Saying or implying something negative about Angelina will get you banned immediately on CB. I don’t know why Kaiser takes any criticism of Angelina very personally, but she does.
I saw your comment. And I agree that possibly Angelina has her own unresolved issues with her father and might be replaying the same scenario over and over.
This is, actually, the concept of karma - we are presented with the same issues /situations over and over and over until we learn and find a way to deal with those issues in a positive way. Only then we can move on from our past and grow.
Bella said that Kate is using her height and looks as a weapon against Meg!Ha Ha Ha!
People are pissed that Kate is tall and wears heels! Also do they all wake up early waiting for the next post? The same people are always the first to comment.
This is hilarious and they think they are so clever. Hat of doom? How cringey. Sounds like something Kaiser would splatter a million of times in a paragraph or tweet! As she does with “Keen” and “Buttons” when truth are she’s the only one obessed with those things.
This is the same poster who said Kate is throwing “Micro agressions toward Meghan” (?) and none of the “woke” commenters called her out for using a serious topic for POC in a obsurd disillusioned way.
Saying she’s using basically her natural body to…hurt Meghan? And why does Bella feel this way? Body language. You know, the thing we can read for Kate but are told not to do for Meghan.
Not only is it sexist, disgusting and a insult to both women, but it’s a insult to all women.
We shouldn’t wear heels or hats or be too noticeable because what about “so and so?“
Guys, newsflash! Our natural height,heels and presences are weapons against poor Meghan.
Kate isn’t a witch and Meghan is a strong ass black woman, who doesn’t need a bunch of women trying to save her from Kate.
And I don’t feel bad that people are calling this out. Since they think they can judge women based off barely anything, I can judge them based off their words. Which unlike thier unhinged comments about Meg and Kate are actual things that are based in reality.I don’t have to speculate the hate and negativity. It’s right in my face. I don’t have to rely on shady sources or bias. I can see it.
—————————————————————————————
The whole discussion about Kate’s height today was nuts. They were all trying catch Kate on a “lie”, as if it was her who lied in the first place. I doubt Kate made any official statements about her height. Notasugar claimed that Kate could not be more than 5′6′’, which is ridiculous.
I think Kate is more like 5′8-5′9′’. I am 5′7′’ and Kate looks a couple inches taller than I am. Not that any of it matters.
I am not sure. It is possible, now that I think of it. Or maybe these are all Kaiser’s fake accounts.Or these are the commentors that Kaiser reads.
Very true.
I just wanted to echo one of the submissions from a few days ago. Notasugar, LAK and others go on and on about how lazy Kate is. But given the time they spend on her posts one has to wonder - what it is they do the whole day? They seem to have plenty of spare time on their hands.
Having children is pretty much the JOB of every woman in any hereditary monarchy, no matter how enlightened and modern it pretends to be. This is another reason the monarchy needs to be abolished. It is so patriarchal. A woman’s value is measured by whether she can have healthy beautiful children.
CB posters all go on about Kate being “lazy”, but as far as the BRF concerned Kate is doing a great job. She gave the BRF the next generation of heirs.
Only deluded CB posters think that sponsoring charities, cutting ribbons and looking pretty at events has any real value. Whether royals do 5 or 5000 of them, it doesn’t have any real impact. The only true benefit is to the royal family in keeping themselves relevant.
A regular working as a nurse delivers much more benefit to the world than any of the royals.
When posts start hitting over 300+ comments you know it is time to run for cover. The crazy fanfics, the claims of lips reading, body language reading and so on are very reminiscent of the Cumberbatch craziness that went on a few years ago.
So I’m postive nosugarhere is Kaiser. I’m also postive that a lot of the anti Kate people have alt accounts.So.do the anti Meghan people.
But why is it that the same people comment on every royal post, all day going through post after post writing “corrections”?
Do they work? They complain that Kate doesn’t work and is attention hungry but they all pay so much attention to every little thing about her.
