Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

October 2018

Meghan markle did like five charity engaments before she was married but appartly shes such a humanatarian its ridiculas

Meghan seems nice enough, but the obsession with her at CB is ridiculous. A regular nurse or a doctor who works 12 hours days do more good for the humanity than any of the royals. Or teachers, who do such important work and are so underpaid. People need to keep remembering that. We get upset about our superficial celebrity culture, but often we are, ourselves, to blame for this. We don’t celebrate regular hardworking people enough.

Oct 22, 2018 4 notes
Hey, I sent this in before but got an error message, so apologies if you get this more than once. What's with Kaiser and her complete lack of fact checking? The Tom Hiddleston post got all the basic facts wrong (posted photos a week after the event then claimed that event had been the previous night, got the name and occasion of the event completely wrong) and when multiple people pointed out the errors, she ignored them. At least old Kaiser would update posts when mistakes were pointed out.

Sometimes Kaiser makes mistakes and misinterpretations on purpose to rile people up -  more clicks that way.

Oct 22, 2018 1 note
Kaiser actually responded to her own article when someone shaded her putting “rest” in quotes. She’s like a child trying to defend herself. And her article about Meghan’s buttons where she alluded that Meghan is probably shading Kate for wearing buttons? Holy cow that is just another level of crazy. I use to get angry at it but now it’s comical. Kaiser and the people who post there are completely off their rocker. How can they not see their own stupidity? Their behavior is kinda scary.

You are right. They are just pathetic.

Oct 21, 2018 2 notes
Anybody else out there find it frightening that Kaiser wanted to throw used tampons at all male Republicans and slash their tires? This was in reference to the Kavanaugh accusations, of which he has not been convicted. Throwing bodily fluids is NEVER okay, no matter who the target is.

I didn’t see that post but would I feel frightened? Not really. A dirty tampon will not cause any kind of bodily damage, though “technically” it would be considered an assault, and could lead to legal actions taken, so I would advise against it. In the past people used to throw rotten tomatoes and eggs at politicians. And I completely understand why.

Now, slashing tires is a different matter entirely. And I would not support this in any shape or form.

Oct 21, 2018 1 note
why is it that in a post yesterday about the royal Kate, who wore the comments are about how she is rapidly aging with the general thread agreeing that its due to her cigarette smoking, with comments like "I blame too much sun, cigarettes and small children." On the same page, Meghan is praised again for being professional and polished with comments like "Her work is much more important and should really overwhelm whatever she chooses to wear. " Just interesting.

The whole discussion about Kate (or any other woman for that matter) looking older is nonsense. On one hand, they judge women for having plastic surgery to look younger or prettier, on the other hand they judge women for looking older. They can’t help themselves, they are hypocrites.

Oct 20, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
3) You should never stop what you are doing here as long as that blog is there. People who have been treated like crap by them need to know what is going on and others should avoid it. There was a time when it was a fun diverse community. Not anymore. That is what happens when a stan gets to ban and moderate. Celebitchy is lazy and let it happen so she is guilty too. Reading through Liana Thinks it has been going on for years. Finally they are getting what they deserve. Bye CB! I won't be back.
Oct 19, 2018 2 notes
2) Kaiser's obsessive unhinged feelings about certain women has become scary and I have seen people around the internet refer to her as psycho. It used to be just the Angie Jo articles but it is everything now. I am not a royal fan but she acts like commenters opinions are personal and then she moderates like she is invested in them. I have never seen such unhealthy behavior on any forum or blog I have ever visited. I would warn people who aren't mentally healthy to stay away from there.
Oct 19, 2018 2 notes
1)I took a look at the post counts at CB and they are lower than I have ever seen them. That is what happens when people are banned and moderated to death. Whether I agreed or disagreed with the regulars, they were the reason people came to the site. It wasn't for the shoddy journalism for sure. I was a long timer and I have no reason to ever go back. That site has been gaining an even bigger reputation for being toxic and notorious for Kaiser's behavior and banning innocent people.
Oct 19, 2018 3 notes
I hate Kaiser. She took a website that was once fun to read and turned it to absolute junk. Even if you didn't like or agree with what was being said, you still had an opportunity to say it. Now, if you don't agree with Kaiser or her idiot followers, you get pounced on and deleted. What happened to intelligent conversation? I don't care if people don't agree with me, I welcome opposing opinions because that's how I learn or consider something i hadn't before. Obviously not CB's credo.

