Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

December 2017

Did you see the comments on the Apu (Simpsons) thread? That was a dumpster fire of racism. I was surprised that Kaiser didn't handle that story, but it might have hit close to home for her. I can respect that, actually. Also, I've noticed after a lot of us have been banned or had comments deleted for being critical of popoholic, the site has quietly stopped linking to them. So that's a good thing!

I am glad to hear that at least something good came out of it. I checked the popoholic site once because somebody asked me about it, and I never went back.

I remember a similar thing with the “knocked up” expression Kaiser used to love. I took an exception to it because I think this expression is disrespectful of women. It sounds like getting pregnant is not something a woman chooses to do, but she just gets pregnant because she doesn’t know where babies come from.

I was put into moderation for saying it. But I kept saying it. Finally, a few months later one of the regulars made the same point and finally it got through to Kaiser and she stopped saying “knocked up”.

Dec 6, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
The Time POTY post comments are, as expected, a total disaster. People twisting themselves in a knot trying to be simultaneously woke and feminist, while also saying how Taylor Swift isn't a real victim (or at least not deserving of recognition) because she just sued that DJ for her own reasons or something equally insane.

I just read it … As much as I could take that is. By the time I got to Taylor’s “problematic feminism” I was DONE.

I simply don’t believe it is her feminism they have an issue with, I think they don’t like her and that is that. She cannot do anything right in their eyes.

Dec 6, 2017 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Are people getting banned? I think I got banned hallway through the morning for defending Taylor Swift. Not even defending her but just commenting that we should celebrate the Times cover and not use it to trash particular women we don't like. The rest of my posts after that did not appear despite being along the party line.

Yes, you probably were banned. Saying anything positive about Taylor Swift would definitely put you on the side opposite to Kaiser. So you would be banned for any perceived infraction.

Dec 6, 2017
MM anon, I just discovered I'm not banned and that they're moderating the MM comments
Dec 4, 2017

My friend who reads CB & Loved it, just told me that an few months back she got banned on an RBF post.
She was first put in moderation for the first time after agreeing with someone standing up for Kate, then she was put on moderation again and her comment was deleted in an JenAnniston post.
Finally, she was banned outright. She said she wrote CB an email 2 days in a row and got no response. Then the next RBF post she said that Kaiser made references to her email in the actual article.Mocking her.

No surpise that my friend was an black regular on CB. They seem to have no issue just disgarding us.

————————————————————————————————

Oh, that is the worst when Kaiser uses insider information to mock people over very real issues they bring up. This is hitting below the belt. When people send private messages they expect their privacy to be respected.

I remember her doing it last year during Taylor Swift vs. Kanye West drama. She made references to some people sending emails and dismissed anyone who was defending Swift as her fangirls, while she was making excuses for Kanye. But the thing people took issue with was Kanye’s misogyny. and it had nothing to do with being a fan of Taylor.

Dec 4, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
So I just posted that I was getting burnt out on MM stories and guess what it was taken down. As this is my first offence, i.e. being deleted, I don't think I've been banned. But kaiser herself on an earlier story said she worried about people burning out on her. As for MM if I were her I would worry about people burning out on stories about me.
Dec 4, 2017

300 comments discussing Meghan Markle’s coat -  too long, too short, not tailored enough or whatever. Who cares? Even for a gossip site this is too much. Is that all there is to Meghan? Her coat and her hair? She is going to be just another person to take apart -  her clothes, her hair, her looks. 

How does this compute in people’s heads? First, they are excited about a bi-racial American entering the Royal family and then they basically reduce her to a cloth hanger. She is starting to get the same treatment as Kate. I think it is not Kate who is the issue here,or Meghan or any other woman with whom CB posters take an issue, it is the posters. They are unable to see a person as a person. Everyone is dehumanized and dissected.

Personally, I think it is such a dull, fake life - forever smiling, shaking hands, being judged, being an ornament or a token at endless ribbon-cutting ceremonies. I would never want that life for myself. I’d run away screaming after 15 min of that. And I feel a bit sorry for both Kate and Meghan.

Dec 2, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

November 2017

QQ commented on the Jay Z post and it was up for an few hours before it was deleted.

