Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

June 2018

(cont'd) due to poor agricultural practices and/or being genetically modified, people being on multi-drug cocktails for long periods of time, etc. Some of these Celebitches want to sue "anti-vaxxers", which would give Big Pharma even more power (total medical tyranny.) Part 3 coming up

You have a point here. Some forms of cancers are much less common in developing countries which don’t use chemicals on the same scale we do. It is a fact, and there are reasons to believe plastics and chemicals, especially fertilizers and various pesticides, which end up in our water supply are a big factor.

Jun 8, 2018
Just love how all the Celebitches label "anti-vaxxers" as arrogant and stupid, but are basically bragging that their "research" is superior. It's definitely a complex subject with a lot of misinformation. How is someone "selfish" for being concerned with all that goes into vaccines? I don't have the answer to whether or not vaccines actually work, but there is definitely evidence that people's immune systems are more challenged than ever (geoengineering chemicals in the skies, foods depleted

The selfish part comes in with people not being vaccinated being a danger to other non-vaccinated people, especially infants. Most other countries are nowhere as lenient as the US when it comes to not vaccinating your kids.

Jun 8, 2018
Nota's comments on 3-year-old Charlotte are disgusting. Her hatred of the Middletons shows pathology she should really get help for. And considering how much work her idol Meghan Markle did to, um, "improve" her appearance ( the straightened hair, the narrowed nose, the tooth veneers) I wouldn't bet on what the natural product will look like. Neither the Markle nor the Windsor nose seem to do kids any favours. Of course, Nota will still claim it the height of infant beauty. She is ill.

The whole topic bothers me, to be honest. Kids should be completely off limits.

Jun 8, 2018
The Meghan stans are just too much. She sure is doing a lot of work. And I’m also convinced Nota and Kaiser are the same person. I think kaiser is a few commenters.
Jun 7, 2018 1 note

Notasugar is hating on a three year old.  These are her words about little Princess Charlotte:  

’You’re welcome to find her darling. I find her a mini Carole and Pippa, and there’s nothing darling in that.“

I bet Meghan’s toddlers will be the most darlingest darlings that ever darlinged.

—————————————————————————–

It might be not a popular opinion, but I really admire Carole Middleton. The woman came from nothing to the top of the British society, all through her hard work.

People were accusing Middletons today of using their connection with the BRF to their advantage. And my question is -  why do they think any members of the BRF, born to privilege and riches, are in any way superior to Carole Middleton? If anything, she is superior to all of them, and it is obsession with class, money and aristocracy that blinds people to this fact.

If people have a problem with the fact that a connection to the BRF bestows an unfair advantage, then they should advocate for abolishment of the monarchy, which is at the root of this unfairness. 

Jun 7, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission

Oh, take a look at this comment. Apparently, we, as true feminists know that we shouldn’t tell a woman what to do with her appearance or anything else, as it should be her choice. Except for when it is a woman we don’t like, like Melania.//sarcasm off.

minx says:

June 7, 2018 at 12:31 pm

I really dislike her aging Barbie doll hair, whether it’s a wig or not. She’s First Lady, get a good trim, ditch the center part and try to look a little classier.

Jun 7, 2018 4 notes
#celebitchy #ban

I am also certain that Celebitchy takes money to promote Kardashians. There could be no other possible explanation for their many articles about Kardashians, trying to present them in a positive light and make excuses for them.

Literally nobody but Kaiser thought Kim Kardashian looked good in that outfit yesterday. Either Kaiser has the worst fashion sense on Earth, or she is being paid to promote Kim, or possibly - both.

Jun 6, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Notasugar is Kaiser. I'm convinced. What a nasty piece of work she is.

Me too. I am not one for conspiracy theories, but the way thy come across is just too similar for them to be two different people. If they are, then they must be soulmates (from hell).

