Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

August 2017

Kaiser Wilhelm (what the arm candy and myself call that individual) and her obsession with all things Angelina Jolie is borderline insane. If AJ ever came across that thing she'd probably laugh in it's face or get a restraining order. AJ probably would not even spit in KW's direction if that thing was on fire. Freaking nut. How old is KW again? It behaves like a petulant bratty child. Almondmilk and Maya are just as bad. Heaven help you if you attack their precious idol. Cool blog by the way.

CB Angelina’s fans are quite over the top. It is no wonder most celebrities can’t handle fame. If you have people who practically worship you, and will fight anyone who doesn’t, it can’t be without consequences for the object of the worship. I’d probably run and hide far away with fans like this. I hear Beyonce’s and Taylor’s fans are like this as well. Some people grow out of it, but many don’t.

Also, the older I get the more I realize that most adults didn’t actually grow up. They are just pretending and playing their roles. Inside they are the same teenagers, just with less mood swings. -))

I have to say, it is a curious choice of the nom de plume by Kaiser. I am assuming she didn’t call herself Kaiser as in the Emperor, or did she? She behaves like one, for sure. 

Aug 10, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
There's an article on celebitchy about Serena Williams talking about getting ready to give birth she im about to become a real woman they are gonna come for her girl you in danger
Aug 10, 2017 1 note
The training that bothers me about celebitchy is the fake feminism the sheer misogyny against melania trump is horrible I remember when they were talking about her modelling work and putting her down like she was no good to be first lady but there new favourite meghan markle has done half naked sex scenes in tv shows but she the best thing since sliced bread and apparently would make a good princess is the double standards that get me

The regulars there are definitely not objective. They forget all about feminism and principles when an opportunity presents itself to pile on on a woman they don’t like. They are hypocrites, most of them.

Aug 10, 2017 2 notes
My coworkers and I had a slow day at work and were talking about the Ben Affleck article she had posted. I decided to write a harmless comment about how we actually find his new woman kind of cute. Maybe it was not the most illuminating comment ever, but it was certainly nothing offensive! We wanted to balance the comment section out with a real opinion, since it was overwhelmingly one sided. Well, now my buddy who is a reader and follower of this site is pissed because his IP address got banned

Ah, this type of thing used to get me in trouble on CB all the time in the past. I just can’t help and not to stand up for an underdog when things start getting over the top. I tried defending Kate Middleton. And it is not that I am a fan.  I actually think the monarchy should be abolished.

But really, the type of hate Kate gets on CB is not reasonable. Yes, she is living at the taxpayer expense, but she is not the only one and she is fairly harmless.

As for the Affleck’s  new lady love, I also think she is cute. Not that I like her. I think she is making a mistake. But you know what, she is a human and humans have to learn some things the hard way. -)). She is the one who will be paying for that mistake in the end.

Aug 8, 2017
Ps: it was Kaiser who blocked us! And it was our only work computer that can access the site. She just lost a longtime reader plus 2 newer readers (myself and my other coworker) with one action. She's an insane dictator.
Aug 8, 2017
Did you read the article for Obama being paid 3 million for a speech they were defending him saying it was fine while calling bernie mediocre if he took three million for a speech people would be in uproar wasn't it obama said in 2010 the should be a limit to people's wealth though it shouldn't be surprising after he took 4 hundred thousand for a speech from wall street after he failed to prosecute them for recession

I saw it. I might’ve made an exception and commented on that one. I like Obama. But let’s be honest here. You can’t make an exception for you”team”.

If you are fighting corruption in politics, you can’t turn a blind eye when it is your “team” doing it for your “team”’s benefit. Corruption is corruption. And that is what these paid speeches are  - a payment for future favors, i.e. legalized corruption. We can be honest , at least with ourselves, and say it, right?

Aug 8, 2017
Look at the latest Jennifer Aniston article. Kaiser's hate for her is showing big time. She has been deleting comments that call her out on it too.

I am not surprised.She is irrational about anything that has to do with Angelina.It is weird how a grown woman can be so obsessed with someone.

I think even her dislike of Vilkander has something to do with Vilkander doing the Tomb Raider, which used to be Angelina’s part.

Aug 4, 2017
The "With us or agaisnt us" Attuitiude that WOC have on Cb...

It’s so hard as a POC to share any opinion that goes agaisnt the grain because once you do, everyone jumps on you.

It’s not right.

