I don’t even click on Angelina’s articles. They are too much for my sanity.
For the love of peace, why are they still going on about Hillary Clinton? She is irrelevant.
On the day Bernie makes his “Medicare for all” proposal, there is no word of it on the supposedly progressive CB site, but a post again about Hillary and why it is not her fault.
There are only two people who dared to say - why are we still talking about Hillary, and both were attacked by all the hardcore Hilalry supporters repeatedly. They were accused of lying, being trolls, having ulterior motives and were told that they didn’t need to comment at all, if they didn’t care for Hillary.
It has been in the back of my mind the whole day, what does this behavior remind me of. And it finally clicked - a cult. That is exactly how cult members behave. The viciousness of the pro-Hillary posters on CB just goes a bit too far outside the accepted norms. The constant accusations of lying and having dishonest motives are hallmarks of people being in a complete and total denial about reality. They don’t see things objectively.
Ah, so today’s Cumberbatch article is called “Benedict Cumberbatch did his TIFF premiere without his loyal&faithful wife”.
That is some very low class trolling from Kaiser, and not at all feminist minded.
Clearly she hasn’t “forgiven” Cumberbatch’s wife for stealing yet another internet boyfriend from her.
Somebody comes across as very vindictive and completely lacking self-awareness.
I didn’t visit CB that day but according to other people this is what happened
“Oh my toads! So, earlier I said I wonder if “Kaiser will cover the BET awards’, well guess what? She decided to cover a agrument that a bunch of rappers had and Kaiser basically said, “nothing noteworthy happened on the show, so I’m not going to cover it, I’ll just talk about what was happening on twitter” (Aka the princess of wokeness didn’t watch the BET Awards and just saw that was trending on twitter) and so a lot of people were complaining about how dismissive the post was and complaining about Kaiser.Everyones stance was, why cover anything from the BET Awards? Why not just ignore the whole thing and be hypocrtical as always, because you always race bait and all that, but on your own website, you basically dismissed a amazing show that was full of diversity and amazing moments, Also you cover LITERALLY EVERY AWARD SHOW.
Kaiser loves to call people out on not being inclusive yet you aknowlegdeged the BET Awards and chose to report on something negative and after the show.
So tell me why, kaiser not only deleted a bunch of comments, but she LOCKED THE POST.
Instead of owning up to it, or apologizing, she LOCKED THE POST.
Seriousy?“
QQ and AlmondJoy were the people who apparently called Kaiser out on that BET awards show post and after that they disappeared. Either they got blocked or they left in protest. I think they were blocked.
But then Kaiser realized that she made a big mistake because ever since then the other people have been asking what happened to QQ and AlmondJoy and keep dropping hints like “ I wish some posters were still here”.
That is because Nicole, who criticized Kaiser, is black. And after what happened with AlmondJoy and QQ Kaiser is forced to tread lightly, otherwise she’ll lose all her POC readers.
If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be marrying into the royal family. I think she just wants a comfortable life. I don’t hate Kate, to me she is a stay at home mom, one of many. It is her choice. And Meghan is no different.
If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be signing up for a highly regimented life of a royal.
Just like Kaiser. -))
Whenver their is a postive Kate story Nosugarhere (one of the biggest and nasiest Kate haters of them all) either doesn’t comment, or they comment really late at night when the thread is dead.
Today’s BRF post was about George’s first day and was very postive. I find that whenever the posts are postive, then the haters don’t bother to comment. It’s really sad that their so hateful of these ppl that they can’t even comment nicely.
Also, I love how whenever LAK, Nosugarhere or Nic say something (and it usually sounds like made up tabloid nonsense to further incrimante Kate) everyone belives it. They seem to know exactly what Kate thinks.
what a bunch of looneys.
Today’s Munroe Bergdorf post is such a mess. I’ll try to step lightly here because I didn’t grow up in the US, and I didn’t grow up with the American race struggles. I had my own experiences as a mixed ethnicity person and I think that helps me to see both sides of the argument.
I only want to say that outside of the US there is no such term as “reverse racism”. At least I never heard it. There is only “racism”. No person is exempt from being seen as a racist if their actions are racist. And ”racism” means personal racism, institutional racism is called “institutional racism” and not simply “racism”.
Btw, I just read on the Guardian what happened to Michael Bennet and it is absolutely crazy. American police is out of control. Guns and racism are an awful combination. I am not black and American police terrifies me. I can’t imagine being black and having to face them, without knowing what to expect.
I am happy to see that common sense prevails in the comments under the Amal’s post. Here is what Kaiser said about Amal. It is her usual passive-aggressive style. And she thinks Taylor is a mean girl?