It’s a case study. I can feel the personal deep hate that some truly have for these mostly female celebs, and to be honest, I never feel like anyone is that passionate about actual horrible.people. I feel like some say “generic statements number 200”
Trump.is the only person that I feel like the hate is legit and personal
Everything else rings hallow. Maybe it’s because.all the grandstanding that CB does. I’ve seen so much hypocrisy that I no longer believe when .they are actually serious. I’ve seen a rules change so much for certain celebs.
But with Kate and some other women it’s a hostility that seems so personal and so angry. That I barely see on Celebitchy these days toward actual harmful people.
Maybe I’m wrong
————————————————————–
That is an excellent point you made. I also feel that they have far more hate for someone generally harmless like Taylor Swift or Kate Middleton than for some truly awful people like Weinstein. Weinstein is over and forgotten but we get a daily scoop on Kate.
You also correctly observed that the worst hate is always reserved for women. Even in case of Trump I think they hate Melania and Ivanka more than Trump.
Lol
Nosugarhere needs help. So does concern trolling Nic.
The most disgusting comments on the site are the royal posts.
A regular said Pippa is like Meghan sister. Which is a hell of a reach. This same commenter plays woke but beats up on certain women for sport.
Celebitchy and humble ? Yeah, that does not happen. ))) Though, I have to say, I personally trust information that is peer reviewed by scientists over claims by celebrities.
You have a point here. Some forms of cancers are much less common in developing countries which don’t use chemicals on the same scale we do. It is a fact, and there are reasons to believe plastics and chemicals, especially fertilizers and various pesticides, which end up in our water supply are a big factor.
The selfish part comes in with people not being vaccinated being a danger to other non-vaccinated people, especially infants. Most other countries are nowhere as lenient as the US when it comes to not vaccinating your kids.
The whole topic bothers me, to be honest. Kids should be completely off limits.
Notasugar is hating on a three year old. These are her words about little Princess Charlotte:
’You’re welcome to find her darling. I find her a mini Carole and Pippa, and there’s nothing darling in that.“
I bet Meghan’s toddlers will be the most darlingest darlings that ever darlinged.
—————————————————————————–
It might be not a popular opinion, but I really admire Carole Middleton. The woman came from nothing to the top of the British society, all through her hard work.
People were accusing Middletons today of using their connection with the BRF to their advantage. And my question is - why do they think any members of the BRF, born to privilege and riches, are in any way superior to Carole Middleton? If anything, she is superior to all of them, and it is obsession with class, money and aristocracy that blinds people to this fact.
If people have a problem with the fact that a connection to the BRF bestows an unfair advantage, then they should advocate for abolishment of the monarchy, which is at the root of this unfairness.
Oh, take a look at this comment. Apparently, we, as true feminists know that we shouldn’t tell a woman what to do with her appearance or anything else, as it should be her choice. Except for when it is a woman we don’t like, like Melania.//sarcasm off.
minx says:
I really dislike her aging Barbie doll hair, whether it’s a wig or not. She’s First Lady, get a good trim, ditch the center part and try to look a little classier.
I am also certain that Celebitchy takes money to promote Kardashians. There could be no other possible explanation for their many articles about Kardashians, trying to present them in a positive light and make excuses for them.
Literally nobody but Kaiser thought Kim Kardashian looked good in that outfit yesterday. Either Kaiser has the worst fashion sense on Earth, or she is being paid to promote Kim, or possibly - both.
Me too. I am not one for conspiracy theories, but the way thy come across is just too similar for them to be two different people. If they are, then they must be soulmates (from hell).
I could not believe what I was reading on the Bill Clinton thread today. This is a classic sexual harassment case. But, of course, our lawyer-in-residence lilacflowers could not recognize it. Neither could the chief-feminist-in-residence otaku fairy. Kitten, of course, would excuse anyone with the last name Clinton. The whol thread was unbelievable. Only towards the end of it some sane people showed up and started asking “Really? “
Melania’s threads are all sick. Sure, she supported the birther nonsense, but the way they treat her you would think she is a serial killer or something.