——————————————————-

That is how CB is on everything, really. If you go against consensus, people immediately jump on you and actually misinterpret what you said on purpose, to make it seem worse than it is.

And then, for the coup de grace, Kaiser bans you, so you can’t even say that those misinterpretations of your words are completely off the mark. You have to read 50 posts telling you how awful you are, even though you didn’t even say the things the people are arguing against.

They love to build a strawman and then to keep fighting it.

Aug 1, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission

July 2017

I was also banned from CB, my offence was not hating Alicia Vikander, I guess Kaiser has a crush on Fassbender and therefore we must all hate anyone he dates lol. Kaiser behaves like a high school mean girl doesn't she? What's her deal anyway, do you know?

Kaiser used to love Benedict Cumberbatch and Michael Fassbender, until both of them got into serious relationships. They were her favorite internet boyfriends.

Now she claims they are not hot anymore and finds all kinds of faults with them.

She also figured out that if she posts these passive-aggressive posts abut their SOs then it brings all kinds of clicks from the subset of their fan girls who hate their SOs. And what is weird, the CB regulars, who didn’t care one way or another, piled on just for the fun of it.

With Cumberbatch it got so awful even Kaiser understood it was too much and one day she banned all those crazy fan girls. And that was the end of the Cumberbatch click bait.

The same story with Fassbender. Vilkander is a useful click bait.Fortunately there are enough CB posters who like her, so it doesn’t go down to the same level of crazy.

Jul 30, 2017

Oh, wow. The discussion on the Aladdin casting is really something. Who are these people claiming the actress is not  “brown enough”? This is wrong in so many ways.

Additionally, as shocking as it might seem to many Americans, who have their own homegrown race classifications, Arabs are white. They identify themselves as white. Many of them are as light skinned as Europeans.

In this context a half-Indian half-white actress is absolutely fine.

I liked this comment by teacakes, among the sea of the cringeworthy ones. She  gets  why the reverse-paperbag test is wrong.

teacakes says:

July 19, 2017 at 1:42 pm

…. it’s all very well to talk about how this is a fictional country and any brown person will do, but the 1992 movie literally opened with a song called Arabian Nights. I’d say that’s a pretty strong hint about where in the world this story is set and the origins of the characters.

That said, the ‘not brown enough’ Internet racial purity paperbag test Naomi Scott is being subjected to following her casting, is gross. I’m Indian and I have friends of full Indian descent like me who are lighter skinned than her – one of them was my best friend from school, and Naomi actually looks a freakish lot like her when she smiles.

Colorism is real but I have to say it, it doesn’t give anyone the right to declare her not Indian. And neither does ethnic ambiguity – plenty of non-white Indians look like they could be from other places, it doesn’t make them not Indian. I really feel like this anger is being misdirected at this girl because everyone is more caught up in how she isn’t Indian enough, than in targeting Disney for their screwups) And don’t even get me started on the ridiculousness of people going off on Mena Massoud’s being Coptic – he’s still Arab, isn’t he? As Aladdin should be.

Jul 19, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Middleton sisters attire

Middletons can do no right on CB. Just the other day Pippa got criticized for wearing a fairly cheap “basic” knee long white dress/ suit to Wimbledon, for being “basic”. 

OK. So today Kate gets criticized for wearing a breathtaking white McQueen suit because it is too expensive. So, which way do they want it -  cheap or expensive?

Oh, and apparently the skirt on the suit was too full and that it is not OK because it is prone to “flashes”.  But I also remember Kate being criticized for dressing too dowdy and too old for her age.

Pippa got raked over the coals for her long white floral dress she wore today. When I saw it, my first thought was -  I wish I could afford to buy that dress. I love long lean summer dresses. Only after reading CB I learned how wrong I was about that dress -)). 

Jul 17, 2017
#ban #celebitchy'
Stating speculation as Fact

I have noticed that Kaiser loves to use her opinion of events and people as facts.  Last week in regards to Kate’s jewelry during the state visit by the Spanish Royals.

Kaiser said,“ The Queen also made Kate wear some big jewelry, and of course it didn’t work.”  

How does Kaiser know what the Queen made Kate do or didn’t make Kate do?  All of her speculation and bias is fact. Of course I attempt to comment that this isn’t fact at all and just speculation.  Surprise it didn’t make it through the moderation.

Kaiser is a snake oil salesman in the business of selling speculation, bias, and BS.