Hate might be too strong of a word for this situation, but I am with you -  Kaiser ran that website into the ground.

Oct 19, 2018 2 notes
I have never seen the response numbers on celebitchy be so low. A few years ago there would be hundreds of posts but now even Royal (aka Meghan) posts are barely passing 150 on a good day. Is it b/c she's "banning" people or is it b/c people who used to go there are sick of her bullsh*t? Or maybe more competition? One thing for sure is Kaiser is unbalanced. I still can't figure out why she hasn't been fired from her "job". I think she's the reason the website is on the decline.
Oct 19, 2018 1 note
Kaiser should really not talk about things like childbirth or pregnancy, she sounds like an ignorant asshole. She offended me so much with her takes on morning sickness- have one of the writers who are moms do those stories. I had a 9 lb 9 oz baby, 8 lb 6 oz is nothing compared to mine! She is obsessed with talking about how painful women's labors must be with these so called huge babies. I'm sure her commentary on Meghan's baby will be cringe worthy.
Oct 18, 2018
Me again. All I am saying is that Harry has a role to play in the reconstruction of his mother qua image. This was not the case with Kate who projects a very different image. This is not to say this image cannit be critically assessed. Of course it can and should. But this resurection of Diana is...

I don’t really read much about Meghan anymore, I am on  Meghan overload. I don’t dislike her, but I feel I already know everything there is to know about her. 

Anyway, i haven’t seen comparisons to Diana yet. Diana had unique charisma, people either have it or not. Neither Kate nor Meghan have it , and I wish people would stop comparing them and setting them up for a fail.

On the other hand, Eugenie’s wedding was lovely. I never cared about the York girls because I can’t stand their father, but now I came to see them as persons apart from their family, and they are quite likeable. After all, they didn’t choose their parents.

Oct 17, 2018 1 note
I'm surprised that several die-hard Kate haters were banned. I guess they said something that was less hateful and Kaiser couldn't handle it.
Oct 17, 2018 1 note
Glad to see others here thought the post about Pippa crossed a line. I’m not even a fan of Pippa’s but FGS, bashing her for going to a wedding while pregnant?! Anyway I was coming here to see if anyone read the most recent post about Pippa — am I the only one who doesn’t even understand WTF Kaiser was saying? What is an “absolute unit?” And I’m sure Kate has seen the baby by now, she just didn’t publicize it. Give me a break.
Oct 17, 2018 2 notes
I wonder if they will shame Meghan Markle for taking maternity leave as they did with Kate? Their comments were appalling! "Kate doesn't work! She doesn't work 40+ hours a week like "regular" women. She doesn't deserve maternity leave! She needs to get back to work!" Don't they realise stay at home mothers need to rest and recuperate too? So much for being a feminist site! Somehow, I don't think they will say anything when Meghan takes months off after having her baby.
Oct 17, 2018 1 note
Just a thouggt as it will be censored anywhere else. Harry had this all thing about "protecting" his wife from the public and the press... So why is she "branded" (pun intended) as the new Princess Diana -- The great, children-loving humanitarian that challanges the whole institution. This is nothing about Meghan; we dont know her, just her public image, the image that is sold to us, and that image is a replication of Princess Diana. And dont tell me that it is the press that is responsible.
Oct 17, 2018
Have you seen today's post about Pippa M giving birth to a baby boy? Am I the only one uncomfortable? I don't know, it's a great news but Kaiser find a way to insinuate Pippa is thirsty because she went to a wedding a few days before she went into labour. No "congratulations to the couple", she's so distant and cold with women she doesn't like.

That post was just plain nasty and unkind. Though, luckily, most posters didn’t agree with Kaiser. She knows she stepped over the line when even her regulars don’t agree with her.

