Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

October 2017

Did you see the latest article on Kate? It’s very petty and childish, especially the “game” she proposes at the end

No, I didn’t. I usually don’t read Kate Middleton or Angelina articles, they are just too much for me. I took a peak at one a few weeks back and Kaiser made it sound like Kate got pregnant just so that she can upstage Meghan Markle or something like that.

I read one about Taylor Swift yesterday and it was fun watching the usual haters trying to reconcile their feelings for her and the fact that they liked the song.

The one comment claiming that Alwyn is not that good looking made me snort. I get it that tastes are different , but Alwyn is very handsome. He and Taylor also look very similar, which makes me think that he is one for her. People often fall for those who look like them.

Oct 21, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Do you ever comment on Pajiba, what do you think of it? I made a (polite) comment there questioning if Hillary Clinton really didn't know about Weinstein, considering she had access to the best intelligence and it got deleted (twice). It seems like Hillary is to Pajiba what Angelina Jolie is to CB. Moderation and censorship is increasing, online and in society in general.

It seems to be  a bigger version of CB -  an echo-chamber for “woke”people. I don’t have a problem with the content as such but the commenters seem to have a kind of herd mentality- you are with us or against us. I checked it out a few times, but was never tempted to join.

Oct 17, 2017 1 note
I think royalsparkle may be another of kaiser’s Alts. That chick is batshi# crazy.
Oct 11, 2017
What is Liana's site that is referenced on here so much? I also used to be a frequent Celebitchy reader, but learned better than to comment after I stuck up for Bernie during the primaries. Glad to have found your tumblr!

It is an old blog thread where a lot of people who were banned over the years posted.

https://lianathinks.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/being-banned/

Oct 10, 2017
I noticed earlier today on the Hugh Hefner article that some people commented about why was the site still linking to popaholic? Some other posters said something about how the site was heavily moderated and called out Kaiser. Those comments have since been deleted.

I bet the answer is money. CB gets money for the links. In the end, despite all the claims of being progressive and what is not, CB is a business. It is there to make its owners money. This is the reason they post about Trump 5 times a day -  clicks, which turn into money, and this is the reason for advertising and links.

Oct 3, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

Anyone thinks “notasugarhere” is Kaiser?  I am not one for conspiracy theories but the writing style is very similar.

Anyway, regardless, on the controversy of a librarian rejecting Dr. Seuss books that Melani Trump gave, notasugarhere seems to be the only person working hard to justify it.

My view is that you don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. If something is given with good intentions, you accept it and move on. You can decide how to handle the gift later, if you don’t actually need it. Anything else is very rude and hurtful.

Oct 2, 2017 4 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Within hours celebitchy managed to turn the vegas shooting into a trash trump thread 50 people are dead for crying out loud who cares about party politics
Oct 2, 2017

September 2017

I believe I got myself banned today so I decided to go out with a bang and call Kaiser out...She didn’t approve either comment but I know she read them. I specifically mentioned that there are blogs/websites dedicated to her ways.
Sep 29, 2017 2 notes

Ha-ha. Kaiser is tying herself into a pretzel to prove the point that the Wonder Woman is a feminist icon and James Cameron is wrong. I know nothing about James Cameron, the person, but his point is valid and whatever his personal failing are, his point still stands on its own.

The Wonder Woman is not a feminist icon. It is disgrace to consider her as such because the character relies too much on the looks and the sexy outfits. Let’s not pretend the tiny outfit that WW wears is an accident.

Pippi Longstocking is more of a feminsit icon than WW will ever be. I feel sad for young American women who are taught that WW is something to aspire and who don’t have enough exposure to strong female characters to know any better.

Sep 28, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
Guys, this tumblr is amazing! I never knew how ridiculous Kaiser and the comment moderation on CB were until last week. I was ont he same critical thread of comments about Popoholic as Anon a few posts ago! I was polite, referenced the supposedly feminist tone of CB but yet my comment was deleted! I commented again asked why the moderation was so strict, then got moderated again. Today I was banned... They are just as bad as Drumpf with the censorship! Popoholic is filth, yet they promote it.
Sep 23, 2017 1 note
This might be Virgilia! virgiliasays -dot-com

Thank you.

