Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

September 2018

Re: Celebitchy (the site owner, not the site) - I saw something on Twitter the other day that really bothered me. I don’t follow her, but someone else commented on it so that’s how I saw it. She’d taken a screenshot of a comment (which wasn’t let through moderation, I don’t think), with a snarky comment of her own. I thought it was so petty and unprofessional. Delete the comment, fine, but don’t post it elsewhere mocking one of your readers, real name or not! IDK if I can post links here, but

This definitely crosses the line.

Sep 30, 2018 7 notes
2) this is the post I’m referring to, just in case links are allowed through (or for you to refer to before posting my comment here). Maybe I’m being overly sensitive since after all CB is “just” a gossip website, but considering she runs the site, I thought it was unnecessarily rude and crossed a line. PS Just realized links aren’t allowed here, but it was the day of the post earlier this week in which Michelle Obama was told to “sit down” by Tomi Lauren.)
Sep 30, 2018
Yeah, Celebitchy (The Owner) unlike Kaiser doesn't seem TOO bad. Her sharing her story had nothing to do with pity and everything to do with her being someone who'd been through something horrid and having a space to do it in her website. Maybe even healing. I dislike everything about Celebitchy, BUT the fact that they talk about that sort of thing. All the writers but Kaiser, seem like they are actually nice well traveled women. Kaiser is too hateful and obsessive, or at least her persona is.
Sep 29, 2018 1 note
"Pity victim comments". How very disgusting of OP. The site really helped me at one time. Women of celebitchy used to share their stories of sexual abuse, and violence long before it became a powerful metoo trend. I wrote and shared my own, and i got sympathy and support from complete strangers on celebitchy. For me, the site was therapeutic, because i could talk about my experiences without any shame. No one is looking for "Pity comments". Apart from "royal"/celeb stories, CB is a great place.

CB is a negative place, and while it provides safe space for people to share their stories  ( if they meet with Kaiser’s approval), then  many  of the same people then turn around and slam other posters and other female celebrities on other posts. Is that healthy? It cannot be a great place when it is so hypocritical.

Don’t forget that Celebitchy is a commercial place and they are after clicks. They provide a safe place for women to share their stories, and that is good. But they don’t do it out of goodness of their hearts, they are selling you advertisement at the same time, and your daily serving of Kardashians, and Kate- and Taylor Swift hate, and a few other things. It is not a wholesome place, and what bothers me. It purposely attracts vulnerable people to make money on them .

And then they also pick and choose which stories are OK to share, and which they are going to block because they don’t conform to Kaiser’s views of the moment.

Sep 29, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
"they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism." This is so true on the Meghan posts. They only like Meghan so much because it gives them a chance to tear into Kate. I'm 100% positive if Meghan was fully white, they would be ripping into her about everything just like they do with Kate at every turn. I don't like reading their faux support towards Meghan Markle because in every comment they end up shading Kate at the same time. They aren't real Meghan fans.
Sep 28, 2018 4 notes
Celebitchy today told her story about rape. She need pitty victim comments.

I don’t know if she wanted pity, or she is just finally ready to admit to herself what happened to her. Anyway, I am not going to judge her for it. No matter what her motivation is, the women who dealt with assault need to be supported, whether we like them or not.

Having said that, I also think Celebitchy is a site which intentionally attracts vulnerable and traumatized people, but not to help them, but for clicks and to make money off them, And THAT I find disgusting. They started as a gossip site and now they turned into a site which takes advantage of people. They also figured out that they could do this with people who are strongly anti-Trump. They give them an emotional outlet, and in exchange they get clicks. But Celebitchy is not  a healthy place for that, either. It feeds negativity, instead of doing something constructive.

Sep 28, 2018 6 notes
#celebitchy #ban
So what is the takeaway about Kate as regards to Meghan? Is she competitive and jealous (what about meeeee)? Or is she relieved and keen to stay home because Meghan takes the spotlight off of her? Kaiser managed to mix both messages in the same story. And in any other case, we'd all be cheering that someone got a proper maternity leave of proper length, yes?

