Pharma even more power (total medical tyranny.) Part 3 coming up

You have a point here. Some forms of cancers are much less common in developing countries which don’t use chemicals on the same scale we do. It is a fact, and there are reasons to believe plastics and chemicals, especially fertilizers and various pesticides, which end up in our water supply are a big factor.

Jun 8, 2018
Just love how all the Celebitches label "anti-vaxxers" as arrogant and stupid, but are basically bragging that their "research" is superior. It's definitely a complex subject with a lot of misinformation. How is someone "selfish" for being concerned with all that goes into vaccines? I don't have the answer to whether or not vaccines actually work, but there is definitely evidence that people's immune systems are more challenged than ever (geoengineering chemicals in the skies, foods depleted

The selfish part comes in with people not being vaccinated being a danger to other non-vaccinated people, especially infants. Most other countries are nowhere as lenient as the US when it comes to not vaccinating your kids.

Jun 8, 2018
Nota's comments on 3-year-old Charlotte are disgusting. Her hatred of the Middletons shows pathology she should really get help for. And considering how much work her idol Meghan Markle did to, um, "improve" her appearance ( the straightened hair, the narrowed nose, the tooth veneers) I wouldn't bet on what the natural product will look like. Neither the Markle nor the Windsor nose seem to do kids any favours. Of course, Nota will still claim it the height of infant beauty. She is ill.

The whole topic bothers me, to be honest. Kids should be completely off limits.

Jun 8, 2018
The Meghan stans are just too much. She sure is doing a lot of work. And I’m also convinced Nota and Kaiser are the same person. I think kaiser is a few commenters.
Jun 7, 2018 1 note

Notasugar is hating on a three year old.  These are her words about little Princess Charlotte:  

’You’re welcome to find her darling. I find her a mini Carole and Pippa, and there’s nothing darling in that.“

I bet Meghan’s toddlers will be the most darlingest darlings that ever darlinged.

—————————————————————————–

It might be not a popular opinion, but I really admire Carole Middleton. The woman came from nothing to the top of the British society, all through her hard work.

People were accusing Middletons today of using their connection with the BRF to their advantage. And my question is -  why do they think any members of the BRF, born to privilege and riches, are in any way superior to Carole Middleton? If anything, she is superior to all of them, and it is obsession with class, money and aristocracy that blinds people to this fact.

If people have a problem with the fact that a connection to the BRF bestows an unfair advantage, then they should advocate for abolishment of the monarchy, which is at the root of this unfairness. 

Jun 7, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission

Oh, take a look at this comment. Apparently, we, as true feminists know that we shouldn’t tell a woman what to do with her appearance or anything else, as it should be her choice. Except for when it is a woman we don’t like, like Melania.//sarcasm off.

minx says:

June 7, 2018 at 12:31 pm

I really dislike her aging Barbie doll hair, whether it’s a wig or not. She’s First Lady, get a good trim, ditch the center part and try to look a little classier.

Jun 7, 2018 4 notes
#celebitchy #ban

I am also certain that Celebitchy takes money to promote Kardashians. There could be no other possible explanation for their many articles about Kardashians, trying to present them in a positive light and make excuses for them.

Literally nobody but Kaiser thought Kim Kardashian looked good in that outfit yesterday. Either Kaiser has the worst fashion sense on Earth, or she is being paid to promote Kim, or possibly - both.

Jun 6, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Notasugar is Kaiser. I'm convinced. What a nasty piece of work she is.

Me too. I am not one for conspiracy theories, but the way thy come across is just too similar for them to be two different people. If they are, then they must be soulmates (from hell).

Jun 5, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
I haven't actually been banned from Celebitchy. I just stopped bothering with it, as it's so dull. The same old cronies making their unfunny comments about, Kates buttons, sexism (while tearing down other Women) and the weird obsession with Tom Hiddleston/Cumberbatch et al. The amusement has been sucked out of it.
Jun 5, 2018 2 notes
@"They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything." AND, in most countries, not only there is no official office and position of FL but also spouses are not REQUIRED to (leave their jobs to) fill the position.
Jun 5, 2018 1 note
@"But what irritates me most is - these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS. What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished." AMEN! I think standing your groud, refusing to become a "first-lady", is respectable (even if one disagrees with her husband's politics and criticize her support of him). Michel Obama left a high power job to promote healthy eating and exercise...
Jun 5, 2018 2 notes
The Bill Clinton post makes me want to throw up. I will say OF COURSE we should still be holding the current president's feet to the fire for his words and actions, but Kaiser's hypocritical and antifeminist words about Bill Clinton are making me sick. It's okay to say both men were wrong, you know. It's true Monica was technically an adult but she was not only a very young adult, i.e. a college student, but she was an intern, an employee, and he was the most powerful man in the world.