Oct 16, 2018 4 notes
How much is too much Meghan? Five stories today - five! And it's interesting how the stans' stories dramatically changed. In response to those who were speculating a Meghan pregnancy - Outrageous! Meghan would never be stupid enough to become pregnant before a big tour, and Zika! Now? Absolutely everyone knew it, even though those same folks were shaming others who were speculating. Also, I see Jessica Mulroney is now untouchable due to her Meghan affiliation.

Lol. It is peak Meghan today! Count your blessings. So many Meghan posts mean there is no room for Kardashians! 

The whole bump watch thing is embarrassing. But hey, she married into the royal family, and we are reminded yet again how archaic it is  -  the main job of a woman in aristocracy is to produce heirs.

Oct 15, 2018 2 notes
I think the hole banning thing ridiculous. I would understand and agree if people were posting racist and homophofic things but all you have to do is disagree with the site and that's it.
Oct 15, 2018 2 notes
Really stupid of them to ban a long time, known poster like sixxer who posted with snark but never viciously...

Agree. I was not a fan of Sixer because she was on the same Kate-hate band wagon, but banning long time posters is just a bad business strategy. People come to the blogs for the community. People don’t come to CB for Kaiser’s  “brilliant” insights.

Oct 12, 2018 3 notes
Oh Sixer was banned... I think. I remember her AJ comments did not go down too well and you know Kaiser and her loons AJ worship is creepy...
Oct 11, 2018
CBer's don't see the hypocrisy of enjoying Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder's dog-whistling when Congressmen have been shot? And all that extra security had to be provided to Senators, etc., during the Kavanaugh hearings?
Oct 11, 2018 2 notes
CBitches really think they're above the Daily Mail comment section, ha! Read some of their comments on certain posts, they sound just as unhinged, hateful, loony, unstable, spiteful, ignorant, and xenophobic as the DM! They also rag on the "tumblr nutters" but they're not any better; especially when it comes to Duchess Kate, Amal Clooney, or any female celebrity they despise.

Absolutely. Many of them are no better than DM commenters.

Oct 10, 2018 1 note
Question to you and/or your readers. I used to see a British commentator called Sixxer on cbitchy Quitte often who posted often quite cleverly. Does anyone remember? Has she just left the site?

She disappeared about a year ago.

Oct 10, 2018 1 note
I got banned completely from celebitchy some time ago through not following the party line, and daring to disagree with various articles, particularly about the royals. I think they put your ip address on the hit list. So I went on through the Opera browser which has a free vpn services, changed my name slightly - several of us have done the same! 1/2
Oct 9, 2018 1 note
2/2 However, I posted on the Taylor Swift article saying that there must be a different culture between the US and the UK because celebs in the UK get called out often for voicing their political views. I went on to say that I see no reason why a celeb should be expected to air their political view - that is not their job or what they get paid to do. I posted it vpn under a different name. It appeared for a short while then disappeared, presumably because I wasn't following their party line! :)
Oct 9, 2018
“The man [Kanye] has legit mental health issues, and it’s not helpful for all of us to follow his every move and really analyze what he’s saying and doing” kaiser says as she does literally just that.
Oct 9, 2018
A Dumpster Fire

Celebitchy has a been an absolute dumpster fire last few days. Where do I even start. First Celebitchy regulars had to eat crow when Emily R. and Amy Schumer went out to protest Kavanaugh nomination  and actually got arrested, while what did holier than you Celebitchy regulars do? Nothing. Kitten commented something along the lines that she always had a lot of snark for those two women, but what they did was good. Really, Kitten? You think they care about your “snark”. They are out there living their lives and doing their thing and not caring about your snark at all. They are bigger women than you are. They don’t get off on putting other women down.

Today’s Taylor Siwft post went pretty much the same way. Many posters twisting themselves into pretzels to avoid owning up their irrational hatred for Taylor. She gets more criticism than MAGA Kanye, despite everything good that she has done.

Then there was Kaiser slut shaming Barbara Bush for marrying too soon, in her opinion. Thankfully most posters didn’t agree with Kaiser.