The way they resent maternity leave make me think that most of the posters are Americans, brainwashed Americans, who don’t see maternity leave as a basic human right. Then why are they so obsessed with Kate and her lack of “work ethics” to begin with. If they were British taxpayers, then it would be more understandable.

Sep 27, 2018 2 notes
#ban celebitchy
The Gisele Bundchen post today. Boy oh boy is Kaiser passive aggressive.
Sep 27, 2018 1 note
If all these CB'ers are survivors of rape/sexual assault, why do they re-traumatize themselves by deliberately watching emotional interviews/testimonies? (That is, instead of just reading text.) As someone who works in the mental health field. we encourage people to AVOID known triggers if they can.
Sep 27, 2018 3 notes
Can ask a question? Its possible to report about CELEBITCHY.COM. Because what she doing its not correct.

What they they are doing is not ethical, but it is not illegal, so nothing can really be done other than spreading the word about it. This information does damage their reputation and ensures they never become a real new site, like, for example, Huffington Post, and will forever remain in the dumpster of gossip sites.

Sep 25, 2018 1 note
"So many of the Jennifer Aniston defenders act like I was smoking crack because I dared to believe that Justin Theroux and Jennifer’s wedding was real & that it’s suspicious and shady AF that we haven’t heard one word about either of them filing for divorce." Yeah that totally sounds like a journalist and not an unhinged lunatic. A comment from the same article- Comments “tearing down physical appearance” are VERY mild on this site compared to most others places on the internet." Yeah nope!
Sep 25, 2018
Never been banned before but have seen comments I submitted that mysteriously disappeared. I’m tired of Kaiser and company claiming they’re progressive when really they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism. I’ve seen commenters argue that white privilege doesn’t exist. I’ve also argued with users who comment in a post about a female celebrity and insult their looks. One user slowsnow pops up in every Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift post to belittle them.
Sep 25, 2018
Can we call out specific users? I’m constantly reading pretentious comments from a user named slowsnow. I’ve read posts from them where they discuss the existence of postmodernism and on a celebrity gossip site of all places! I started arguing with them in a fashion post and their response was to laugh at me. I couldn’t post a defense bc I was moderated. Mods claim they censor rude responses but that’s not the case. They’ll defend pretentious asshats like slowsnow because they’re regulars.

Slowsnow must be new, or an old user under a new name, because I don’t remember this nic. I think if you bring a comment of a person from Celebitchy, as a quote with the time, then it is a fair game to discuss it, given that you would be discussing an actual post, not just some hearsay. Whatever is posted in public domain is a fair game.

Sep 25, 2018
I got banned for trying to defend myself against a regular poster. I called them out but then they edited their post so that it seemed less sexist. Then my post didn’t make sense, which gave them the chance to mock me for my “mistake” so when I tried to submit a rebuttal Kaiser denied it. I try not to return to that hellscape of a website but I feel I have to post because I think it’s disgusting that Kaiser and her ilk get away with calling themselves progressive when they’re anything but.

That is why started this site. The regular posters will on purpose misinterpret what you’ve said, but when you try to clarify and call them out on it, you comments get moderated!

Nobody gets to moderate me here ))).

Sep 25, 2018 1 note
I've gotten in trouble on CB sometimes because I wouldn't take a "side." I love Angelina, but I like Jennifer, and why oh why did they have to be linked eternally? I found Brandi and LeeAnn both vile, although I liked LeeAnn's song when she was a teenager. Honestly, I kind of like both duchesses. I do love Meghan, I admit, but I see nothing wrong with Kate. It's antifeminist to pit woman against woman, but that's promoted on Celebitchy time and again. You aren't allowed to mention it.
Sep 21, 2018 3 notes
1 poster actually said the reason Kate gets so much vitriol thrown at her on CB is because "she doesnt work as much as we'd like her too". So,constantly putting her down, telling her she doesn't need maternity leave, slut/party shaming her; saying she's utterly useless, calling her a mattress, saying she doesnt have a mind of her own, being really spiteful/negative about her. Basically nitpicking at absolutely everything she does.. is perfect fine because she doesnt "work". LOL They're American!