Sep 21, 2017
Popoholic always bugs me. Sometimes a link headline will intrigue me (This dress is cute?), and I'll click without noticing it was popoholic. (sexy little this and hot little that and exposed cleavage). The pictures are fine but the salivating objectifying language bothers me. And it surprised me that such a "woke" and feminist blog links to it. I thought I was alone but today others commented about it. I did too. Then all the comments were deleted! I was polite. Happened to anyone else?

I wasn’t familiar with Popoholic. I just checked it out. It is not my cup of tea either, for the same reasons you stated. Objectification is wrong.

Sep 20, 2017
I have no idea why I was banned from Celebitchy. How can I find out the reason?

I don’t think so. But it is safe to say that it was whatever your posted the last day. I know some people even emailed the Celebitchy owner asking to be unblocked because they felt they didn’t do anything wrong. They never got any response back, of course.

Some of them got eventually unblocked after a year or so, once their IP addresses disappeared from the blocked list.  It looks like whatever blocking software CB uses, it clears up IP addresses after 6 months or a year.

Sep 20, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Do you know what happened to Virgilia Coriolanus? She was my favorite commenter.

No, I don’t. If anyone knows, feel free to shoot me a note. I’ll post it. I remember her as well. She had very thoughtful posts.

I also remember Nutballs. She was funny, she was a Hiddleston fan. Once she ventured outside of Hiddles posts into something more controversial and got banned.

P.S. 

I just checked Lianna’s site, I thought I saw Viriginia’s posts there. Here is her last one from this July. Maybe she did start her own site.

Yeah–I haven’t been commenting on CB as often. Part of it is because I don’t want to write a comment and then have it modded–especially if I worked looong and haaard on that comment too. I’m also annoyed that you apparently can’t write about hot dreams about Tom Hardy, but they’ll let people GO TO TOWN on the Jennifer/Justin/Brad/Angelina threads. I mean, I honestly start dreading reading the threads because of a few people who just go after people for disagreeing. Why aren’t any of their comments deleted?

But yeah, I was telling my friend this, and she told me to start my own site—she convinced me…..:)

Sep 20, 2017 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
The Angelina Jolie fans on CB are scary, unless you completely worship her they will attack. It's just insane.

I don’t even click on Angelina’s articles. They are too much for my sanity.

Sep 15, 2017
I tried to comment on the Hillary article to tell them calling people who do not like her trolls or other things is as bad as Trump supporters crying fake news. I went straight into moderation of course. The level of crazy on that site is unreal.
Sep 14, 2017

For the love of peace, why are they still going on about Hillary Clinton? She is irrelevant. 

On the day Bernie makes his “Medicare for all” proposal, there is no word of it on the supposedly progressive CB site, but a post again about Hillary and why it is not her fault.

There are only two people who dared to say - why are we still talking about Hillary, and both were attacked by all the hardcore Hilalry supporters repeatedly. They were accused of lying, being trolls, having ulterior motives and were told that they didn’t need to comment at all, if they didn’t care for Hillary.

It has been in the back of my mind the whole day, what  does this behavior remind me of. And it finally clicked - a cult. That is exactly how cult members behave. The viciousness of the pro-Hillary posters on CB just goes a bit too far outside the accepted norms. The constant accusations of lying and having dishonest motives are hallmarks of people being in a complete and total denial about reality. They don’t see things objectively.

Sep 14, 2017 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban

Ah, so today’s Cumberbatch article is called “Benedict Cumberbatch did his TIFF premiere without his loyal&faithful wife”.

That is some very low class trolling from Kaiser, and not at all feminist minded.

Clearly she hasn’t “forgiven” Cumberbatch’s wife for stealing yet another internet boyfriend from her.

Somebody comes across as very vindictive and completely lacking self-awareness. 

Sep 11, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
What happened to QQ? I loved her!