I could not believe what I was reading on the Bill Clinton thread today. This is a classic sexual harassment case. But, of course, our lawyer-in-residence  lilacflowers could not recognize it. Neither could the chief-feminist-in-residence otaku fairy. Kitten, of course, would excuse anyone with the last name Clinton. The whol thread was unbelievable. Only towards the end of it some sane people showed up and started asking “Really? “

Jun 4, 2018 5 notes
#celebitchy #ban
They should just rename the damn site "All whiteys are racist, y'all", except St. Hillary. Now they're hoping Melania Trump is in need of a kidney transplant - sick. Also, kinda surprised Kaiser (who says she has Indian heritage, I think) kept her user name. After all, you'd think she'd want to avoid anything reminding anyone of Germany since she also loves labeling people Nazis!

Melania’s threads are all sick. Sure, she supported the birther nonsense, but the way they treat her you would think she is a serial killer or something.

But what irritates me most is -  these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS.  What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished. As per feminism, shouldn’t a woman be free to do what she wants, regardless of who her husband is?

They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything.

Jun 4, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban

I just saw this comment under the Benedict’s article

Danielle says:

June 3, 2018 at 7:04 pm

If this had happened back in 2014 there would have been hundreds of comments on this story and it would have quickly descended into insanity. Good times!! Someone should do a study into how Bendy killed off his fanclub so rapidly!

ROFL! It is not Bendy, it is Kaiser! Bendy is doing just fine. Kaiser ran off all of Bendy’s fans off the site with her peddling of conspiracy theories and PR accusations when Bendy got married.

Jun 3, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Moderated out of existence

Kaiser has always moderated me out, even when someone made an identical comment to me, my post always disappeared, I have no idea why, she is entirely capricious, blatantly biased and frankly not very bright. The wit and humour have been sucked out of the site. A pity, it used to be good natured messaging from women (mainly) from all over the world, now it’s just a gang of deranged cronies spewing out bile, I won’t be going back.

Jun 3, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban #submission
(continuation) the Princess of Wales, later on Queen of the UK, and Meghan will always be a Duchess, and as such she will have more freedom, but less relevance in the future when the fascination lessens. The couple of times I tried to make this point in several of their posts, all of them were deleted.

I think I did not get the beginning of this message. Posting what I got, sorry.

Jun 3, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
@"Another woman"-LOL Wait till their beloved Megs dumps Jessica Mulroney for Amal. After all, Amal is married to fabulously wealthy actor George Clooney (who by all odds plans to run for high office in America at some point); the Clooneys have a huge estate outside London, and it's London that counts now, not Toronto. Can't wait.
Jun 1, 2018

May 2018

Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney. 

They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.

They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).

May 31, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
So Kaiser (expert political scientist) says she HOPES Obama was plotting with people to bring down Trump. Why would anyone ever hope that? Especially if they were against Trump? Something like that could come out and muddy the waters, possibly unravel the case against the Trumps? Sometimes people get so angry they don't think.
May 30, 2018
@ha ha ha - Notasugar is just possibly the most hysterical of the fraus on Celebitchy. Her mission in life is to defend Meghan from any and all criticism and to demonize Kate and Prince William. Her comment is ludicrous: naturally it's not on the BRF's web site. How disingenuous! The heirs are supposed to "represent" middle-class family life-it's hard to do that without kids. The line is rarely broken for "convenience". Projection of family life is the unspoken bit of their job. She hates Kate.
May 30, 2018

Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.

And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?

notasugarhere says:

May 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm

Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.