“I like that she’s not a “kept woman,” even though I’ve believed for a long time that George is financing her shopping habit. That being said, it wouldn’t surprise me if she did find a way to quietly quit her job, right?
“
And kudos to Nicole for calling her out on that and sticking to her guns.
Nicole says:
You’re incredible rude about Amal and it’s confusing. People were right to tell you you didn’t know she could work from home, but you continue to be dismissive and imply that she doesn’t work that much. Plus, finance her shopping trips? They’re married, she likes to buy clothes, he’s not financing anything, it’s a shared pot of money. I don’t know…your attitude towards Amal seems odd.
On today’s Hillary article there was this comment regarding Hillary vs. Bernie, under which I cosign 100%.
Patricia says:
Listen, I’m not a bro and I’m not anywhere near a Trump voter. I grew up pretty poor, tied on the college debt that is the hallmark of my generation, and couldn’t even get a job in the field. My husband and children are Hispanic so I don’t fit the “oh so white” Bernie supporter mold.
Bernie talked about universal healthcare, for real. He talked about affordable college. He talked about taxing the 1% for real. He talked like a socialist becuase he is one, and so am I. Bernie didn’t pull the wool over anybody’s eyes on this. Yes I want change, and the Democratic Party isn’t offering it in any real form. I want a nation of free people who live within a society that functions for the good of all. I want hard work to pay off. I want my fellow Americans treated like human beings. Hillary didn’t speak to me at all. Sorry Hillary, this isn’t Bernie’s fault.
And what did the poster get in return? Insults and ridicule. Here is an example.
Scout says:
So does that mean you voted for Jill Stein whose platform was almost identical to Bernie’s? If so…LMAO.
The majority of the CB posters must be very privileged if they don’t see how hard the life is for the majority of the young Americans, and for working and lower middle class. The poster here is telling them that Hillary had no solutions, and yet her CB supporters just go la-la-la. That is because they have no personal experience with what OP is talking about, imo.
“Kaiser@Celebitchy @KaiseratCB
Replying to @Kel_MoonFace
I’m over him. The Vikander thing has left a bad taste in my mouth
5:07 AM - 5 Sep 2017”
Kaiser admits on Twitter that she is like a 12 year old bully, who likes a guy, finds out he has a girlfriend, and instead of moving on, she decides to try to spite and shit talk the girl. Or speard rumors behind her back. Or make weak ass passive agressive digs.
So from now on, everytime Kaiser criticizes Vikander, we know it’s because she’s a mean girl. Just like they call Taylor Swift. Kaiser seems to be more like the people she loathes then she knows.
She’s somewhat like Trump, whenever people give a opinion she doesn’t like she calls it, “Whining” or “Shouting” as if these opinions aren’t valid. But are people just bitching.
She ignores anything that dares to criticize her. She will not admit fault in anyway. She’s sexist, demeaning and calls everything that she doesn’t want to believe (even if it’s actual fact) Fake News, in order to make her feel better.
And like Taylor, Kaiser plays the victim. Is always passive agressively shitting on women who date men that she had crushes on (at least Taylor Swift actually dates the guys and has expereince with them).
Though while Taylor is successful, beatiful and regardless of anything smart, Kaiser likes to insert her power over a website that doesn’t even get her verified on twitter.
Kaiser also isn’t creative and repeats the same four or five “Insults” for every celeb
Like Kate, well..no..Kaiser isn’t like Kate. Kate seems to actually be a nice person that CB picks apart for filth because they are sexist shaming assholes.
Also on Twitter she reposted something negative about Meghan Merkle, but on CB, she tries to appeal to the crazy people who jump on anyone who says anything about MM and shit on Kate for everything.
So she doesn’t even give her honest opinion.
and the worst offense to me is that they love Kim Kardashian because she “called out Swift” which made me realize that they are a bunch of white women pretending to be “woke” because any black person, especially a women, would not and could not respect Kim K, because she steals from black women and resales it.
I’m not the type of black woman to say this but ,it’s white privielege for Kaiser and the gang, to brush over Kim K’s past just because Kim “called out” Tayor. That shows how fickle minded and hateful they are.
It also showed that they don’t care about black people.
And not to mention that QQ and Almondjoy got kicked off.
Yep. That is how it works. And this is why I have this blog, It happened to me too. I am never rude or disrespectful. But I am not a blind follower. I like to have a conversation and explore many angles.
This banning of people left and right, for politely disagreeing and trying to have a discussion, is just not right.