It is pretty clear that the  “work” is just an excuse to allow them to discard their “feminist” robes for a while and be themselves. Especially since the most vitriolic critics seem to be Americans, who don’t pay British taxes and seem to have no problem with many other member of the royal family, whether they work or not. 

Sep 21, 2018 1 note
Not sure how this works, but I have quit reading anything on CB that is on the Pitt-Jolie saga. Or on Saint Megan. I would in no way call Kaiser a journalist. She is so biased against Pitt and adoring of Markle. I can't comment on there anymore so I guess I got banned when I told her she is very biased re Pitt-Jolie. lol
Sep 20, 2018 2 notes
Hi:In response to my post of 9/19... Hall wrote the phrase: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". It's really a matter of freedom of speech and if we don't have that, we can't learn about different views. Re: the Kavanaugh/Ford issue, from my professional work and personal experience (I was a victim of physical assault), her story raises many questions and the Dems have certainly manipulated things. Both should be heard/questioned.
Sep 20, 2018

Ok so today’s post was about Meghan at the launch of her book accompanied by Harry and her mother. Oh the accolades! I couldn’t read them all, it was so nauseating. If Carole was ever to accompany her daughter to an official event, we would never hear the end of it, like, “She can’t do anything without her mother”! So much hypocrisy on that site, and they are all parrots.

Sep 20, 2018 1 note
I need to stop reading Celebitchy because its unfair to Meghan merkle,im starting to dislike her because so many downlow racists and sexist like her on CB. That's not right. As a black person i see a bunch of faux love for her. Some people only like her because they hate Kate, which is why they bring Kate up every Meghan post. The "POC" sound liked fake accounts. It's all creepy really, I don't want your support at the expense of hating someone else.

I feel the same way. When they start putting Kate down in comparison, I want to defend her. And it creates negative feelings towards Meghan. But Meghan has nothing to do with any of it!

Sep 20, 2018 3 notes
I have been twice banned from CB... Re: Kaiser, some have referred to her as a journalist/writer and I have to disagree with this. A journalist deals with facts, not supposition and their personal biases as Kaiser does. The current issue with Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford is an example. The Judge is apparently guilty because he is male and has been accused by a female. I am interested in the facts of this matter and finding the truth and that's not on CB.

Kaiser doesn’t know the first thing about writing or journalism. It would make CB a better place if she were to get some training in that area. There are plenty of free classes available online.

As for the judge, I hear what you are saying, but his professional history doesn’t bode well for women’s rights, so I won’t be sorry if he gets derailed. At the very least he comes off as very entitled.

And have you seen how the right wing press went after the woman and her family? They are doing all they can to discredit her. That is not in relationship to the CB, I don’t condone stooping to the same level, but the Republicans definitely fight very, very dirty here. And that makes me less inclined to be impartial in this case. If they think it is OK to go after a woman and her family like that, then I am not even going to bother giving them the benefit of a doubt.

Sep 19, 2018 2 notes
From today's article on Lady Gabriella Windsor: "In case you’re wondering, Ella is 37 years old. And she’s an expert at branding?" I'm baffled by this comment. Is she saying that she's too young, or too old? Why? WTF does Kaiser know about branding or how "brand-positioning platforms" work, or how old their staff should be? She's so arrogant. She makes unnecessary, catty swipes like this constantly, on dubious and unsubstantiated grounds, because she isn't accountable for her anonymous bull---t.
Sep 19, 2018 1 note
I know that most talk is about Kaiser, but I noticed yesterday in some of the Emmys posts, that Celebitchy herself was leaving snarky comments. Like Kaiser with bangs & buttons, she seems to have arbitrary rules about what women do with their bodies. Guess what, I put eyeliner on my bottom lid- bite me CB! I think it's why she doesn't care that Kaiser acts the way she does. I once subtweeted that CB & LaineyGossip were toxic sites. BOTH CB & Kaiser blocked me, Lainey didn't. I didn't tag anyone.
Sep 19, 2018
It's really funny reading the Cumberbatch threads now, since they get about 24 comments and many tearing the piss out of the deranged loons on Tumblr who think the marriage is fake and the babies all plastic dolls. I wonder if Kaiser ever regrets feeding the crazies and ramping up the Sophie hate so much? Or if she regrets that she can't do that anymore?

