Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

September 2018

they should call it Celebiased
Sep 11, 2018 2 notes
Seeing a lot of "feminists" doing tone-policing of Matthew McC's comment about single-parent households. They usually HATE tone-policing, but it's okay here because he's an evil white man. So far I spotted some sane comments, but they'll probably get deleted soon.
Sep 11, 2018 1 note
Try to bring up tha Olivia Munn worked and hung out with Bryan Singer despite the numerous accusations then you get deleted and blocked.
Sep 11, 2018
Robin Wright believes House of Cards co-star Kevin Spacey deserves a second chance. And Kaiser did not post about this just because she likes RW. But she crucifies the women she doesn't like for a lot less.

Absolutely. I remember they racked Scarlett Johanson over the coals for going out with Shawn Penn, once. She was cancelled. Charlise dated Penn for a few years, but because she was liked, that was OK. Robin was actually married to the guy. 

Sep 11, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Just sitting back watching the feminists attack each other on the "Peppermint" thread and hating on Christians in the NY Times Trump article thread...
Sep 7, 2018
Nota has Queen Elizabeth's entire schedule memorized dating back to 1949. 'K.

Lol. Isn’t that the truth. I always found it strange how some posters knew what happened to this and that royal on a given day 20 years ago, and what engagements they had and how many,  and was it official or unofficial.

It is bad enough that some people track this type of staff for a living, but at least they are paid for it. But then there are also people who do this because they have nothing better to do with their lives, and it is just sad.

Sep 6, 2018
There are so many places online that call out CB. If Kaiser takes her reputation as a writer/journalist seriously, wouldn't this be of concern? Comments I found on Dlisted: Kaiser and just about every CB commenter are some bitter, unhappy, hateful women. I mean that from the bottom of my heart. They call themselves feminist but are the first ones to tear a woman down. These are unhappy broads.
Sep 4, 2018 2 notes
continued. I'm posting here because I didn't realize there were so many different places calling out Kaiser&Co. Insane! 'You will have no doubts that these are some unhappy, sad, disgusting women. But, they think they are feminists who are at the forefront of all that is right with women and their thinking is what everybody in the world should be thinking. It would be comical if it wasn't so sad.'
Sep 4, 2018
Just found this site. I had a couple very harmless comments deleted and I thought that was my browser being faulty. After I got deleted again I looked around and found this site. So hypocritical of Kaiser to talk about Trump being think skinned and wanting to control the media. To talk about racism and then censor black women on her own site. Imagine someone like her in an actual position of power. Scary thought.
Sep 3, 2018 4 notes
On one of the recent Amal posts, someone commented something along the lines of, "I want to really smack the smug off Amal's face". Then a poster pointed out the comment sounded racist/insulting. Guess what? The whole convo was deleted! I really think they only see Meghan Markle as a WOC on that site (those types of comments against her are labelled racist immediately and they aren't deleted) I don't think they've ever referred to Amal Clooney as a WoC?

I think you are right. I think many of them don’t even realize that Amal is a WOC. I’ve been puzzled for a long time by their hatred of Amal until recently Kaiser herself clued me in. It turns out they see her as an Angelina’s competitor. The whole thing is just wild.

Sep 2, 2018 2 notes
Their slut shaming on jeggings and skirts above the knee is insane. Their policing heel height is hilarious. It's good that CB has archives full of negative, rude, disgusting, bodyshaming, uncalled for comments against a certain Duchess. I can't wait for Kate to start wearing nice heels and lovely short hemlines again to show off her gorgeous legs. I hope she goes even higher so they can bitch/moan about her "Showing off her legs again. Why won't she put them away? She looks unprofessional."

It is funny how Otaku Fairy is never there to  educate them about slut shaming.She knows she’ll get banned in no time.

Sep 2, 2018 1 note
I am still new to this site and don’t know if I can reply to an earlier post, but I have to give props to the person who deliberately posts comments knowing Kaiser will delete them. This made me laugh so hard. She’s like a mini-dictator on CB but that won’t last forever and it will be interesting to see how much longer she lasts there.
Sep 1, 2018 2 notes

August 2018

I can’t believe that Kaiser and her followers (who are the only people allowed to post on Celebitchy as we all know) are now PRAISING and COMPLIMENTING was Jennifer Aniston? After how many years of bashing her? I wonder if they have any idea how ridiculous they are? Other sites makes fun of Kaiser and her minions. She is hated!! I’d be so embarrassed if I were her. I have no idea why the owner doesn’t fire her ass. Thanks you so much for creating and maintaining this blog!