Nov 30, 2017
Nov 30, 2017

I have a couple things on my mind today in light of the Lauer’s debacle.

First, his co-hosts were crying about it and then I saw an article in the Guardian about how we have to reconcile horrible actions by a well loved man. And I thought -  give me a f*ing break! I don’t need to reconcile anything. The guy is a dirtbag and that is that. The fact that he worked for an organization you approve of doesn’t make him more palatable. In fact, the said organization (NBC) clearly enabled him, because there were enough warning signs.

In connection to this I came across the Lauer’s interview with Anne Hathway from 2012 where he pestered her about inappropriate photos of her taken by paps and he was clearly set to humiliate and diminish her. How was that ever considered to be an acceptable behavior by an interviewer? 

Anne handled it like a professional that she is, and kudos to Anne. Yes, kudos to Anne,  who Kaiser also tried to diminish so many times. And you know what, Anne comes out of this looking like a queen. And all her critics look petty and immature.

Nov 29, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
GossipBucket

If anyone is interested in gossiping about the site or just gossip in general about the topics on CB, without it getting modded out, I think it’d be really cool if all the ex readers could come to GossipBucket and comment under the stories where they can’t be deleted or modded out.

here’s an link for an example, http://gossipbucket.com/celebitchy/1247644/duchess-kate-stepped-out-for-a-keen-visit-to-a-london-school-this-morning/

Nov 29, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
follow up on Malia post: two comments criticizing the coverage were deleted! I was wondering how they got through in the first place.
Nov 28, 2017
The post about Malia Obama today was insane. The title was “Malia Obama smokes and has a douchebag boyfriend, and it’s none of our business” while the post proceeds to detail the photos and pictures people are leaking of her. Including TMZ videos. Wtf?! If it’s nobody’s obusiness, don’t cover her!

I didn’t read that post exactly for this reason - none of my business.

Nov 28, 2017
The worse commenters on celebitchy seem to be not a sugar and princesss k who tryed to justify harrys racist comments in the past a just wanting to fit in with friends

Notasugar is Kate’s hater and by some bizzare logic she now likes Harry because he is with Meghan Markle and Meghan is not Kate.

Nov 28, 2017
I made what I thought was an innocuous comment about what happened with certain posters (someone suggested they had been pushed out) and my comment was deleted. Not banned as yet, but as I'm reading your site, I see there's a systemic problem.
Nov 28, 2017
Joining your club

So I’ve been banned from Celebitchy several times over the years, sometimes I know why. This time I’m pissed at the hypocrisy. On a post the other day about the Marvel covers for Vanity fair, by Kaiser. She goes off on how Marvel has disregarded black women and are sexist for not giving Black Widow her own movie. Then at the end she figuratively throws the whole MCU at bottom dwelling basement livers by saying ‘the fanboys will be happy with the covers’. 

So I agree with a poster who is an adult woman and likes those movies that I don’t understand why fans of a huge franchise get reduced to fanboys when you know we are not, moreover how can you care if black women are disregarded and if Black widow gets her own movie if it’s a sexist vehicle for more racism and sexism? Banned. Open discussion is all I would like, I don’t mind being on the wrong side but let each side have their piece. Thanks for the space to rant, just found you:)

———————————————————————

Marvel just spent gazillion dollars to make The Black Panther, which was a huge risk. And Scott Derrickson was one of the first Hollywood people who came out against Harvey Weinstein.  In the world of the Hollywood Marvel is not a problem, they are at least trying. But Marvel is a huge business and they have to make sure their projects are profitable. If The Black Panther does well then they will invest more money into movies with POC leads. So go out and spend the dough. It is all in your hands. -))

Nov 28, 2017
#celebitchy #ban #submission
Kaiser is really a pill. I think I just became a super fan of both Jenny Slate and Chris Evans and am now rooting for them to be together and maybe get married when before I was just indifferent towards them and their relationship just because of her biases against them. Who went and made her Cupid? Lady find your own man and maybe then you won’t be such a Bitter (Hateful) Betty. Tried to say I really don’t mind them together, if they’re happy good for them. Now on moderation. Maybe banned too.