The latter, because she tried reigniting it a couple of times but it didn’t take. She loved all those clicks.

Sep 19, 2018

A couple thoughts on today’s posts. Kaiser is out again with her bangs “disorder”, that is what I am going to call it. There is nothing wrong with bangs. They look especially good on women with oval faces or women with high foreheads. And aren’t we all about letting women do what they want and be who they are? If they like bangs, so be it, and who is to say otherwise?

I also think Brie Larson looks fine as Captain Marvel. And I am not a fan of hers by any stretch, but maybe I will become one. ))) I especially liked one comment by someone who said, this is the first fully clothed female superhero. I am fully on board with that, I think we need more of that - more strong women who don’t have to be half dressed to hold attention. More women like Grace Jones.

Sep 18, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I agree that the CB worship is stupid, but Meghan didn’t just write the foreword, she came up with the idea of doing a cookbook and put it together with the women.

Thank you. As I read more of today’s comments which weren’t there yesterday I saw that. Sorry for overreacting. It is a nice thing she did, but it is blown way out of proportions on CB.

Sep 18, 2018 1 note
Chat Submission

Couldn’t believe the hate on the Kate posts. And I think Meghan is headed for sainthood.

—————————————————————————————————–

Lol, so yesterday I went and read the post about Meghan’s cookbook and the comments and I was just dying from laughter. The posters sound like teenage Taylor Swift fans, or Hanna Montana fans of a decade ago.

They all went and bought the book immediately on Amazon.. Yay! Why stop there, buy 5  copies, like Taylor’s fans. There is nothing wrong with it, I just thought it is funny they behave like that on a site that hates Taylor. Actually Meghan reminds me of Taylor so much in her manner and body language.

And all Meghan did, apparently, was writing the foreword for the book, or rather her PR person did, with Meghan’s input. It is such hard work, or as one person said “this is a modern, thinking royal”. I almost burst out laughing. No kidding.

Sep 18, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Chat Submission

I was banned from celebitchy..and just realized it. I think it was because I did not agree with all the Angelina Jolie saga..and I guess that is why I was banned. I was thinking it was becoming very one sided when it comes to certain celebrities. but I thought the tone was getting dark and very mean spirited.

————————————————————————————————–

And now you know why it is so one sided. Because everybody else is banned.

Sep 18, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I'm disgusted with everyone in those royal posts. The way Nosugarhere went at this one poster really disturbed me. And Nosugarhere does this all the time and Kaiser does nothing. She and Nic919 bully people, and kaiser does nothing. Because she wants them to spread the extreme sexism and hate that she has for Kate Middleton. That site truly is a vile place pretending to be a place for women to talk gossp, "smart" but really is a place to be sexist, racist and bullies.
Sep 18, 2018

Compare, if can stomach it, the Meghan and Kate articles today. 150 ish comments each. Meghan’s are all good and Kate’s are all bad. It would be funny it it wasn’t so obvious. Now I don’t really think either of these inituatives are exactly perfect but come on, please see yourselves people, they are clearly pandering to Meghan.


————————————————————————————————

Just last week I was so angry when I saw comments judging Kate for not working because she was on maternity leave. It is maternity leave , not vacation! Honestly, we wouldn’t let men get away with ignorant comments like that. But  when it is women doing it, it is OK?!!! 

No, it is not OK. I am in the US, I worked until the day my contractions started, and that is normal in the US. We are treated like livestock here, and that is not OK. And people who don’t see that because it is more important for them to disparage Kate than to defend women’t rights, I don’t have words for them ….

Anyway, the next day I saw that Kate was out with her own charity, and, apparently, was not just lolling about during her maternity leave (Urggghhhh.) I did wonder how the Kate-haters were going to spin that.

