Anyone thinks “notasugarhere” is Kaiser? I am not one for conspiracy theories but the writing style is very similar.
Anyway, regardless, on the controversy of a librarian rejecting Dr. Seuss books that Melani Trump gave, notasugarhere seems to be the only person working hard to justify it.
My view is that you don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. If something is given with good intentions, you accept it and move on. You can decide how to handle the gift later, if you don’t actually need it. Anything else is very rude and hurtful.
Ha-ha. Kaiser is tying herself into a pretzel to prove the point that the Wonder Woman is a feminist icon and James Cameron is wrong. I know nothing about James Cameron, the person, but his point is valid and whatever his personal failing are, his point still stands on its own.
The Wonder Woman is not a feminist icon. It is disgrace to consider her as such because the character relies too much on the looks and the sexy outfits. Let’s not pretend the tiny outfit that WW wears is an accident.
Pippi Longstocking is more of a feminsit icon than WW will ever be. I feel sad for young American women who are taught that WW is something to aspire and who don’t have enough exposure to strong female characters to know any better.
Thank you.
I wasn’t familiar with Popoholic. I just checked it out. It is not my cup of tea either, for the same reasons you stated. Objectification is wrong.
I don’t think so. But it is safe to say that it was whatever your posted the last day. I know some people even emailed the Celebitchy owner asking to be unblocked because they felt they didn’t do anything wrong. They never got any response back, of course.
Some of them got eventually unblocked after a year or so, once their IP addresses disappeared from the blocked list. It looks like whatever blocking software CB uses, it clears up IP addresses after 6 months or a year.
No, I don’t. If anyone knows, feel free to shoot me a note. I’ll post it. I remember her as well. She had very thoughtful posts.
I also remember Nutballs. She was funny, she was a Hiddleston fan. Once she ventured outside of Hiddles posts into something more controversial and got banned.
P.S.
I just checked Lianna’s site, I thought I saw Viriginia’s posts there. Here is her last one from this July. Maybe she did start her own site.
Yeah–I haven’t been commenting on CB as often. Part of it is because I don’t want to write a comment and then have it modded–especially if I worked looong and haaard on that comment too. I’m also annoyed that you apparently can’t write about hot dreams about Tom Hardy, but they’ll let people GO TO TOWN on the Jennifer/Justin/Brad/Angelina threads. I mean, I honestly start dreading reading the threads because of a few people who just go after people for disagreeing. Why aren’t any of their comments deleted?
But yeah, I was telling my friend this, and she told me to start my own site—she convinced me…..:)
I don’t even click on Angelina’s articles. They are too much for my sanity.
For the love of peace, why are they still going on about Hillary Clinton? She is irrelevant.
On the day Bernie makes his “Medicare for all” proposal, there is no word of it on the supposedly progressive CB site, but a post again about Hillary and why it is not her fault.
There are only two people who dared to say - why are we still talking about Hillary, and both were attacked by all the hardcore Hilalry supporters repeatedly. They were accused of lying, being trolls, having ulterior motives and were told that they didn’t need to comment at all, if they didn’t care for Hillary.
It has been in the back of my mind the whole day, what does this behavior remind me of. And it finally clicked - a cult. That is exactly how cult members behave. The viciousness of the pro-Hillary posters on CB just goes a bit too far outside the accepted norms. The constant accusations of lying and having dishonest motives are hallmarks of people being in a complete and total denial about reality. They don’t see things objectively.
Ah, so today’s Cumberbatch article is called “Benedict Cumberbatch did his TIFF premiere without his loyal&faithful wife”.
That is some very low class trolling from Kaiser, and not at all feminist minded.
Clearly she hasn’t “forgiven” Cumberbatch’s wife for stealing yet another internet boyfriend from her.
Somebody comes across as very vindictive and completely lacking self-awareness.