What is the point of having a blog where everyone agrees with each other on everything? It is an echo chamber.
Ha-ha, yes. Kaiser can’t forgive Alicia for “stealing” Fassy. And , yet, even her regulars, who usually back her, don’t support her against Alicia.
CB pretend to be more than just a gossip site. Except, they don’t follow their own high minded rules most of the time. It is just once in a while they remember about feminism, sexism and other topics. And usually it has to do with their favorites. When it comes to anybody else, the high standards go right out of the window.
I don’t think they are all Kaiser, at least not LAK and Sixer. But they are her core posters. If she blocks them there will be nobody left.
I used to think LAK and Sixer were interesting. But their hypocrisy, in the end, made me see them for who they are.
Their hate for Kate is squarely in the unhinged, too far gone territory. That is why I can’t take anything those posters say anywhere else seriously. They all need help.
I haven’t seen this yet. Now they’ve found something wrong with Chastain? Unbelievable.
Lol, yes, it does seem like it is a therapy place for people who don’t like Swift, Kate Middleton and a few other celebrities. They blow off their steam there and (hopefully?) feel better afterwards.
As for Taylor, I give her credit for how well she handled that DJ trial. She did us all a great service.
Can I also blame Alicia Vikander a little bit for this mess too? While critics aren’t saying that Vikander sucks in Tulip Fever (they’re just saying the movie is terrible), I just feel like… we’ve been here before. The release date for The Light Between Oceans kept getting pushed back too, and it felt like a case of “the emperor’s new clothes” where no one really wants to admit that Vikander in particular really can’t carry a film and that she’s not really a “draw” as an actress.
A-ha-ha. I see Kaiser still can’t let go of of her need to put Vilkander down, though now she has to phrase it more circumspectly because quite a few people on CB, including the regulars, like Vilkander.
It is said, living well is the best revenge, and Vilkander is doing exactly that. Enjoy your sour grapes, Kaiser.
I loved this comment on a Swift post yesterday. Well said, Erica.
Erica_V says:
Until Kanye apologies for using her naked likeness without her consent Taylor doesn’t have to apologize FOR ANYTHING!!!
Why does everyone forget he did that to her? Why does everyone insist Taylor take the highroad? She does not have to be the bigger person just because she’s a woman!! Kanye is a misogynistic douchebag and Taylor doesn’t owe him a single thing.
I personally think Angelina’s face is incredibly beautiful . For me, her face and Liv Tylers’s seem so beautiful that it is almost impossible to believe such faces exist. But I also understand that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And what is inside also affects the perception of outside beauty.
I also always remind myself that I shouldn’t treat a beautiful person better than others, I still should judge them on their character and actions. And I do question some of Angelina’s actions.
As for CB, imo, if you allow posters to say certain things about one woman, then you should allow the same for the other. You cannot have different standards for your favorites vs. others, that is just means you have no integrity. CB either shouldn’t censor anything, or should censor using the same criteria. If you are not allowing to shame one woman for being underweight or under-dressed, or whatever else, you shouldn’t allow shaming of another.
And a self-proclaimed feminist site definitely shouldn’t allow shaming of women based on their looks, or allow harsh judging of women while giving a pass to men for same or worse actions.
Which blog did I swtich to? The Guardian. Not joking here. There is nothing in the world of the celebirty gossip right now that is decent enough for me. The Guardian allows comments and has fair censorship. If I want to discuss Trump and politics that is the right place to do it, not CB. They also have a decent arts section.
You’ll see , those Swift fans will disappear pretty quickly. I’ve seen it over and over. Yes, there will be people for a while, who openly disagree, but eventually they disappear because in general disagreement just doesn’t jive with CB. CB is an echo chamber.
And, yes, it goes beyond saying that criticism of the site or Kaiser will result in an immediate ban even for long term posters. I remember last year one of Kaiser’s favorites, lilacflower/ lighpurple, got banned when she disagreed with Kaiser over Kanye.
Absolutely.You are not allowed to support Swift on CB , period.
Exactly. It doesn’t matter what Taylor is like. What Kanye did was wrong. It is not about Kanye and Kim vs. Taylor, it is about right and wrong. Kaiser and many CB posters have very flexible ethics when it comes to their favorites, while those they don’t like are never given the benefit of a doubt.
A few thoughts on the some of the last days of posts
* People going to town on Susan Sarandon. Really? Susan Sarandon has been a lefty for longer than many of us were alive and now you are judging her? If your party doesn’t have a place for a brave and principled person that is Susan Sarandon then I am not interested in being in your party.