———————————————————

Yes, Kaiser also thinks she knows what Taylor Swift thinks about anything. But the worst is when she intentionally misinterprets some celebrity news item to make a celebrity look bad. I think she does it on purpose because then she gets dozens of posts from the said celebrity fans trying to explain that this is not what  actually happened.

Jul 17, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
Can I just ask, and apologies if this has been discussed before, but why exactly is Kate Middleton such a sore subject for them? She's not American and she seems completely harmless, I genuinely don't understand. Is it really about her work ethic, and what distinguishes her from most other young royals or consorts? Did William not answer Kaiser's fan letter or something?

I don’t know myself. When I came across Celebitchy about 3 years ago, I think, it was already like this. It bothered me right away and I posted something positive a few times, but I was immediately drowned by a dozen of negative posts, so after a few tries I gave up and avoided Kate posts.

As to why this is happening, that I have an answer for. Kaiser is simply trolling for clicks. She has a few topics which she knows will bring a lot of comments from longtime loyal posters, who stick around CB for that one subject only. 

Sometimes she also intentionally misinterprets actions or words of the celebrities who are her bait to generate ore controversy and more clicks.

Middletons are one of these baits, Amal Clooney is another, Hiddleston used to be, and before that Fassebender and Cumberbatch, before Kaiser fell out of love with them and turned nasty. Then their fans left. I am not sure who her internet boyfriend du jour is these days.

It was funny to watch how for the last 2 days Kaiser tried to get Cumberbatch fans bite, like in the past, to get some clicks out of them, but they didn’t.

Jul 17, 2017
I wrote a lengthy reply a couple of weeks ago to one of Kaiser's rants on Russian interference, wanting her or anyone really to specify what they mean by collusion and interference etc. Now I'm not in moderation anymore but my posts don't show up either. Am I banned?

Yes, that is how ban works. You write a post and submit it but it never appears.

Jul 17, 2017
Liberals on celebitchy just want to take trump down if he does something wrong by all means speak up but they just want the country to fail because they didn't win . They criticized him for bombing Syria Obama was bombing six countries they attacked his Muslim ban Obama also banned travel for some countries for six months other Muslim countries banned people from some Muslim country's due to terrorism it's the hypocrisy that gets me

Their obsession with Trump is disturbing. It is not like the US was a paradise on Earth before Trump. But somehow this gets completely lost in the hysterical reactions to Trump.

So much energy is being wasted on anger. It is time to let go and work towards the next elections.

People should be asking questions such as -  what do they want the country to be like?  Do we want more socialism, in what form? What about religion? What about foreign wars? What are our views of the American empire? If we let go of our dominance, what kind of the world we will be living in? Who is a valid alternative to Trump by whom progressives can stand? 

There are so many questions without answers. And we need answers because at this point we don’t know where we are heading. How can you get anywhere if you don’t even know where you are going?

Jul 13, 2017 2 notes
There hatred of Bernie Saunders is awful there claim that hilary lost because of his voters is ridiculous aparrently you had to vote for hilary or you were a woman hating racist the democrats have become the party of rich white liberals although to them being liberal means agree with me or you're scum
Jul 13, 2017 1 note
If you are white you are no longer allowed to have an opinion on there anymore

Yes, absolutely. On the other hand,  I read a really good post by Josie on this topic on Lianna and it helped me a lot to understand why so many POCs react negatively when white people participate in the race discussions. 

She says “ For white people, talking about race is uncomfortable. For people of color, it’s a necessity. “ This sentence made me understand.

At the end of the day, for many white people race relations is an intellectual discussion, where we want to analyze all sides of the issue so that we can relate it to our own experiences. But for POCs it is an every day struggle and to them the urgency of the issue is much greater and their patience has worn thin. They have no patience for analyzing, relating and translating it into experiences whites can relate to.

But I don’t see any other way than continuing to talk to each other. In the end, only through talking we’ll reach better understanding. Shutting down the ability of people to talk is counterproductive because it prevents us from forming that mutual understanding.

Jul 13, 2017
They make me laugh with there obsession with Meghan markle how she's so much better than kate and is going to somehow save the monarchy she's a c list actress who has done a couple of speeches not mother Theresa the double standards annoy me kate dress blows up they critize the he'll out of her meghan does sex scenes in her underwear is fine because that'd her jobg

True. It reminds me of the days people were wanting Prince William to be named the heir instead of his father. He looked so much like Diana, people idealized him. Something similar is happening with Markle. People project their expectations on her. But I think she is going to be a disappointment. She is going into the highly scripted and restrictive life of a a royal with her eyes wide open. She is fully prepared to sacrifice her freedom for a status.