Sep 17, 2018 1 note
#celebotchy #ban #submission
I self-banned myself from Celebitchy ever since Herr K*ser took over, not only has she always been an egomaniac dating back to her days as a commentator but she’s always been a s/h/i/t and unoriginal writer as well. Today after months of not visiting, during my lunch break I went to the site out of boredom & that killed my brain cells. I find it laughable that HK & her Kronies are condemning body shaming in the Jameela Jamil post, those hypocrites always body shame celeb women they don’t like.
Sep 17, 2018
Seems at CB that it's "racist" if you believe Soon-Yi (defending the evil white man) but ALSO "racist" if you think she was groomed and exploited by him (WTF?) That thread also raised some interesting questions about Mia Farrow that wouldn't be allowed about St. Angelina...
Sep 17, 2018
Have you see the post on Liana's site about a past poster saying Kaiser called her WORKPLACE not knowing that she was self employed, because she made a comment that Kaiser didn't like?This is all alleged of course, and happened year ago but why hasn't Kaiser cleared this up? This beyond banning and sexism.

I know, this is CRAZY and an outright abuse of power. She remains anonymous, but she thinks it is OK to unmask posters who sign up to her site under anonymous names. It is doxxying, pure and simple, if it true, and should be against their terms of service, not that I read them.

Sep 17, 2018 2 notes
Apparently child abusers are cool beans if they hate whatever white man SJWs have decided is the villain du jour. Even if it means attacking child abuse victims for speaking up about their abuse. (Soon Yi thread.)
Sep 17, 2018 1 note
Kaiser is deleting anyone bringing up Michelle Rodriguez' criminal history (three prison sentences, two hit and runs, many DUIs, and domestic violence). Even though those are purely factual. Because god forbid anything get in the way of her "she's only called difficult for having an opinion and not sleeping with male bosses!" agenda.
Sep 17, 2018
Jezebel is also transforming into an echo-chamber. Their recent coverage, more precisely lack of coverage of recent scandals involving women is concerning. Avital Ronell who? Asia Aregento is not to be mentioned. Oh and today we are celebrating a man who paid his partner's victim. But it's ok -- if we dont speak about it, it means it never happened, right? Asked the question in the comment sections - it was never published....
Sep 16, 2018 1 note
Prince Harry has said very ignorant and racist things in the past, but on CB it's all easily explained away with hundreds of excuses.. "He was young and dumb, we all make mistakes". Will makes a simple mistake and he's a racist? Lol, where are Will's excuses? On CB, Harry is the poor, tortured young Prince boy and Will is the evil older brother!

And they also never forget whatever it was Kate did in her early 20s. I think bar hopping was her unforgivable sin. The double standard is very obvious.

Sep 16, 2018
Angelina Jolie

I got banned from Celebitchy because I brought up the subject of parental alienation and had felt the story of B. Pitt and A. Jolie on CB was very one sided…and the comments and Kaiser posted often about Pitt being an abusive alcoholic…I had a good friend who was a good Dad and he experience parental alienation and I wanted to point it out…now I am banned. I didnt realize how many have been struck from its comment section for petty reasons. 

————————————————————————————————-

Saying something that can be perceived as even slightly critical of Jolie is not allowed on CB, it is like cursing in church. Simply not done .))) 

Sep 14, 2018 9 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission
Some people are really going in on William accidentally saying Chinese instead of Japanese. Kaiser even brought up he may be racist. This is absurd. He misspoke and correctly himself immediately. All of her minions (alternate personalities?) are agreeing with her or course.
Sep 14, 2018

Kaiser called Prince William a racist because he made a mistake in confusing Chinese and Japanese food. He corrected himself instantly but that wasn’t good enough for her. Fortunately not many posters agreed with her.

Sep 14, 2018
The Viola Davis post is a mess. Both Kaiser's and the commenters point of view.
Sep 14, 2018

I still can’t get over the excuses for Cassel. He dated a teenager, 30 years his junior, cheated on his wife, and that is somehow is being excused along the lines “well, if I was in the same situation, I would’ve also jumped on the chance”. Duh, it is not about you, it is about him making a choice to date a teenager.