I didn’t visit CB that day but according to other people this is what happened

“Oh my toads! So, earlier I said I wonder if “Kaiser will cover the BET awards’, well guess what? She decided to cover a agrument that a bunch of rappers had and Kaiser basically said, “nothing noteworthy happened on the show, so I’m not going to cover it, I’ll just talk about what was happening on twitter” (Aka the princess of wokeness didn’t watch the BET Awards and just saw that was trending on twitter) and so a lot of people were complaining about how dismissive the post was and complaining about Kaiser.Everyones stance was, why cover anything from the BET Awards? Why not just ignore the whole thing and be hypocrtical as always, because you always race bait and all that, but on your own website, you basically dismissed a amazing show that was full of diversity and amazing moments, Also you cover LITERALLY EVERY AWARD SHOW.
Kaiser loves to call people out on not being inclusive yet you aknowlegdeged the BET Awards and chose to report on something negative and after the show.
So tell me why, kaiser not only deleted a bunch of comments, but she LOCKED THE POST.
Instead of owning up to it, or apologizing, she LOCKED THE POST.
Seriousy?“

QQ and AlmondJoy were the people who apparently called Kaiser out on that BET awards show post and after that they disappeared. Either they got blocked or they left in protest. I think they were blocked.

But then Kaiser realized that she made a big mistake because ever since then the other people have been asking what happened to QQ and AlmondJoy and keep dropping hints like “ I wish some posters were still here”.

Sep 10, 2017 1 note
I'm really surprised that Kaiser let the critical comments on the Amal story stay, comments like that usually get deleted fast.

That is because Nicole, who criticized Kaiser, is black. And after what happened with AlmondJoy and QQ Kaiser is forced to tread lightly, otherwise she’ll lose all her POC readers.

Sep 9, 2017
Kaiser seems to think anyone who dislikes meghan markle is somehow either racist or jelous she can't seem to grasp the reason some are unhappy about vanity fair article is because her and harry have complained about press intrusion if kate had done an interview when she was dating william they would of cruzified her this meghans so great a bumanitarian and will save the royal family bulls hit is getting old she done like 5 charity events in five years they will be calling her a saint soon

If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be marrying into the royal family. I think she just wants a comfortable life. I don’t hate Kate, to me she is a stay at home mom, one of many. It is her choice. And Meghan is no different.

If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be signing up for a highly regimented life of a royal.

Sep 9, 2017 1 note
I think kaiser doesn't know how democracy works that people can vote for who they want to its not a liberal dictator ship it's the same with free speech your only allowed to have an opinion if you agree
Sep 9, 2017 1 note
Notasugarhere also hates amal clooney though loves meghan markle

Just like Kaiser. -))

Sep 9, 2017
Something I noticed

Whenver their is a postive Kate story Nosugarhere (one of the biggest and nasiest Kate haters of them all) either doesn’t comment, or they comment really late at night when the thread is dead.

Today’s BRF post was about George’s first day and was very postive. I find that whenever the posts are postive, then the haters don’t bother to comment. It’s really sad that their so hateful of these ppl that they can’t even comment nicely.

Also, I love how whenever LAK, Nosugarhere or Nic say something (and it usually sounds like made up tabloid nonsense to further incrimante Kate) everyone belives it. They seem to know exactly what Kate thinks.

what a bunch of looneys.

Sep 7, 2017

Today’s Munroe Bergdorf post is such a mess. I’ll try to step lightly here because I didn’t grow up in the US, and I didn’t grow up with the American race struggles. I had my own experiences as a mixed ethnicity person and I  think that helps me to see both sides of the argument.

I only want to say that outside of the US there is no such term as  “reverse racism”. At least I never heard it. There is only “racism”. No person is exempt from being seen as a racist if their actions are racist. And ”racism” means personal racism, institutional racism is called “institutional racism” and not simply “racism”.

Btw, I just read on the Guardian what happened to Michael Bennet and it is absolutely crazy. American police is  out of control. Guns and racism are an awful combination. I am not black and American police terrifies me. I can’t imagine being black and having to face them, without knowing what to expect.

Sep 6, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I am happy to see that common sense prevails in the comments under the Amal’s post. Here is what Kaiser said about Amal. It is her usual passive-aggressive style. And she thinks Taylor is a mean girl?

“I like that she’s not a “kept woman,” even though I’ve believed for a long time that George is financing her shopping habit. That being said, it wouldn’t surprise me if she did find a way to quietly quit her job, right? “

And kudos to Nicole for calling her out on that and sticking to her guns.

