Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

January 2018

The latest post about Will getting his hair cut to upstage Meghan and Harry is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on there.

The whole discussion was ridiculous. He cannot control whether he is bold or not, why is it even OK to be discussing it? People should’ve learned by now that it is not OK to discuss things that people cannot control such as looks, gender, race, ethnicity, one’s family etc.

But then Kaiser wouldn’t know what to write about half of the time.

Jan 22, 2018
Kaiser is the worst. On the post about Princess Charlotte learning Spanish she made some ignorant comments about langauges, the British royal family and their supposed 'tolerance' of certain languages. She implied that the family must surely see Spanish as ''less than'' French, which is ridiculous. It showed how little she knows of European attitudes. Spanish is highly valued here. I asked a critical question and wrote of my own bilingual upbringing but the comment wasn't approved of course.

Kaiser comes across as someone who haven’t really traveled or interacted with different cultures much. Her views are very American-centric. She doesn’t understand international perspective at all. She is not equipped to write for an international audience.

Jan 20, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

A few observations on the last weeks articles on CB:

1. People who keep talking about how awful Norman Reedus looks and how Joshua Jakson is so much better, just stop it. Happiness has nothing to do with looks. You can be with the most beautiful person  in the world and still be unhappy if that person is not right for you and vice versa.

2.Aziz Ansari discucssion -  whether it was an assault or not. It wasn’t an outright assault in my opinion, but that doesn’t make it somehow OK, or forgivable. He treated that young woman as a piece of meat. not a person. And he doesn’t even get it why it was wrong. Women shouldn’t have to accept that it is OK to treat them as piece of chattel. It is not OK to blame the woman for wanting and expecting more than just being a sex toy. Too many commenters sounded like it was the woman’s fault that she expected to be treated with more respect and consideration.

3. So, now that Meghan and Harry are proving to be Will&Kate #2, only without kids so far, I find it funny how their CB fans are coming up with excuses they never seems to think of in case of Wil&Kate - “ Harry is RICH! What else did people expect?”. I expected nothing different and this is why the monarchy needs to be abolished . What is the saying - none are so blind as those who refuse to see?  That applies to the CB posters most of the time, so many of them have blinders on.

Jan 16, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
How can I comment here?

You can comment by adding notes under the posts or you can send your comment to me and I will publish it.

Jan 16, 2018
Oh dear. Just had a comment deleted for very politely suggesting it might be time we stop looking at dysfunctional politics potentially affecting billions of lives as a source of entertainment. Actually that might have been enough to get me banned. I've been on thin ice before. :(

I agree with you there. It is not like people come to Celebitchy to have a serious political discussion. They come there because it became an echo chamber of Hillary’s supporters and her supporters get their validation there. I guess there aren’t many other places to get it .

Jan 16, 2018
Holy crap! I just discovered this through a google search but I was banned too for basically saying to stop pitting women against each other for the millionth time, if you are so-called feminist.
Jan 12, 2018
I can’t beljeve this is my first time finding your blog but WOW, I’m so glad I did. I’ve been a longtime CB reader (I rarely comment, when I do it’s pretty useless input) and have wondered where lots of the regular commenters have gone. Thank you for putting this together and allowing us to communicate in an open and honest environment!

Thank you for your kind words.

Jan 9, 2018 1 note

Today Kaiser decided to take an issue with Gal Gadot’s pink and red outfit. This is so petty, I just rolled my eyes.

Is Celebitchy a fashion blog now? That would be funny because Kaiser has no taste and no eye for fashion. Red and pink actually go well together and you’ll find this combination used by many designers.

One day Celebitchy is a progressive political blog ( see all Trump articles), or  a champion for feminist issues  (Harvey coverage), another day it is a trashy gossip blog ( various Swift, Kardashian and roayls articles) and other days it is just nasty pointless negative gossip that rips into people for superficial things like clothes and haircuts.

Does Kaiser even know who she wants to be when she grows up?

Jan 4, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
So Kaiser’s Meghan Markle love has worn off and she’s being as harsh on her as she has been Kate... her latest post has a subtle bit of misogyny, like Meghan will be crazy if she has her mother walk her down the aisle instead of her father. Kaiser is really backwards and hates when daughters and mothers are close.

I don’t think she ever truly loved Meghan, I think it was a convenient narrative for her to compare Meghan to Kate and use it to bash Kate. And , well, now she got to criticize Meghan as well, and that means more clicks for Celebitchy and more money.