I didn’t visit CB that day but according to other people this is what happened
“Oh my toads! So, earlier I said I wonder if “Kaiser will cover the BET awards’, well guess what? She decided to cover a agrument that a bunch of rappers had and Kaiser basically said, “nothing noteworthy happened on the show, so I’m not going to cover it, I’ll just talk about what was happening on twitter” (Aka the princess of wokeness didn’t watch the BET Awards and just saw that was trending on twitter) and so a lot of people were complaining about how dismissive the post was and complaining about Kaiser.Everyones stance was, why cover anything from the BET Awards? Why not just ignore the whole thing and be hypocrtical as always, because you always race bait and all that, but on your own website, you basically dismissed a amazing show that was full of diversity and amazing moments, Also you cover LITERALLY EVERY AWARD SHOW.
Kaiser loves to call people out on not being inclusive yet you aknowlegdeged the BET Awards and chose to report on something negative and after the show.
So tell me why, kaiser not only deleted a bunch of comments, but she LOCKED THE POST.
Instead of owning up to it, or apologizing, she LOCKED THE POST.
Seriousy?“
QQ and AlmondJoy were the people who apparently called Kaiser out on that BET awards show post and after that they disappeared. Either they got blocked or they left in protest. I think they were blocked.
But then Kaiser realized that she made a big mistake because ever since then the other people have been asking what happened to QQ and AlmondJoy and keep dropping hints like “ I wish some posters were still here”.
That is because Nicole, who criticized Kaiser, is black. And after what happened with AlmondJoy and QQ Kaiser is forced to tread lightly, otherwise she’ll lose all her POC readers.
If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be marrying into the royal family. I think she just wants a comfortable life. I don’t hate Kate, to me she is a stay at home mom, one of many. It is her choice. And Meghan is no different.
If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be signing up for a highly regimented life of a royal.
Just like Kaiser. -))
Whenver their is a postive Kate story Nosugarhere (one of the biggest and nasiest Kate haters of them all) either doesn’t comment, or they comment really late at night when the thread is dead.
Today’s BRF post was about George’s first day and was very postive. I find that whenever the posts are postive, then the haters don’t bother to comment. It’s really sad that their so hateful of these ppl that they can’t even comment nicely.
Also, I love how whenever LAK, Nosugarhere or Nic say something (and it usually sounds like made up tabloid nonsense to further incrimante Kate) everyone belives it. They seem to know exactly what Kate thinks.
what a bunch of looneys.
Today’s Munroe Bergdorf post is such a mess. I’ll try to step lightly here because I didn’t grow up in the US, and I didn’t grow up with the American race struggles. I had my own experiences as a mixed ethnicity person and I think that helps me to see both sides of the argument.
I only want to say that outside of the US there is no such term as “reverse racism”. At least I never heard it. There is only “racism”. No person is exempt from being seen as a racist if their actions are racist. And ”racism” means personal racism, institutional racism is called “institutional racism” and not simply “racism”.
Btw, I just read on the Guardian what happened to Michael Bennet and it is absolutely crazy. American police is out of control. Guns and racism are an awful combination. I am not black and American police terrifies me. I can’t imagine being black and having to face them, without knowing what to expect.
I am happy to see that common sense prevails in the comments under the Amal’s post. Here is what Kaiser said about Amal. It is her usual passive-aggressive style. And she thinks Taylor is a mean girl?
“I like that she’s not a “kept woman,” even though I’ve believed for a long time that George is financing her shopping habit. That being said, it wouldn’t surprise me if she did find a way to quietly quit her job, right?
“
And kudos to Nicole for calling her out on that and sticking to her guns.
Nicole says:
You’re incredible rude about Amal and it’s confusing. People were right to tell you you didn’t know she could work from home, but you continue to be dismissive and imply that she doesn’t work that much. Plus, finance her shopping trips? They’re married, she likes to buy clothes, he’s not financing anything, it’s a shared pot of money. I don’t know…your attitude towards Amal seems odd.
