Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

June 2018

I'm sure Kaiser has multiple accounts
Jun 21, 2018
In response to the person who asked what Kaiser looks like - she is half-Indian, half-Caucasian, which she herself said in a comment responding to an article she'd written some time ago.

I seriously doubt her half-Indian claim. She knows nothing about the Indian culture / cultures, imo. This is why I said that I think she lies about her background.

Jun 21, 2018 1 note
You all have to read notas comments on the thread about Prince Louis's christening. She states that his is going to be low-key because the girls are more valued by the family. You have to read her comments to believe that she actually put them up on a public forum. Even some of the regulars are, like, whut is she talking about? These couple of comments have convinced me that nota is mentally ill with a hate fixation on Kate and William. You have to read them.

I saw them, something about Charlotte being a Diana’s granddaughter and therefore more valuable than the boys. And I went - what ?!!! Completely sick.

Jun 20, 2018
Does anyone else think that Maya and Minx are actually Kaiser herself? The two of them are probably the nastiest commenters in CB.

Not sure. Minx doesn’t sound like Kaiser to me.

Jun 20, 2018 1 note
i googled kaiser and i cannot find a single photo of hers - do we know what does she look like?

I don’t. I think Kaiser lies a lot about who she is and hides her identity. I think she is probably some regular middle class white American woman. She doesn’t come across as well traveled or being exposed to any culture/society other than suburban American.

Jun 20, 2018
"But I have to be honest, on the Michael Fassbender controversy I am inclined to believe his side of the story because that was one time accusation." You are free to believe what you want. But Kaiser clearly said we need to "believe women" and then picks which woman she believes. Based on nothing but sexual attraction to the accused man. At least be consistent.

True.

Jun 20, 2018
An article that angered me was when Mariah Carey was accused of sexual harassment by her male bodyguard. Kaiser wrote "I didn’t really think there was much to discuss about this story because it’s pretty clear that the guy is angling for a tidy settlement" Thats insane. What would she write if a male celeb said that about a female accuser? If she doesnt believe him, fine. But then dont cover it and dont use the "lying about assault for money" line of thinking.

Agree.She is no better than men who think all women are gold-diggers.

Jun 20, 2018 1 note
Reading the comments on the article "Kim Kardashian was still culturally appropriating at the MTV Movie Awards" (june 18) was so disheartening, I cannot believe that it's 2018 and we still have to explain why cultural appropriation is wrong, especially on a site that claims to be woke and to have the most educated readers.

There are people who are willfully ignorant, but also many people, who are not Americans, are just confused what cultural appropriation is and is not because their views are influenced by their own backgrounds and experiences. 

I was confused for a long time myself. Cultural appropriation is very common and in the world outside of the US it is often not treated as negatively, but with mild ridicule and annoyance. It also depends on whose culture is being appropriated.

Now, in Kim K case, it is very obviously a case of stirring the pot on purpose.

Jun 19, 2018 1 note
Kaiser still slamming Alicia Vikander for marrying her Internet Boyfriend. But suuuuuuuure she's not a jealous, obsessed stan. Pathetic.
Jun 19, 2018
Haha Kaiser wrote a shady article implying Alicia Vikander regrets "signing up" (wut) to be a movie star's wife and now she's stuck with a race car driver, and literally every single comment is like, ummm she's married to him pretty sure she knew he wanted to race cars because they're MARRIED and MARRIED PEOPLE ACTUALLY SPEAK TO EACH OTHER. Meanwhile Kaiser is home weeping over her Prometheus blu-ray.

Kaiser’s dislike of Alicia or of any of her other internet boyfriends partners is pretty obvious. She is not fooling anyone. She acts like she is above it all, but in reality she is very transparent.

Jun 19, 2018 1 note
Kaiser deletes every comment that is critical of Michael Fassbender (aka her internet boyfriend) in today's thread or mentions his past abuse allegations. The same does not apply for Brad Pitt. Lol Kaiser has some major issues.
Jun 19, 2018
I cant with their faux feminism. I visited that site regularly in the past but was banned when I brought up allegations against Michael Fassbender. Now its obviously Believe all women all the time. Kaiser, you literally silenced comments calling out a possible abuser. For all her bashing white men she will always find excuses for the ones she wants to bone.

