Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

May 2018

Another woman Celebitchers hate for no apparent reason is Amal Clooney. 

They went on and on about trying to explain away the claim that Amal and Meghan could be friends. They completely discounted all of Amal’s accomplishments. Apparently, Amal’s crime is that she smiles too brightly at the camera.

They conveniently forget that Amal is a woman of color as well. And they clearly have no idea how hard it is to make a career as a lawyer in the class and pedigree obsessed London when you are a woman with the name Amal Amaluddin and not let’s say Olivia Annesley (an aristo name I just made up ).

May 31, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
So Kaiser (expert political scientist) says she HOPES Obama was plotting with people to bring down Trump. Why would anyone ever hope that? Especially if they were against Trump? Something like that could come out and muddy the waters, possibly unravel the case against the Trumps? Sometimes people get so angry they don't think.
May 30, 2018
@ha ha ha - Notasugar is just possibly the most hysterical of the fraus on Celebitchy. Her mission in life is to defend Meghan from any and all criticism and to demonize Kate and Prince William. Her comment is ludicrous: naturally it's not on the BRF's web site. How disingenuous! The heirs are supposed to "represent" middle-class family life-it's hard to do that without kids. The line is rarely broken for "convenience". Projection of family life is the unspoken bit of their job. She hates Kate.
May 30, 2018

Ha-ha-ha, I just had to laugh at this notsugar’s comment. Who does she think she is kidding? Childbearing is not a requirement for women in a hereditary monarchy? Ha-ha-ha-ha.

And people actually read the official BRF’s website? What for?

notasugarhere says:

May 29, 2018 at 4:27 pm

Having children is not a royal requirement. Go look at the official website of the BRF; childbearing is no where on there. There are 5,000 people in line to the throne; W&K did not have to have kids as part of their “job”.

May 29, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
This site is gold. Glad to have found it. Kaiser is garbage with her hypocrisy as are her followers, wouldn’t surprise me if the pathetic lunatic actually created sockpuppet accounts to agree with herself as many online think she does. Wonder how long Sara’s comment about the love/adoration from supposedly everyone of the Royals for K/CB idol Meghan being lovely fanfiction will be left up? Relying on the Daily Fail and anonymous sources that supposedly praise Meghan for accuracy are we Kaiser?🙄
May 29, 2018 2 notes
What I find amusing about CB is that the second half of it's name implies not just latitude in criticizing famous people, but an expectation of same. But if you criticize someone Kaiser likes, suddenly you have "violated commenting guidelines". It's really only about who Kaiser likes and dislikes, so the commenting "guidelines" are a complete sham.

When it is somebody they don’t like on CB, they forget all about their “feminism” and start judging the person’s looks and clothes and what is not. And if you point it out , they say -  this is why this site is  called “bitchy”.

However, if it is one of their faves, then most of negative comments get deleted right away, and to the ones that get to stay  ( to spice things up ) you get a dozen comments along the lines -  why are you commenting on this person  if you don’t like him/ her, you could  just skip the post.

The disturbing thing is how they seem to be completely unaware of their own hypocrisy.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban

Celebitchy continues to be nasty today. Apparently, Melania Trump has not been seen in public for a while, after she was hospitalized with a kidney issue.

And these nasty women on CB are making fun of her because they think the only reason she is not seen is plastic surgery. What if she is really seriously sick? This is crosses the line of decency and leaves it far, far behind. And no amount “she chose this life” justifies it. Nothing justifies being cruel and and nasty. 

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
@response to the "famewhore" issue, we'll have to agree to disagree. We are agreed that MM wouldn't have looked at Harry if his name hadn't been "Windsor" with the global fame she stood to gain. To me, agreeing to that "Vanity Fair" article, which we all know that she would never have gotten without dating him, says it all. She's always looking for the cameras, and to me it seems clear that her whole life has been dedicated to becoming a AAA+ lister. Well, now she is-through her marriage.