Nicole says:

September 6, 2017 at 8:33 am

You’re incredible rude about Amal and it’s confusing. People were right to tell you you didn’t know she could work from home, but you continue to be dismissive and imply that she doesn’t work that much. Plus, finance her shopping trips? They’re married, she likes to buy clothes, he’s not financing anything, it’s a shared pot of money. I don’t know…your attitude towards Amal seems odd.

Sep 6, 2017
#celebitchy #ban

On today’s Hillary article there was this comment regarding Hillary vs. Bernie, under which I cosign 100%.

Patricia says:

September 6, 2017 at 8:45 am

Listen, I’m not a bro and I’m not anywhere near a Trump voter. I grew up pretty poor, tied on the college debt that is the hallmark of my generation, and couldn’t even get a job in the field. My husband and children are Hispanic so I don’t fit the “oh so white” Bernie supporter mold.

Bernie talked about universal healthcare, for real. He talked about affordable college. He talked about taxing the 1% for real. He talked like a socialist becuase he is one, and so am I. Bernie didn’t pull the wool over anybody’s eyes on this. Yes I want change, and the Democratic Party isn’t offering it in any real form. I want a nation of free people who live within a society that functions for the good of all. I want hard work to pay off. I want my fellow Americans treated like human beings. Hillary didn’t speak to me at all. Sorry Hillary, this isn’t Bernie’s fault.


And what did the poster get in return? Insults and ridicule. Here is an example.

Scout says:

September 6, 2017 at 10:13 am

So does that mean you voted for Jill Stein whose platform was almost identical to Bernie’s? If so…LMAO.


The majority of the CB posters must be very privileged if they don’t see how hard the life is for the majority of the young Americans, and for working and lower middle class. The poster here is telling them that Hillary had no solutions, and yet her CB supporters just go la-la-la. That is because they have no personal experience with what OP is talking about, imo.

Sep 6, 2017 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Kaiser acts like a 10 year old girl...

“Kaiser@Celebitchy‏ @KaiseratCB

 

Replying to @Kel_MoonFace

I’m over him. The Vikander thing has left a bad taste in my mouth

5:07 AM - 5 Sep 2017”

Kaiser admits on Twitter that she is like a 12 year old bully, who likes a guy, finds out he has a girlfriend, and instead of moving on, she decides to try to spite and shit talk the girl. Or speard rumors behind her back. Or make weak ass passive agressive digs.


So from now on, everytime Kaiser criticizes Vikander, we know it’s because she’s a mean girl. Just like they call Taylor Swift. Kaiser seems to be more like the people she loathes then she knows.

She’s somewhat like Trump, whenever people give a opinion she doesn’t like she calls it, “Whining” or “Shouting” as if these opinions aren’t valid. But are people just bitching.

She ignores  anything that dares to criticize her. She will not admit fault in anyway. She’s sexist, demeaning and calls everything that she doesn’t want to believe (even if it’s actual fact) Fake News, in order to make her feel better.

And like Taylor, Kaiser plays the victim. Is always passive agressively shitting on women who date men that she had crushes on (at least Taylor Swift actually dates the guys and has expereince with them).

Though while Taylor is successful, beatiful and regardless of anything smart, Kaiser likes to insert her power over a website that doesn’t even get her verified on twitter.

Kaiser also isn’t creative and repeats the same four or five “Insults” for every celeb

Like Kate, well..no..Kaiser isn’t like Kate. Kate seems to actually be a nice person that CB picks apart for filth because they are sexist shaming assholes.

Also on Twitter she reposted something negative about Meghan Merkle, but on CB, she tries to appeal to the crazy people who jump on anyone who says anything about MM and shit on Kate for everything.

So she doesn’t even give her honest opinion.

and the worst offense to me is that they love Kim Kardashian because she “called out Swift” which made me realize that they are a bunch of white women pretending to be “woke” because any black person, especially a women, would not and could not respect Kim K, because she steals from black women and resales it.


I’m not the type of black woman to say this but ,it’s white privielege for Kaiser and the gang, to brush over Kim K’s past just because Kim “called out” Tayor. That shows how fickle minded and hateful they are.

It also showed that they don’t care about black people.