I am not deleting your comment. so there is that. Your opinion is as valid as mine. But I have to be honest, on the Michael Fassbender controversy I am inclined to believe his side of the story because that was one time accusation. Plus, I am inclined to trust Alicia’s judgement. She seems like a smart woman. I am not a fan of his, but I like Alicia. Maybe I am not exactly impartial here.

Jun 19, 2018
"What I am noticing at CB even more lately is the black and white thinking." This is spot on. Its bound to happen when you delete and ban anything with the mildest criticism or alternate pov. Also love how Kaiser acts so anti racist and white men are bad am i right but when black posters called out her racism she deleted their posts. QQ was a funny poster and said she will leave the site and that comment was deleted. posts asking for them also get deleted. But she has to read them xD
Jun 19, 2018
That Matt Smith post where Kaiser was basically saying "ofc men can be vicitims but they should be silent about it because patriarchy" was so offensive to me. How can you actually aruge that "its not the time for men to speak about it" When was that time? Like ever? If there are more female victims we will hear more stories about women without the few men "derailing" the conversation, if there are more male victims than we think: good that we hear them now!

I remember they were also making fun of Kit Harrington for complaining about objectification.It made me angry too. You can’t say someone’s experience is not valid just because that person belong to the majority. 

When even a person that has everything going for them is being objectified, abused or whatever, that just shows you the depth of the problem and that person is your natural ally. Instead, by denying that person’s experience they are minimizing the issue and push away natural allies.

Jun 19, 2018 1 note
Kaiser is all worked up about the wedding of Princess Diana's niece: "Several things are painful all at once. One, the realization that Pippa Bloody Middleton had a full press phalanx waiting for photos of everyone while an honest-to-God member of the aristocracy got maybe two photographers waiting for her wedding? That sucks." Why is this worth noting? Kaiser herself did not show a pic of said niece!

They all went on about how Kitty Spenser’s dress was as bad  as Meghan’s (again, without actually having a photo of her either). I think Kitty looked great. The bold floral pattern might not be to everyone’s liking, but that is just a matter of an opinion. Her dress fit, her fascinator looked nice and everything was presentable.

My issue with Meghan’s attire , apart from her having no clue how to wear hats, which can be learned, is the cost of her clothing. The cost of her clothing is outrageous, given that most of it nothing to write home about to begin with. She is completely tone deaf in this respect. She got her fairy tale princess life, and she is completely oblivious to the unfavorable impression she is making with her expensive designer clothes.This is a huge misstep,and she will not be able to remedy it later on.

Jun 18, 2018 4 notes
#celebitchy #ban

I see the ever humble Carters saw nothing wrong with recording their 3rd rate music in the Louvre, among some of the greatest art the humanity ever  produced.

I know Kaiser has no opinion of her own, she just goes along with whatever her posters say, and they say she is supposed to like Beyonce, so that is what she does.

But for a more balanced take I suggest the Guardian review:

“ But, for the most part, Everything Is Love concentrates on hymning the imperial nature of the Carters’ success, how untouchably prosperous and magnificent they are. An entire song is devoted to emphasising that even their friends are “better than your friends” “

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/jun/17/the-carters-everything-is-love-review-beyonce-jay-z

Jun 17, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban

I see Mrs. Bump has been accused of being a Trump’s supporter for questioning whether Angelina’s trip to Mosul is all that helpful given that she is an American celebrity. I, personally, think Mrs. Bump is probably a Sanders supporter.

Anyway, I agree with her larger point. Angelina, and any other American going to Syria without pointing out what the US role was in creating the disaster there in the first place, legitimizes the role of the US in Syria and Iraq, and is unhelpful, in the grander scheme of things. This is not a personal slight against Angelina but a point about the US foreign war crimes. The point so many of the CB posters, being Hillary supporters, refuse to see.

Oh, and I bet Mrs. Bump was banned for voicing this opinion because suddenly she stopped posting.