* It is funny to read the praise for Taylor Swifts given so grudgingly. Admit it, Taylor Swift has guts and has strength that is to be admired and she did all feminists a huge service by standing up for herself and not folding. Yes, she is privileged but she is still a human being with feelings. She definitely did more for feminism than Kanye will ever do. And I still remember some of the posters defending Kanye over his video with naked wax replicas of Swift and others.
* No fan of Ivanka or nepotism, but I wouldn’t be so readily jumping on board with criticism of her by Indian officials, many of whom think that a woman is a lesser human being. I felt a whiff of that in their condescension towards Ivanka.
I think Kaiser mentioned that she is half-Indian, I have my doubts. She knows little about India and Indians and the knowledge is superficial She comes across as an American white. It is possible that she is half-Indian but was raised by the white side of the family and has no connection to the Indian side. Still, she doesn’t seem to have any desire to learn more about India. And that makes me think she is a white person posing as someone else. It is internet, there is no way to tell.
Bullying and piling on are pretty typical of the CB, if you hold an opinion not shared by the majority of posters.
But yes, I think you are thinking about the right person.
Yep. Kaiser’s race baiting is pretty transparent. And the thing is, half of the time she doesn’t even understand the issue she is talking about, and she gets flak from her posters. Still, it is too good of an opportunity for her to get more clicks to pass it up.
Ha, good point. If Kate never works, how is it she is out and about at all these functions.
Yes. If they really have an issue with people living at taxpayer expense then they should stop making an exception for Harry. He is no less privileged than Will.
But it seems roayls living at the taxpayer expense are OK, as long as they like them. It only becomes a problem with those they don’t like.
For example, they will never say a bad word about Leticia and Matilda, but I personally fail to see the difference. All of them benefit from their royal status, and that is something that shouldn’t even exist anymore.
CB Angelina’s fans are quite over the top. It is no wonder most celebrities can’t handle fame. If you have people who practically worship you, and will fight anyone who doesn’t, it can’t be without consequences for the object of the worship. I’d probably run and hide far away with fans like this. I hear Beyonce’s and Taylor’s fans are like this as well. Some people grow out of it, but many don’t.
Also, the older I get the more I realize that most adults didn’t actually grow up. They are just pretending and playing their roles. Inside they are the same teenagers, just with less mood swings. -))
I have to say, it is a curious choice of the nom de plume by Kaiser. I am assuming she didn’t call herself Kaiser as in the Emperor, or did she? She behaves like one, for sure.
The regulars there are definitely not objective. They forget all about feminism and principles when an opportunity presents itself to pile on on a woman they don’t like. They are hypocrites, most of them.
Ah, this type of thing used to get me in trouble on CB all the time in the past. I just can’t help and not to stand up for an underdog when things start getting over the top. I tried defending Kate Middleton. And it is not that I am a fan. I actually think the monarchy should be abolished.
But really, the type of hate Kate gets on CB is not reasonable. Yes, she is living at the taxpayer expense, but she is not the only one and she is fairly harmless.
As for the Affleck’s new lady love, I also think she is cute. Not that I like her. I think she is making a mistake. But you know what, she is a human and humans have to learn some things the hard way. -)). She is the one who will be paying for that mistake in the end.
I saw it. I might’ve made an exception and commented on that one. I like Obama. But let’s be honest here. You can’t make an exception for you”team”.
If you are fighting corruption in politics, you can’t turn a blind eye when it is your “team” doing it for your “team”’s benefit. Corruption is corruption. And that is what these paid speeches are - a payment for future favors, i.e. legalized corruption. We can be honest , at least with ourselves, and say it, right?
I am not surprised.She is irrational about anything that has to do with Angelina.It is weird how a grown woman can be so obsessed with someone.
I think even her dislike of Vilkander has something to do with Vilkander doing the Tomb Raider, which used to be Angelina’s part.
It’s so hard as a POC to share any opinion that goes agaisnt the grain because once you do, everyone jumps on you.
It’s not right.
——————————————————-
That is how CB is on everything, really. If you go against consensus, people immediately jump on you and actually misinterpret what you said on purpose, to make it seem worse than it is.
And then, for the coup de grace, Kaiser bans you, so you can’t even say that those misinterpretations of your words are completely off the mark. You have to read 50 posts telling you how awful you are, even though you didn’t even say the things the people are arguing against.
They love to build a strawman and then to keep fighting it.
Kaiser used to love Benedict Cumberbatch and Michael Fassbender, until both of them got into serious relationships. They were her favorite internet boyfriends.
Now she claims they are not hot anymore and finds all kinds of faults with them.