And not to mention that QQ and Almondjoy got kicked off. 

 

Sep 6, 2017
I sent you a comment yesterday about criticizing Jolie. Today I tried to post a positive comment about a poem on the Fassbender article, and my comment wouldn't go through. Tried two more times - it just reloads to the top of the page. I'm shocked. I've posted on and off for several months, I'm generally in agreement with the "party line," have been civil, etc. For a site that's anti-Trump, that's some straight-up Trump-style censorship.

Yep. That is how it works. And this is why I have this blog, It happened to me too. I am never rude or disrespectful. But I am not a blind follower. I like to have a conversation and explore many angles.

This banning of people left and right, for politely disagreeing and trying to have a discussion, is just not right.

What is the point of having a blog where everyone agrees with each other on everything? It is an echo chamber.

Sep 6, 2017
After not going to CB for months, tired of my posts getting deleted then said posts being passed off as Kaiser's writing, I caved and went to witness the K meltdown regarding the rumors of Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander wedding. What is she 10? Like he would even give her psycho self a 2nd glance. There does seem to be support for Alicia though which must be burning K inside. Good honestly! Also apparently longtime posters QQ and AlmondJoy were banned? That place is going downhill fast.

Ha-ha, yes. Kaiser can’t forgive Alicia for “stealing” Fassy. And , yet, even her regulars, who usually back her, don’t support her against Alicia.

Sep 6, 2017 2 notes
I made a critical but polite comment about Jolie today that got deleted. Twice. Meanwhile they spent last week on how Swift is apparently the devil. Don't get me wrong, Taylor is OTT, but I don't get the coddling one celebrity while tearing down another (doubly so since Taylor is annoying but harmless while Jolie has a documented history of manipulation). Can't celebrity gossip just be a bitchy escape without petty crap?

CB pretend to be more than just a  gossip site. Except, they don’t follow their own high minded rules most of the time. It is just once in a while they remember about feminism, sexism and other topics. And usually it has to do with their favorites. When it comes to anybody else, the high standards go right out of the window.

Sep 5, 2017 1 note
I find the comments on Kate Middleton disgusting as well. I haven't been able to post anything for awhile now. Kaiser has her little group of friends LAK, Sixer, Notasugar, who is vile, among others. They seem to be able to say whatever they want. Makes me think they might all be Kaiser.

I don’t think they are all Kaiser, at least not LAK and Sixer. But they are her core posters. If she blocks them there will be nobody left. 

I used to think LAK and Sixer were interesting. But their hypocrisy, in the end, made me see them for who they are.

Sep 5, 2017
The hate on the latest Kate Middleton post is absolutely disgusting. Kaiser is saying she got pregnant to avoid working.

Their hate for Kate is squarely in the unhinged, too far gone territory.  That is why I can’t take anything those posters say anywhere else seriously. They all need help.

Sep 4, 2017
The dog pile on Jessoca Chastain was breathtaking. Someone actually said Becky's like her are worse than the alt-right and neo nazi's

I haven’t seen this yet. Now they’ve found something wrong with Chastain? Unbelievable.

Sep 4, 2017 1 note
i tried to comment 5 times on today's Taylor Swift posts, "Good on Taylor for donating" and my post was deleted on the spot. Are they not allowing people to say nice things about her? Or is CB just a place for the same five people to bitch about how much they hate her, yet follow every single thing she does?

Lol, yes, it does seem like it is a therapy place for people who don’t like Swift, Kate Middleton and a few other celebrities. They blow off their steam there  and (hopefully?) feel better afterwards.

As for Taylor, I give her credit for how well she handled that DJ trial. She did us all a great service.

Sep 3, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

Can I also blame Alicia Vikander a little bit for this mess too? While critics aren’t saying that Vikander sucks in Tulip Fever (they’re just saying the movie is terrible), I just feel like… we’ve been here before. The release date for The Light Between Oceans kept getting pushed back too, and it felt like a case of “the emperor’s new clothes” where no one really wants to admit that Vikander in particular really can’t carry a film and that she’s not really a “draw” as an actress.

A-ha-ha. I see Kaiser still can’t let go of of her need to put Vilkander down, though now she has to phrase it more circumspectly because quite a few people on CB, including the regulars, like Vilkander.    

