Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

November 2018

Culture differences are interesting.Once my uncles hosted a foreigner student and she started calling women from our country sl*ts because of the bikinis' sizes and because we hug/kiss each other on the cheek when we are introduced in a social event. Later that week, my aunt caught her having sex with my cousin, that she only met a few hours before that day. She thought sex with someone she barely knew was ok, but hugging and kissing on the cheek was too intimative. Lol

Thanks for sharing, exactly!

Nov 3, 2018
you know what, maybe Kaiser and the commentators talked about on here love they are receiving attention. I know people "hate read" CB, however, not giving CB clicks is the better option. It's such a shit storm of extremely distasteful views against women. The negative energy pouring out of the posters is off the chart. Maybe a lot of the women posting aren't leading happy lives, so they go their to vent. Not reading (even if it's just to laugh at the comments) seems like a good idea for myself.

Maybe, but that is the choice people can make for themselves. I think having an outlet like this actually might help women to let go of CB. They can talk it out, and let go.

And just to add, another important function of this blog is to shine the light on the gaslighting that Kaiser subjected people for years, by banning them for simply disagreeing with her. Many of these people were completely bewildered and also hurt by the experience. They didn’t understand what did they do wrong. They did nothing wrong, and that is important to give them an outlet for their stories.

Nov 3, 2018
Haha, oh my word, the belly cupping was insane! But I don't think the comments were racist? I'm not sure, seemed like a difference in opinion. I guess for some women belly cupping is natural but for other pregnant women it isn't a natural instinct. But Holding your belly whilst pregnant is considered gauche and tacky? Yeah, that was out of line. Reminds me when ppl shame women for breastfeeding in public.

There is nothing wrong with belly cupping. Sure, it  might seem a bit cheesy, but so what? We don’t know what Meghan was thinking doing it, so I’d rather not assign intent, and assume it was done for attention. Cultures are different. Brits generally are more reserved than Americans and to some of them it might seem a little bit too much, but it is not Meghan’s fault.

When I moved to the US I realized that Americans, for example, are often very uncomfortable with nudity. Some women got mad at me for not being fully covered up in  the women-only sauna.Oh, the horror, they saw another women’s breasts, lol !!! 

Nov 3, 2018
Me again. Just to explain -- This week several used this platform to label us MM haters. These attacks are all framed the same: "I feel so uncomfortable visiting this page lately....with all the vicious critiques of poor Meghan". Not here for it. On Gofugyourself, several posts along this line were posted this week. The community quickly reacted, thankfully, referring the offended to Celebitchy!
Nov 3, 2018
Replying to a comment: Getting off one of the planes, Meghan's dress was flapping in the wind and could've gone up if she hadn't been holding it. Couple of years ago,the same thing happened with Kate and everyone complained so much by saying people got an eyeful! Oh, the horror. She was also holding George obviously she couldn't hold down her skirt with the other hand. It's wind, nobody can control the weather, clothes can accidental fly up, but these women don't seem to understand that fact.
Nov 2, 2018
Lol. There was also a takeover attempt on Gofugyourself this week. Luckily, fug nationals (and the site's own Heather and Jessica) nipped it in the bud... Gurrl power!

To be honest, I have no idea what this is about, sorry! ))). Posting this just because there doesn’t seem to be a reason not too. 

Nov 2, 2018
The whole skinny jeans shaming might be down to age. Skinny trousers/jeans paired with blouses, blazers, heels and boots are the norm for myself and my peers. I don't believe the majority of ladies posting on there have a clue about dressing - based on their comments that is. What they call boring on Kate is polished, tailored, timeless/classic to my eyes. 1/2

That is my impression as well. The majority of commenters posting, starting with Kaiser,  don’t really have fashion sense, they simply use fashion to criticize whoever they don’t like.

Nov 2, 2018
Would they like her to dress in a burqa to satisfy their own ideas of modesty and appropriateness? No offence to any Muslim reading! I just mean, they wouldn't be satisfied with anything she does or wears - they always end up nitpicking her to death. I hope they criticize Trump and Melania with the same anger, hatred and passion!

The whole “modesty” policing is ridiculous. We are not in Saudi Arabia. It used to be only on Kate’s posts, now it also migrated to Meghan’s posts.

Nov 2, 2018
Is this a Kate fanblog/Meghan hate blog or just about Celebitchy in general?

It is about Celebitchy, but because 80% of Celebitchy is about Meghan and Kate these days, it is reflected here as well.Kaiser is just phoning in, she keeps posting on the same 3-4 topics, which get the most clicks, no research required from her side.