She also figured out that if she posts these passive-aggressive posts abut their SOs then it brings all kinds of clicks from the subset of their fan girls who hate their SOs. And what is weird, the CB regulars, who didn’t care one way or another, piled on just for the fun of it.
With Cumberbatch it got so awful even Kaiser understood it was too much and one day she banned all those crazy fan girls. And that was the end of the Cumberbatch click bait.
The same story with Fassbender. Vilkander is a useful click bait.Fortunately there are enough CB posters who like her, so it doesn’t go down to the same level of crazy.
Oh, wow. The discussion on the Aladdin casting is really something. Who are these people claiming the actress is not “brown enough”? This is wrong in so many ways.
Additionally, as shocking as it might seem to many Americans, who have their own homegrown race classifications, Arabs are white. They identify themselves as white. Many of them are as light skinned as Europeans.
In this context a half-Indian half-white actress is absolutely fine.
I liked this comment by teacakes, among the sea of the cringeworthy ones. She gets why the reverse-paperbag test is wrong.
teacakes says:
…. it’s all very well to talk about how this is a fictional country and any brown person will do, but the 1992 movie literally opened with a song called Arabian Nights. I’d say that’s a pretty strong hint about where in the world this story is set and the origins of the characters.
That said, the ‘not brown enough’ Internet racial purity paperbag test Naomi Scott is being subjected to following her casting, is gross. I’m Indian and I have friends of full Indian descent like me who are lighter skinned than her – one of them was my best friend from school, and Naomi actually looks a freakish lot like her when she smiles.
Colorism is real but I have to say it, it doesn’t give anyone the right to declare her not Indian. And neither does ethnic ambiguity – plenty of non-white Indians look like they could be from other places, it doesn’t make them not Indian. I really feel like this anger is being misdirected at this girl because everyone is more caught up in how she isn’t Indian enough, than in targeting Disney for their screwups) And don’t even get me started on the ridiculousness of people going off on Mena Massoud’s being Coptic – he’s still Arab, isn’t he? As Aladdin should be.
Middletons can do no right on CB. Just the other day Pippa got criticized for wearing a fairly cheap “basic” knee long white dress/ suit to Wimbledon, for being “basic”.
OK. So today Kate gets criticized for wearing a breathtaking white McQueen suit because it is too expensive. So, which way do they want it - cheap or expensive?
Oh, and apparently the skirt on the suit was too full and that it is not OK because it is prone to “flashes”. But I also remember Kate being criticized for dressing too dowdy and too old for her age.
Pippa got raked over the coals for her long white floral dress she wore today. When I saw it, my first thought was - I wish I could afford to buy that dress. I love long lean summer dresses. Only after reading CB I learned how wrong I was about that dress -)).
I have noticed that Kaiser loves to use her opinion of events and people as facts. Last week in regards to Kate’s jewelry during the state visit by the Spanish Royals.
Kaiser said,“ The Queen also made Kate wear some big jewelry, and of course it didn’t work.”
How does Kaiser know what the Queen made Kate do or didn’t make Kate do? All of her speculation and bias is fact. Of course I attempt to comment that this isn’t fact at all and just speculation. Surprise it didn’t make it through the moderation.
Kaiser is a snake oil salesman in the business of selling speculation, bias, and BS.
———————————————————
Yes, Kaiser also thinks she knows what Taylor Swift thinks about anything. But the worst is when she intentionally misinterprets some celebrity news item to make a celebrity look bad. I think she does it on purpose because then she gets dozens of posts from the said celebrity fans trying to explain that this is not what actually happened.
I don’t know myself. When I came across Celebitchy about 3 years ago, I think, it was already like this. It bothered me right away and I posted something positive a few times, but I was immediately drowned by a dozen of negative posts, so after a few tries I gave up and avoided Kate posts.
As to why this is happening, that I have an answer for. Kaiser is simply trolling for clicks. She has a few topics which she knows will bring a lot of comments from longtime loyal posters, who stick around CB for that one subject only.
Sometimes she also intentionally misinterprets actions or words of the celebrities who are her bait to generate ore controversy and more clicks.
Middletons are one of these baits, Amal Clooney is another, Hiddleston used to be, and before that Fassebender and Cumberbatch, before Kaiser fell out of love with them and turned nasty. Then their fans left. I am not sure who her internet boyfriend du jour is these days.
It was funny to watch how for the last 2 days Kaiser tried to get Cumberbatch fans bite, like in the past, to get some clicks out of them, but they didn’t.
Yes, that is how ban works. You write a post and submit it but it never appears.