On today’s Hillary article there was this comment regarding Hillary vs. Bernie, under which I cosign 100%.
Patricia says:
Listen, I’m not a bro and I’m not anywhere near a Trump voter. I grew up pretty poor, tied on the college debt that is the hallmark of my generation, and couldn’t even get a job in the field. My husband and children are Hispanic so I don’t fit the “oh so white” Bernie supporter mold.
Bernie talked about universal healthcare, for real. He talked about affordable college. He talked about taxing the 1% for real. He talked like a socialist becuase he is one, and so am I. Bernie didn’t pull the wool over anybody’s eyes on this. Yes I want change, and the Democratic Party isn’t offering it in any real form. I want a nation of free people who live within a society that functions for the good of all. I want hard work to pay off. I want my fellow Americans treated like human beings. Hillary didn’t speak to me at all. Sorry Hillary, this isn’t Bernie’s fault.
And what did the poster get in return? Insults and ridicule. Here is an example.
Scout says:
So does that mean you voted for Jill Stein whose platform was almost identical to Bernie’s? If so…LMAO.
The majority of the CB posters must be very privileged if they don’t see how hard the life is for the majority of the young Americans, and for working and lower middle class. The poster here is telling them that Hillary had no solutions, and yet her CB supporters just go la-la-la. That is because they have no personal experience with what OP is talking about, imo.
“Kaiser@Celebitchy @KaiseratCB
Replying to @Kel_MoonFace
I’m over him. The Vikander thing has left a bad taste in my mouth
5:07 AM - 5 Sep 2017”
Kaiser admits on Twitter that she is like a 12 year old bully, who likes a guy, finds out he has a girlfriend, and instead of moving on, she decides to try to spite and shit talk the girl. Or speard rumors behind her back. Or make weak ass passive agressive digs.
So from now on, everytime Kaiser criticizes Vikander, we know it’s because she’s a mean girl. Just like they call Taylor Swift. Kaiser seems to be more like the people she loathes then she knows.
She’s somewhat like Trump, whenever people give a opinion she doesn’t like she calls it, “Whining” or “Shouting” as if these opinions aren’t valid. But are people just bitching.
She ignores anything that dares to criticize her. She will not admit fault in anyway. She’s sexist, demeaning and calls everything that she doesn’t want to believe (even if it’s actual fact) Fake News, in order to make her feel better.
And like Taylor, Kaiser plays the victim. Is always passive agressively shitting on women who date men that she had crushes on (at least Taylor Swift actually dates the guys and has expereince with them).
Though while Taylor is successful, beatiful and regardless of anything smart, Kaiser likes to insert her power over a website that doesn’t even get her verified on twitter.
Kaiser also isn’t creative and repeats the same four or five “Insults” for every celeb
Like Kate, well..no..Kaiser isn’t like Kate. Kate seems to actually be a nice person that CB picks apart for filth because they are sexist shaming assholes.
Also on Twitter she reposted something negative about Meghan Merkle, but on CB, she tries to appeal to the crazy people who jump on anyone who says anything about MM and shit on Kate for everything.
So she doesn’t even give her honest opinion.
and the worst offense to me is that they love Kim Kardashian because she “called out Swift” which made me realize that they are a bunch of white women pretending to be “woke” because any black person, especially a women, would not and could not respect Kim K, because she steals from black women and resales it.
I’m not the type of black woman to say this but ,it’s white privielege for Kaiser and the gang, to brush over Kim K’s past just because Kim “called out” Tayor. That shows how fickle minded and hateful they are.
It also showed that they don’t care about black people.
And not to mention that QQ and Almondjoy got kicked off.
Yep. That is how it works. And this is why I have this blog, It happened to me too. I am never rude or disrespectful. But I am not a blind follower. I like to have a conversation and explore many angles.
This banning of people left and right, for politely disagreeing and trying to have a discussion, is just not right.