Nov 2, 2018 1 note
My GOD the racists have come out in force in the Meghan photo post. I can't stop LOLing at the poster claiming she never touched her bump when she was pregnant "but then I'm a very educated person from a good family." That comment has to be a spoof, no one could be that stupid and out of touch.
Nov 2, 2018
As for Nota, she goes quiet when she can't openly criticize Meghan for the things she constantly drags Kate for, such as; high hemlines, see through clothes, high heels, skinny pants and windy skirts/dresses accidentally going up. Whenever Kate does any of these things, her and her hateful cronies can't stop going on and on and on about it - with Meghan, they're silent. I don't even think these ladies should be dragged for this silly stuff but its amusing to read! Pearl clutching much?!
Nov 1, 2018 2 notes
Apparently, Meghan's Tour wardrobe cost is around £117,000? LOL. Imagine if Kate had spent this amount during a tour!! The usual hypocrisy is showing itself in the comment section.. "It's a made up number, all false". They instantly believe Kate's wardrobe numbers listed in the DM, but Meghan gets a pass, I guess?
Nov 1, 2018
This is what I wrote and was moderated instantly: So let me get this straight. This is about a DM article about a VF article about Katie's style or lack thereof? It seems like another excuse to just bash her without her having actually done anything? There's also a lot of complaining about her not being a woman of substance and some very harsh criticism of her fashion choices (because fashion matters a lot then, not just substance?). 1/4
Nov 1, 2018
Some very bitter complaints about the tightness of her clothing, goodness me. I just find it amazing to read the royal threads here, whereas there is some really good and progressive writing and commentary on politics, feminism, etc. but all this doesn't seem to apply to the royal threads.I'm against the monarchy so I'm not a fan of any of the royals. 2/4
Nov 1, 2018
But I can still be amazed by the level of criticism of this woman. I noticed the new thing now is, well if she did more work we wouldn't talk about her clothing. But I don't buy that. Perhaps the reasons she is disliked are generally legit but just the relentlessness of the criticism, it just goes on and on, and I find that alarming. 3/4
Nov 1, 2018 1 note
It's as if everyone just wants to come here and vent and have a go. Is this what smart gossip is supposed to be? 4/4
Nov 1, 2018
"What is alarming is coming up with statements about the intentions and character of people simply based on the fact they disagree with your personal opinion. Differing opinions from your own doesn’t make her passive aggressive or a bad person." An objective comment from the messy Royal posts.

I saw it too, and I completely agree.

Nov 1, 2018 2 notes

October 2018

Today Kate in her inoffensive blue dress warranted 100+ posts, and some are sure she must’ve had a boob job. She couldn’t be possibly breastfeeding. So, on one hand the posters are  “feminists” who think women should be in control of their bodies, on the other hand they make accusations and insinuations about plastic surgery? Why is plastic surgery bad if you think women should have freedom of choice?

On the Taylor’s post the discussion is again about the color of her eyes and whether it is natural, and possible plastic surgery, not her recent political activism. And I kept thinking -  who cares if it is contacts that make her eyes so blue? Do you really begrudge somebody looking well  because you don’t like that person? How bitter do you have to be?

Oct 31, 2018 7 notes
Believe me, there are plenty of Black, Biracial, and Asian etc women out here and we don't share similar views on the Duchess of Sussex. I know women who adore her, and I also know women who think she might not be as genuine as she portrays. Shrugs. But calling women extremely racist when they criticise Meghan for her outrageous spending, her love of non British labels, the fit of her clothes, inappropriate clothes for official engagements, or whatever else, is dangerous territory.
Oct 31, 2018 13 notes
2. We do pay for the Royals, so we should be allowed to share our thoughts. As long as the criticism is fair, there's nothing wrong with discussing DoS and pointing out things which could have been better. There are always going to be die hard DoS stans who can't take the slightest critique, but this comes with being Royal -they have all been called out. Celebitchy posters turn every comment into "they're nitpicking/complaining because they don't like the colour of her skin", which is wrong imo.
Oct 31, 2018 2 notes
It’s funny, I just came here to comment about NotASugarHere and the top post was about her! I ventured back onto CB briefly and while LAK seems to be gone (?), Nota is Nota-ing in full force. I’ve actually considered that she works for Charles’s office and suspect I know who she is on Twitter as well. She is far too militant in her comments to simply be a royal-watcher and she clearly has an agenda and A LOT of time to dedicate to this. Her posts are always praising Charles & Camilla. Thoughts?