May 29, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
This site is gold. Glad to have found it. Kaiser is garbage with her hypocrisy as are her followers, wouldn’t surprise me if the pathetic lunatic actually created sockpuppet accounts to agree with herself as many online think she does. Wonder how long Sara’s comment about the love/adoration from supposedly everyone of the Royals for K/CB idol Meghan being lovely fanfiction will be left up? Relying on the Daily Fail and anonymous sources that supposedly praise Meghan for accuracy are we Kaiser?🙄
May 29, 2018 2 notes
What I find amusing about CB is that the second half of it's name implies not just latitude in criticizing famous people, but an expectation of same. But if you criticize someone Kaiser likes, suddenly you have "violated commenting guidelines". It's really only about who Kaiser likes and dislikes, so the commenting "guidelines" are a complete sham.

When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say -  this is why this site is  called “bitchy”.

However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay  ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines -  why are you commenting on this person  if you don’t like him/ her, you could  just skip the post.

The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban

Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.

And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty. 

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
@response to the "famewhore" issue, we'll have to agree to disagree. We are agreed that MM wouldn't have looked at Harry if his name hadn't been "Windsor" with the global fame she stood to gain. To me, agreeing to that "Vanity Fair" article, which we all know that she would never have gotten without dating him, says it all. She's always looking for the cameras, and to me it seems clear that her whole life has been dedicated to becoming a AAA+ lister. Well, now she is-through her marriage.

Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.

May 28, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

I see posters on CB are so concerned with feminists issues that there are only 20-30 posts on the #MeToo related topics but 200-300 each of the royal posts and there are 5-6 of them a day. // sarcasm

CB turned into a nastier version of Mirror.  

May 28, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

Wow,I  just went to the  Kate’s maternity leave thread and it is NASTY.

What is this, for example ( a post by Lizbeth )

“ While I think leave is fine, I’m not buying the idea that proper bonding requires her to be home with the baby 24/7. While Kate’s “on leave” she’s not available 24/7 to the baby nor are “ordinary hands-on” moms who do things like clean the house, grocery shop, go to church, engage in their regular charitable activities, have a night out with dad, etc. all while “on leave.” “


Let me tell you something, “Lizbeth”, a  new baby wakes up every 2 hours to feed. And if you breastfeed, it does not matter how many nannies you have, you still have to wake up every 2 hours. You get no sleep for the first 3-4 months, you become a zombie. 

Cleaning? What cleaning? Grocery shopping an cooking - the husband can do it.  Believe it or not, even in regular households women get help, and they are still struggling.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Kaiser's hatred of Kate Middleton is pathological and she can try blaming it on Kate being "lazy" from now till Kingdom Come, I don't believe her. I'm only waiting for her blame the weather on Kate. IMHO Kaiser hates Kate because she is a white English girl. If Meghan had been white Kaiser would have hung her out to dry for using dating Harry to get herself a "Vanity Fair" cover and talking about their relationship inside. Mention "Meghan" and "famewhore" on Celebitchy and watch the fur fly.

I don’t think Meghan is a famewhore, but I am pretty sure if Harry wasn’t a rich royal she wouldn’t have given him a second look. But this goes for many women. I don’t think Meghan  is worse than any other regular woman, but she is not an activist, feminist etc.  that Celebitchy posters are making her out to be. If she were, she would have never married into the royal family to begin with.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Exhibit D: CHER: "She gave birth and a few hours later she got up and left the hospital. Thus, she is very capable of fitting a few appearances between now and October." Sound logic...

Even in the backwards US, which does not have any maternity leave whatsoever, women get 6 weeks disability leave to recover from birth. And I can attest that they need every day of it since bleeding often doesn’t stop for 4-6 weeks.

May 25, 2018
Exhibit C: "GOOFPUFF: I’m not begrudging her maternity leave – i am tired of all the continued promises of work and keenness lies all these years in between them. They have several nannies, surely she can spare an hour or two for an appearance several times a week." Gosh. I am shocked. Women with "easy" jobs should not take full time leaves.
May 25, 2018
Exhibit B: "Mat leave isn’t a vacation but with alll the help in the world an hour or two away to ‘work’ is fine." Luckily for all of us, the law does not work like this. These women, they read what they write?!?
May 25, 2018
(part 2 of 2) You know what kate did to "deserve" a six-month maternity leave? NOTHING. She lives in a country that rcognizes parents' rights and protects them. And we all ahould fight for not less but even more legal protections!
May 25, 2018
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December