Jenny is a bit extra, but she is very likeable. If the girl is in love, why not wish her the best? Why make fun of her? I don’t get it.

I am rooting for her -)).

Nov 13, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Ok apparently I was just banned today. Seriously, I found your site a few weeks ago & thought "well surely they did something to get banned." Uhh I was wrong. I commented today in a ridiculous over the top hatred post of Taylor Swift & now I'm banned. I responded to a commenter that said they didn't get how the site was saying the reviews for Taylor's new album were mixed. I literally responded in one sentence in my comment "This site doesn't like her so there's the bias." Now I'm banned. Wtf?

You are not allowed to disagree on CB. It might go unnoticed a couple of times, but if you do that on topics close to the Kaiser’s heart like Taylor Swift, Kanye, Angelina or racial issues, you will be banned at the first “offense”. And, of course, you are never allowed to criticize Kaiser or the site.

I take it Kaiser truly believes that her opinion of Taylor Swift is unbiased -)). And all those millions of people buying her music are doing it because of reasons …, not because they like her music.

Nov 10, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Anyone read the Taylor Swift thread yesterday? What a bunch of hateful hypocritical posters. It actually scares me to read some of the comments. I think they feed off of one another and the anger escalates to a level of craziness.

I think so too, yes. It is like a feeding frenzy.

Nov 10, 2017
I sent in something to you a couple of months ago about being banned for making a somewhat critical comment of "Saint Angie" (despite following their stated rules). The whole Weinstein had me gravitating back towards Celebitchy as, for all its problems, it's a mostly safe place to be angry about the sex scandals without a bunch of sexist trolls. So I commented on a post today, and apparently I'm still banned. As for Lainey: I've always assumed the hatred is due to jealousy.

They won’t un-ban you just because you changed your mind about them. I think it takes about 6 month for the ban list to refresh. You’ll probably be able to post again after a few months.

The coverage of Weinstein and Spacey is good, but it doesn’t mean Celebitchy changed. it is still the same toxic place outside of those topics.

Lainey is definitely better at gossip. But I don’t read her site because it doesn’t allow comments.I am not interested in one-way conversations.

Nov 9, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I visited CB today and I read the post about Maureen O’Hara. I was reading the glowing comments about her and I was nodding along. What a beautiful woman, inside and out.

Then I went to Joe Alwyn’s post and saw the same people going on about how they don’t think he is good looking. Really, it is like being with the high school kids. Everybody tries to show their disdain for the cool girl’s boyfriend. And failing badly. Just how many times do you have to say that some guy you know nothing about doesn’t look appealing to you? And why?

This dichotomy is just weird. How can you be a normal person one minute and then completely irrational and immature just minutes later?

There was one sane person who said this was similar to bullying. And , of course, the regulars immediately jumped in with their “this is a gossip site” schtick.

Nov 7, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Have you seen not so sugar and princess k defend harry on there someone broufht up harry once racially abused a pakistani solider by calling him a paki and princess k said he didnt mean anything by it he was just trying to fit in with his friend and him wearing a nazi symbol was apparently william fault because he some how forced a grown man to wear it 😁 its a bloody racist term in britain imagine if that was donald triump they would have his head the hypocrisy hilarious

I am not a fan of Harry, to be honest. He is just as privileged and out of touch as William. I really don’t get why they give Harry a pass. 

Nov 7, 2017
Sixer and LightPurple (formerly LilacFlowers, who was banned and changed names) drove me to leave CB. I wasn’t banned, I just can’t stand how obnoxious they are and they pop into too many threads to “snark” but just come off like assholes. And yes, Kaiser is a classic white feminist. She completely disregarded the upset over Sebastian Stan’s “take the knee” debacle, which definitely rightfully offended some posters there. And you cannot mention Lainey for some reason.

I can’t stand either one as well. Both are obnoxious hypocrites. LilacFlowers got banned because she went against the party line on CB and criticized Kanye for his unathorized video with naked Taylor and other women. The rest of CB, with Kaiser in the lead, were all busy attacking “snake” Taylor and defending “poor” Kanye West from her. Some feminists they are …

Anyway, so instead of standing her ground LilacFlowers changed her name and came back as if nothing happened.