Jul 13, 2017 1 note
Did You Notice They Didnt Mention That Melania Won Her Libel Suit Against The Daily Mail When They Were Implying she was a hooker and celebitchy got on board

Yes, I noticed it too. And isn’t it ironic that they were slut shaming the woman they don’t like while with the women they like they always say that slut  shaming is anti-feminist. 

Jul 13, 2017
I've been a daily Celebitchy reader for many years. I never comment so I haven't been banned but have become so disgusted with all the political posts I've thought of dropping it. Whenever there is any celebrity gossip, it's something I already read about yesterday. I've long thought that the writers spend the day trolling other various celeb gossip sites, then rewrite the stories with their own (usually negative) spin. The site has gone downhill in a major way, was happy to find you.
Jul 13, 2017 2 notes
Just reading back on your blog and have to say that the Anonymous poster on 4/26/17 sounds very much like Lyan posting on Liana's site. This dude is unhinged, no? Scary.

You know, you are probably right. It does sound like Lyan. He/she is so over the top.

Jul 13, 2017
I found your site a few months ago while exploring the internet for an explanation as to why Celebitchy had become so intolerable in the last year. I read your comments and found a great deal of common sense. I have gone back to Celebitchy several times to verify many of the statements you, and others on the site, have made and found them all to be true. It is quite sad that many women find an ear with Kaiser to spew such remarkably hateful rhetoric. Thank you for creating this forum.
Jul 13, 2017

June 2017

I officially left CB around the time Trump won the election but had already been making a conscious effort to stay away from the site quite a while before that. The environment is toxic and rabid. After Trump won it went nuclear. They (Kaiser and most of the commenters) don't care about any other opinion other than their own hate. Truth and facts also don't matter and oh and forget suggesting people need to learn and understand why others may have for voted trump so maybe we could fix the issue

The political articles there are the worst. No discussion of what might’ve gone wrong and how the country could be improved is allowed. The posters turn on anyone daring question the official Democrats party line and start blaming that person for everything that is wrong under the sun.

Jun 21, 2017 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
They're really going to town on Elizabeth Banks for some reason. Is she one of their hate objects?

I am not sure. I think it is because of the racial aspect. She is a “white feminist” and it is not good enough for the posters there.

This comment explains it :

“ She didn’t mean Spielberg she’s cast more roles for women. She meant for white women lol this is such white feminism. She dismissed the color purple bc it was a film of women of color. “

And to add to this.  I don’t find Banks likeable myself.But I see the point she is making, albeit she made it very badly and picked a really bad target. If you want to talk about misogyny in Hollywood you shouldn’t be making Spielberg your target, you should be making Spielberg your ally. 

But you know what. Banks might be a “white feminist” and she might not be good enough, but if she is speaking for your cause, maybe hold your horses a bit with criticism. Don’t let the perfect to be the enemy of the good.  

And I think that is exactly the problem with CB. Unless someone is pitch perfect, they get torn to shreds. And you get to the point where nobody is good enough. And that is very negative and soul destroying.

Jun 18, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
Celebitchy is a place of passive agressive woman their the sort of people who claim they are feminists but are actually misogynistic there whole hate against kate campaign has recently going worse when their new idole meghan came along the reason they like her is because they want her to make kate look bad .if you ate not a fan they call you racist bs is getting old
Jun 18, 2017

130 comments discussing every minor detail of Kate Middleton’s blazer and capri outfit. It is so strange. I’d understand  if the posters were professional stylists. Then these things could be very interesting and important. But otherwise? It is just bewildering. Most people judge fashion in a passing manner - does it look good overall or not. 

To me she always looks good and presentable. Maybe she is not a fashion icon, but she is inoffensive in her wardrobe choices. You have to look very closely to find something to criticize. 

Jun 16, 2017 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy

OMG. What an awful blog on Tinashe. I won’t go there because I am not qualified. But all those people denying her experience, it is just so hurtful.The Original TC and QQ are the worst.

Jun 14, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

Ha, Kaiser was just told ever so politely that Joe Alwyn is not getting work because of Swift but due to his own qualifications. We know nothing about this guy but Kaiser already hates him by association. She has really strong feelings about Swift.