And then to top it of the Keira and Kate post where majority of commenters went out of their way to miss the point Keira was making about patriarchy and the crazy expectations for women, and instead talked about their “different” experiences. If you judge by Celebitchy comments, apparently it is completely normal for a woman to be dressed up for a photo call hours after birth. Well, I don’t care how different they are, I felt like I was hit by a truck, and I had one of those “easy” births. These women internalized patriarchy to such extent, they don’t even realize what is normal and what is not normal anymore.Thankfully there were some reasonable commenters on that thread as well, I especially liked the one who said that we never get to see “the other side” of women’t choices. We see women dressed up and made up and we should respect that as their choice, but why don’t we see women in the public eye making another choice? That is patriarchy for you. 

I almost forgot, they also think Susan Sarandon who supports Bernie Sanders, is worse than Trump. Wow, just wow. For a site which claims to support women they really do have irrational levels of hate for some women.

Oct 8, 2018 7 notes
#ban #celebitchy
I honestly don't get all the hate against Kate and the defense squad of Megan. Sometimes they talk as if Megan is saving the world and her was life was pretty hard before Harry showing up. And it clearly shows that some there have no interest in learning the differences between american and british culture. Changing the subject I once made a comment about an actress that Kaiser likes and she blocked. It was not even disrespectfull, something about me not thinking that she is so good.
Oct 8, 2018
Kaiser seems a little bit obessessed with Jennifer Aniston and her marriage or whatever that was with Justin Theroux. I commented a few weeks ago that in Hollywood there are much worse things to talk about than an actress lieing she was married. Guess what? Blocked.
Oct 8, 2018
Kaiser said this about Brad Pitt. "Nah, girl. He literally just did a Netflix movie (War Machine, which everyone hated) and he hasn’t starred in a hit movie in years. He’s no Robert Redford. " And i thought By the sea was a hit. LOL
Oct 8, 2018
Kaiser was forced today to write a positive post about Taylor Swift as she is making headlines because of finally making her political views public. I tried to post about what my speculation of why Taylor refused to call out those white supr*macists from 2 years ago who tried to claim her as their ideal for a female star. In my post I wrote how I think that Taylor refused to share any of her fame with this sc*m because by distancing they would have received a platform.Kaiser censored my comment.

This Taylor post today made me absolutely livid. Even now Kaiser continues calling her a snake, and not a single poster called her out on it! Some feminists there are ! Or maybe they did and were blocked.

So, let’s take a look -  on one hand we have Kaiser, an anonymous gossip writer and on the other hand we have Taylor Swift, a successful performer and a business woman, who took a person who groped her to court, who contributes to various charities and feminist causes and who came out in support of Democrats, while Kaiser did what?  Kaiser is a coward with no principles, and she doesn’t get to call anybody a snake because she contributes nothing positive to society herself.

Oct 8, 2018
One question I have been wondering about for a while now: Is it likely that sites such as celebitchy or also Lainey get paid by a celeb's PR so that they start posting always positively about them. I just wonder because some celebs always always get praised. Even when posting about negative stories Kaiser is apologetic. Is this simple favoritism or is there a financial interest.

I am pretty sure Celebitchy is paid by Kardashians. There is absolutely no reason otherwise for Kaiser to write 2 Kardashian stories a day and continue giving passes to Kanye and his MAGA rants.

Oct 8, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
Chat Submission

In reading the stories I notice that all the comments are about seething hatred for Pitt…and then someone writes the following “Ops the comment i was replying to got deleted” so that does show how each comment must be constantly monitored ..erasing all room for dissent. yikes!

Oct 8, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Wow, RoyalSparkle is a real psychopath. Her hate for everything Middleton is crazy, even for Celebitchy.

Yeah, this person doesn’t sound stable at all. I noticed her comments today as well.

Oct 3, 2018 2 notes
Oh, the Kate Hate and shaming is back after one appearance! From people diagnosing her as being anorexic/bulimic, talking about her slutty jeggings, and telling her to cover herself haha.... not understanding that maternity leave actually means MATERNITY LEAVE! What is with these women? I'm from Europe, we have a year year off or more. I feel sorry for new American mothers when they have to rush back to work! But they take everything to the extreme with this Duchess. Freakin' bizarre.
Oct 3, 2018 1 note
Does Kaiser moderate comments in real time? I'm asking because I was just on the Royal threads posting normal things, but as soon as I said a few things against the preferred narrative, my comments stopped going through. That is really weird and unhealthy for her to mod royal threads so incessantly! I'm British so we view things differently when it comes to the Royals. There's no hate or unpopularity, but when I point out positive things, i'm told to go away so everyone can keep on hating!