Sixer was making all kinds of excuses for Georgina when Weinstein scandal broke but she doesn’t have a problem ripping into Kate Middleton, who is absolutely harmless.

Nov 5, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

October 2017

Anyone else notice that comments mentioning Lainey don't get through?

I didn’t realize that. 

Oct 30, 2017
I was banned too! Again! I swear this time I was careful! IDK what I did wrong! It's okay, sometimes I feel it's a toxic environment. I think its better for me.

It is a toxic place. I don’t really care for it. But I keep this blog open so that the people can tell their stories and don’t feel powerless when they get banned for having a different opinion.

Oct 28, 2017 3 notes
This is old news but I want share a story about when I had my comments deleted on some CB post about Ryan Lochte being an a-hole in Rio. Kaiser was basically defending Ryan and trying to diminish brazilian authorities at all costs. Even after he was proven wrong. So when someone tries to bring a new light into the subjects that are sensitive to the CB team (How dare a 3rd world country make our beloved-but-not-so-bright child look so bad for the whole world to see?), you know what happens.

I noticed myself that Kaiser and the general readership are not at all receptive to non-US-centric views. That tells me that Kaiser is not that well read or well traveled. regardless of what she claims. Her views are very narrow.

Oct 28, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
I just figured out that I have been banned. I didn’t say any wrong ... just made it clear that I am a black woman and ppl don’t fight for us...wtf
Oct 28, 2017

I remember prior to Depp and Heard breaking up, Kaiser portrayed her as a fame whore who loved pap walks and Deep was painted as this guy who put up with it. Not to mention Matt Damon was constantly painted as a good guy because of how he gave interviews? Please he has to be one of the worst in Hollywood, Kaiser is naive and readers should not accept all the view points presented. Kaiser knows little to nothing about the celebrities being talked about, the only accuracy is perhaps Trump’s coverage I’ll give them that much.

Oct 21, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
Did you see the latest article on Kate? It’s very petty and childish, especially the “game” she proposes at the end

No, I didn’t. I usually don’t read Kate Middleton or Angelina articles, they are just too much for me. I took a peak at one a few weeks back and Kaiser made it sound like Kate got pregnant just so that she can upstage Meghan Markle or something like that.

I read one about Taylor Swift yesterday and it was fun watching the usual haters trying to reconcile their feelings for her and the fact that they liked the song.

The one comment claiming that Alwyn is not that good looking made me snort. I get it that tastes are different , but Alwyn is very handsome. He and Taylor also look very similar, which makes me think that he is one for her. People often fall for those who look like them.

Oct 21, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Do you ever comment on Pajiba, what do you think of it? I made a (polite) comment there questioning if Hillary Clinton really didn't know about Weinstein, considering she had access to the best intelligence and it got deleted (twice). It seems like Hillary is to Pajiba what Angelina Jolie is to CB. Moderation and censorship is increasing, online and in society in general.

It seems to be  a bigger version of CB -  an echo-chamber for “woke”people. I don’t have a problem with the content as such but the commenters seem to have a kind of herd mentality- you are with us or against us. I checked it out a few times, but was never tempted to join.

Oct 17, 2017 1 note
I think royalsparkle may be another of kaiser’s Alts. That chick is batshi# crazy.
Oct 11, 2017
What is Liana's site that is referenced on here so much? I also used to be a frequent Celebitchy reader, but learned better than to comment after I stuck up for Bernie during the primaries. Glad to have found your tumblr!

It is an old blog thread where a lot of people who were banned over the years posted.

https://lianathinks.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/being-banned/

Oct 10, 2017
I noticed earlier today on the Hugh Hefner article that some people commented about why was the site still linking to popaholic? Some other posters said something about how the site was heavily moderated and called out Kaiser. Those comments have since been deleted.

I bet the answer is money. CB gets money for the links. In the end, despite all the claims of being progressive and what is not, CB is a business. It is there to make its owners money. This is the reason they post about Trump 5 times a day -  clicks, which turn into money, and this is the reason for advertising and links.

Oct 3, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

Anyone thinks “notasugarhere” is Kaiser?  I am not one for conspiracy theories but the writing style is very similar.