“ Alba says:

June 14, 2017 at 9:56 am

I see, but this article sort of says Alwyn wasn’t getting work. I think thats a slight misrepresentation . He is a guy who graduated recently from a very distinguished drama school in London ( The Royal Central School-Judi Dench, Vanessa Redgrave and tons of great actors from that school, most recently Andrew Garfield who is earning rave reviews for Angels in America at The National Theatre ). He has already scored jobs with Oscar winning/nominated directors such as Lee and Lanthimos and worked with some stellar actors in that year since he graduated, so hes way ahead of the heap of recent graduates already. The fact that such good directors cast him as an unknown makes me think he must have something. Lee is an actors director.”


For what it is worth, I think Alwyn is very handsome, and if he has any sort of talent on top of it, he’ll go far. 

He and Swift also seem to look strangely similar. This must be a real thing, if that is possible with Taylor Swift. I noticed that many people get really attached to people who look like them.

Jun 14, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I just saw this comment under the Sessions article. What an excellent comment. Well said.


Manzur says:

June 13, 2017 at 5:51 pm

There are SO many other things to comment on besides appearance. Can we just stop? It brings the discussion down to junior high level. And YES i KNOW Trump has picked on physical appearance but does that mean we ALL have to now too? Is that mature reasoning? I despise that. Who cares what Sessions looks like? Who cares what about his accent? Just because the mean kids on the playground throw insults about appearance around does not mean the entire school should start. It dumbs down the conversation. Ivanka sleeps with her father. Eric Trump is ugly. Melanie sounds funny. Trump is Cheeto. There. Now we’re all five years old. It’s like a bad Saturday Night Live skit. Funny for the first 10 seconds and then lame and groan worthy as it drones on. Let’s all rise above. We are too good for this.

Jun 13, 2017 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
What is with all the super hate and slut shaming of ScarJo on CB lately? It's super disappointing and disturbing. I have been reading that site for 10+ years and honestly I have never seen the writers go after a woman so hard for being sex positive. Thoughts?

I don’t get it either.You would think a self-proclaim feminist site would support a woman coming out and saying what she really thinks. Yes. monogamy is not for everyone. If it works for someone, great, if not, fine. 

Also, relationships are hard work and there are enough people who feel that the benefits they get from stable relationships are not worth the work required to maintain them.

I think Kaiser always disliked ScarJo, but now she can openly dislike her because of the whitewashing controversy with the Ghost in a Shell. 

On top of that there is a certain racial bias purposely cultivated on the site. You will see comments along the lines that so and so is white and pretty and skinny and for this reason doesn’t have to struggle like the others, and it is a strike against that person. And ScarJo happens to be white, pretty and skinny. The only women who seem to be exempt from this criticism are Angelina and Katy Perry. And possibly Naomi Watts. Naomi is so likeable, people just can’t find it in themselves to criticize her.

Jun 13, 2017 1 note

Discussions of Vilkander and Fassbender bring back disturbing memories of Hunterbatch 2015. That was my first encounter with so-called “fans” viciously attacking a woman for her relationship with their internet boyfriend, and idle bystanders cheering them on from the sidelines, just for the fun of it.

Now, the second time around, I recognize all the signs.

*Claims that he (the internet boyfriend) looks unhappy and is just not the same, not attractive anymore. Yes, Kaiser, that is in reference to your comment “ He just seems so neutered with Vikander. “.

*That she (the woman) has abuse issues, snobby, unfriendly, unaccomplished.

*That the relationship is fake.

*That something just seems off.

*Bystanders claiming that this is no big deal, this is just regular gossip. I remember how lilacflower’s  “Comet Sophie” references used to drive me mad during Hunterbatch.  She didn’t care about it one way or another, she is a Hiddleston fan, or should I say “stan”. But she still went on and continued pouring gas on the fire, just for the fun of it. With Vilkander the same thing is going on. 

In fairness, there are a couple of posters with factual information who refute the made up stories. But they drown in the sea of  awfulness.

*

I just noticed this comment by Skylark got deleted. I wondered how did it make it through -)).

—————————————————————-

June 9, 2017 at 3:18 pm

Let’s not forget that the CB writer who used to wet her knickers over everything (single) Fassbinder did has actively encouraged this deeply unpleasant madness purely because Fassy has taken up with a woman who is not her.

Make no mistake, that’s at the absolute root of it. Click on ‘Michael Fassbender’ for a history.