Fair enough ))). I agree with your Vanity Fair point. She only got the cover because of who she is married to, not through her own work, and that is sad, for all women, that money and connections still matter more than honest work.

May 28, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

I see posters on CB are so concerned with feminists issues that there are only 20-30 posts on the #MeToo related topics but 200-300 each of the royal posts and there are 5-6 of them a day. // sarcasm

CB turned into a nastier version of Mirror.  

May 28, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

Wow,I  just went to the  Kate’s maternity leave thread and it is NASTY.

What is this, for example ( a post by Lizbeth )

“ While I think leave is fine, I’m not buying the idea that proper bonding requires her to be home with the baby 24/7. While Kate’s “on leave” she’s not available 24/7 to the baby nor are “ordinary hands-on” moms who do things like clean the house, grocery shop, go to church, engage in their regular charitable activities, have a night out with dad, etc. all while “on leave.” “


Let me tell you something, “Lizbeth”, a  new baby wakes up every 2 hours to feed. And if you breastfeed, it does not matter how many nannies you have, you still have to wake up every 2 hours. You get no sleep for the first 3-4 months, you become a zombie. 

Cleaning? What cleaning? Grocery shopping an cooking - the husband can do it.  Believe it or not, even in regular households women get help, and they are still struggling.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Kaiser's hatred of Kate Middleton is pathological and she can try blaming it on Kate being "lazy" from now till Kingdom Come, I don't believe her. I'm only waiting for her blame the weather on Kate. IMHO Kaiser hates Kate because she is a white English girl. If Meghan had been white Kaiser would have hung her out to dry for using dating Harry to get herself a "Vanity Fair" cover and talking about their relationship inside. Mention "Meghan" and "famewhore" on Celebitchy and watch the fur fly.

I don’t think Meghan is a famewhore, but I am pretty sure if Harry wasn’t a rich royal she wouldn’t have given him a second look. But this goes for many women. I don’t think Meghan  is worse than any other regular woman, but she is not an activist, feminist etc.  that Celebitchy posters are making her out to be. If she were, she would have never married into the royal family to begin with.

May 28, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Exhibit D: CHER: "She gave birth and a few hours later she got up and left the hospital. Thus, she is very capable of fitting a few appearances between now and October." Sound logic...

Even in the backwards US, which does not have any maternity leave whatsoever, women get 6 weeks disability leave to recover from birth. And I can attest that they need every day of it since bleeding often doesn’t stop for 4-6 weeks.

May 25, 2018
Exhibit C: "GOOFPUFF: I’m not begrudging her maternity leave – i am tired of all the continued promises of work and keenness lies all these years in between them. They have several nannies, surely she can spare an hour or two for an appearance several times a week." Gosh. I am shocked. Women with "easy" jobs should not take full time leaves.
May 25, 2018
Exhibit B: "Mat leave isn’t a vacation but with alll the help in the world an hour or two away to ‘work’ is fine." Luckily for all of us, the law does not work like this. These women, they read what they write?!?
May 25, 2018
(part 2 of 2) You know what kate did to "deserve" a six-month maternity leave? NOTHING. She lives in a country that rcognizes parents' rights and protects them. And we all ahould fight for not less but even more legal protections!
May 25, 2018
For the first time i commented on CB and my comment was deleted within 2 minutes precisely. I could not believe how women were quick to argue that KM should show up to work during her maternity leave (because her work is easy, because she is lazy AF, yada yda yada, neoliberal bulshit). The way women spoke... I told them the truth: they are disgusting and should be ashamed of themselves.

Exactly. They want Kate to work while pregnant, when she just had a baby but have no problems with Meghan’s many vacations because apparently she was stressed out by wedding preparations. 

Sometimes I wonder if those women have any idea what it takes to birth a child and how much energy being a parent requires, even if you have help.