Yes, she moderates in real time. I’ve seen comments disappear very quickly. And once they deleted a couple of your comments, they put you in a permanent moderation and they only let through what they decide to let through.

That also means that if a nasty comment is not moderated it is not that Kaiser hasn’t seen it. It means that she agrees with it, or leaves it be to create more drama and more clicks.

Oct 3, 2018 1 note
PITY COMMENTS. SORRY MY ENGLISH.

To Anon that share her point of view.
I fully understand your about that comment seeker .who actually was me.I didn’t mean with that view that you are saying.
Like Kaiser i was abused /raped more than once by men and women.Because of that i cannot have babies.
Fortunately i had a great institution who helped me and still help me today everyday.
I told my story and continue to tell my story in group support.Everyone who have being throw a situation like this reacts differently. I lost many things in that period of time but did not lost my opinion.
My pity comments is i (in my opinion)i personally don’t like to share my story with in my “work place” like Kaiser and have comments i feel sorry for you .I had that experience and the look for people look at and feel sorry for you everyday and looks at you and remember the story and cried (like i say is my experience).
Like Kaiser i don’t feel happy with this Kavanaugh and Ford situation and others stories But i don’t see EVERYTHING BLACK AND WHITE.
In my opinion Kaiser bravely told her story like others who aren’t heard.The difference is CB is not victim support site and don’t have the skills and the education and professionaly to help.Like me and others she remember by personally experience what going through .
Kaiser was interesting site well write site but in couple months had being bullying people harshly and only her opinion counts only and that is not fare.Blocking moderation comments was created to inappropiate language (like my pity comment ,whore ,bitch and others) .
The way she present her story and previous story was like she giving justification why she acts and blocked comments that what she does.
I truly apologize this situation and comment.I truly apologize to @bannedfromcelebitchy.i will be always responsible by my actions.i fully support and respect if want block me and do not and keep contact.
I TRULY RESPECT THE VICTIMS AND HISTORY.BUT EVERYONE DEAL DIFFERENTLY ITS 11 YEARS SINCE IT HAPPENS IN MY.I LIVED BY THE DAY.I WAKE AND GO TO SLEEP EVERYDAY WITH THIS SITUATION.

I AM TRULY TO ALL OF YOU.IF DON’T BELIEVE THAT IS FINE.💓

———————————————————————————————-

I hear you. I don’t necessarily agree with everything you say. I think a part of the confusion is that it was Celebitchy (the site owner) who posted her assault story, not Kaiser. Even though it is mostly Kaiser who writes for that site, and it is Kaiser who moderates and demonstrates hypocrisy at every turn. Though, Celebitchy, as the site owner is ultimately responsible for what goes on there as well.

You also make a good point that they are not professionals, and should be very careful about how they approach such sensitive subjects.

Ultimately, what I wish for everyone who has been through such a terrible experience  is to be able to share their hurt and let go of it, and heal. It is a hard road, and it is different for everyone. HUGS.

Oct 3, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission
I am chuckling about the comments re: Kaiser. Kaiser states that she has a degree in Philosophy. The thing is,Philosophy and understanding basic logic are intertwined; a course in Logic ( with a passing grade) is a requirement for any Philosophy major. Kaiser clearly doesn't understand the relationship between a false premise(s) and a false conclusion. So, facts,chains of reasoning etc are not part of what she thinks/write. That's a good reason for not reading CB.

Understanding philosophy requires an open mind, and willingness to consider other opinions, understanding difficult and often even contradictory concepts. Kaiser doesn’t have this skill, I imagine she wasn’t very good at philosophy. May be this is why she ended up where she is, and not working for McKinsey or Boston Consulting Group.

Oct 2, 2018 1 note

I am fully aware that the Celebitchy website is a buisness, after all. A buisness owned by a woman. There obviously will be advertisements, she doesn’t owe me anything. I’ve been a reader of that site since its beginning. No ads back then.