You are welcome!

Aug 31, 2018
"And, if I could look just a tiny bit like Jennifer as a result, I’m in." Kaiser is praising Jennifer Aniston these days. The same Kaiser who was badmouthing JA for the last 10 years.
Aug 31, 2018 1 note
Submission

My comment on yesterday’s Salma Hayek post got deleted. All I said was that I thought it was demeaning to refer to her as a “trophy wife” but alas, the poster didn’t agree with my feedback

—————————————————————————————————-

I agree with you. Salma Hayek might be attracted to power and money, but so are most people. That alone doesn’t make her a trophy wife. Otherwise, by the same argument, Meghan Markle is a trophy wife too.

Aug 30, 2018 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Lol. Did you see a comment today which sort of confirms they are reading this blog? Where and how is CB open to different opinions?! Wow, they are really deluded in their self made echo chamber. It was by LadyD in a Royal post.
Aug 30, 2018
Here's the post. "They just slam Meghan? No dissenting opinions at all? That ‘s why I like this site. I get to read a huge variety of opinions that I always learn something from. I guess that’s the part that gets to me. If every single person has the same opinion, where is the stimulation? I guess if you’re looking to vent or are just miserable, a site like that would help you, but you still wouldn’t learn anything." Hahahaha. Who are they kidding? So many miserable peeps on CB.
Aug 30, 2018 2 notes
Can I just say that I find the anonymity of CB seedy? The only other gossip blogs that are completely anonymous are shady, think Blind Gossip or CDAN. The commenters aren't getting paid, but Kaiser is, and she stoops as low as they do. Going after women's looks? Making up theories and rumors? All while hidden behind pseudonym. I definitely can see her getting Kardashian money, but if the rumors are true about Jolie using her for PR- well that's alarming. Those stans are creepily obsessed.

I agree completely. The journalists, and that is who she works as, even though she is not qualified and has no idea what the expectations are, are not supposed to be anonymous. They are supposed to fact check and stand behind what they write.

And attacking other women’s looks just because they don’t like the woman is just gross. I saw this today on Miranda Lamert’s post. I don’t know much about her, I don’t listen to her music, it does seem like she is not a very nice person. But then, you know what, come out and say it. Don’t attack something that nobody has any control over, i.e. their looks. That is what women 2-3-4 generations before us used to do, because that is what the society valued in women most - their looks. But one hopes we are past that point.

If women want to end sexism, then they should stop behaving in a sexist manner themselves.

Aug 29, 2018
lol an entire thread of comments deleted for politely inquiring if celebitchy was going to cover the Black Girls Rock red carpet (other than a link to GFY)
Aug 29, 2018
I have to admit I get a little kick out of posting something I know Kaiser will delete. I'm not rude to other commenters, but I enjoy calmly pointing out Kaiser's leaps of logic, incoherent positions, worthless news sources, etc. Whenever she deletes something I've posted, no matter how much time I wasted writing it, I consider it a private victory. It means she sees me as a threat to her ego, and that validates me. TL;DR: Kaiser treats me like a troll, so I've embraced it. It's pretty fun.
Aug 28, 2018 1 note
Kaiser's post today on Prince George's new school year, shows that she has no idea about schooling even though her mother was a teacher lol. The early years are crucial. Kids can learn so much; from languages, to playing instruments, to dancing, singing, coding etc. All the comments are going against her post. Haha!
Aug 28, 2018 1 note
First time poster here. Just to spread a little mischief - find a browser such as opera and activate the free VPN then post something on celebitchy with a new name and an imaginary but realistic looking email addressI! I tried it after being banned and it works.

VPN works even against Chinese government censorship. )))

Aug 28, 2018
#celebitchy #ban

So, after the trainwreck of the Cassel’s post I got to the Krainski’s post. And people are annoyed at him praising his wife. Really? Wow. Now, ask yourself, if a woman was saying something like that about her more famous husband, would we think anything amiss? Of course, not!  But, when the genders are reversed, people are uncomfortable with it. They internalized the patriarchy and they don’t even know it about themselves.

