Melania’s threads are all sick. Sure, she supported the birther nonsense, but the way they treat her you would think she is a serial killer or something.
But what irritates me most is - these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS. What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished. As per feminism, shouldn’t a woman be free to do what she wants, regardless of who her husband is?
They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything.
I just saw this comment under the Benedict’s article
Danielle says:
If this had happened back in 2014 there would have been hundreds of comments on this story and it would have quickly descended into insanity. Good times!! Someone should do a study into how Bendy killed off his fanclub so rapidly!
ROFL! It is not Bendy, it is Kaiser! Bendy is doing just fine. Kaiser ran off all of Bendy’s fans off the site with her peddling of conspiracy theories and PR accusations when Bendy got married.
Kaiser has always moderated me out, even when someone made an identical comment to me, my post always disappeared, I have no idea why, she is entirely capricious, blatantly biased and frankly not very bright. The wit and humour have been sucked out of the site. A pity, it used to be good natured messaging from women (mainly) from all over the world, now it’s just a gang of deranged cronies spewing out bile, I won’t be going back.
I think I did not get the beginning of this message. Posting what I got, sorry.
Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney.
They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.
They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).
Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.
And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?
notasugarhere says:
Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.
When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say - this is why this site is called “bitchy”.
However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines - why are you commenting on this person if you don’t like him/ her, you could just skip the post.
The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.
Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.
And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty.
Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.
I see posters on CB are so concerned with feminists issues that there are only 20-30 posts on the #MeToo related topics but 200-300 each of the royal posts and there are 5-6 of them a day. // sarcasm
CB turned into a nastier version of Mirror.
Wow,I just went to the Kate’s maternity leave thread and it is NASTY.
What is this, for example ( a post by Lizbeth )
“
While I think leave is fine, I’m not buying the idea that proper bonding requires her to be home with the baby 24/7. While Kate’s “on leave” she’s not available 24/7 to the baby nor are “ordinary hands-on” moms who do things like clean the house, grocery shop, go to church, engage in their regular charitable activities, have a night out with dad, etc. all while “on leave.”
“
Let me tell you something, “Lizbeth”, a new baby wakes up every 2 hours to feed. And if you breastfeed, it does not matter how many nannies you have, you still have to wake up every 2 hours. You get no sleep for the first 3-4 months, you become a zombie.
Cleaning? What cleaning? Grocery shopping an cooking - the husband can do it. Believe it or not, even in regular households women get help, and they are still struggling.
I don’t think Meghan is a famewhore, but I am pretty sure if Harry wasn’t a rich royal she wouldn’t have given him a second look. But this goes for many women. I don’t think Meghan is worse than any other regular woman, but she is not an activist, feminist etc. that Celebitchy posters are making her out to be. If she were, she would have never married into the royal family to begin with.
Even in the backwards US, which does not have any maternity leave whatsoever, women get 6 weeks disability leave to recover from birth. And I can attest that they need every day of it since bleeding often doesn’t stop for 4-6 weeks.
Exactly. They want Kate to work while pregnant, when she just had a baby but have no problems with Meghan’s many vacations because apparently she was stressed out by wedding preparations.
Sometimes I wonder if those women have any idea what it takes to birth a child and how much energy being a parent requires, even if you have help.
The hypocrisy is unbearable. When it is a woman they like, any missteps are excused. When it is a woman they don’t like every misstep is treated like a crime against humanity.
I, personally, have an issue with how much Meghan’s dresses cost. 100K per dress is way, way too much for someone who is supposed to be all about helping people. I remember CB used to go on and on about the cost of Kate’s wardrobe. They have been silent on the subject for months. And in case of Meghan, even when the price is brought up, the posters “choose” to talk about how lovely she looks instead. They are not fooling anyone.
The same with Meghan curtsying and wearing tights. They find an excuse after an excuse, but they do not afford the same courtesy when it comes to celebrities they don’t like,
Every Celebrity on that site has diehard Stan’s or Haters.
Everyone has Strong and personal feelings toward some Celebrities and won’t hear otherwise. The royal posts are not only moderated by Kaiser but Lak,Nosugarhere and Nic919 who seem to spend all day going through every comment to correct, state “facts” or chatise you and be rude.
Meghan is good. Kate is bad.
Amal Clooney is apparently the devil.