I am also aware of Kaiser-the toad being a bully. As a commenter, she used to engage in unnecessary arguments all day, every day. She was very vulgar, too. Weird obsession with Michael Fassbender’s “dong”. So when the fangirl became the site’s head writer, things changed rapidly. The readership increased and improved, because she focussed on Kate Middleton. CB was one of the few websites which didn’t indulge in sycophancy which was probably refreshing for its new audience. (Later, it evolved into full on hate and obsession) Kaiser cleverly chose her subjects. From just another celeb gossip site, it now focussed on issues that its readership face: domestic violence, molestation, assault. For a young girl like me, it was a safe space.

I got molested by a member of my school staff. I cried for days, didn’t sleep properly, and i was terrified. After sharing my story on CB, i was encouraged by a commenter to seek help. I told my parents. He got fired. My school headmistress listened, and believed me.

As far as i know, CB is, and as of yet, continues to be a safe space for women wanting to share their stories. Without men cyber bullying/threatening them, or other women calling them “Pity comment” seekers. But the rate with which Kaiser is banning and silencing - that would eventually change.

CB isn’t a charity, either. Like every business, hypocrisy is a policy they all follow. But, It is the very few women in the comment section which matter. If/when they get banned, I’d stop reading that site.

Kaiser was clever enough to attract an impressive readership, but too dumb to sustain it. I doubt her current dedicated minions read your page. Policing Kate sugars, and blessing Meghan devotees keeps them pretty busy. Quite entertaining to watch.

I am not a Kaiser fan, I enjoy it when you people call her out. She is an unhinged bully toad. But I felt offended by “Looking for pity comments” ask. Katie is very brave, and that bravery needs to celebrated rather than questioned.

I read and follow you, too. Thanks for creating this Tumblr page. I bet Kaiser reads it, too. I was banned for writing a nice comment on a Taylor Swift article. Oh well. CB is following the daily Mail model of business. Selling hate, and creating false narratives. When applied to celebrities, I couldn’t care less. In 1% -ers universe, we don’t exist.

Sorry for writing you an essay, please don’t ban me:)

————————————————————————————————–

I am very happy you found support and help. Lots of love and hugs for you . You are right, there are some very good people who pass through that site. Too bad CB cannot keep them, and even bans some on purpose.  

I would never ban you. I haven’t banned anyone, actually. This thought didn’t even cross my mind. I am not the one to shut down any opinion, and I actually agree with what your wrote. Again, lots of love. It is very sad that so many women are still targeted, assaulted and are taken advantage of. But I truly believe that with the #MeToo movement the tide finally started  to turn. 

And what is more, because you were so brave and spoke up, you probably saved other girls at your school from going through the same.You might not think you are a hero, but you are.

Oct 2, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban #submission
CBer's are obviously reading this site. Gals, 1) if you don't want to look "hysterical", maybe you shouldn't compare Kavanaugh to Ted Bundy unless there are corpses found. 2) you really should restructure the site as a support for sexual/physical/emotional abuse survivors and just have "gossip" as a sub-forum. Do better by being honest about it.

For starters, they should stop moderating everybody who doesn’t follow the party line. Then they wouldn’t have to come here in order to find out what people really think. What does this remind me of? Ah, that is right, the Soviet Union and the Iron Curtain.

Oct 1, 2018 4 notes
#celebitchy #ban
The Lindsay Lohan story is terrible, TERRIBLE. But it sounds like mental illness to me, some kind of psychotic break. Or manic episode. I'm not a psychiatrist, so I'm not equipped to diagnose even if I had been there. But Kaiser just calls it "white saviorism and privilege of this b-tch." Which... maybe that comes into it. But I'm not so sure this is simple bad celebrity behavior and normal gossip fodder. This is bad, but it's not LL's usual brand of bad. she needs help

Agree.

Oct 1, 2018 1 note

September 2018

Re: Celebitchy (the site owner, not the site) - I saw something on Twitter the other day that really bothered me. I don’t follow her, but someone else commented on it so that’s how I saw it. She’d taken a screenshot of a comment (which wasn’t let through moderation, I don’t think), with a snarky comment of her own. I thought it was so petty and unprofessional. Delete the comment, fine, but don’t post it elsewhere mocking one of your readers, real name or not! IDK if I can post links here, but

This definitely crosses the line.