Jun 5, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
I haven't actually been banned from Celebitchy. I just stopped bothering with it, as it's so dull. The same old cronies making their unfunny comments about, Kates buttons, sexism (while tearing down other Women) and the weird obsession with Tom Hiddleston/Cumberbatch et al. The amusement has been sucked out of it.
Jun 5, 2018 2 notes
@"They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything." AND, in most countries, not only there is no official office and position of FL but also spouses are not REQUIRED to (leave their jobs to) fill the position.
Jun 5, 2018 1 note
@"But what irritates me most is - these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS. What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished." AMEN! I think standing your groud, refusing to become a "first-lady", is respectable (even if one disagrees with her husband's politics and criticize her support of him). Michel Obama left a high power job to promote healthy eating and exercise...
Jun 5, 2018 2 notes
The Bill Clinton post makes me want to throw up. I will say OF COURSE we should still be holding the current president's feet to the fire for his words and actions, but Kaiser's hypocritical and antifeminist words about Bill Clinton are making me sick. It's okay to say both men were wrong, you know. It's true Monica was technically an adult but she was not only a very young adult, i.e. a college student, but she was an intern, an employee, and he was the most powerful man in the world.

I could not believe what I was reading on the Bill Clinton thread today. This is a classic sexual harassment case. But, of course, our lawyer-in-residence  lilacflowers could not recognize it. Neither could the chief-feminist-in-residence otaku fairy. Kitten, of course, would excuse anyone with the last name Clinton. The whol thread was unbelievable. Only towards the end of it some sane people showed up and started asking “Really? “

Jun 4, 2018 5 notes
#celebitchy #ban
They should just rename the damn site "All whiteys are racist, y'all", except St. Hillary. Now they're hoping Melania Trump is in need of a kidney transplant - sick. Also, kinda surprised Kaiser (who says she has Indian heritage, I think) kept her user name. After all, you'd think she'd want to avoid anything reminding anyone of Germany since she also loves labeling people Nazis!

Melania’s threads are all sick. Sure, she supported the birther nonsense, but the way they treat her you would think she is a serial killer or something.

But what irritates me most is -  these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS.  What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished. As per feminism, shouldn’t a woman be free to do what she wants, regardless of who her husband is?

They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything.

Jun 4, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban

I just saw this comment under the Benedict’s article

Danielle says:

June 3, 2018 at 7:04 pm

If this had happened back in 2014 there would have been hundreds of comments on this story and it would have quickly descended into insanity. Good times!! Someone should do a study into how Bendy killed off his fanclub so rapidly!

ROFL! It is not Bendy, it is Kaiser! Bendy is doing just fine. Kaiser ran off all of Bendy’s fans off the site with her peddling of conspiracy theories and PR accusations when Bendy got married.

Jun 3, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Moderated out of existence

Kaiser has always moderated me out, even when someone made an identical comment to me, my post always disappeared, I have no idea why, she is entirely capricious, blatantly biased and frankly not very bright. The wit and humour have been sucked out of the site. A pity, it used to be good natured messaging from women (mainly) from all over the world, now it’s just a gang of deranged cronies spewing out bile, I won’t be going back.

Jun 3, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban #submission
(continuation) the Princess of Wales, later on Queen of the UK, and Meghan will always be a Duchess, and as such she will have more freedom, but less relevance in the future when the fascination lessens. The couple of times I tried to make this point in several of their posts, all of them were deleted.

I think I did not get the beginning of this message. Posting what I got, sorry.

Jun 3, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
@"Another woman"-LOL Wait till their beloved Megs dumps Jessica Mulroney for Amal. After all, Amal is married to fabulously wealthy actor George Clooney (who by all odds plans to run for high office in America at some point); the Clooneys have a huge estate outside London, and it's London that counts now, not Toronto. Can't wait.
Jun 1, 2018

May 2018

Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney. 

They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.

They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).