Aug 27, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
Another thing that they’re INSANE about is their insistence that Kate Middleton wears extensions. Kaiser thinks she’s so witty calling them “wiglets” and god forbid anyone disagrees. They deny that K has a scar and insist the palace was lying (!) when they said she did. IDK if she does or doesn’t, but it’s not a big deal either way, yet they harp about it. What reminded me is a recent post about K; there’s an old photo of her in a Starbucks, her hair looks the same as it does now & no wiglet!

Absolutely. So, according to Kaiser, women (a.k.a Kardashians) are free to choose what to do with their bodies , but at the same time we (Celebitchy) are going to shame Kate Middleton for potentially having extensions.Hey, it is completely logical. Who pays (that is Kardashians) that is who orders the music.

Aug 27, 2018
I have a joke for you: Kaiser fancies herself a progressive and feminist.

Lol. I just wrote about that too. Again,

Aug 27, 2018

Today’s post about Vincent Cassel is so lame. And right there you know that Kaiser has no convictions of her own. She doesn’t know what to say, how people will react, and so she hedges.

Let me tell you, Kaiser, how you should react when a powerful 51 y.o. man marries a woman 30 years his junior, whom he groomed since she was 18 y.o. You should be outraged, and the man should be “cancelled”.

And the same goes for the CB commenters, who also didn’t know how to react without Kaiser telling them, and chose to talk about how pretty the woman is , and how she looks older, and her dress, and anything else, other than the issue at hand.They were so pathetically avoided it, it was ridiculous.

Thankfully, towards the end some sane people showed up and put it to rights. I liked the post which reminded everyone about their reaction to Priyanka and Nick, and how everybody thinks 11 years difference is too much. But, here , apparently, 30 y.o. difference with a power imbalance is just OK.

Also, allow me to remind you about their reaction to Karlie’s engagement, and how people pointed out that she started dating her fiance when she was 18 y.o. and he was 26 y.o. People said it was gross, and I tend to agree. But, hey, that was easy, that was Karlie and Kushner, whom Kaiser doesn’t like, so it was easy for posters to know how to react. 

Aug 27, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
I'd like to see pictures of the women who bash Kate for her weight, hair, and her haggard appearance. Especially Nota! The amount of time that person spends hating on her makes me think she has no life.

For Nota it seems personal, as if she planned on marrying William herself.

Aug 25, 2018
I am the anon who said Duchess of Cambridge doesn't enjoy white privilege. I meant CB posters make up ridiculous things about her and say it's white privilege when it isn't. She doesn't get a pass from our Press when she doesnt "work". The media named her lazy/dolittle. They've called her out plenty. Where was her white privilege at play when they were harassing her on the streets? Or hacking her private calls, calling her family common social climbers, just to name a few.

What gets me is when people on CB bring up “Waity Katy”. It is so offensive. We don’t know what went on, but even if William did take advantage of her desire to marry him, then why is she shamed for it and not him? 

Aug 24, 2018 1 note
What Kate's Uncle did last year was all over our news! Sky, BBC, all of our papers. The story died down because the Middletons Stick Together. They didn't release a statement, they didn't release articles/photoshoots trying to sell their own side! Yes, certain media outlets are notoriously racist, but it did not start with Meghan. They have always been this way. It would help If thehorribleMarkles shut up and stop feeding stories because their crazy is making our tabs a lot of money thru clicks.
Aug 24, 2018
Example of Kate getting away with something? I'll happily change my opinion. She has been called out by media for everything: spending, work shyness, holidays, nude pics, being a doormat, fashion, gold digger, skirts flying up, etc even her toenails! Can you imagine Kate doing anything remotely like Will and Harry? The racist comments, Nazi dress, colonial parties. She would be crucified, but they are given passes, its all hushed up. That's my definition of white privilege in the BRF.
Aug 24, 2018 1 note
Wow, I was very surprised to see the stats you posted a couple of days ago! To me it seemed as if the number of comments on most posts there had been decreasing dramatically over the past few months.