But would Charles really put it with someone who hates his daughter-in-law so much? Charles might be a prat, but I don’t see him as being that devious.

Oct 31, 2018 1 note
One more quick observation about NOTA — she states her opinions, even about minor things, as fact. For example, she just said today that when Charles becomes King, he will “remain” at Clarence House and split his time between there and Windsor. How is this possibly something that an outside observer could claim to know? She is either employed somehow by Clarence House or she’s seriously disturbed (or both!).
Oct 31, 2018
It's really sad that NOTA talks all that shit about Kate, yet it seems she spends hours of her day hating her. I don't like to generalize, but from what I've seen, she seems to search the web for royal posts just to talk about Kate all day. That's a obsession. How does she find the time? At least Kaiser gets something out of hating Kate. Nota gets nothing. It's sad really. I hope people from CB see that they are enabling someone with a sick obsession. (At least I think)
Oct 31, 2018 1 note
NIC919: "Yep. Perhaps if she read the letters to children or something this may have more value as an engagement. This seems tacked on and pretty empty." Yep, this is me shaming...
Oct 31, 2018 1 note
BECKS1: "I agree that the nature of this event feels weird. I am hoping there is more involved than reading letters about her great-grandmother’s brothers. (I think that’s a nice thing to do in light of the 100 year anniversary of the end of World War I…but it def feels like a 'padding the numbers' event.)" Alas, what can be said. Someone should raise her awareness, just as persons' awareness re WWI was raised today... ;)
Oct 31, 2018
APRIL MAY: "I don’t see why she needed to have a public event to go see these letters. Reads more as a private event to me. Just feels like a way to boost her numbers." No words...
Oct 31, 2018
SLIGHTLYANONNY: "I’m neutral on Kate and this may be more on the PR office than her, but to position this as her just going to read the letters about her family is a little self-centered. Literally all they had to add was 'and others' and it would be fine. This just reads like she dressed up for a personal trip to a museum and got some photos taken." She's NEUTRAL people, okkkaaayyrrrlll?

Lol, I saw it too.

Oct 31, 2018 1 note
Btw, I'm pretty sure notasugarhere is posting on LipstickAlley in the Royal related threads. I won't name her handle on there, but she reposts the same hateful talking points over and over again. I think she copies and pastes from CB lmao. Nota and Nic919 (I think that's right) are on countless different royal blogs/forums spreading their Kate hate, and they have been doing this for yearssss. Can you say jealous, bitter, unhinged? They act like Kate murdered their animals or stole their BF!

I think they take the cake from the Twilight fans, who are generally considered the most out there. I think Nota has been at this for longer than Twilighters. It is sad when people dedicate their lives to hating somebody, what a waste. Though, you typically see this with fans hating wives of their crashes. 

Oct 30, 2018
f"or some time I've been worried that your blog was being co-opted by the Meghan Markle haters, many of whom are extremely racist" I completely disagree with this Ask. This is what CB does all day, every day - accusing others of being racist when they they try to voice their opinion. Not once have i seen anything racist against MM on this blog. This is not CB, every person does not have to like/love MM! Her success right now is through Harry. I don't see her as a role model either.
Oct 30, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
And this was neither to deny that racism exists and is prevalent nor was it to earase her experiences and struggles. This was to celebrate her as a woman. This was also to remind us that in her current position she affects the lives of others: our notions of femininity and measures of success.

That is one way to look at it. But another way to look at it  is -  why should I celebrate someone who got to the position of authority through marriage? This is not an empowering story for women. As I said earlier, I am fine with Meghan, she is perfectly nice, but to me she is not a role model. I meet role models every day -  they are working women who make their own destinies with their own hands.

I’ve had a brush with aristocracy, and it colors my opinion of all of them, including Meghan, and the rest of royals. Just to think that no matter how accomplished I may be (or my children) , what I achieve, they will never consider us  “good enough” for them. It burns. And , trust me, they might not show it, but many of them deep down think that way, they can’t help it.

Just like we don’t choose the color of our skin, we don’t choose the family of our birth, so why should be some considered above us just because they were born into the right family? No, royalty is nothing to celebrate. Having royalty in this day and age is offensive. And circling back to Celebitchy - how is a site, which claims to be progressive and feminist, doesn’t see the contradiction?