But what irritates me most is - these fake feminists keep demanding that Melania acts as a FLOTUS. What for? If a woman does not want to be a FLOTUS, why does she have to be? The whole institution is patriarchal and needs to be abolished. As per feminism, shouldn’t a woman be free to do what she wants, regardless of who her husband is?
They justify their demands by the fact that she is supported by taxpayers. So are the spouses of all other heads of state, but none of them are expected to perform ceremonial roles. In fact, most people would object to it, as the spouses are not elected to anything.
I just saw this comment under the Benedict’s article
Danielle says:
If this had happened back in 2014 there would have been hundreds of comments on this story and it would have quickly descended into insanity. Good times!! Someone should do a study into how Bendy killed off his fanclub so rapidly!
ROFL! It is not Bendy, it is Kaiser! Bendy is doing just fine. Kaiser ran off all of Bendy’s fans off the site with her peddling of conspiracy theories and PR accusations when Bendy got married.
Kaiser has always moderated me out, even when someone made an identical comment to me, my post always disappeared, I have no idea why, she is entirely capricious, blatantly biased and frankly not very bright. The wit and humour have been sucked out of the site. A pity, it used to be good natured messaging from women (mainly) from all over the world, now it’s just a gang of deranged cronies spewing out bile, I won’t be going back.
I think I did not get the beginning of this message. Posting what I got, sorry.
Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney.
They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.
They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).
Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.
And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?
notasugarhere says:
Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.
When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say - this is why this site is called “bitchy”.
However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines - why are you commenting on this person if you don’t like him/ her, you could just skip the post.
The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.
Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.
And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty.
Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.
I see posters on CB are so concerned with feminists issues that there are only 20-30 posts on the #MeToo related topics but 200-300 each of the royal posts and there are 5-6 of them a day. // sarcasm
CB turned into a nastier version of Mirror.
Wow,I just went to the Kate’s maternity leave thread and it is NASTY.
What is this, for example ( a post by Lizbeth )
“
While I think leave is fine, I’m not buying the idea that proper bonding requires her to be home with the baby 24/7. While Kate’s “on leave” she’s not available 24/7 to the baby nor are “ordinary hands-on” moms who do things like clean the house, grocery shop, go to church, engage in their regular charitable activities, have a night out with dad, etc. all while “on leave.”
“
Let me tell you something, “Lizbeth”, a new baby wakes up every 2 hours to feed. And if you breastfeed, it does not matter how many nannies you have, you still have to wake up every 2 hours. You get no sleep for the first 3-4 months, you become a zombie.
Cleaning? What cleaning? Grocery shopping an cooking - the husband can do it. Believe it or not, even in regular households women get help, and they are still struggling.
I don’t think Meghan is a famewhore, but I am pretty sure if Harry wasn’t a rich royal she wouldn’t have given him a second look. But this goes for many women. I don’t think Meghan is worse than any other regular woman, but she is not an activist, feminist etc. that Celebitchy posters are making her out to be. If she were, she would have never married into the royal family to begin with.
Even in the backwards US, which does not have any maternity leave whatsoever, women get 6 weeks disability leave to recover from birth. And I can attest that they need every day of it since bleeding often doesn’t stop for 4-6 weeks.
Exactly. They want Kate to work while pregnant, when she just had a baby but have no problems with Meghan’s many vacations because apparently she was stressed out by wedding preparations.
Sometimes I wonder if those women have any idea what it takes to birth a child and how much energy being a parent requires, even if you have help.
The hypocrisy is unbearable. When it is a woman they like, any missteps are excused. When it is a woman they don’t like every misstep is treated like a crime against humanity.
I, personally, have an issue with how much Meghan’s dresses cost. 100K per dress is way, way too much for someone who is supposed to be all about helping people. I remember CB used to go on and on about the cost of Kate’s wardrobe. They have been silent on the subject for months. And in case of Meghan, even when the price is brought up, the posters “choose” to talk about how lovely she looks instead. They are not fooling anyone.
The same with Meghan curtsying and wearing tights. They find an excuse after an excuse, but they do not afford the same courtesy when it comes to celebrities they don’t like,