May 25, 2018 3 notes
FAIL! Missing Gwyneth Paltrow’s statement AND Harvey W’s surrender Friday is a huge fail. I read goop’s statement this morning on the GAURDIAN FFS! WTF change the name to taykimyetrumproyalbitchy 🤦🏻‍♀️
May 24, 2018
Kaiser deleted my post asking if she will let Megan find her royal style or continually blame kate for Megan’s choices. I asked if pregnancy speculation will be all the posts now that the wedding is over. Deleted. IMMEDIATELY. So sensitive
May 23, 2018 4 notes
I stopped reading celebitchy today. I got really offended by their blatant hypocrisy. How can they preach feminism when half the time they are putting down select women? Kaiser has some serious vitriol. I pray she gains some soul.

The hypocrisy is unbearable. When it is a woman they like, any missteps are excused. When it is a woman they don’t like every misstep is treated like a crime against humanity.

I, personally, have an issue with how much Meghan’s dresses cost. 100K per dress is way, way too much for someone who is supposed to be all about helping people. I remember CB used to go on and on about the cost of Kate’s wardrobe. They have been silent on the subject for months. And in case of Meghan, even when the price is brought up, the posters “choose” to talk about how lovely she looks instead. They are not fooling anyone. 

The same with Meghan curtsying and wearing tights. They find an excuse after an excuse, but they do not afford the same courtesy when it comes to celebrities they don’t like,

May 22, 2018 4 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Omg, Kaiser coulndt help herself and had to slam Kate on today's story about Katy Perry comments on Meghan' s dress. It's just so petty and dumb. A bunch of commenters called her out on it but they've already been deleted. It's ridiculous. If Celebitchy is the owner of the site she needs to take away some of Kaiser' s power because that little dictator is going crazy.
May 22, 2018 4 notes
Of course Kaiser has to insult Kate today. And the normal commentators have to chime in and insult her as well. This is beyond sad. I don’t know why Kaiser is so jealous of Kate.
May 20, 2018 4 notes
How is Celebitchy fun?

Every Celebrity on that site has diehard Stan’s or Haters.

Everyone has Strong and personal feelings toward some Celebrities and won’t hear otherwise. The royal posts are not only moderated by Kaiser but Lak,Nosugarhere and Nic919 who seem to spend all day going through every comment to correct, state “facts” or chatise you and be rude.

Meghan is good. Kate is bad.

Amal Clooney is apparently the devil.

I’ve never seen a site that takes people they don’t know so fucking serious! I feel like some of these Stan’s and haters just spend all day stalking the person they hate/love name on Google and going to spread thier narrative. I know some commenters do that with the royals.

How is Celebitchy any fun? You can’t even gossip without someone telling you you’re wrong.Its not light hearted. I don’t feel like I’m chilling with a bunch of homegirls, I feel like I’m with a bunch of woman that I used to be cool with but now, unless I agree with them, their opinions and their “facts” then we can’t be friends.

It’s High school! Wasn’t CB named the smartest site or some shit?  How? Some people act like babies. Especially Kaiser who is a schoolyard bully pretending to be a hero.

May 19, 2018 6 notes

I can’t believe the demonization that’s going on with Meghan Markle’s father.  The man had a massive heart attack a week ago and is now recovering from having three stents inserted.  Yet Celebitchy has completely demonized him.  He’s ruined her wedding, is white trash, should be totally cut out of her life, and has had a heart attack because Karma, etc.  It’s sick.

————————————————————————————-

The way the royal family mismanaged the relationships with Meghan’s extended family is ridiculous. I am no aristocrat ( all my knowledge of British aristocracy is comes from Jane Austin, lol ), but even I know that it does nobody any favors to have family fighting openly in the media. They should have foreseen it and placated her family. I get it that some of them are not nice people, all the same, smart people would’ve reached out to them early on and helped them financially. It is pretty clear her family is struggling,while Meghan is marrying into royalty. It just does not compute and was always going to be an issue.