What is the point of having a blog where everyone agrees with each other on everything? It is an echo chamber.
Ha-ha, yes. Kaiser can’t forgive Alicia for “stealing” Fassy. And , yet, even her regulars, who usually back her, don’t support her against Alicia.
CB pretend to be more than just a gossip site. Except, they don’t follow their own high minded rules most of the time. It is just once in a while they remember about feminism, sexism and other topics. And usually it has to do with their favorites. When it comes to anybody else, the high standards go right out of the window.
I don’t think they are all Kaiser, at least not LAK and Sixer. But they are her core posters. If she blocks them there will be nobody left.
I used to think LAK and Sixer were interesting. But their hypocrisy, in the end, made me see them for who they are.
Their hate for Kate is squarely in the unhinged, too far gone territory. That is why I can’t take anything those posters say anywhere else seriously. They all need help.
I haven’t seen this yet. Now they’ve found something wrong with Chastain? Unbelievable.
Lol, yes, it does seem like it is a therapy place for people who don’t like Swift, Kate Middleton and a few other celebrities. They blow off their steam there and (hopefully?) feel better afterwards.
As for Taylor, I give her credit for how well she handled that DJ trial. She did us all a great service.
Can I also blame Alicia Vikander a little bit for this mess too? While critics aren’t saying that Vikander sucks in Tulip Fever (they’re just saying the movie is terrible), I just feel like… we’ve been here before. The release date for The Light Between Oceans kept getting pushed back too, and it felt like a case of “the emperor’s new clothes” where no one really wants to admit that Vikander in particular really can’t carry a film and that she’s not really a “draw” as an actress.
A-ha-ha. I see Kaiser still can’t let go of of her need to put Vilkander down, though now she has to phrase it more circumspectly because quite a few people on CB, including the regulars, like Vilkander.
It is said, living well is the best revenge, and Vilkander is doing exactly that. Enjoy your sour grapes, Kaiser.
I loved this comment on a Swift post yesterday. Well said, Erica.
Erica_V says:
Until Kanye apologies for using her naked likeness without her consent Taylor doesn’t have to apologize FOR ANYTHING!!!
Why does everyone forget he did that to her? Why does everyone insist Taylor take the highroad? She does not have to be the bigger person just because she’s a woman!! Kanye is a misogynistic douchebag and Taylor doesn’t owe him a single thing.
I personally think Angelina’s face is incredibly beautiful . For me, her face and Liv Tylers’s seem so beautiful that it is almost impossible to believe such faces exist. But I also understand that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And what is inside also affects the perception of outside beauty.
I also always remind myself that I shouldn’t treat a beautiful person better than others, I still should judge them on their character and actions. And I do question some of Angelina’s actions.
As for CB, imo, if you allow posters to say certain things about one woman, then you should allow the same for the other. You cannot have different standards for your favorites vs. others, that is just means you have no integrity. CB either shouldn’t censor anything, or should censor using the same criteria. If you are not allowing to shame one woman for being underweight or under-dressed, or whatever else, you shouldn’t allow shaming of another.
And a self-proclaimed feminist site definitely shouldn’t allow shaming of women based on their looks, or allow harsh judging of women while giving a pass to men for same or worse actions.
Which blog did I swtich to? The Guardian. Not joking here. There is nothing in the world of the celebirty gossip right now that is decent enough for me. The Guardian allows comments and has fair censorship. If I want to discuss Trump and politics that is the right place to do it, not CB. They also have a decent arts section.
You’ll see , those Swift fans will disappear pretty quickly. I’ve seen it over and over. Yes, there will be people for a while, who openly disagree, but eventually they disappear because in general disagreement just doesn’t jive with CB. CB is an echo chamber.
And, yes, it goes beyond saying that criticism of the site or Kaiser will result in an immediate ban even for long term posters. I remember last year one of Kaiser’s favorites, lilacflower/ lighpurple, got banned when she disagreed with Kaiser over Kanye.