May 31, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
So Kaiser (expert political scientist) says she HOPES Obama was plotting with people to bring down Trump. Why would anyone ever hope that? Especially if they were against Trump? Something like that could come out and muddy the waters, possibly unravel the case against the Trumps? Sometimes people get so angry they don't think.
May 30, 2018
@ha ha ha - Notasugar is just possibly the most hysterical of the fraus on Celebitchy. Her mission in life is to defend Meghan from any and all criticism and to demonize Kate and Prince William. Her comment is ludicrous: naturally it's not on the BRF's web site. How disingenuous! The heirs are supposed to "represent" middle-class family life-it's hard to do that without kids. The line is rarely broken for "convenience". Projection of family life is the unspoken bit of their job. She hates Kate.
May 30, 2018

Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.

And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?

notasugarhere says:

May 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm

Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.

May 29, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
This site is gold. Glad to have found it. Kaiser is garbage with her hypocrisy as are her followers, wouldn’t surprise me if the pathetic lunatic actually created sockpuppet accounts to agree with herself as many online think she does. Wonder how long Sara’s comment about the love/adoration from supposedly everyone of the Royals for K/CB idol Meghan being lovely fanfiction will be left up? Relying on the Daily Fail and anonymous sources that supposedly praise Meghan for accuracy are we Kaiser?🙄
May 29, 2018 2 notes
What I find amusing about CB is that the second half of it's name implies not just latitude in criticizing famous people, but an expectation of same. But if you criticize someone Kaiser likes, suddenly you have "violated commenting guidelines". It's really only about who Kaiser likes and dislikes, so the commenting "guidelines" are a complete sham.

When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say -  this is why this site is  called “bitchy”.

However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay  ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines -  why are you commenting on this person  if you don’t like him/ her, you could  just skip the post.

The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban

Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.

And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty. 

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
@response to the "famewhore" issue, we'll have to agree to disagree. We are agreed that MM wouldn't have looked at Harry if his name hadn't been "Windsor" with the global fame she stood to gain. To me, agreeing to that "Vanity Fair" article, which we all know that she would never have gotten without dating him, says it all. She's always looking for the cameras, and to me it seems clear that her whole life has been dedicated to becoming a AAA+ lister. Well, now she is-through her marriage.

Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.

May 28, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

I see posters on CB are so concerned with feminists issues that there are only 20-30 posts on the #MeToo related topics but 200-300 each of the royal posts and there are 5-6 of them a day. // sarcasm

CB turned into a nastier version of Mirror.  

May 28, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

Wow,I  just went to the  Kate’s maternity leave thread and it is NASTY.

What is this, for example ( a post by Lizbeth )

“ While I think leave is fine, I’m not buying the idea that proper bonding requires her to be home with the baby 24/7. While Kate’s “on leave” she’s not available 24/7 to the baby nor are “ordinary hands-on” moms who do things like clean the house, grocery shop, go to church, engage in their regular charitable activities, have a night out with dad, etc. all while “on leave.” “


Let me tell you something, “Lizbeth”, a  new baby wakes up every 2 hours to feed. And if you breastfeed, it does not matter how many nannies you have, you still have to wake up every 2 hours. You get no sleep for the first 3-4 months, you become a zombie. 

Cleaning? What cleaning? Grocery shopping an cooking - the husband can do it.  Believe it or not, even in regular households women get help, and they are still struggling.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Kaiser's hatred of Kate Middleton is pathological and she can try blaming it on Kate being "lazy" from now till Kingdom Come, I don't believe her. I'm only waiting for her blame the weather on Kate. IMHO Kaiser hates Kate because she is a white English girl. If Meghan had been white Kaiser would have hung her out to dry for using dating Harry to get herself a "Vanity Fair" cover and talking about their relationship inside. Mention "Meghan" and "famewhore" on Celebitchy and watch the fur fly.

I don’t think Meghan is a famewhore, but I am pretty sure if Harry wasn’t a rich royal she wouldn’t have given him a second look. But this goes for many women. I don’t think Meghan  is worse than any other regular woman, but she is not an activist, feminist etc.  that Celebitchy posters are making her out to be. If she were, she would have never married into the royal family to begin with.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Exhibit D: CHER: "She gave birth and a few hours later she got up and left the hospital. Thus, she is very capable of fitting a few appearances between now and October." Sound logic...