May 17, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy

All hail St Doria. Seriously, it’s a bit much. I know she’s getting slammed on other sites by racists and people calling her a gold digger, which it abhorrent. But, over 100 comments on how cool she looks, how she’s rocking that blazer, how she could totally be opening her own practice, how Meghan totally gets all her cool from her, blah, blah patronizing comment after patronizing comment.
Doria seems to be a perfectly average professional, 60 something woman. Why are we even talking about her? We can talk about what she wears to the wedding but until then let’s leave in peace.

———————————————————————————————–

Doria seems to be a nice, down to Earth woman. I did not read that article, but at that point I honestly would rather talk about Doria. Just how many articles a day one needs about Meghan? It is 5-6 articles every day.

Kaiser is not even trying anymore, she just reposts all the gossip about Meghan and she is done for the day.

May 17, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission

I want to post this comment from the thread on John McCain, because this is a very insightful comment, which deserves to be read and understood. This person is the only person who was able to get above the usual partisan bickering that goes on on CB and get to the hear of the matter. She is  correctly pointing out what is going on with fragmentation of the US, and how indifference towards the fate of the foreigners bleeds into the domestic American politics. You can even see it on CB where anyone who does not support Hillary Clinton is treated with complete contempt:

A says:

May 11, 2018 at 3:42 pm

I’ve been reading up on the history of this torture debate, and what really stood out to me was how this exposed the way America failed to consider anyone aside from themselves as human beings worthy of compassion. It exposed that utter disregard in a profoundly ugly way post 9/11 especially. There were many in the administration at the time of the invasion who didn’t think Iraqis were human beings, who basically said as much when asked about the subject.

Am I really surprised that this culture of casual cruelty has finally come to roost in their own nest? No. It’s what happens when you allow it to run rampant, unchecked and without consequence. It’s what happens when you dehumanize fellow human beings without thinking twice about it. Before long, you find yourself treating the people around you in the exact same way.

This is what this torture “debate” says about America. If Americans are so willing, eager even, to inflict prolonged pain on another person in that way, and they excuse it by saying “they’re not American” it won’t be very long before that turns into, “They’re American but not the type of American that matters.” And that should scare people.

May 11, 2018 1 note
Just another comment on their hypocrisy...Today I saw a lot of these same hystrionics "tone-policing" Rose McGowan's comments about meeting Obama, and siding with him over her disappointment in him. Aren't they siding with the evil patriarchy?

I read that too, and LAK was the only one who kept saying -  Rose doesn’t have to be a perfect victim. What I am noticing at CB even more lately is the black and white thinking. This is a very simplistic and narrow type of thinking, which you usually see in brainwashed people. If one person is good, the other must be bad. If Obama is good, then Rose must be bad. No, they can both be good people, each with their own personal failings. Nobody is perfect.

The same thing went on today on the McCain’s article -  if Trump is bad, then McCain must be good. How about both of them are awful? McCain participated in an illegal Vietnam war, where innocent civilians were killed. He is no “war hero”, he is a victim , at best. And then he was instrumental in getting the US in a number of other illegal wars. He is a war criminal, who will never be prosecuted, just like George Bush and Dick Chaney. The only redeeming thing about him is that he is against torture. There was one person who got in right on the McCain’s post, I am going to post her comment next.

May 11, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
On the latest post about Meghan and Kate, there are several comments criticizing Kaiser for promoting the Meghan vs Kate narrative. There are also a few comments talking about Kaiser’s obsessive hatred for Kate. I know the comments won’t last long, but It’s good to finally see people waking up to her craziness.
May 2, 2018 3 notes
I think I have been banned again from celebitchy I cannot think of anything I have done wrong. I am never rude or aggressive. I am very pro Meghan and Harry but not nasty about Kate. Can I find out if I have really been banned or whether its a mistake. How can I get back in?

If you post but your comments never appear, then you were banned. As I understand the ban is IP address, name and email based. If you login from a different computer (or with VPN ) , use a different name and a different email, it is likely you will be able to post.

Also, the ban expires usually around 6 months.

However, once you’ve been banned once, the chances are very high you will be banned again. You are simply not compatible with Celebitchy group-think. So, why bother?

May 2, 2018 1 note
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December