Jun 17, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban
I had a friend make a comment. And I made a comment but we just changed the name in them. Mine didn't go through because I said something that was critical of Angelina Jolie. Not mean just not fawning. And it got banned. My friend said the same thing except it was about Brad Pitt. That one got through.
Jun 17, 2018
I haven’t been banned yet but I have had tons of my comments deleted. Always positive comments, never anything rude, about women Kaiser dislikes. I asked in one comment why she always uses unflattering photos of women she dislikes and she got so pissed/flustered she gave some BS answer in a comment.
Jun 16, 2018 2 notes
When Amber first made the DV accusations, Kaiser was very much "oh I'm not condoning DV but we can all agree Amber is a conniving golddigger and these convenient accusations are super sketchy, right??" And got surprised when the CB commentators were completely, rabidly pro-Amber and anti-Depp. And now viola Kaiser is all yay Amber for standing strong against her abuser. It must kill her to have to praise a woman, especially one married to a celeb which is her weird jealous fixation. 2/2
Jun 15, 2018 1 note
I love how Kaiser's minions have forgotten Kaiser was completely anti-Meghan (pulling her usual "any woman who dates a male celeb is a manipulative golddigger" shtich) and constantly subtly dissed and undermined her until the commentariat became entirely pro-Meghan. Kaiser doesn't even have the courage of her convictions; she's racist and misogynistic but will adopt any opinion that's popular. It was the same thing with Amber Heard, 1/2

Agree. I noticed that too. Kaiser changes her opinions in accordance with what “woke”  people say.

Jun 15, 2018 4 notes

Anyone feel uncomfortable about the way they talk about Meghan? I feel like they treat her like a thing, or a child, but not a grown ass woman.

Something about it makes me very uncomfortable. Celebitchy as a whole makes me uncomfortable. 

Everything is so hallow and for show. I feel like they treat all the royal family women like children. They don’t do that to the men.

—————————————————————————-

My take on it is that they create a fantasy version of every celebrity, a cartoon. Ones they don’t like are villains and the ones they like are saints. Both versions are extreme and far from reality.

Jun 15, 2018 5 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission
There's a poster named 'Hezareus' on other sites (not CB that I've seen), who sounds exactly like 'Bluhare', 'LAK' and 'Notasugarhere'. They have the same know-it-all attitude about absolutely everything and will not tolerate being corrected in any way. I think they're all one and the same! Disturbingly, the latter three all 'talk' to each other on CB. Hezareus is elsewhere, annoying people with their holier-than-thou comments and put-downs to other posters who dare to share an opinion.
Jun 15, 2018 1 note
(part 2 of 2) ... and have only Kaiser's narrative on what's happening (which is OFTEN incorrect). There's one particular commenter on there who loves to attack any 'new commenter' (she must keep a list somewhere and check them off?), and accuse them of being reincarnated using a VPN or someone with multiple IDs ... honestly, it gets old. And then you have the ones who comment on royal threads claiming to know everything and insulting everyone else for having an opinion.
Jun 15, 2018 3 notes
I was banned years ago for correcting something Kaiser had written. Of course she'll never admit to being wrong, so *poof* my comment went, followed by a permanent ban. She was harking on about the reader numbers having dropped a few months back - is it any wonder why? Why can't the site owner see that she's bad for business? Sure, she puts out a lot of stories, but it's no fun when there's only the same old regulars commenting ... (part 1 of 2)
Jun 15, 2018 4 notes
Banned

Was banned for saying judges don’t threaten to take away custody for no reason. I guess now I know why the posts are so pro-Jolie! Kaiser bans anyone who says otherwise

Jun 14, 2018 4 notes
Part 2. I'm starting to worry about the collective mental health of that site. What they say isn't based in reality. Its delusional...
Jun 14, 2018 3 notes
My comment got deleted on the Meghan markle and queen thread. All I said is there was a photo of the queen and kate that looked exactly the same as the one with Meghan and the queen, and how cute it was. But that doesn't go along with their narrative that Meghan is the queen's favorite person and this is the most she's ever smiled. They even said this is why sophie wore EW. To be passive aggressive since she's not the favorite anymore. The queen smiled a ton with kate on their first engagements.
Jun 14, 2018 3 notes
I got banned today for saying that parental alienation was a form of abuse and that Angelina was creating a cycle of her own childhood most likely out of fear/pain. How does that warrant a ban??? Celebitchy is a nutso site

Saying or implying something negative about Angelina will get you banned immediately on CB. I don’t know why Kaiser takes any criticism of Angelina very personally, but she does.