I said from the beginning that Meghan was entering into this to have a comfortable, secure life. And it seems that way more and more.

As for walking down the aisle and the “giving away” of the bride, I  find this custom to be really questionable given its origins, sorry. We used to do that in my culture as well, but now the bride and the groom walk in together. I would love if Meghan and Harry did that. And that would end all the controversy right there.

Jan 3, 2018

December 2017

For a site which comments on everything about Kate Middleton, from her shoes to her knickers, facial expressions to her hand placement. They have pretty much ignored the hefty price tag of Meghan Markle's tacky engagement dress with the Hollywood Harry. Double standards. That site is absolutely scary just like Breitbart.

The mental gymnastics they use trying to explain away the price of the dress are pretty amusing.They keep claiming that it must’ve been gifted or sold at a discount, even though it has been stated over and over that the royal family cannot accept clothes for free or at a discount, they pay full price.

It is really simple. Meghan is out of touch, and is not a humanitarian hero they created in their minds.

Dec 22, 2017 2 notes

So, today Kaiser called Oscar Isaac’s partner his baby-mama. Some feminist she is … Someone needs to explain to her why this is a sexist term just like “knocked up”.

Dec 14, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Did you read the Al Franken article? I found it funny how so many people thought his accusers were lying. What happened to their “believe every woman” stance? It’s because Franken is a Democrat. I feel like if it had been a Republican in that situation, they would never accuse the women of lying. I am a democrat who despises Trump and his ilk, by the way. I just find the hypocrisy amusing.

Absolutely, hypocrisy is the way at CB.

I was pretty impressed, though, that  democrats made Franken resign and didn’t fall victim to the political expediency, which is often the case. To be honest, I fully expected them to sweep it under the rug.

Dec 13, 2017 1 note

LAK and NIcole really went after each other on the Lupita’s article today. And it made me sad, because they are both right, they both have valid points, but that is the nature of Celebitchy -  people get too self-righteous, too absolute in their views and refuse to accept more nuanced views.

if you haven’t seen Lupita’s Vogue cover - take a look. It is absolutely gorgeous. I spent full 5 minutes just staring at it. It is so beautiful.

As for her point that colonialism causes an identity crisis, I don’t fully agree . I think colonialism impedes the development of the cultures that are colonized  and it tries to subsume them but I think colonized people are still very clear about who they are.

Dec 12, 2017
#celebitchy #ban

I have to say, I very much enjoyed reading all the regulars on Celebitchy trying to reconcile the irreconcilable. 

In their heads they created this image of Meghan Markle as a forward thinking progressive feminist, and now she is going to have to curtsy to Kate.

Apparently, Meghan can still remain a progressive feminist while doing so because it was her choice -  their words , not mine. 

I also felt quite a bit of disbelief  about just how much people know about the rules of the royal family. Some people take the monarchy way too seriously. The monarchy should be abolished, and its archaic , sexist rules should be abolished with it.

SoulSPA poster went into great lengths to talk about people who know how to curtsy properly, as if it is some kind of a great accomplishment and not a sexist anachronism. But I am repeating myself ….

Dec 12, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I just want to point out one thing on the Meghan Markle comments. She will have to give up her American citizenship. She cannot marry into the British Royal family and keep it. This type of divided loyalties will never be allowed, even if allowed by law.

In fact I remember seeing an article talking about the exit taxes and such she would have to pay to give up her American citizenship.

So, if the things go south, she will not be able to go back to the US as an American citizen. For the same reason, she will not have protection of American laws in such matters as prenup agreements.

Dec 6, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy

On the article “ Lena Dunham casts herself as the only person with foresight on Harvey Weinstein “  there is a lot of criticism of Lena Dunham, which I have no problem with. 

But it is very noticeable how everyone studiously avoiding the subject of Hillary Clinton knowing the truth about Harry Weinstein, because I have no doubt she knew, but she didn’t care enough to forgo hie influence and his donations.

Or maybe people did point it out but their comments their deleted. That blog post is supposed to have 76 comments as per the front page, but only 36 are published.

Dec 6, 2017
#celebitchy #ban

What is Kaiser’s problem with men saying that they are objectified as well? It is not either/or. Women are objectified, men are objectified. Both men and women feel diminished and disrespected when it happens.They are people and want to be seen as persons, not bodies.