I think there are less comments, and definitely less posters. But it is hard to tell whether there are less clicks.

Aug 24, 2018
Haha I just got banned (again) for saying it was weird Kaiser was so upset not to know how Meghan and Amal met considering we don't actually know celebrities and only see a tiny fraction of their lives.
Aug 23, 2018 2 notes
Is the 8/22 example of Kate Middletown's privilege really a good example of white privilege? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure there are plenty of examples of her receiving white privilege, I just don't think this is a good one. Neither Kate nor Meghan should be getting dragged for what someone else does, even if it's family. I would characterize it more as the British media being racist/sexist because I don't think those stories are newsworthy at all (unless either one of them is somehow complicit.)
Aug 23, 2018
Mia =I can only speak for me but I'd never ever bash another black women to make a point. Meghan is going through hell with the royal family, we know why Meghan is getting it harder through the press. It goes without saying. My point has always been the idolization that's fake and only at the expense of Kate Middleton for SOME posters. I feel like the people who don't down Kate every time they up Meghan are actual fans. In a perfect world neither woman should have to be judged for their families
Aug 23, 2018
I disagree, I think Kate Middleton definitely enjoys white privilege. Look how the media treats coverage of her family (her uncle was arrested for punching his wife unconscious in public while high on drugs literally less than a year ago and it got little media coverage) vs the way the media treats Meghan Markle's family problems (slavishly reporting on every word uttered by people she's not spoken to since childhood, and posting hinty racial slurs over photos of her).

Of course Kate benefits from white privilege. But it doesn’t mean it is OK to attack her individually for it. I don’t agree with this sort of collective punishment approach. Everyone should be judged on their own actions. 

And, of course, Meghan is judged harsher, just as I mentioned in the previous post. It is not only her race that is an issue for the British society, it is also her nationality and her class. And those things are very deep rooted, and people often are not even aware of them.

Ironically, the best way to make British society more equitable is to abolish roaylty. And yet, it is some of Meghan’s fans who’ve become very vocal defenders of the BRF, because they want the fairy tale to last.

Aug 22, 2018
I can tell you as a Brit, our media is incredibly racist, and racism is definitely at play with the Meghan Markle coverage. It disturbs me that some anons think just because CB bashes one woman and idolises another, that it's okay to bash the women they idolise and idolise the women they bash. Surely the lesson is not to arbitrarily bash/idolise women in the first place? Not 'solve' CB's problems by copying their behaviour but in reverse?

Sure, British society is racist, just like American, and on top of it, it is also obsessed with class and is very insular. In the US the other two things don’t matter nearly as much. Here money trumps both class and nationality.

So, Meghan has to deal with at least three things at once. She was familiar with racism, of course. But I don’t know if she was aware of the other two, and the degree to which they would affect her.  This is one of the reasons I ended up in the US and not in Western Europe. I worked there and I decided life was too short to deal with that kind of nonsense.I was never going to be good enough for some people, simply because I wasn’t born there.

As for comments, I judge people on their own merits, on their actions. It has nothing to do with who CB likes or dislikes. But I can’t speak for other people who comment here. And I am not going to ignore them, even if I disagree. Everyone can discuss their disagreements in the open. 

Aug 22, 2018
Stats

I’ve been promising to look at the stats. I use Alexa.com, which is a free tool. Last time I looked at the stats was a long time ago.  From what I am seeing since then Celebitchy.com rankings both in the US and globally are up about 2 thousand points, in comparison to other sites. Last time they were ranked in the 8th thousand and now they are in the 6th thousand in the US. 

So, what do I know . )))

The funny thing is their traffic pattern matches almost exactly with the Daily Mail. Maybe people are just reading more gossip.

Aug 22, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Oh, one more thing, sorry hehe. I've noticed that the posters on CB demonize certain famous women (like the Duchess of Cambridge) and call the treatment of her white privilege which isn't even true.. but they never call out famous celebrity men for their obvious white privilege! It's excuse after excuse, coddling, and more excuses/passes when it comes to Prince Harry's past, or Ben Affleck, even Brad Pitt before the breakup! They pile on the women and protect the white men, always!