—————————————————————

Jun 12, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
I am not american, so I don't know how much the americans are suffering with Trump in power. BUT why a site of celebrity gossip needs to talk everyday about Trump ou Ivana? Really why politics everyday?,.. that's why I prefer Lainey or Ohnotheydidnt. when Obama was in power they almost never talked bad about Obamas. I know Trump sounds a nightmare, but god, it's a celebrity gossip.

I think it is just a way to drive traffic to the site because traffic means more advertisement revenue for the site and more money for the owners. Trump posts are the ones getting the most comments. A lot of people hate Trump with passion. Though, I don’t know how they don’t get tired of talking about him every day for hours. It is the same thing over and over.

#ban #celebitchy

Jun 8, 2017

Why does Celebitchy have an issue with men talking about objectification of men? I remember Kit Harrington talking about it and the CB commenters ridiculing him for it. Now Sam Clafin talks about it and it is a similar reaction, though a milder one. 

Just because women have it worse, it doesn’t mean men should just shut up and take it when it happens to them. When both men and women talk about it then it only makes it the cause stronger.

Maybe it is because CB itself loves to indulge into objectification of men and this hits a bit close to home?

Jun 7, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

Well, I’ve noticed Kaiser is trying to build up Taylor Swift to be the new Kate Middleton. It doesn’t seem to take. While there are a number of posters who seem to have irrational hatred of Swift, there aren’t enough of them. Swift posts can’t even break 100 comments.

I found it a bit surreal how in today’s comments people were blaming Swift for being immature and so on because she is still ‘beefing’  with Perry. Except Swift hasn’t said anything in years, it is all from ‘sources’. I guess it is fun, building a strawman and then pummeling it to death.

Jun 6, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Kaiser is really pissed people aren't on her side...

So I got banned and after getting banned, I decided to go on Twitter and ask Kaiser why.

Because I didn’t do anything wrong, I didn’t break any rules, I read the rules and I was following them.

And I came across a tweet of her saying “Swifty fans” were “butthurt” (her favorite insult) and basically pissed off. Because in today’s thread (the Katy Vs Taylor Thread) people weren’t on Kaiser’s side about the “dated” (another word K uses to death) beef that Katy keeps bringing up.

And it made me laugh because you’re butthurt that people aren’t here for petty old dusty beef? We get that you hate Taylor Swift, but really? Am I as a black woman, supposed to stand up for Katy who was accused by a black rapper of saying the N word (multiple times)? Or someone who made fun of someone having a mental breakdown?

But no, let’s  get pissed at T Swift for making love/hate songs about boyfriends and that Kanye bullshit.

It’s stupid and I love how Kaiser is so bent out of shape that she went to Twitter to complain about her readers not agreeing with the  pettiness between two petty women.

But that’s okay, stick up for problematic Katy because she hates Taylor Swift.

You are so basic Kaiser.

Honestly. I love how you can ignore things that go against the “beliefs” you so call hold, because you hate someone that much. Kaiser did bring up people saying Katy was “trash” but not why people were saying it. They were saying the song is trash, Katy’s is like Kaiser who says one thing and does another. I’m way more offended by the few things Katy’s done then anything TS has ever done.

And I say this as a fan of neither, I’d take a immature, stunt queen, over a fake woke problematic Katy any day.

Because I don’t let hate overshadow my beliefs.

I’m sorry for the rant but it pissed me off and made me laugh.

Jun 1, 2017 1 note

May 2017

Are you sure you have been *banned* properly? I would assume that an automated message would appear, telling you so. If it's just about some of your messages not being approved (ridiculous in itself), I don't think it constitutes banning properly. Anyway, it would be a good idea to give visitors (here) the opportunity to comment (you can always approve the comments or not). You might find that many people are very much "over" CB. :)

I am quite sure this is how banning works on CB. Some other sites do it this way as well. They put your IP address or the name/ email on the blocked list. And your post just goes into limbo and never gets published.

I think on Disquis you do get a message that you are banned, but it is not the case with many other ‘comments’ applications.

May 23, 2017
Oh, and BTW: I found it hilarious to see the radio silence - or was it crickets? - that ensued for a whole day after Pippa's wedding. :) To me, at least, it signalled massive disappointment that Pippa did not arrive in a carriage (I never thought she would), nor was anything less than lovely as weddings go.
May 23, 2017 1 note
Submitted a vague political comment, have now been put in moderation. Lol! I wonder what happens to those who seriously dissent!
May 23, 2017
I was banned too! My email doesn't work so I am using now my sister's email to comment. IDK what I did! Once I criticized Saudi Arabia because woman cant drive there, and is not a good place to visit, but I went to Egypt and said nice things about there. maybe they hate critics against muslims countries. Maybe they are antisemite because I have a jewish name. that's so crazy!
May 23, 2017
Hey, how do you know when you're banned? Is it when you type in a comment but doesn't go through?