I am talking about this post

Matt Smith is #MeToo-ing: Men are objectified too, ‘it’s not exclusive’ to women

Kaiser says

“ I have an honest question: when men start #MeToo-ing in this particular way, does it ever feel like they’re derailing the conversation? Does it ever feel like someone saying “all lives matter” to Black Lives Matter? We know men and boys are victimized, and they have every right to tell their stories and be believed, the same as women. But… the patriarchy is real, you know? “

As I said, it is not either/ or. Patriarchy doesn’t make it OK to silence men. Just support both men and women. Simple. 

It is like Kaiser doesn’t know what to do when things are not black and white. 

Kaiser mercilessly mocked Kit Harrington when he talked about it. And that has been a sore point with me since then because Harrington was absolutely right. He was being an ally and he was trying to relate to women’s experiences and for that he was mocked. Matt got a slightly better treatment because Kaiser seems to like him more.

Dec 6, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
Did you see the comments on the Apu (Simpsons) thread? That was a dumpster fire of racism. I was surprised that Kaiser didn't handle that story, but it might have hit close to home for her. I can respect that, actually. Also, I've noticed after a lot of us have been banned or had comments deleted for being critical of popoholic, the site has quietly stopped linking to them. So that's a good thing!

I am glad to hear that at least something good came out of it. I checked the popoholic site once because somebody asked me about it, and I never went back.

I remember a similar thing with the “knocked up” expression Kaiser used to love. I took an exception to it because I think this expression is disrespectful of women. It sounds like getting pregnant is not something a woman chooses to do, but she just gets pregnant because she doesn’t know where babies come from.

I was put into moderation for saying it. But I kept saying it. Finally, a few months later one of the regulars made the same point and finally it got through to Kaiser and she stopped saying “knocked up”.

Dec 6, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
The Time POTY post comments are, as expected, a total disaster. People twisting themselves in a knot trying to be simultaneously woke and feminist, while also saying how Taylor Swift isn't a real victim (or at least not deserving of recognition) because she just sued that DJ for her own reasons or something equally insane.

I just read it … As much as I could take that is. By the time I got to Taylor’s “problematic feminism” I was DONE.

I simply don’t believe it is her feminism they have an issue with, I think they don’t like her and that is that. She cannot do anything right in their eyes.

Dec 6, 2017 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Are people getting banned? I think I got banned hallway through the morning for defending Taylor Swift. Not even defending her but just commenting that we should celebrate the Times cover and not use it to trash particular women we don't like. The rest of my posts after that did not appear despite being along the party line.

Yes, you probably were banned. Saying anything positive about Taylor Swift would definitely put you on the side opposite to Kaiser. So you would be banned for any perceived infraction.

Dec 6, 2017
MM anon, I just discovered I'm not banned and that they're moderating the MM comments
Dec 4, 2017

My friend who reads CB & Loved it, just told me that an few months back she got banned on an RBF post.
She was first put in moderation for the first time after agreeing with someone standing up for Kate, then she was put on moderation again and her comment was deleted in an JenAnniston post.
Finally, she was banned outright. She said she wrote CB an email 2 days in a row and got no response. Then the next RBF post she said that Kaiser made references to her email in the actual article.Mocking her.

No surpise that my friend was an black regular on CB. They seem to have no issue just disgarding us.

————————————————————————————————

Oh, that is the worst when Kaiser uses insider information to mock people over very real issues they bring up. This is hitting below the belt. When people send private messages they expect their privacy to be respected.

I remember her doing it last year during Taylor Swift vs. Kanye West drama. She made references to some people sending emails and dismissed anyone who was defending Swift as her fangirls, while she was making excuses for Kanye. But the thing people took issue with was Kanye’s misogyny. and it had nothing to do with being a fan of Taylor.

Dec 4, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
So I just posted that I was getting burnt out on MM stories and guess what it was taken down. As this is my first offence, i.e. being deleted, I don't think I've been banned. But kaiser herself on an earlier story said she worried about people burning out on her. As for MM if I were her I would worry about people burning out on stories about me.
Dec 4, 2017

300 comments discussing Meghan Markle’s coat -  too long, too short, not tailored enough or whatever. Who cares? Even for a gossip site this is too much. Is that all there is to Meghan? Her coat and her hair? She is going to be just another person to take apart -  her clothes, her hair, her looks. 