Absolutely.You are not allowed to support Swift on CB , period.
Exactly. It doesn’t matter what Taylor is like. What Kanye did was wrong. It is not about Kanye and Kim vs. Taylor, it is about right and wrong. Kaiser and many CB posters have very flexible ethics when it comes to their favorites, while those they don’t like are never given the benefit of a doubt.
A few thoughts on the some of the last days of posts
* People going to town on Susan Sarandon. Really? Susan Sarandon has been a lefty for longer than many of us were alive and now you are judging her? If your party doesn’t have a place for a brave and principled person that is Susan Sarandon then I am not interested in being in your party.
* It is funny to read the praise for Taylor Swifts given so grudgingly. Admit it, Taylor Swift has guts and has strength that is to be admired and she did all feminists a huge service by standing up for herself and not folding. Yes, she is privileged but she is still a human being with feelings. She definitely did more for feminism than Kanye will ever do. And I still remember some of the posters defending Kanye over his video with naked wax replicas of Swift and others.
* No fan of Ivanka or nepotism, but I wouldn’t be so readily jumping on board with criticism of her by Indian officials, many of whom think that a woman is a lesser human being. I felt a whiff of that in their condescension towards Ivanka.
I think Kaiser mentioned that she is half-Indian, I have my doubts. She knows little about India and Indians and the knowledge is superficial She comes across as an American white. It is possible that she is half-Indian but was raised by the white side of the family and has no connection to the Indian side. Still, she doesn’t seem to have any desire to learn more about India. And that makes me think she is a white person posing as someone else. It is internet, there is no way to tell.
Bullying and piling on are pretty typical of the CB, if you hold an opinion not shared by the majority of posters.
But yes, I think you are thinking about the right person.
Yep. Kaiser’s race baiting is pretty transparent. And the thing is, half of the time she doesn’t even understand the issue she is talking about, and she gets flak from her posters. Still, it is too good of an opportunity for her to get more clicks to pass it up.
Ha, good point. If Kate never works, how is it she is out and about at all these functions.
Yes. If they really have an issue with people living at taxpayer expense then they should stop making an exception for Harry. He is no less privileged than Will.
But it seems roayls living at the taxpayer expense are OK, as long as they like them. It only becomes a problem with those they don’t like.
For example, they will never say a bad word about Leticia and Matilda, but I personally fail to see the difference. All of them benefit from their royal status, and that is something that shouldn’t even exist anymore.
CB Angelina’s fans are quite over the top. It is no wonder most celebrities can’t handle fame. If you have people who practically worship you, and will fight anyone who doesn’t, it can’t be without consequences for the object of the worship. I’d probably run and hide far away with fans like this. I hear Beyonce’s and Taylor’s fans are like this as well. Some people grow out of it, but many don’t.
Also, the older I get the more I realize that most adults didn’t actually grow up. They are just pretending and playing their roles. Inside they are the same teenagers, just with less mood swings. -))
I have to say, it is a curious choice of the nom de plume by Kaiser. I am assuming she didn’t call herself Kaiser as in the Emperor, or did she? She behaves like one, for sure.
The regulars there are definitely not objective. They forget all about feminism and principles when an opportunity presents itself to pile on on a woman they don’t like. They are hypocrites, most of them.
Ah, this type of thing used to get me in trouble on CB all the time in the past. I just can’t help and not to stand up for an underdog when things start getting over the top. I tried defending Kate Middleton. And it is not that I am a fan. I actually think the monarchy should be abolished.
But really, the type of hate Kate gets on CB is not reasonable. Yes, she is living at the taxpayer expense, but she is not the only one and she is fairly harmless.
As for the Affleck’s new lady love, I also think she is cute. Not that I like her. I think she is making a mistake. But you know what, she is a human and humans have to learn some things the hard way. -)). She is the one who will be paying for that mistake in the end.