That is right, because despite their claims to the contrary, the reason they come to CB is not to better themselves (and who would come to a gossip site for that! ) but for distraction, at best, and at worst to spend their negative emotions there. In the past people used to come home and lash out at their family, and now people go to social media and do the same. It is a form of stress relief.

I was at CB originally for some light, snarky gossip. But outright bullying and over the top attitudes of some posters never sat well with me. So, I objected and got banned pretty quickly. Then I gave it another try, and that time was very careful to avoid certain hot button issue posts. but I got banned in a month again anyway.

Celebitchy has an identity crisis -  it cannot decide whether it wants to be a gossip site or a social justice site. And, frankly, Kaiser isn’t qualified to write for either one, anyway.

Now they seem to have abandoned all pretense and decided to become “influencers” for Kardashians. I imagine they weren’t making much money otherwise given that they have banned 90% of their active posters over the time, and got really aggressive with banning last 2 years. Their click count must’ve declined pretty badly.

Aug 22, 2018 6 notes
Last part! LAK seemed to be the Only POC poster allowed to express her opinions. I don't know where she's gone. Maybe Kaiser banned her for something petty! They have no idea really about what POC go through and face. If you try to call them out on their ignorance, they will try and shut you down. It's just a yuck site overall.
Aug 21, 2018 1 note
Part 3. It doesn't take a genius to figure out they need a place to vent about their sad lives. They need a place to live vicariously through, Meghan Markle, Angelina Jolie, etc and CB is the perfect place for their herd like, echo chamber mentality. Not all of the posters are like this, but after reading for a while, you can tell which posters are just resentful, hideously jealous, and full of spite against certain women.
Aug 21, 2018 1 note
Part 2. I find it amusing how they try to demean Amal Clooney and trash her successful law career! They have absolutely No idea how hard it is to become a Barrister in the UK, it's even harder if you're a POC. I am convinced the majority of posters on Celebitchy are do nothing women who feel the need to put other women down because their lives are so damn miserable. I mean, look at the way they hate on Kate Middleton for breathing!

And when your last name is Alamuddin, on top of it.

Aug 21, 2018 2 notes
Part 1. Women of Colour, pls stay away from Celebitchy. That site and its comment section is not for us, at all. Whenever a WOC tries to voice her opinion on certain issues, they all rally around and attack the poster. Celebitchy is predominantly a site for White Women to feel good about themselves whilst trashing accomplished women. It's a place where They can pat themselves on the back for being so "woke" and "hip" to POC issues. In reality, they are full of ignorance and xenophobia.

Their true feelings make themselves known whenever they talk about Priyanka and Amal.

Aug 21, 2018 1 note

I was just reading the post on Amal vs. Angelina and kept saying to myself - what? what? in what universe does this make any sense? But one thing does make sense now -  the irrational dislike of Amal on Celebitchy. She is Angelina’s competition in their eyes!

It was also funny how posters kept addressing their posts to Brad, as if he reads Celebitchy, lol.

Aug 21, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
On Madonna

Wow they really like to go the ageist route when it comes to Madonna. I heard old while lady, hag, has-been, comments about her puffy face. Dang, the woman is 60 and in the worst industry that scrutinizes a woman’s appearance. Kaiser really doesn’t get the pressure of being in the public eye as opposed to sitting at home writing blog posts in sweatpants dragging women who achieved 100x what she has for stupid crap like fashion and hair choices.
Madonna was there as a fan of Aretha Franklin, so told her story from an inspired fan’s perspective. She didn’t break into a rendition of RESPECT or anything. And if you were outraged, blame MTV who chose her to do it. But don’t make awful ageist comments about her appearance and act like Madonna never did anything worth a damn.
I’m amazed these women who support women, these woke feminists are so ageist.
Also they seem to wait for a way the narrative is going to go in the comments to chime in, because days ago they were calling Madonna an icon. Depending on the day and the outrage about cultural appropriation, Madonna is either a washed up old hag or a pop icon. Ridiculous.

—————————————————————————————————

My first reaction was -  why Madonna? I mean, really, they could not find a respect black musician to do it? I have absolutely nothing against Madonna, but it just didn’t make any sense, even on the surface. But it is not Madonna’s fault, you are right about that. This decision is on MTV.