Henry Cavill was “cancelled” because he dated a 18 y.o. , while he  was 30 something, and not married to somebody else. I guess, unlike Cassell, Cavill didn’t get the pass because Kaiser is not attracted to him. 

Does she even hear herself? And it is interesting how commenters fall in line with Kaiser’s line of thinking, depending which man it is about. She trained them well. Either that, or she doesn’t let the comments which disagree with her through.

Sep 13, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
Why does Kasier think she's a fashionista? Why do her commenters think they know the first thing about fashion? They really don't! They don't know what tailoring means, they don't know what couture and bespoke means; they don't buy designer clothes, shoes, bags, etc., and they certainly don't know what's trendy from season to season. Basically, they have no clue about fashion and clothes. So why do they think they can judge famous women so harshly when it comes to their outfit choices?

My thoughts exactly.

I also don’t think many Celebitchy posters, if any, would be able to handle the treatment they, themselves, so freely dole out. 

Sep 13, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
Who is Kaiser??

I have also been banned by Kaiser MULTIPLE TIMES!  I’ve used up all my personal, professional, and business e-mail addresses.  But half my comments were deleted anyway, even before I was banned.

Anyway, I know Kaiser has mentioned multiple times that she is half Indian, but she’s never said what the other half is?  I’m guessing she must be African American based on how if you don’t gush about other AA celebrities you will be banned or your comment deleted.  I’m guessing she’s also overweight, due to all her cries for body positivity and how we need more “real” and “average” women to be models and movie stars.

I’m guessing her demographic is exactly like her.  Any woman who is thin is accused of having an eating disorder, white women are consistently referred to as “beckies” by both Kaiser and her commenters, ad the term “whitesplaining” is used all to often.

—————————————————————————————————–

According to what Kaiser posted herself her father is Indian and her mother is white. My guess is that her parents are divorced and she was raised by her mother, because she just doesn’t show the knowledge of familiarity of Indian or Indian culture, or should I say cultures, since there are so many. 

In regards to African Americans, she courts this demographic for her site, but multiple times she showed not to have true interest or understanding of the topic, and every time she was called out for it, she responded by banning people or deleting whole chains of comments.

Sep 13, 2018
#ban #celebitchy #submission
So, what would make CB'ers happy re: Matthew McC? I'm not exactly a fan or hater, but should he just say "the kid in my movie became a drug kingpin because he's an evil white male, and all white males are evil, and therefore we should all kill ourselves?"

I liked what one of the commenters posted about his charity work. In the end, actions speak louder than words.And you are right, sometimes there is no answer that would please everyone.

Sep 13, 2018
Just here to give <3 <3 <3 to the professional culture critic-- we need people like you to make escapism smart again
Sep 12, 2018 1 note
Chat Submission

 Oh no. Oh no!! Hahahaha! I found this website when I accidentally googled “celebitchy.com” instead of entering it into my browser bar. I was like, “Oh? What’s this?” and clicked further down the page, to this Tumblr. Oh, my god. I’d had no IDEA others were banned from Celebitchy, too! 

So, ok, just a bit of backstory: I used to be a professional culture critic. I have bylines at NYTimes, Guardian, Paste Magazine, a variety of tech websites… I even covered Kesha versus Dr. Luke, when that story was still fairly unknown, for Flavorwire. I’ve mostly been a tech writer my entire life, but for nine months I actually blogged about celebrity gossip for easy money. I replaced Molls McAleer at her old job when she left to found HelloGiggles. (The pay was fine, but… having to pose serious moral questions to yourself every morning, “Is it okay that I cover this?” is… well, it’s crazymaking. I *now* realize there are critical pop-culture analysts like Anne Helen Petersen, but those types didn’t exist back when I did it, back when it was basically dirty money you were earning.) I stopped writing culture-essays four years ago because of something unrelated to celebrity gossip… but I started to get my groove back on Celebitchy, and I guess I was leaving reeeeally long comments… …and then I got banned. 