Oct 29, 2018 1 note
Those Nazis scientists should have been tried and executed - not brought into our space programs, etc. F*ck Nazis and the Aryan Nation/whatever they call themselves. (Part 2 of 2)
Oct 29, 2018
I also see someone undoubtedly referring to my asks as "Neo-Nazi"; this was the same crap I saw at Celebitchy. One can't express different ideas without being labelled "Nazi", "Misogynist", "White Supremacist", etc. It's ridiculous to call me that when I have criticised our government for Operation Paperclip -(part 1 of 2)

I just said pretty much the same, I know where you are coming from. My family was in Europe in the WW2, I know that a lot of things went on, even on the allies side which are “not good”, and then they were airbrushed from history. But Holocaust specifically is a very raw subject, let’s tread gently there. 

And I want to apologize to anyone of Jewish decent, there was no intent to upset anyone or question the suffering and prosecution that happened during the WW2 and before.

Oct 29, 2018
Omg, as a fellow Jew (Re whether or not Im a PoC: I'm not American so I cannot apply American categories to myself), I get your comment re Soros. But the "dont critique MM" point is non related. She is a strong, independent woman in a position of power. She is a civil servant. She can take being critiqued. I am sure she can. Let's acknowledge her as an agent. Let's not "orientalize" (for lack of a better term) her. As I see it, in a "safe space," everyone should be acknowledged as an agent.
Oct 29, 2018 1 note
Notasugarhere is truly vile. I notice that she has stopped posting on Meghan's posts as she turned out to be just like every other royal and not the game changer they were expecting her to be. But you can always find her staling Kate's posts complaining and whining and writing essays to people with different opinions than hers.
Oct 29, 2018 1 note
And I definitely don't think you're racist or misogynistic. I just hope you can consider how posting Asks from anons with a racist/Neo Nazi agenda affects how your blog is viewed and how your supporters feel. Ps I'm not the anon who sent the 'globalism is antisemitism' Ask. 3/3

That is the thing, though, isn’t it. If you just block people like Celebitchy does, do they start thinking differently? No, they just go somewhere else, and just get more entrenched in those views. While people sit comfortably in their echo chamber feeling good about being “on the right side of the debate”, those other opinions that got blocked, they don’t go away. it is much healthier to have everything in the open.

You can’t ascribe intent to people, unless they declare it. 

And I don’t want to get carried away with branding people neo-nazi and shutting them down. This is what goes on Celebitchy every day -  everything is completely blown out of proportion. And then people accused of something are blocked and can’t even defend themselves.

Though, you are right, I don’t know how I ended up in a discussion where I have to take sides on George Soros. ))) This is way over my head, He is a very divisive figure.

Oct 29, 2018
but the fact at least one Neo-Nazi considers your blog a good place to spread antisemitic lies is worrying. Because none of that stuff has anything to do with the point of your blog, which is exposing Kaiser's hypocrisy and slagging off CB and its lame duck posters. Like I said this is NOTHING against you personally. But as a Jew and woman of colour some of your Asks are making me feel increasingly uncomfortable and unsafe here. I'm not trying to tell you what to do, because it's your blog. 2/3
Oct 29, 2018
Hi. I've been a huge supporter and fan of your blog for ages, and I absolutely despise Kaiser. And I don't have any issue with you personally. But for some time I've been worried that your blog was being co-opted by the Meghan Markle haters, many of whom are extremely racist, and that giving them a platform was dangerous ground. Hating CB shouldn't mean hating women CB worships, surely? I'm glad you've removed the Soros post (which was 100% well-known Neo-Nazi propaganda) 1/3

Well, I guess here you see what doesn’t make through moderation on Celebitchy. And you might realize that you actually like that they moderate with a heavy hand on some topics. )))

Though, there is no way of telling why some people don’t like Meghan. Are they really racist, or  they truly don’t like her as a person? As long as they stick to the facts, I think it is a fair game.

For example, one thing I agree with her critics is -  why does she not wear British brands? I think it is disrespectful, and she is unnecessarily pokes the Brits into the proverbial eye, so to speak, and it is completely unnecessary. She wears a lot of socially conscious brands, so it is pretty clear she does put thought into it. But she seems completely oblivious to the fact that if she wants Brits to adopt her as “their princess”, she needs to adopt them as well, and their ways. Sure, Americans adore her, she is an American princess, but Brits seem to see her as a foreigner and that is going to hurt her later.

Oct 29, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

I can’t understand what Celebitchy is getting at when they post these  “Jen and Ben were seen together” posts. So what? Why don’t they come out and say what is wrong with it? What is with all the pussyfooting around it?

Do they not like Jennifer Gardner? Do they not like that she is supporting her ex for the sake of her kids? What is it? 

And how typical is this of Celebitchy, -  the guy screws up, the woman gets all the grief and innuendo from other women.