I also noticed that when CB commenters don’t like someone, they attack the person’s looks, even though they know better than that. I remember reading something really nasty about Ivanka’s looks a few days ago.And I thought - , really, is that is what important? It is so petty. Plus, what about people who resemble Ivanka’s looks? Her look is not that uncommon in Eastern Europe. Are we going to call all those women “strange looking” too, just because they look like Ivanka?

And, triple yes to the groupthink observation. Kaiser herself is like that. Half of the time she doesn’t know what to think on issues and takes lead from people she thinks are “woke”. Either people on other sites or on CB. On top of it the merciless moderating out of people with any kind of independent opinions also naturally leads to groupthink.

Aug 21, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission

Ha-ha-ha. I just read the post where Meghan’s father said that the BRF as like a secret cult, and then the comments below. Quite surreal, I must say.

You know what, he is right. The BRF, as an institution, is old, secretive, has many skeletons in the closet, and I am sure, is guilty of covering up many crimes. As recently as Andrew’s involvement with Epstein.

You can feel whatever way you want about Meghan, and her extended family, but let’s not whitewash the BRF, just because you like Meghan. Remember, this is the same family that Diana couldn’t wait to get out of. This is an institution which should’ve been gone 200 years ago, at least.

It is telling that the posters go on and on about how awful he is, but don’t address the core of this claim, which is actually true. They can’t bring themselves to admit that they were seduced by the Cinderella story to the point where they are willing to overlook quite the real harm that the BRF inflicts on the society.

Aug 20, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
Notice how CBer's are patting themselves on the back for believing Asia Argento's victim and still being good feminists? I think they're aware of this site...

Ok, that one is a shocker. I do think, though, that a victim of abuse can also become an abuser, as abuse gets internalized. Though, I would say it seems to be usually the case with abuse sustained over a period of time, such as domestic abuse. I was a bit taken aback that a couple of CB posters were  very offended by this observation.

In fact, this is why abuse is so awful -  it not only damages the direct victim, but also people close to the victim and also can create a cycle of abuse and many victims down the line.

Aug 20, 2018
The hypocrisy is rife over at CB, I recall a post maybe two weeks ago when it came out that Meghan Markel’s half sister was going to be on a UK reality show. Kaiser said she was being forced (ha!) to write these posts and blamed the people who read the site for “forcing” her to keep writing about Meghan’s relatives. Since then there has been a post almost every day about one of these people. I am trying to stop reading CB, but it’s hard, as it used to be fun. Have started reading pajiba instead
Aug 18, 2018
My first clue to GTFO of there was once, a long time ago, in an article about one of the royals, Kaiser was discussing a recently published book (which I had read and found to be fair, FWIW). She admitted to not having read the book, then went on to trash it and the author. I commented — very politely — that she might want to read it before writing about it and my comment was immediately deleted. I mean, COME ON. That’s pretty basic!
Aug 18, 2018
Part 2) How can she write about that reality TV family with a straight face and then turn around and bash people who have never done anything close to the crap they have pulled. They aren't that much better than Trump and in fact have associated themselves with him. I thought she hated Trump. She is a huge phony with a disturbed mind. Reading the comments on this Tumblr sealed the deal for me. I don't want to contribute to or support a blog that mistreats people and is full of hypocrisy. Bye CB.

Exactly. One can’t go much lower than making excuses for Kardashians. But then they turn around and rip to shreds women like Kate Middleton, Taylor Swift and Amal Cloonie.

Taylor Swift actually had the strength to go through an ordeal of standing up to the guy who groped her! For that alone she should have a free pass with feminists. She made a stand for all the women out there. But Kim Kardashian, who makes money on objectification of women gets better treatment than Taylor.

Aug 15, 2018 1 note
I am now officially embarrassed that I was ever a long timer at CB. Part 1) The Angie and Brad posts have taken on a new level of toxic insanity. She claims to be concerned for the JP kids but then writes unsubstantiated vitriol smearing their father. He was cleared by the FBI but she knows more? I am no fan of his but they go too far. They went too far with Jen and now they do it with him. She lets the stans attack fair people who aren't fans of other party when they try to post or she deletes
Aug 15, 2018
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December