How does this compute in people’s heads? First, they are excited about a bi-racial American entering the Royal family and then they basically reduce her to a cloth hanger. She is starting to get the same treatment as Kate. I think it is not Kate who is the issue here,or Meghan or any other woman with whom CB posters take an issue, it is the posters. They are unable to see a person as a person. Everyone is dehumanized and dissected.

Personally, I think it is such a dull, fake life - forever smiling, shaking hands, being judged, being an ornament or a token at endless ribbon-cutting ceremonies. I would never want that life for myself. I’d run away screaming after 15 min of that. And I feel a bit sorry for both Kate and Meghan.

Dec 2, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

November 2017

QQ commented on the Jay Z post and it was up for an few hours before it was deleted.

Nov 30, 2017
Nov 30, 2017

I have a couple things on my mind today in light of the Lauer’s debacle.

First, his co-hosts were crying about it and then I saw an article in the Guardian about how we have to reconcile horrible actions by a well loved man. And I thought -  give me a f*ing break! I don’t need to reconcile anything. The guy is a dirtbag and that is that. The fact that he worked for an organization you approve of doesn’t make him more palatable. In fact, the said organization (NBC) clearly enabled him, because there were enough warning signs.

In connection to this I came across the Lauer’s interview with Anne Hathway from 2012 where he pestered her about inappropriate photos of her taken by paps and he was clearly set to humiliate and diminish her. How was that ever considered to be an acceptable behavior by an interviewer? 

Anne handled it like a professional that she is, and kudos to Anne. Yes, kudos to Anne,  who Kaiser also tried to diminish so many times. And you know what, Anne comes out of this looking like a queen. And all her critics look petty and immature.

Nov 29, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
GossipBucket

If anyone is interested in gossiping about the site or just gossip in general about the topics on CB, without it getting modded out, I think it’d be really cool if all the ex readers could come to GossipBucket and comment under the stories where they can’t be deleted or modded out.

here’s an link for an example, http://gossipbucket.com/celebitchy/1247644/duchess-kate-stepped-out-for-a-keen-visit-to-a-london-school-this-morning/

Nov 29, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
follow up on Malia post: two comments criticizing the coverage were deleted! I was wondering how they got through in the first place.
Nov 28, 2017
The post about Malia Obama today was insane. The title was “Malia Obama smokes and has a douchebag boyfriend, and it’s none of our business” while the post proceeds to detail the photos and pictures people are leaking of her. Including TMZ videos. Wtf?! If it’s nobody’s obusiness, don’t cover her!

I didn’t read that post exactly for this reason - none of my business.

Nov 28, 2017
The worse commenters on celebitchy seem to be not a sugar and princesss k who tryed to justify harrys racist comments in the past a just wanting to fit in with friends

Notasugar is Kate’s hater and by some bizzare logic she now likes Harry because he is with Meghan Markle and Meghan is not Kate.

Nov 28, 2017
I made what I thought was an innocuous comment about what happened with certain posters (someone suggested they had been pushed out) and my comment was deleted. Not banned as yet, but as I'm reading your site, I see there's a systemic problem.
Nov 28, 2017
Joining your club

So I’ve been banned from Celebitchy several times over the years, sometimes I know why. This time I’m pissed at the hypocrisy. On a post the other day about the Marvel covers for Vanity fair, by Kaiser. She goes off on how Marvel has disregarded black women and are sexist for not giving Black Widow her own movie. Then at the end she figuratively throws the whole MCU at bottom dwelling basement livers by saying ‘the fanboys will be happy with the covers’. 

So I agree with a poster who is an adult woman and likes those movies that I don’t understand why fans of a huge franchise get reduced to fanboys when you know we are not, moreover how can you care if black women are disregarded and if Black widow gets her own movie if it’s a sexist vehicle for more racism and sexism? Banned. Open discussion is all I would like, I don’t mind being on the wrong side but let each side have their piece. Thanks for the space to rant, just found you:)

———————————————————————

Marvel just spent gazillion dollars to make The Black Panther, which was a huge risk. And Scott Derrickson was one of the first Hollywood people who came out against Harvey Weinstein.  In the world of the Hollywood Marvel is not a problem, they are at least trying. But Marvel is a huge business and they have to make sure their projects are profitable. If The Black Panther does well then they will invest more money into movies with POC leads. So go out and spend the dough. It is all in your hands. -))

Nov 28, 2017
#celebitchy #ban #submission
Kaiser is really a pill. I think I just became a super fan of both Jenny Slate and Chris Evans and am now rooting for them to be together and maybe get married when before I was just indifferent towards them and their relationship just because of her biases against them. Who went and made her Cupid? Lady find your own man and maybe then you won’t be such a Bitter (Hateful) Betty. Tried to say I really don’t mind them together, if they’re happy good for them. Now on moderation. Maybe banned too.