I saw your comment. And I agree that possibly Angelina has her own unresolved issues with her father and might be replaying  the same scenario over and over.

This is, actually, the concept of karma -  we  are presented with the same issues /situations over and over and over until we learn and find a way to deal with those issues in a positive way. Only then we can move on from our past and grow.

Jun 13, 2018 5 notes
#ban #'celebitchy

Bella said that Kate is using her height and looks as a weapon against Meg!Ha Ha Ha!

People are pissed that Kate is tall and wears heels!  Also do they all wake up early waiting for the next post? The same people are always the first to comment.

This is hilarious and they think they are so clever. Hat of doom? How cringey. Sounds like something Kaiser would splatter a million of times in a paragraph or tweet! As she does with “Keen” and “Buttons” when truth are she’s the only one obessed with those things. 

This is the same poster who said Kate is throwing “Micro agressions toward Meghan” (?) and none of the “woke” commenters called her out for using a serious topic for POC in a obsurd disillusioned way.

Saying she’s using basically her natural body to…hurt Meghan? And why does Bella feel this way? Body language. You know, the thing we can read for Kate but are told not to do for Meghan. 

Not only is it sexist, disgusting and a insult to both women, but it’s a insult to all women.

We shouldn’t wear heels or hats or be too noticeable because what about “so and so?“ 

Guys, newsflash! Our natural height,heels and presences are weapons against poor Meghan.

Kate isn’t a witch and Meghan is a strong ass black woman, who doesn’t need a bunch of women trying to save her from Kate.

And I don’t feel bad that people are calling this out. Since they think they can judge women based off barely anything, I can judge them based off their words. Which unlike thier unhinged comments about Meg and Kate are actual things that are based in reality.I don’t have to speculate the hate and negativity. It’s right in my face. I don’t have to rely on shady sources or bias. I can see it.

—————————————————————————————

The whole discussion about Kate’s height today was nuts. They were all trying catch Kate on a “lie”, as if it was her who lied in the first place. I doubt Kate made any official statements about her height. Notasugar claimed that Kate could not be more than 5′6′’, which is ridiculous.

I think Kate is more like 5′8-5′9′’. I am 5′7′’ and Kate looks a couple inches taller than I am. Not that any of it matters.

Jun 13, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission
I've noticed when I reply to certain people my comments get moderated out? Why is this? Are they moderators too?

I am not sure.  It is possible, now that I think of it. Or maybe these are all Kaiser’s fake accounts.Or these are the commentors that Kaiser reads.

Jun 13, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
I have to admit I giggled today reading the post complaining about the biased Kate-defenders in the media. How Kate must always be praised and how she must never be compared with the Duchess of Sussex unless it's obvious that Kate comes out on top. It was such a looking-glass version of CB! Do they really have so little self-awareness that they don't see they're describing themselves, only in reverse? (Personally, I have nothing against Kate or Meghan either one)

Very true.

Jun 12, 2018 3 notes

I just wanted to echo one of the submissions from a few days ago. Notasugar, LAK and others go on and on about how lazy Kate is. But given the time they spend on her posts one has to wonder - what it is they do the whole day? They seem to have plenty of spare time on their hands.

Jun 12, 2018 5 notes
#celebitchy #ban
I don't understand Notasugar's obsession with saying that it doesn't matter if William and Kate didn't have children. She says it nearly every royal post, and she harps on it to the extreme. Sure, the queen's father unexpectedly became king, but why ignore that it was a fluke, and that it shakes the stability of the institution. Now she's banging on about evil W&K having a second and third baby! Well the queen had four, where's the outrage?

Having children is pretty much the JOB of every woman in any hereditary monarchy, no matter how enlightened and modern it pretends to be. This is another reason the monarchy needs to be abolished. It is so patriarchal. A woman’s value is measured by whether she can have healthy beautiful children.

CB posters all go on about Kate being “lazy”, but as far as the BRF concerned Kate is doing a great job. She gave the BRF the next generation of heirs.