It is said, living well is the best revenge, and Vilkander is doing exactly that. Enjoy your sour grapes, Kaiser.

Sep 2, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I loved this comment on a Swift post yesterday. Well said, Erica.

Erica_V says:

September 1, 2017 at 4:21 pm

Until Kanye apologies for using her naked likeness without her consent Taylor doesn’t have to apologize FOR ANYTHING!!!

Why does everyone forget he did that to her? Why does everyone insist Taylor take the highroad? She does not have to be the bigger person just because she’s a woman!! Kanye is a misogynistic douchebag and Taylor doesn’t owe him a single thing.

Sep 2, 2017 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I'm laughing right now. Shitser is indeed incredibly thin skinned when it comes to Angelina Jolie, tried to post a reply saying Angelina's last movies bombed hard @ the box office & how she's always been both incredibly overrated lookswise & in terms of "talent". Was immediately put on moderation. Is there a Jolie filter over there or something? How is Kate Middleton considered thin to the point of being accused of an eating disorder when her mediocre idol Jolie weighs less than my teen niece?

I personally think Angelina’s face is incredibly beautiful . For me, her face and Liv Tylers’s  seem so beautiful that it is almost impossible to believe such faces exist. But I also understand that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And what is inside also affects the perception of outside beauty.

I also always remind myself that I shouldn’t  treat a beautiful person better than others, I still should judge them on their character and actions. And I do question some of Angelina’s actions.

As for CB, imo, if you allow posters to say certain things about one woman, then you should allow the same for the other. You cannot have different standards for your favorites vs. others, that is just means you have no integrity. CB either shouldn’t censor anything, or should censor using the same criteria. If you are not allowing to shame one woman for being  underweight or under-dressed, or whatever else, you shouldn’t allow shaming of another.

And a self-proclaimed feminist site  definitely shouldn’t allow shaming of women based on their looks, or allow harsh judging of women while giving a pass to men for same or worse actions.

Sep 2, 2017

August 2017

I had asked you yesterday about the being banned thing bc of some semi-TS posts and you said she did ban me. That is seriously insane! I'm not even a TS fan, I just disagree with the double standard for women. I'm exactly the demo they want: millennial, educated, well-employed and buy a lot online. So crazy to me, and a terrible business model for CB. Most sites are so happy if they create organic, educated discussions bc it means lots of clicks! What blog did you switch to instead of CB?

Which blog did I swtich to? The Guardian. Not joking here. There is nothing in the world of the celebirty gossip right now that is decent enough for me. The Guardian allows comments and has fair censorship. If I want to discuss Trump and politics that is the right place to do it, not CB. They also have a decent arts section.

Aug 31, 2017 1 note
There are Swift fans on CB, I've seen their posts over the last few days. I don't think the issue is whether the site is pro or anti a certain celeb but when you criticise the site, even a question or feedback is deleted.

You’ll see , those Swift fans will disappear pretty quickly. I’ve seen it over and over. Yes, there will be people for a while, who openly disagree, but eventually they disappear because in general disagreement just doesn’t jive with CB.  CB is an echo chamber.

And, yes, it goes beyond saying that criticism of the site or Kaiser will result in an immediate ban even for long term posters. I remember last year one of Kaiser’s favorites, lilacflower/ lighpurple, got banned when she disagreed with Kaiser over Kanye. 

Aug 30, 2017
Could I have been banned for simply pointing out that the site is pro-Kanye in the Taylor Swift feud? The post itself admitted it. My comments were there yesterday and are not there anymore, all of the replies to me are scattered.

Absolutely.You are not allowed to support Swift on CB , period.

Aug 30, 2017 1 note
For a group of people on CB, who claim to be "feminist" and "woke", they are anything but. Kanye humiliated a young girl on world stage and disgustingly put her naked likeness on a bed along side him and his whorish wife. Even if T did know about the lyrics, the video itself was misogynistic. For the race obsessed, they make it into black vs white tripe. I wish Taylor destroys Kumye. The hypocrisy of Kaiser and her minions no longer shock me.