Jenny is a bit extra, but she is very likeable. If the girl is in love, why not wish her the best? Why make fun of her? I don’t get it.

I am rooting for her -)).

Nov 13, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Ok apparently I was just banned today. Seriously, I found your site a few weeks ago & thought "well surely they did something to get banned." Uhh I was wrong. I commented today in a ridiculous over the top hatred post of Taylor Swift & now I'm banned. I responded to a commenter that said they didn't get how the site was saying the reviews for Taylor's new album were mixed. I literally responded in one sentence in my comment "This site doesn't like her so there's the bias." Now I'm banned. Wtf?

You are not allowed to disagree on CB. It might go unnoticed a couple of times, but if you do that on topics close to the Kaiser’s heart like Taylor Swift, Kanye, Angelina or racial issues, you will be banned at the first “offense”. And, of course, you are never allowed to criticize Kaiser or the site.

I take it Kaiser truly believes that her opinion of Taylor Swift is unbiased -)). And all those millions of people buying her music are doing it because of reasons …, not because they like her music.

Nov 10, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Anyone read the Taylor Swift thread yesterday? What a bunch of hateful hypocritical posters. It actually scares me to read some of the comments. I think they feed off of one another and the anger escalates to a level of craziness.

I think so too, yes. It is like a feeding frenzy.

Nov 10, 2017
I sent in something to you a couple of months ago about being banned for making a somewhat critical comment of "Saint Angie" (despite following their stated rules). The whole Weinstein had me gravitating back towards Celebitchy as, for all its problems, it's a mostly safe place to be angry about the sex scandals without a bunch of sexist trolls. So I commented on a post today, and apparently I'm still banned. As for Lainey: I've always assumed the hatred is due to jealousy.

They won’t un-ban you just because you changed your mind about them. I think it takes about 6 month for the ban list to refresh. You’ll probably be able to post again after a few months.

The coverage of Weinstein and Spacey is good, but it doesn’t mean Celebitchy changed. it is still the same toxic place outside of those topics.

Lainey is definitely better at gossip. But I don’t read her site because it doesn’t allow comments.I am not interested in one-way conversations.

Nov 9, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I visited CB today and I read the post about Maureen O’Hara. I was reading the glowing comments about her and I was nodding along. What a beautiful woman, inside and out.

Then I went to Joe Alwyn’s post and saw the same people going on about how they don’t think he is good looking. Really, it is like being with the high school kids. Everybody tries to show their disdain for the cool girl’s boyfriend. And failing badly. Just how many times do you have to say that some guy you know nothing about doesn’t look appealing to you? And why?

This dichotomy is just weird. How can you be a normal person one minute and then completely irrational and immature just minutes later?

There was one sane person who said this was similar to bullying. And , of course, the regulars immediately jumped in with their “this is a gossip site” schtick.

Nov 7, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Have you seen not so sugar and princess k defend harry on there someone broufht up harry once racially abused a pakistani solider by calling him a paki and princess k said he didnt mean anything by it he was just trying to fit in with his friend and him wearing a nazi symbol was apparently william fault because he some how forced a grown man to wear it 😁 its a bloody racist term in britain imagine if that was donald triump they would have his head the hypocrisy hilarious

I am not a fan of Harry, to be honest. He is just as privileged and out of touch as William. I really don’t get why they give Harry a pass. 

Nov 7, 2017
Sixer and LightPurple (formerly LilacFlowers, who was banned and changed names) drove me to leave CB. I wasn’t banned, I just can’t stand how obnoxious they are and they pop into too many threads to “snark” but just come off like assholes. And yes, Kaiser is a classic white feminist. She completely disregarded the upset over Sebastian Stan’s “take the knee” debacle, which definitely rightfully offended some posters there. And you cannot mention Lainey for some reason.