Sep 30, 2018 7 notes
2) this is the post I’m referring to, just in case links are allowed through (or for you to refer to before posting my comment here). Maybe I’m being overly sensitive since after all CB is “just” a gossip website, but considering she runs the site, I thought it was unnecessarily rude and crossed a line. PS Just realized links aren’t allowed here, but it was the day of the post earlier this week in which Michelle Obama was told to “sit down” by Tomi Lauren.)
Sep 30, 2018
Yeah, Celebitchy (The Owner) unlike Kaiser doesn't seem TOO bad. Her sharing her story had nothing to do with pity and everything to do with her being someone who'd been through something horrid and having a space to do it in her website. Maybe even healing. I dislike everything about Celebitchy, BUT the fact that they talk about that sort of thing. All the writers but Kaiser, seem like they are actually nice well traveled women. Kaiser is too hateful and obsessive, or at least her persona is.
Sep 29, 2018 1 note
"Pity victim comments". How very disgusting of OP. The site really helped me at one time. Women of celebitchy used to share their stories of sexual abuse, and violence long before it became a powerful metoo trend. I wrote and shared my own, and i got sympathy and support from complete strangers on celebitchy. For me, the site was therapeutic, because i could talk about my experiences without any shame. No one is looking for "Pity comments". Apart from "royal"/celeb stories, CB is a great place.

CB is a negative place, and while it provides safe space for people to share their stories  ( if they meet with Kaiser’s approval), then  many  of the same people then turn around and slam other posters and other female celebrities on other posts. Is that healthy? It cannot be a great place when it is so hypocritical.

Don’t forget that Celebitchy is a commercial place and they are after clicks. They provide a safe place for women to share their stories, and that is good. But they don’t do it out of goodness of their hearts, they are selling you advertisement at the same time, and your daily serving of Kardashians, and Kate- and Taylor Swift hate, and a few other things. It is not a wholesome place, and what bothers me. It purposely attracts vulnerable people to make money on them .

And then they also pick and choose which stories are OK to share, and which they are going to block because they don’t conform to Kaiser’s views of the moment.

Sep 29, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
"they only use the site as a platform to downplay their sexism and racism." This is so true on the Meghan posts. They only like Meghan so much because it gives them a chance to tear into Kate. I'm 100% positive if Meghan was fully white, they would be ripping into her about everything just like they do with Kate at every turn. I don't like reading their faux support towards Meghan Markle because in every comment they end up shading Kate at the same time. They aren't real Meghan fans.
Sep 28, 2018 4 notes
Celebitchy today told her story about rape. She need pitty victim comments.

I don’t know if she wanted pity, or she is just finally ready to admit to herself what happened to her. Anyway, I am not going to judge her for it. No matter what her motivation is, the women who dealt with assault need to be supported, whether we like them or not.

Having said that, I also think Celebitchy is a site which intentionally attracts vulnerable and traumatized people, but not to help them, but for clicks and to make money off them, And THAT I find disgusting. They started as a gossip site and now they turned into a site which takes advantage of people. They also figured out that they could do this with people who are strongly anti-Trump. They give them an emotional outlet, and in exchange they get clicks. But Celebitchy is not  a healthy place for that, either. It feeds negativity, instead of doing something constructive.

Sep 28, 2018 6 notes
#celebitchy #ban
So what is the takeaway about Kate as regards to Meghan? Is she competitive and jealous (what about meeeee)? Or is she relieved and keen to stay home because Meghan takes the spotlight off of her? Kaiser managed to mix both messages in the same story. And in any other case, we'd all be cheering that someone got a proper maternity leave of proper length, yes?

The way they resent maternity leave make me think that most of the posters are Americans, brainwashed Americans, who don’t see maternity leave as a basic human right. Then why are they so obsessed with Kate and her lack of “work ethics” to begin with. If they were British taxpayers, then it would be more understandable.

Sep 27, 2018 2 notes
#ban celebitchy
The Gisele Bundchen post today. Boy oh boy is Kaiser passive aggressive.
Sep 27, 2018 1 note
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December