Anyway, regardless, on the controversy of a librarian rejecting Dr. Seuss books that Melani Trump gave, notasugarhere seems to be the only person working hard to justify it.

My view is that you don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. If something is given with good intentions, you accept it and move on. You can decide how to handle the gift later, if you don’t actually need it. Anything else is very rude and hurtful.

Oct 2, 2017 4 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Within hours celebitchy managed to turn the vegas shooting into a trash trump thread 50 people are dead for crying out loud who cares about party politics
Oct 2, 2017

September 2017

I believe I got myself banned today so I decided to go out with a bang and call Kaiser out...She didn’t approve either comment but I know she read them. I specifically mentioned that there are blogs/websites dedicated to her ways.
Sep 29, 2017 2 notes

Ha-ha. Kaiser is tying herself into a pretzel to prove the point that the Wonder Woman is a feminist icon and James Cameron is wrong. I know nothing about James Cameron, the person, but his point is valid and whatever his personal failing are, his point still stands on its own.

The Wonder Woman is not a feminist icon. It is disgrace to consider her as such because the character relies too much on the looks and the sexy outfits. Let’s not pretend the tiny outfit that WW wears is an accident.

Pippi Longstocking is more of a feminsit icon than WW will ever be. I feel sad for young American women who are taught that WW is something to aspire and who don’t have enough exposure to strong female characters to know any better.

Sep 28, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
Guys, this tumblr is amazing! I never knew how ridiculous Kaiser and the comment moderation on CB were until last week. I was ont he same critical thread of comments about Popoholic as Anon a few posts ago! I was polite, referenced the supposedly feminist tone of CB but yet my comment was deleted! I commented again asked why the moderation was so strict, then got moderated again. Today I was banned... They are just as bad as Drumpf with the censorship! Popoholic is filth, yet they promote it.
Sep 23, 2017 1 note
This might be Virgilia! virgiliasays -dot-com

Thank you.

Sep 21, 2017
Popoholic always bugs me. Sometimes a link headline will intrigue me (This dress is cute?), and I'll click without noticing it was popoholic. (sexy little this and hot little that and exposed cleavage). The pictures are fine but the salivating objectifying language bothers me. And it surprised me that such a "woke" and feminist blog links to it. I thought I was alone but today others commented about it. I did too. Then all the comments were deleted! I was polite. Happened to anyone else?

I wasn’t familiar with Popoholic. I just checked it out. It is not my cup of tea either, for the same reasons you stated. Objectification is wrong.

Sep 20, 2017
I have no idea why I was banned from Celebitchy. How can I find out the reason?

I don’t think so. But it is safe to say that it was whatever your posted the last day. I know some people even emailed the Celebitchy owner asking to be unblocked because they felt they didn’t do anything wrong. They never got any response back, of course.

Some of them got eventually unblocked after a year or so, once their IP addresses disappeared from the blocked list.  It looks like whatever blocking software CB uses, it clears up IP addresses after 6 months or a year.

Sep 20, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Do you know what happened to Virgilia Coriolanus? She was my favorite commenter.

No, I don’t. If anyone knows, feel free to shoot me a note. I’ll post it. I remember her as well. She had very thoughtful posts.

I also remember Nutballs. She was funny, she was a Hiddleston fan. Once she ventured outside of Hiddles posts into something more controversial and got banned.

P.S. 

I just checked Lianna’s site, I thought I saw Viriginia’s posts there. Here is her last one from this July. Maybe she did start her own site.

Yeah–I haven’t been commenting on CB as often. Part of it is because I don’t want to write a comment and then have it modded–especially if I worked looong and haaard on that comment too. I’m also annoyed that you apparently can’t write about hot dreams about Tom Hardy, but they’ll let people GO TO TOWN on the Jennifer/Justin/Brad/Angelina threads. I mean, I honestly start dreading reading the threads because of a few people who just go after people for disagreeing. Why aren’t any of their comments deleted?

But yeah, I was telling my friend this, and she told me to start my own site—she convinced me…..:)

Sep 20, 2017 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
The Angelina Jolie fans on CB are scary, unless you completely worship her they will attack. It's just insane.

I don’t even click on Angelina’s articles. They are too much for my sanity.