I’ve never seen a site that takes people they don’t know so fucking serious! I feel like some of these Stan’s and haters just spend all day stalking the person they hate/love name on Google and going to spread thier narrative. I know some commenters do that with the royals.
How is Celebitchy any fun? You can’t even gossip without someone telling you you’re wrong.Its not light hearted. I don’t feel like I’m chilling with a bunch of homegirls, I feel like I’m with a bunch of woman that I used to be cool with but now, unless I agree with them, their opinions and their “facts” then we can’t be friends.
It’s High school! Wasn’t CB named the smartest site or some shit? How? Some people act like babies. Especially Kaiser who is a schoolyard bully pretending to be a hero.
I can’t believe the demonization that’s going on with Meghan Markle’s father. The man had a massive heart attack a week ago and is now recovering from having three stents inserted. Yet Celebitchy has completely demonized him. He’s ruined her wedding, is white trash, should be totally cut out of her life, and has had a heart attack because Karma, etc. It’s sick.
————————————————————————————-
The way the royal family mismanaged the relationships with Meghan’s extended family is ridiculous. I am no aristocrat ( all my knowledge of British aristocracy is comes from Jane Austin, lol ), but even I know that it does nobody any favors to have family fighting openly in the media. They should have foreseen it and placated her family. I get it that some of them are not nice people, all the same, smart people would’ve reached out to them early on and helped them financially. It is pretty clear her family is struggling,while Meghan is marrying into royalty. It just does not compute and was always going to be an issue.
All hail St Doria. Seriously, it’s a bit much. I know she’s getting slammed on other sites by racists and people calling her a gold digger, which it abhorrent. But, over 100 comments on how cool she looks, how she’s rocking that blazer, how she could totally be opening her own practice, how Meghan totally gets all her cool from her, blah, blah patronizing comment after patronizing comment.
Doria seems to be a perfectly average professional, 60 something woman. Why are we even talking about her? We can talk about what she wears to the wedding but until then let’s leave in peace.
———————————————————————————————–
Doria seems to be a nice, down to Earth woman. I did not read that article, but at that point I honestly would rather talk about Doria. Just how many articles a day one needs about Meghan? It is 5-6 articles every day.
Kaiser is not even trying anymore, she just reposts all the gossip about Meghan and she is done for the day.
I want to post this comment from the thread on John McCain, because this is a very insightful comment, which deserves to be read and understood. This person is the only person who was able to get above the usual partisan bickering that goes on on CB and get to the hear of the matter. She is correctly pointing out what is going on with fragmentation of the US, and how indifference towards the fate of the foreigners bleeds into the domestic American politics. You can even see it on CB where anyone who does not support Hillary Clinton is treated with complete contempt:
A says:
I’ve been reading up on the history of this torture debate, and what really stood out to me was how this exposed the way America failed to consider anyone aside from themselves as human beings worthy of compassion. It exposed that utter disregard in a profoundly ugly way post 9/11 especially. There were many in the administration at the time of the invasion who didn’t think Iraqis were human beings, who basically said as much when asked about the subject.
Am I really surprised that this culture of casual cruelty has finally come to roost in their own nest? No. It’s what happens when you allow it to run rampant, unchecked and without consequence. It’s what happens when you dehumanize fellow human beings without thinking twice about it. Before long, you find yourself treating the people around you in the exact same way.
This is what this torture “debate” says about America. If Americans are so willing, eager even, to inflict prolonged pain on another person in that way, and they excuse it by saying “they’re not American” it won’t be very long before that turns into, “They’re American but not the type of American that matters.” And that should scare people.
I read that too, and LAK was the only one who kept saying - Rose doesn’t have to be a perfect victim. What I am noticing at CB even more lately is the black and white thinking. This is a very simplistic and narrow type of thinking, which you usually see in brainwashed people. If one person is good, the other must be bad. If Obama is good, then Rose must be bad. No, they can both be good people, each with their own personal failings. Nobody is perfect.
The same thing went on today on the McCain’s article - if Trump is bad, then McCain must be good. How about both of them are awful? McCain participated in an illegal Vietnam war, where innocent civilians were killed. He is no “war hero”, he is a victim , at best. And then he was instrumental in getting the US in a number of other illegal wars. He is a war criminal, who will never be prosecuted, just like George Bush and Dick Chaney. The only redeeming thing about him is that he is against torture. There was one person who got in right on the McCain’s post, I am going to post her comment next.