Even in the backwards US, which does not have any maternity leave whatsoever, women get 6 weeks disability leave to recover from birth. And I can attest that they need every day of it since bleeding often doesn’t stop for 4-6 weeks.

May 25, 2018
Exhibit C: "GOOFPUFF: I’m not begrudging her maternity leave – i am tired of all the continued promises of work and keenness lies all these years in between them. They have several nannies, surely she can spare an hour or two for an appearance several times a week." Gosh. I am shocked. Women with "easy" jobs should not take full time leaves.
May 25, 2018
Exhibit B: "Mat leave isn’t a vacation but with alll the help in the world an hour or two away to ‘work’ is fine." Luckily for all of us, the law does not work like this. These women, they read what they write?!?
May 25, 2018
(part 2 of 2) You know what kate did to "deserve" a six-month maternity leave? NOTHING. She lives in a country that rcognizes parents' rights and protects them. And we all ahould fight for not less but even more legal protections!
May 25, 2018
For the first time i commented on CB and my comment was deleted within 2 minutes precisely. I could not believe how women were quick to argue that KM should show up to work during her maternity leave (because her work is easy, because she is lazy AF, yada yda yada, neoliberal bulshit). The way women spoke... I told them the truth: they are disgusting and should be ashamed of themselves.

Exactly. They want Kate to work while pregnant, when she just had a baby but have no problems with Meghan’s many vacations because apparently she was stressed out by wedding preparations. 

Sometimes I wonder if those women have any idea what it takes to birth a child and how much energy being a parent requires, even if you have help.

May 25, 2018 3 notes
FAIL! Missing Gwyneth Paltrow’s statement AND Harvey W’s surrender Friday is a huge fail. I read goop’s statement this morning on the GAURDIAN FFS! WTF change the name to taykimyetrumproyalbitchy 🤦🏻‍♀️
May 24, 2018
Kaiser deleted my post asking if she will let Megan find her royal style or continually blame kate for Megan’s choices. I asked if pregnancy speculation will be all the posts now that the wedding is over. Deleted. IMMEDIATELY. So sensitive
May 23, 2018 4 notes
I stopped reading celebitchy today. I got really offended by their blatant hypocrisy. How can they preach feminism when half the time they are putting down select women? Kaiser has some serious vitriol. I pray she gains some soul.

The hypocrisy is unbearable. When it is a woman they like, any missteps are excused. When it is a woman they don’t like every misstep is treated like a crime against humanity.

I, personally, have an issue with how much Meghan’s dresses cost. 100K per dress is way, way too much for someone who is supposed to be all about helping people. I remember CB used to go on and on about the cost of Kate’s wardrobe. They have been silent on the subject for months. And in case of Meghan, even when the price is brought up, the posters “choose” to talk about how lovely she looks instead. They are not fooling anyone. 

The same with Meghan curtsying and wearing tights. They find an excuse after an excuse, but they do not afford the same courtesy when it comes to celebrities they don’t like,

May 22, 2018 4 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Omg, Kaiser coulndt help herself and had to slam Kate on today's story about Katy Perry comments on Meghan' s dress. It's just so petty and dumb. A bunch of commenters called her out on it but they've already been deleted. It's ridiculous. If Celebitchy is the owner of the site she needs to take away some of Kaiser' s power because that little dictator is going crazy.
May 22, 2018 4 notes
Of course Kaiser has to insult Kate today. And the normal commentators have to chime in and insult her as well. This is beyond sad. I don’t know why Kaiser is so jealous of Kate.
May 20, 2018 4 notes
How is Celebitchy fun?

Every Celebrity on that site has diehard Stan’s or Haters.

Everyone has Strong and personal feelings toward some Celebrities and won’t hear otherwise. The royal posts are not only moderated by Kaiser but Lak,Nosugarhere and Nic919 who seem to spend all day going through every comment to correct, state “facts” or chatise you and be rude.

Meghan is good. Kate is bad.

Amal Clooney is apparently the devil.

I’ve never seen a site that takes people they don’t know so fucking serious! I feel like some of these Stan’s and haters just spend all day stalking the person they hate/love name on Google and going to spread thier narrative. I know some commenters do that with the royals.