Only deluded CB posters think that sponsoring charities, cutting ribbons and looking pretty at events has any real value.  Whether royals do 5 or 5000 of them, it doesn’t have any real impact. The only true benefit is to the royal family in keeping themselves relevant.

A regular working as a nurse delivers much more benefit to the world than any of the royals.

Jun 12, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
So, the DM has an article up talking about Closer Mag appealing the fine they got for taking long-lens photos of Kate topless, claiming that "other members of the BRF are happy with sexy photos" & the BRF are "like any other celebrities". Who does DM use as an example? A video of MM stripping off in her actress career-just before MM heads to Chester with TQ! So I put a post up on CB condemning DM for using the story to trash MM's image-moderated out. Any bets on CB putting the story up?!
Jun 12, 2018 2 notes
Ooohhh the CB crowd is soooo annoyed at those photos of Kate out with the kids at William's first polo event! It's just to steal some of Meghan's thunder after her (tacky) appearance on the balcony of Buck House in a suit showing bathing suit strap marks by an American designer on this most British of royal calendar days! At this point, every breath Kate takes by their lights is dictated by jealousy of Meghan Markle. These people are ill.
Jun 11, 2018 1 note
The Kate thread have descended into almost delusion. They rip her a part for literally everything. She took pics of her kids, shared them, and they ripped on her. She works more, they rip on her. Now, apparently her entire existence is about attacking Meghan. They're asserting her polo match pictures are a shot at Meghan despite the fact that she's been every year long before Meghan. How has it descended into this false reality? I can't be the only on that sees the double standard.

When posts start hitting over 300+ comments you know it is time to run for cover. The crazy fanfics, the claims of lips reading, body language reading and so on are very reminiscent of the Cumberbatch craziness that went on a few years ago.

Jun 11, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
I hate how personal it feels...

So I’m postive nosugarhere is Kaiser. I’m also postive that a lot of the anti Kate people have alt accounts.So.do the anti Meghan people.

But why is it that the same people comment on every royal post, all day going through post after post writing “corrections”?

Do they work? They complain that Kate doesn’t work and is  attention hungry but they all pay so much attention to every little thing about her.

It’s a case study. I can feel the personal deep hate that some truly have for these mostly female celebs, and to be honest, I never feel like anyone is that passionate about actual horrible.people. I feel like some say “generic statements number 200”

Trump.is the only person that I feel like the hate is legit and personal

 Everything else rings hallow. Maybe it’s because.all the grandstanding that CB does. I’ve seen so much hypocrisy that I no longer believe when .they are actually serious. I’ve seen a rules change so much for certain celebs.

But with Kate and some other women it’s a hostility that seems so personal and so angry. That I barely see on Celebitchy these days toward actual harmful people.

Maybe I’m wrong

————————————————————–

That is an excellent point you made. I also feel that they have far more hate for someone generally harmless like Taylor Swift or Kate Middleton than for some truly awful people like Weinstein. Weinstein is over and forgotten but we get a daily scoop on Kate. 

You also correctly observed that the worst hate is always reserved for women. Even in case of Trump I think they hate Melania and Ivanka more than Trump.

Jun 11, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban #submission
I'm going to have some fun tomorrow with their coverage of Trooping the Color. They have always criticized Kate's "sausage curls" and her "obsession with buttons". And Meghan had both today! (I think she looked lovely, but it Will be fjnnf to see what do they do and say tomorrow!)

Lol

Jun 9, 2018 1 note
Trooping the Colour-just caught it on BBC. Kate looks stunning, Meghan's hair is messy and her off the shoulder dress shows bathing suit strap marks; a tad inappropriate? Watch Nota and LAK and Kaiser sneer at Kate's elegant outfit and exclaim over MM's poise, beauty, sexy dress, hair, etc., and pretend that she doesn't look not only less elegant but somewhat diminished next to Kate. I'd put $ on it but I'm already heavily committed to Powerball this weekend.
Jun 9, 2018 3 notes
Obessed with ppl you don't know

Nosugarhere needs help. So does concern trolling Nic.

The most disgusting comments on the site are the royal posts.

A regular said Pippa is like Meghan sister. Which is a hell of a reach. This same commenter plays woke but beats up on certain women for sport.