If you post but your comments never appear, then you were banned. As I understand the ban is IP address, name and email based. If you login from a different computer (or with VPN ) , use a different name and a different email, it is likely you will be able to post.
Also, the ban expires usually around 6 months.
However, once you’ve been banned once, the chances are very high you will be banned again. You are simply not compatible with Celebitchy group-think. So, why bother?
I went there for the first time and months and the rabid, malicious posts about the royals are still unsettling. Pippa is pregnant, it’d be a shame for someone to bring up the charges against her father in law. Let’s bring them up 100 times. Kate never had HG, she’s a liar and William is the devil incarnate. Oh and the Kanye posts are the absolute height of hypocrisy. Kaiser only treats Kanye with kid gloves and worries about his well being because of her hatred for Taylor Swift. If it was literally anyone else, except for Angelina, the coverage would have a different tone.
I don’t like to put people on blast but I’ve became an huge fan of the Royals. So I follow a few popular blogs, and I’ve found that three of the most negative commenters on Celebitchy toward kate (the ones that personally hate Kate) use the same names and go on those sites spewing the same hate filled comments.
It’s really sad that they spend what seems like all day hating on Kate, on MULTIPLE websites. Even websites that aren’t even talking about her
Everytime, I see one of thier names I know they’ll try to twist and turn whatever they can to make Kate seem like the devil.
I’m just so sick of the sexism and hate that Kaiser allows. She’s a fair weather feminist. As long as a woman fits her standards the she won’t be sexist, racists or shaming toward them.
I hope one day those posters reflect and look back at all the time they spent hating on one person.
Kaiser too.
I had no idea that the Celebitchy site actually deleted comments until today. I was FLOORED. I thought it was legit an echo chamber until I noticed someone calling Kaiser out on her racist crap. The the comment was deleted! So I posted and was like hey, liked everything you said until you made the point about how all white dudes blend together and how livid she would be if anyone said that about another race. THEN my comment was deleted. Unreal. For some who claims to be so progressive she sure does enjoy censoring.
I remember you. )))
I just a made a mistake of reading comments under the Neri-Brad article. Wow! This is some crazy sh*t. The shades of “Bendy married” type of thing. The posters completely lost their link to reality.
So, supposedly Pitt just wants to hurt Angelina and kids and everything is PR somehow. I remember when Cumberbatch wedding was also all about PR, supposedly.
Another thing about CB which used to drive me crazy
* when it is a post about a celebrity they don’t like and you challenge them about over the top criticism of every tiny thing - their come back “ this site is called celeBITCHY”
* when people post that they don’t like a celebrity the majority of the site likes - “nobody made you click on this article, why do you post negative things about a celebrity you don’t like, just don’t read it”.
It is like having your cake and eating it too.
That is my main issue with the CB - the pile on on people with different opinions until these people are simply run off the site. You said it well - it is like a cult.
Yes, Sixer seems to be gone. I used to think she was interesting. But her participation in the Kate-hate-fest comments made me think less and less of her.
When I first came across CB 3 or 4 years ago the site had multiple writers, and diverse opinions. Now it is just an echo chamber, and God forbid you have a different opinion. The people will jump on you immediately.
I also suspect the site is paid to write on certain topics like Kardashians because otherwise I can’t fathom why they would write 3 articles a day about them.
I see Kaiser is not over her Benny Batch crash. She hates his wife something bad. Suffer Kaiser, for you have sinned, lol.
LOL
They are just grasping for straws. Can’t Meghan and Harry get married already. Three posts a day about them are too much.
When I started reading a post about her wedding flowers and something about the foxgloves I thought to myself - this is really more than I ever wanted to know about weddings. I married at a courthouse. Going through a full blown formal wedding sounds like a nightmare.
Harry and Meghan are harmless, but any attempt to put them on a pedestal is bound to end in a disappointment. I am curious to see how long this love for them on CB will last.
Completely agree with you. I had the same sentiment. Kaiser’s hate for Middleton’s is irrational. It is a very feminist thing to do - instead of taking about the rapist to use the situation to attack a woman completely unrelated to the situation - NOT.
We are in agreement here. Thanks for reading!
I am good, thanks for asking. I’ve been on vacation, just came back yesterday.