How is Celebitchy any fun? You can’t even gossip without someone telling you you’re wrong.Its not light hearted. I don’t feel like I’m chilling with a bunch of homegirls, I feel like I’m with a bunch of woman that I used to be cool with but now, unless I agree with them, their opinions and their “facts” then we can’t be friends.

It’s High school! Wasn’t CB named the smartest site or some shit?  How? Some people act like babies. Especially Kaiser who is a schoolyard bully pretending to be a hero.

May 19, 2018 6 notes

I can’t believe the demonization that’s going on with Meghan Markle’s father.  The man had a massive heart attack a week ago and is now recovering from having three stents inserted.  Yet Celebitchy has completely demonized him.  He’s ruined her wedding, is white trash, should be totally cut out of her life, and has had a heart attack because Karma, etc.  It’s sick.

————————————————————————————-

The way the royal family mismanaged the relationships with Meghan’s extended family is ridiculous. I am no aristocrat ( all my knowledge of British aristocracy is comes from Jane Austin, lol ), but even I know that it does nobody any favors to have family fighting openly in the media. They should have foreseen it and placated her family. I get it that some of them are not nice people, all the same, smart people would’ve reached out to them early on and helped them financially. It is pretty clear her family is struggling,while Meghan is marrying into royalty. It just does not compute and was always going to be an issue.

May 17, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy

All hail St Doria. Seriously, it’s a bit much. I know she’s getting slammed on other sites by racists and people calling her a gold digger, which it abhorrent. But, over 100 comments on how cool she looks, how she’s rocking that blazer, how she could totally be opening her own practice, how Meghan totally gets all her cool from her, blah, blah patronizing comment after patronizing comment.
Doria seems to be a perfectly average professional, 60 something woman. Why are we even talking about her? We can talk about what she wears to the wedding but until then let’s leave in peace.

———————————————————————————————–

Doria seems to be a nice, down to Earth woman. I did not read that article, but at that point I honestly would rather talk about Doria. Just how many articles a day one needs about Meghan? It is 5-6 articles every day.

Kaiser is not even trying anymore, she just reposts all the gossip about Meghan and she is done for the day.

May 17, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission

I want to post this comment from the thread on John McCain, because this is a very insightful comment, which deserves to be read and understood. This person is the only person who was able to get above the usual partisan bickering that goes on on CB and get to the hear of the matter. She is  correctly pointing out what is going on with fragmentation of the US, and how indifference towards the fate of the foreigners bleeds into the domestic American politics. You can even see it on CB where anyone who does not support Hillary Clinton is treated with complete contempt:

A says:

May 11, 2018 at 3:42 pm

I’ve been reading up on the history of this torture debate, and what really stood out to me was how this exposed the way America failed to consider anyone aside from themselves as human beings worthy of compassion. It exposed that utter disregard in a profoundly ugly way post 9/11 especially. There were many in the administration at the time of the invasion who didn’t think Iraqis were human beings, who basically said as much when asked about the subject.

Am I really surprised that this culture of casual cruelty has finally come to roost in their own nest? No. It’s what happens when you allow it to run rampant, unchecked and without consequence. It’s what happens when you dehumanize fellow human beings without thinking twice about it. Before long, you find yourself treating the people around you in the exact same way.

This is what this torture “debate” says about America. If Americans are so willing, eager even, to inflict prolonged pain on another person in that way, and they excuse it by saying “they’re not American” it won’t be very long before that turns into, “They’re American but not the type of American that matters.” And that should scare people.

May 11, 2018 1 note
Just another comment on their hypocrisy...Today I saw a lot of these same hystrionics "tone-policing" Rose McGowan's comments about meeting Obama, and siding with him over her disappointment in him. Aren't they siding with the evil patriarchy?

I read that too, and LAK was the only one who kept saying -  Rose doesn’t have to be a perfect victim. What I am noticing at CB even more lately is the black and white thinking. This is a very simplistic and narrow type of thinking, which you usually see in brainwashed people. If one person is good, the other must be bad. If Obama is good, then Rose must be bad. No, they can both be good people, each with their own personal failings. Nobody is perfect.