I got super fucking banned. It was probably because of one of the times I’d written a long analysis about why a bad take was a Bad Take, but it might’ve been as benign as the time I wrote a longform analysis of Jessica Chastain’s changing fashion sense. Who knows? I honestly can’t remember. 

Either way, it was actually really hard on me! I was like, “Wow, what a total failure; you’ll never write for anyone again, you got banned from a random blog, you obviously suck.” I took it mega hard. But banning me didn’t stop me from posting. 

I just switched to my real-name email and kept posting – shorter comments, obviously, and much less pointed ones. I was a rule-follower now, I guess. But oh my god, hahahahahaha! I finally saw the Tumblr questions here that are like “whoa, why did they add the whole thing to their comments policy about deleting comments that are long?" 

Oh, no. I can honestly say that was added FOR ME. I did that! I am why! Oh my god, that is so embarrassing, I am crying. I hadn’t realized that the comments policy was updated FOR ME before now, and… I’m honestly a little bit crushed! I’d thought that my ban was random and arbitrary! It kind of cuts to the quick, that they were THAT insistent that I just leave their website. 

Before now, I didn’t realize how much they wanted me to just leave. (I’m not being delusional btw; the policy change was FOR ME. The timelines match up. This is literally why I was banned, and they made up a rule for me afterward. Ugh.) 

Anyway, I can’t go back and comment on that website again, obviously. To me it’s like, wow! My ban wasn’t a shot in the dark, wasn’t arbitrary. They just really don’t want me to comment ever again. 

Obviously I’m verbose, so you can see why I was banned, too, haha. Sorry! Old habits die hard. But… I know my insights were good. It’s kind of fucked up to claim that people who have lots to say are "distracting from the story,” and that really bothers me. 

To anyone else who fancies themselves as a burgeoning culture critic, just, take your talents elsewhere, ok? Don’t let your opinion of yourself be ruined by these people. I wish there were another good gossip website with a cool comments section, but I guess there isn’t one. That’s heartbreaking, but it’s what it is.

—————————————————————————————————-

“Either way, it was actually really hard on me! I was like, “Wow, what a total failure; you’ll never write for anyone again, you got banned from a random blog, you obviously suck. “ - Lol, I felt something similar. ))) 

Sep 11, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy

I just got banned because I didn’t praise Serena Williams in the post about her yesterday. Today there’s another post where comments are heavily moderated and most comments are agreeing with Serena, and Kaiser actually thanked one poster for telling others they’re not real tennis fans for having a different opinion. LMAO Kaiser is so biased and she’s not even ashamed of it. That website has truly gone to the pits. 

—————————————————————————————————–

That Serena Williams post is a such trainwreck. Serena behaved like a spoiled diva, and instead of just admitting it and moving on people are trying to justify it. Sure, there could be multiple reasons that she lost it, but the fact remains that she did, in a professional setting. Most of us, if we behaved like Serena, would be out of work, regardless of our race, color or sex. Nobody behaves like that in my office.

On top of it, you have to realize that foreigners have very little understanding of the US racial dynamics, and the other player got caught in the cross-fire, through no fault of her own. And she is a woman of color too! And from a country notorious for sexism. Japan is far more sexist than the US. But Celebitchy posters don’t care about that. They feel they have to protect Serena at all costs.

Sep 11, 2018 15 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission
I cannot believe that Kaiser responded in her own post praising another commenters post. Unbelievable. She is biased and horrible. Whether agreeing or disagreeing with what ur commenters say, keep out of it. If people who continue to post there don’t understand the simple fact, then shame on them. So glad I got banned from there as this behavior shows what a biased website it is. No better than the DM. She is ridiculous. I’m still shaking my head. Am I wrong? What are ur thoughts?
Sep 11, 2018
"Don’t get me wrong, I actually like Cate, still, despite her Woody Allen and Roman Polanski vague apologia." That's Kaiser the feminist (sarcasm).
Sep 11, 2018
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December