Jun 8, 2018
Part 3: Why can't they humble themselves and realize that A) there are no guarantees in life and B) people have EVERY RIGHT by now to be skeptical of which information to trust. Just because they choose differently doesn't mean they're racist Nazis who don't give a crap about anyone else.

Celebitchy and humble ? Yeah, that does not happen. )))  Though, I have to say, I personally trust information that is peer reviewed by scientists over claims by celebrities.

Jun 8, 2018
(cont'd) due to poor agricultural practices and/or being genetically modified, people being on multi-drug cocktails for long periods of time, etc. Some of these Celebitches want to sue "anti-vaxxers", which would give Big Pharma even more power (total medical tyranny.) Part 3 coming up

You have a point here. Some forms of cancers are much less common in developing countries which don’t use chemicals on the same scale we do. It is a fact, and there are reasons to believe plastics and chemicals, especially fertilizers and various pesticides, which end up in our water supply are a big factor.

Jun 8, 2018
Just love how all the Celebitches label "anti-vaxxers" as arrogant and stupid, but are basically bragging that their "research" is superior. It's definitely a complex subject with a lot of misinformation. How is someone "selfish" for being concerned with all that goes into vaccines? I don't have the answer to whether or not vaccines actually work, but there is definitely evidence that people's immune systems are more challenged than ever (geoengineering chemicals in the skies, foods depleted

The selfish part comes in with people not being vaccinated being a danger to other non-vaccinated people, especially infants. Most other countries are nowhere as lenient as the US when it comes to not vaccinating your kids.

Jun 8, 2018
Nota's comments on 3-year-old Charlotte are disgusting. Her hatred of the Middletons shows pathology she should really get help for. And considering how much work her idol Meghan Markle did to, um, "improve" her appearance ( the straightened hair, the narrowed nose, the tooth veneers) I wouldn't bet on what the natural product will look like. Neither the Markle nor the Windsor nose seem to do kids any favours. Of course, Nota will still claim it the height of infant beauty. She is ill.

The whole topic bothers me, to be honest. Kids should be completely off limits.

Jun 8, 2018
The Meghan stans are just too much. She sure is doing a lot of work. And I’m also convinced Nota and Kaiser are the same person. I think kaiser is a few commenters.
Jun 7, 2018 1 note

Notasugar is hating on a three year old.  These are her words about little Princess Charlotte:  

’You’re welcome to find her darling. I find her a mini Carole and Pippa, and there’s nothing darling in that.“

I bet Meghan’s toddlers will be the most darlingest darlings that ever darlinged.

—————————————————————————–

It might be not a popular opinion, but I really admire Carole Middleton. The woman came from nothing to the top of the British society, all through her hard work.

People were accusing Middletons today of using their connection with the BRF to their advantage. And my question is -  why do they think any members of the BRF, born to privilege and riches, are in any way superior to Carole Middleton? If anything, she is superior to all of them, and it is obsession with class, money and aristocracy that blinds people to this fact.

If people have a problem with the fact that a connection to the BRF bestows an unfair advantage, then they should advocate for abolishment of the monarchy, which is at the root of this unfairness. 

Jun 7, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission

Oh, take a look at this comment. Apparently, we, as true feminists know that we shouldn’t tell a woman what to do with her appearance or anything else, as it should be her choice. Except for when it is a woman we don’t like, like Melania.//sarcasm off.

minx says:

June 7, 2018 at 12:31 pm

I really dislike her aging Barbie doll hair, whether it’s a wig or not. She’s First Lady, get a good trim, ditch the center part and try to look a little classier.

Jun 7, 2018 4 notes
#celebitchy #ban

I am also certain that Celebitchy takes money to promote Kardashians. There could be no other possible explanation for their many articles about Kardashians, trying to present them in a positive light and make excuses for them.

Literally nobody but Kaiser thought Kim Kardashian looked good in that outfit yesterday. Either Kaiser has the worst fashion sense on Earth, or she is being paid to promote Kim, or possibly - both.

Jun 6, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Notasugar is Kaiser. I'm convinced. What a nasty piece of work she is.

Me too. I am not one for conspiracy theories, but the way thy come across is just too similar for them to be two different people. If they are, then they must be soulmates (from hell).

Jun 5, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December