The same thing went on today on the McCain’s article -  if Trump is bad, then McCain must be good. How about both of them are awful? McCain participated in an illegal Vietnam war, where innocent civilians were killed. He is no “war hero”, he is a victim , at best. And then he was instrumental in getting the US in a number of other illegal wars. He is a war criminal, who will never be prosecuted, just like George Bush and Dick Chaney. The only redeeming thing about him is that he is against torture. There was one person who got in right on the McCain’s post, I am going to post her comment next.

May 11, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
On the latest post about Meghan and Kate, there are several comments criticizing Kaiser for promoting the Meghan vs Kate narrative. There are also a few comments talking about Kaiser’s obsessive hatred for Kate. I know the comments won’t last long, but It’s good to finally see people waking up to her craziness.
May 2, 2018 3 notes
I think I have been banned again from celebitchy I cannot think of anything I have done wrong. I am never rude or aggressive. I am very pro Meghan and Harry but not nasty about Kate. Can I find out if I have really been banned or whether its a mistake. How can I get back in?

If you post but your comments never appear, then you were banned. As I understand the ban is IP address, name and email based. If you login from a different computer (or with VPN ) , use a different name and a different email, it is likely you will be able to post.

Also, the ban expires usually around 6 months.

However, once you’ve been banned once, the chances are very high you will be banned again. You are simply not compatible with Celebitchy group-think. So, why bother?

May 2, 2018 1 note

April 2018

Submission

I went there for the first time and months and the rabid, malicious posts about the royals are still unsettling. Pippa is pregnant, it’d be a shame for someone to bring up the charges against her father in law. Let’s bring them up 100 times. Kate never had HG, she’s a liar and William is the devil incarnate. Oh and the Kanye posts are the absolute height of hypocrisy. Kaiser only treats Kanye with kid gloves and worries about his well being because of her hatred for Taylor Swift. If it was literally anyone else, except for Angelina, the coverage would have a different tone.

Apr 27, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban

I don’t like to put people on blast but I’ve became an huge fan of the Royals. So I follow a few popular blogs, and I’ve found that three of the most negative commenters on Celebitchy toward kate (the ones that personally hate Kate) use the same names and go on those sites spewing the same hate filled comments.

It’s really sad that they spend what seems like all day hating on Kate, on MULTIPLE websites. Even websites that aren’t even talking  about her

Everytime, I see one of thier names I know they’ll try to twist and turn whatever they can to make Kate seem like the devil.

I’m just so sick of the sexism and hate that Kaiser allows. She’s a fair weather feminist. As long as a woman fits her standards the she won’t be sexist, racists or shaming toward them.

I hope one day those posters reflect and look back at all the time they spent hating on one person.

Kaiser too.

Apr 26, 2018 3 notes
Kaiser

I had no idea that the Celebitchy site actually deleted comments until today. I was FLOORED. I thought it was legit an echo chamber until I noticed someone calling Kaiser out on her racist crap. The the comment was deleted! So I posted and was like hey, liked everything you said until you made the point about how all white dudes blend together and how livid she would be if anyone said that about another race. THEN my comment was deleted. Unreal. For some who claims to be so progressive she sure does enjoy censoring.

Apr 26, 2018 2 notes
I've just found your blog! I was banned from CB about three times (but for some bizarre reason unbanned after a while) for repeatedly calling Kaiser an obsessed fangirl who hated anyone who dated one of her Internet boyfriends. I used to post as spiderpig.

I remember you. )))

Apr 22, 2018

I just a made a mistake of reading comments under the Neri-Brad article. Wow! This is some crazy sh*t. The shades of “Bendy married”  type of thing. The posters completely lost their link to reality.

So, supposedly Pitt just wants to hurt Angelina and kids and everything is PR somehow. I remember when Cumberbatch wedding was also all about PR, supposedly.

Apr 17, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December