Exactly. It doesn’t matter what Taylor is like. What Kanye did was wrong. It is not about Kanye and Kim vs. Taylor, it is about right and wrong. Kaiser and many CB posters have very flexible ethics when it comes to their favorites, while those they don’t like are never given the benefit of a doubt.

Aug 30, 2017 1 note
I think I got the punt from Celebitchy today. Kaiser's nastiness really got to me. She was on about Will and Kate's choice of prep school for George. Yesterday my comments regarding Angelina Jolie never showed up. I dont attack anyone but I do put out my opinion. It's never mean or nasty.
Aug 25, 2017

A few thoughts on the some of the last days of posts

* People going to town on Susan Sarandon. Really? Susan Sarandon has been a lefty for longer than many of us were alive and now you are judging her? If your party doesn’t have a place for a brave and principled person that is Susan Sarandon then I am not interested in being in your party.

* It is funny to read the praise for Taylor Swifts given so grudgingly. Admit it, Taylor Swift has guts and has strength that is to be admired and she did all feminists a huge service by standing up for herself and not folding. Yes, she is privileged but she is still a human being with feelings. She definitely did more for feminism than Kanye will ever do. And I still remember some of the posters defending Kanye over his video with naked wax replicas of Swift and others.

* No fan of Ivanka or nepotism, but I wouldn’t be so readily jumping on board with criticism of her by Indian officials, many of whom think that a woman is a lesser human being. I felt a whiff of that in their condescension towards Ivanka.

Aug 15, 2017 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Came across your blog today. I found out about CB about 5 years ago and I for some reason I thought Kaiser is Asian/Hindu/American and that she went to Law School or I could be confusing her with one of the other writers. I was not aware that people had been banned but I did notice that the there is a "in line" type of comment. What made me not want to look at that site was a video I found on youtube about a commentator of CB talking about how she had been bullied in an AJ thread on CB. Sad.

I think Kaiser mentioned that she is half-Indian, I have my doubts. She knows little about India and Indians and the knowledge is superficial She comes across as an American white. It is possible that she is half-Indian but was raised by the white side of the family and has no connection to the Indian side. Still, she doesn’t seem to have any desire to learn more about India. And that makes me think she is a white person posing as someone else. It is internet, there is no way to tell.

Bullying and piling on are pretty typical of the CB, if you hold an opinion not shared by the majority of posters. 

But yes, I think you are thinking about the right person.

Aug 13, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Kaiser has a knack for making everything about race

Yep. Kaiser’s race baiting is pretty transparent. And the thing is, half of the time she doesn’t even understand the issue she is talking about, and she gets flak from her posters. Still, it is too good of an opportunity for her to get more clicks to pass it up.

Aug 11, 2017
They constantly try to make out natalie portman son is Darren affronsky despite the fact he looks like Natalies dad claim her marriage is on the rocks then claim that the second baby her and her husband had was a bandaid baby that she's stuck up must of paid her way into Harvard Despite a 4.0 high school diploma its like the fact she exists is a problem
Aug 11, 2017
Despite the fact that kate middleton apparently never works according to Kaiser she manages to write about three stories about her a week her hatred is ridicules and good forbid you say a nice comment they ban you they also seem to take pot shots at her kids too saying charlotte looks like an old lady she all middle to poor baby

Ha, good point. If Kate never works, how is it she is out and about at all these functions.

Aug 11, 2017 1 note
Kaiser Hate red of will and kate is hilarious whenever harry does something it's wills fault harry barley works its apparently will stopping him to make him look bad if harry disappears on holiday apparently it's will who must of leaked to the press that time harry wore a Nazi costume it was aparrently the big bad will who made him wear it dispute the fact he was 20 when it happened

Yes. If they really have an issue with people living at taxpayer expense then they should stop making an exception for Harry. He is no less privileged than Will.

But it seems roayls living at the taxpayer expense are OK, as long as they like them. It only becomes a problem with those they don’t like.

For example, they will never say a bad word about Leticia and Matilda, but I personally fail to see the difference. All of them benefit from their royal status, and that is something that shouldn’t  even exist anymore.

Aug 11, 2017
Kaiser definitely has her favourites jolie and beyonce can do no but her hate red of people like kate and Natalie portman is horrendous
Aug 11, 2017
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December