Yes, you are banned if you type a comment and submit it, but it never shows up.

If you submit it and it shows up ‘in moderation’, then you are being moderated, i.e. your comments are only let through after a review.

May 19, 2017

For May 3rd the most commented articles were the one about Hiddleston vs. Fassbender and then Brad &Angelina. The usual click-bait.

o   I am surprised so many poster there don’t think Fassbender is handsome. As far as looks go he has a strong jaw and a proportionate face. I am not one of his fans but I think Fassbender is better looking and a better actor than Hiddleston.  At the same time Hiddleston’s fans were very amusing with their over-the-top defense.

o   Brad vs. Angelina -  I see Kaiser couldn’t find anything to spin in his interview so she just left it for posters to rip him apart. And rip him apart they did. I don’t dislike either Brad or Angelina. They both seem like good people, so I am just going to stay away from this one and not take sides.

Three Trump articles for the day, we are getting desperate, are we?

A Kate Middleton article. There was one comment that got under my skin. The one that slammed Will for bringing up Diana’s death in the paparazzi trial.  Who are the posters to tell whether he should be still affected by his mother’s death and the paparazzi behavior or not? I don’t necessarily like him and I am against the monarchy, but I know that this kind of trauma stays with people for their whole lives and I am not going to deny how it affected him just because I don’t like him. And people twisting themselves into pretzels trying to make it look like the pictures taken in France by the paparazzi are somehow Will &Kate’s fault, just stop. Laws are laws. You don’t argue against the laws and common decency just because you don’t like somebody.

Netflix  ’13 Reasons’ show sounds like a big and dangerous mess.  But I don’t watch, so no opinion there.

Susan Sarandon article – Celebitchy posters are Hillary supporters and Susan Sarandon committed an unforgivable sin of disliking Hillary and supporting Bernie. That means it is an open season on Susan Sarandon on the site. I think Susan Sarandon probably knows Hillary personally and is a better judge of who Hillary truly is than Celebitchy posters who don’t know either woman.

My own opinion of Hillary is very much in line with the post below. The only thing I don’t agree with is that it calls Hillary’s followers ‘bots’. Everyone is entitled to support whoever they like, it doesn’t make them a bot. Though acting that it is impossible for a rational person to understand why people don’t support Hillary even though other posters explained it over and over again does come over as willful denial.

May 4, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Is the anon poster in late April the same "Lancelot" who posted on Liana's site? And is Lancelot also Kaiser? I wonder...

I don’t think it is Kaiser. I don’t think she would pay any attention to me, some obscure blog which posts once in a blue moon.

Also, the writing style of that anon felt like she was pretty young, in her early 20s.

May 4, 2017

April 2017

"often Americans think that their way is the only way" So true, it was really funny when people found out that Japanese and Chinese didnt care at all about the casting of ScarJo in Ghost and Matt Damon in The Great Wall.

Japanese and Chinese are the majority in their respective countries. And they also have their own entertainment and movie industries. They don’t view Hollywood the same way Japanese-Americans or Chinese-Americans do.  This perspective is not understood at all by the Celebitchy posters and if anyone dares to voice it, they are quickly shut down.

Apr 27, 2017 2 notes
stiina_81 hotcom I hate Kaiser. I have been reading Celebitchy for years. Why don't you include a comment section on every post you write?

I am not sure I understood you right, anon. I think all my posts have ‘Notes’ feature enabled where you can write comments. If that is what you are asking.

Or are you talking about the Celebitchy site?

Apr 27, 2017
No one is censoring you, especially not on your own blog. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the right to free speech. There is no way to even begin a discussion or give you an example because you're changing the definitions of words to suit your bias. Also saying something cannot be true because you do not understand it is a fallacy known as an argument from incredulity. It is extremely illogical.

OK. 

I meant I wasn’t going to censor you.

Apr 26, 2017
Why would any person be interested in entertaining the incoherent ramblings of someone who is clearly ignorant and uneducated in the subject they are discussing? This is exactly why the world is in such dire straits, because people like you think your uneducated opinions are more valid than facts. You are free to express those nonsense feelings, just like I am free to tell you that they are factually incorrect and ridiculous. Free speech =/= freedom from criticism or ridicule.