Sep 15, 2017
I tried to comment on the Hillary article to tell them calling people who do not like her trolls or other things is as bad as Trump supporters crying fake news. I went straight into moderation of course. The level of crazy on that site is unreal.
Sep 14, 2017

For the love of peace, why are they still going on about Hillary Clinton? She is irrelevant. 

On the day Bernie makes his “Medicare for all” proposal, there is no word of it on the supposedly progressive CB site, but a post again about Hillary and why it is not her fault.

There are only two people who dared to say - why are we still talking about Hillary, and both were attacked by all the hardcore Hilalry supporters repeatedly. They were accused of lying, being trolls, having ulterior motives and were told that they didn’t need to comment at all, if they didn’t care for Hillary.

It has been in the back of my mind the whole day, what  does this behavior remind me of. And it finally clicked - a cult. That is exactly how cult members behave. The viciousness of the pro-Hillary posters on CB just goes a bit too far outside the accepted norms. The constant accusations of lying and having dishonest motives are hallmarks of people being in a complete and total denial about reality. They don’t see things objectively.

Sep 14, 2017 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban

Ah, so today’s Cumberbatch article is called “Benedict Cumberbatch did his TIFF premiere without his loyal&faithful wife”.

That is some very low class trolling from Kaiser, and not at all feminist minded.

Clearly she hasn’t “forgiven” Cumberbatch’s wife for stealing yet another internet boyfriend from her.

Somebody comes across as very vindictive and completely lacking self-awareness. 

Sep 11, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
What happened to QQ? I loved her!

I didn’t visit CB that day but according to other people this is what happened

“Oh my toads! So, earlier I said I wonder if “Kaiser will cover the BET awards’, well guess what? She decided to cover a agrument that a bunch of rappers had and Kaiser basically said, “nothing noteworthy happened on the show, so I’m not going to cover it, I’ll just talk about what was happening on twitter” (Aka the princess of wokeness didn’t watch the BET Awards and just saw that was trending on twitter) and so a lot of people were complaining about how dismissive the post was and complaining about Kaiser.Everyones stance was, why cover anything from the BET Awards? Why not just ignore the whole thing and be hypocrtical as always, because you always race bait and all that, but on your own website, you basically dismissed a amazing show that was full of diversity and amazing moments, Also you cover LITERALLY EVERY AWARD SHOW.
Kaiser loves to call people out on not being inclusive yet you aknowlegdeged the BET Awards and chose to report on something negative and after the show.
So tell me why, kaiser not only deleted a bunch of comments, but she LOCKED THE POST.
Instead of owning up to it, or apologizing, she LOCKED THE POST.
Seriousy?“

QQ and AlmondJoy were the people who apparently called Kaiser out on that BET awards show post and after that they disappeared. Either they got blocked or they left in protest. I think they were blocked.

But then Kaiser realized that she made a big mistake because ever since then the other people have been asking what happened to QQ and AlmondJoy and keep dropping hints like “ I wish some posters were still here”.

Sep 10, 2017 1 note
I'm really surprised that Kaiser let the critical comments on the Amal story stay, comments like that usually get deleted fast.

That is because Nicole, who criticized Kaiser, is black. And after what happened with AlmondJoy and QQ Kaiser is forced to tread lightly, otherwise she’ll lose all her POC readers.

Sep 9, 2017
Kaiser seems to think anyone who dislikes meghan markle is somehow either racist or jelous she can't seem to grasp the reason some are unhappy about vanity fair article is because her and harry have complained about press intrusion if kate had done an interview when she was dating william they would of cruzified her this meghans so great a bumanitarian and will save the royal family bulls hit is getting old she done like 5 charity events in five years they will be calling her a saint soon

If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be marrying into the royal family. I think she just wants a comfortable life. I don’t hate Kate, to me she is a stay at home mom, one of many. It is her choice. And Meghan is no different.

If Meghan was a great humanitarian she wouldn’t be signing up for a highly regimented life of a royal.

Sep 9, 2017 1 note
I think kaiser doesn't know how democracy works that people can vote for who they want to its not a liberal dictator ship it's the same with free speech your only allowed to have an opinion if you agree
Sep 9, 2017 1 note
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December