Oct 29, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
And I bet it was one of the known Kate Haters who compared her to Trump LOL. They need to get a life.... They have a deep seated hatred for the Duchess of Cambridge and her family, the Middleton's. It's real for these people, not just harmless gossip, which makes it creepier. They take it way too far when they're mostly Americans and Canadians.
Oct 29, 2018
If Cb'rs can't call you a racist, they resort to calling you envious of Meghan, they say you're anti feminist, or some other pile of pooh. I saw this very conversation in the recent threads. Women had to state they were WoC before saying why they don't like the over the top fawning of Meghan. Crazy.
Oct 29, 2018 3 notes
I read CB article and posts this morning re: article in VF about Kate. I had to stop reading. I can’t believe how much Kaiser dislikes Kate and the posters just echo what she says. It’s quite scary. Meg can do no wrong even though she has spent thousands of $ on a wardrobe and constantly clings to Harry all the time. This is romantic but if Kate were to do any of this things, she’d be crucified. What is Kaiser’s problem with Kate? Any ideas b/c it’s legit crazy.

I honestly don’t know. It seems it has gotten worse once Meghan came on the scene. I’ve seen some loonie fans and haters from some fandoms, who behave like Kaiser, and they can go on for years with their wild theories and hatred. It is irrational. They don’t want to give up their delusions.

Oct 29, 2018
You are wrong about the term globalist. It is frequently used as a euphemism for Jewish by the alt right. You are also wrong to print that foul post about survivor George Soros. It is factually wrong and IS Neo Nazi propaganda. It is very offensive especially in light of what has happened in the recent week. Anti semitism is hidden in accepted terms because most people don't know the origins of the term or understand antisemitism. I like what you do but you are wrong here. Please remove it.

I don’t know what kind of news you read, but no, a globalist is not the same as a Jew, unless you are talking about some far right sites, such as Breitbart, which I never visited in my life. So, I am just guessing.

A globalist is someone who supports globalization. There are arguments for globalization and against. Being against globalization is not the same as being against Jews as an ethnicity. People who oppose globalization tend to be against immigration and outsourcing, I have never heard an argument that Jews are responsible for globalization, this is completely bonkers,

It is you, not I, who gives credence to such outlandish theories. And I am not going to avoid the subject just because some far right people make crazy claims. Forcing people to be silent about them is what gives more power to the far right, denouncing their claims is what every sane person should do.

I have nothing against George Soros whatsoever. Well, other than the fact that he is a crazy rich hedge fund manger, who skims the wealth off the productive people. But that another topic. I have the same issue with the most of the financial industry.


P.S. I see the part you have a problem with, the one about George Soros. I also have a hard time believing that claim, so I will remove it. If it is factual, the original poster can send me a link.

Oct 29, 2018 1 note
Why are you posting Asks containing antisemitic/white supremacist propaganda?

I didn’t post any antisemitic propaganda. If you think I did, then you need to clarify your statement.

Oct 28, 2018
Why would they mention the cost? Kate is the she-devil sucking up taxpayer money, remember. She is the only one draining the public purse. Everyone else in the Royal family deserves taxpayer money - Kate doesn't, she should be constantly criticised because she's a lazy, useless, do nothing woman. sarcasm off! This how how they think,though, and it is absurd.
Oct 28, 2018 1 note
Someone has just compared kate speeches to donald trump

Really? Some people need to get out more.

Oct 28, 2018
Kaiser is now claiming no royal woman can do a soeech as good as meghan
Oct 28, 2018
Meghan wore a ten grand dress and no one mentioned the cost

The cost of that tour is going to be outrageous. And what does Australia get out of it?

Oct 27, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Woke white feminists my ass. I mean Cb'ers Lol.
Oct 23, 2018 1 note
Re microaggression, one poster said Kate being pregnant with Louis was a microaggression against Meghan Markle. I can't with them. Just another example of CB posters not having a clue about real racism, dog whistling - another term they like to throw around in the Royal section, and real microaggressions. They haven't faced this in their lives, but they think it's acceptable to call anyone a racist if they criticise/dont endlessly worship their fave famous person of the moment. Ridiculous.
Oct 23, 2018 4 notes
The double standards with Meghan and Kate are so obvious. They will slam Kate for just breathing, but Meghan walks on a beach and she's the best thing evaaaah, and everyone who doesn't praise her on CB is a racist hater lol!

They do like to throw the word micro-aggression around, whether it makes sense or not,

Oct 22, 2018 5 notes
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December