I post this because I don’t believe in censoring. But I have nothing further to say on this. I am neither ignorant nor uneducated, I simply have  a different frame of reference and different life experience. If you want to discuss facts, give me an example of cultural appropriation that you find so damaging, and we can talk about it. I’ll tell you what I think.

But I can tell you right away that I find impossible to understand the Celebitchy's outrage du-jour about Wes Anderson’s animation about dogs set in Japan being voiced  by white actors. If we take it as one example.

Apr 26, 2017
Your opinion doesn't change the definition of words sweetheart. For that matter you didn't show you were right either, you just spouted a lot of factually incorrect nonsense. No one gives a shit about your vendetta with that website, so congratulations for the inane rambling!

I am sweetheart to you now, am I. You know that is a belittling term just like “boy”, correct?

You take an issue with me but you cannot keep your own prejudices in check.

I have no vendetta with Celebitchy. But our exchange here is quite illustrative. On Celebitchy all of my posts disagreeing with the approach to “cultural appropriation” would be moderated while yours would be allowed to stand. And this is why I created this blog.

Discussion happens when both parties can express their opinion freely. It doesn’t happen when one party is shut out and is forced to accept the other’s opinion as the ultimate truth.

You see my earlier post as a rant. But I was actually trying to explain where I am coming from.  You are not interested in understanding it. And that is fine. It is your right. But don’t expect me to change my opinion just because you think I should.

Apr 26, 2017
Cultural appropriation =/= cultural exchange dipshit. When you go around showing you don't even know basic definitions you just look silly.

I am not going to argue. It is my opinion and my experience coming from a mixed ethnicity family and a multi-cultural society.

Not everybody looks at the world the American way or any other specific way. I live in the US now and I can see how often Americans think that their way is the only way. That their way is the only way and everybody else is wrong. It isn’t so.

You think your way is right. I think my way is right, more productive and less adversarial.

That is probably why I was banned from Celebitchy. I am not going to agree with something that in my experience is a negative/ unproductive approach, just because I am told that  I am supposed to think a certain way.

What some people don’t seem to understand is  that calling others names is not going to convince them to change their opinion. If you are certain you are right, then SHOW how you are right.  That means -  SHOW through your own experience and actions. Words are empty. Actions speak louder than words. That means you cannot say one thing one day  and then  act differently another day, that would be hypocrisy, something that Celbitchy is full of.

Apr 26, 2017 1 note

Oh my. All the race baiting going on in and under the Rachel Dolezal article. “Peak white supremacy”, really? 

For example this part, what is that about?

“It is a bit extreme, but it is in no way new for white people to take what they want from other cultures in the name of love and respect, while distorting or discarding the remainder of that culture for their comfort”

Is that about so-called cultural appropriation? Cultures always borrowed from one another and adapted what they borrowed to their tastes. It makes cultures richer. I’ll go even further and say that this is how the human society progresses, through synthesis. It is not a bad thing.

And are some of the regular posters seriously arguing that race is a biological trait and not a social construct? 

Apr 25, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

Melania Trump is another woman “Celebitchers” love to hate. I think they are so free with derision of her because she is  a wife of “the enemy”. And they feel free to engage into some “therapeutical steam release” using her as a target dummy. There is nothing about Melania herself to justify this level of derision.

Almost every comment under the article starts with “ I don’t feel sorry for her”, “she made her choice” and so on.

As someone who grew up outside of the US I also find the US office of First lady to be archaic and patriarchal. And this is not a new position for me. I always thought so. For Europeans this concept of a whole family representing their country is too similar to monarchy. In addition, the office of the First lady is not official, unelected and is unpaid.  The First Lady is treated as a property of her husband. And that is just not right. I don’t see how American feminists square the concept of the First Lady with women rights. No woman should be treated as a property or pressured into doing something she doesn’t want to just because of who her husband is. Again, for Europeans this is unthinkable.

Here is one of very few balanced comments on Melania I tend  agree with. Especially about the bitchiness she provokes in others.

And here is another one, which is more representative of what you see BTL at Celebitchy.

Doesn’t any capitalist society operate on this principle? Especially one such as the US, which practices unrestrained laissez-faire capitalism? So it is OK that everyone else does it, just Melania is not allowed? Celebitchy is a wrong name for his site. It should be called Hypocrisy by any other name.

Apr 25, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December