I can’t stand either one as well. Both are obnoxious hypocrites. LilacFlowers got banned because she went against the party line on CB and criticized Kanye for his unathorized video with naked Taylor and other women. The rest of CB, with Kaiser in the lead, were all busy attacking “snake” Taylor and defending “poor” Kanye West from her. Some feminists they are …

Anyway, so instead of standing her ground LilacFlowers changed her name and came back as if nothing happened.

Sixer was making all kinds of excuses for Georgina when Weinstein scandal broke but she doesn’t have a problem ripping into Kate Middleton, who is absolutely harmless.

Nov 5, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

October 2017

Anyone else notice that comments mentioning Lainey don't get through?

I didn’t realize that. 

Oct 30, 2017
I was banned too! Again! I swear this time I was careful! IDK what I did wrong! It's okay, sometimes I feel it's a toxic environment. I think its better for me.

It is a toxic place. I don’t really care for it. But I keep this blog open so that the people can tell their stories and don’t feel powerless when they get banned for having a different opinion.

Oct 28, 2017 3 notes
This is old news but I want share a story about when I had my comments deleted on some CB post about Ryan Lochte being an a-hole in Rio. Kaiser was basically defending Ryan and trying to diminish brazilian authorities at all costs. Even after he was proven wrong. So when someone tries to bring a new light into the subjects that are sensitive to the CB team (How dare a 3rd world country make our beloved-but-not-so-bright child look so bad for the whole world to see?), you know what happens.

I noticed myself that Kaiser and the general readership are not at all receptive to non-US-centric views. That tells me that Kaiser is not that well read or well traveled. regardless of what she claims. Her views are very narrow.

Oct 28, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
I just figured out that I have been banned. I didn’t say any wrong ... just made it clear that I am a black woman and ppl don’t fight for us...wtf
Oct 28, 2017

I remember prior to Depp and Heard breaking up, Kaiser portrayed her as a fame whore who loved pap walks and Deep was painted as this guy who put up with it. Not to mention Matt Damon was constantly painted as a good guy because of how he gave interviews? Please he has to be one of the worst in Hollywood, Kaiser is naive and readers should not accept all the view points presented. Kaiser knows little to nothing about the celebrities being talked about, the only accuracy is perhaps Trump’s coverage I’ll give them that much.

Oct 21, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
Did you see the latest article on Kate? It’s very petty and childish, especially the “game” she proposes at the end

No, I didn’t. I usually don’t read Kate Middleton or Angelina articles, they are just too much for me. I took a peak at one a few weeks back and Kaiser made it sound like Kate got pregnant just so that she can upstage Meghan Markle or something like that.

I read one about Taylor Swift yesterday and it was fun watching the usual haters trying to reconcile their feelings for her and the fact that they liked the song.

The one comment claiming that Alwyn is not that good looking made me snort. I get it that tastes are different , but Alwyn is very handsome. He and Taylor also look very similar, which makes me think that he is one for her. People often fall for those who look like them.

Oct 21, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Do you ever comment on Pajiba, what do you think of it? I made a (polite) comment there questioning if Hillary Clinton really didn't know about Weinstein, considering she had access to the best intelligence and it got deleted (twice). It seems like Hillary is to Pajiba what Angelina Jolie is to CB. Moderation and censorship is increasing, online and in society in general.

It seems to be  a bigger version of CB -  an echo-chamber for “woke”people. I don’t have a problem with the content as such but the commenters seem to have a kind of herd mentality- you are with us or against us. I checked it out a few times, but was never tempted to join.

Oct 17, 2017 1 note
I think royalsparkle may be another of kaiser’s Alts. That chick is batshi# crazy.
Oct 11, 2017
What is Liana's site that is referenced on here so much? I also used to be a frequent Celebitchy reader, but learned better than to comment after I stuck up for Bernie during the primaries. Glad to have found your tumblr!

It is an old blog thread where a lot of people who were banned over the years posted.

https://lianathinks.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/being-banned/

Oct 10, 2017
I noticed earlier today on the Hugh Hefner article that some people commented about why was the site still linking to popaholic? Some other posters said something about how the site was heavily moderated and called out Kaiser. Those comments have since been deleted.

I bet the answer is money. CB gets money for the links. In the end, despite all the claims of being progressive and what is not, CB is a business. It is there to make its owners money. This is the reason they post about Trump 5 times a day -  clicks, which turn into money, and this is the reason for advertising and links.

Oct 3, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December