Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

November 2018

Wow, what a great comment. Well said.

Killjoy says:

November 30, 2018 at 2:53 pm

If the British taxpayers really cared about wasted money on this nonsense, they’d dissolve the monarchy. Instead, they (and the commenters on this site) act like they get their value when Kate does x more appearances a month, or when she finally cuts an inch or two off her hair. 

Like the millions spent on this would be worth it if she just acted in accordance to Joe Schmoe’s idea of how many appearances she should do, and how broadly she needs to smile, blah blah blah. I think people – especially us gossip lovers – are just looking for excuses to tear someone down and feel superior (“if I were a royal, I’d surely x, y, z! The nerve!”).

It’s like we feel like we’ve gotten a free pass to police these women in ways we don’t typically do to other women in 2018, and justify it based on “this is what they signed up for.” It doesn’t make what we’re doing right. If the monarchy shouldn’t exist, it shouldn’t exist. But let’s not act like a leg slit is going to be the downfall of the free world.

Nov 30, 2018 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
I posted a link of this tumblr and got super banned. Before, I was getting moderated and my comments were disappearing. Now I can't post anything at all. I knew this would happen and I don't care lol.

Thanks!

Nov 30, 2018 2 notes
There are no comments on non-royal posts. I can't believe it used to be a good site, now it's just boring Meghan stans whipping themselves into a frenzy about whatever. It used to be that the Jolie threads were insane so I used to avoid it but now I think I will avoid the whole site.
Nov 30, 2018 1 note
In response to the post about Melania. Doesn't everyone have a past? Melania was 25 when these "art" photos were published in a French magazine. At 25 I admit to doing some things, I wouldn't have done at 30. She may not be Eleanor Roosevelt, but she is a devoted mother. If one reads biographies, it's clear that many people have done things when young that are not admirable. Methinks life is a learning experience.

I am with you there. People are mad at Trump and they take it out on Melania. I am not really all that excited about further promotion of the stereotype of Eastern European women as shady escorts and more. And Melania shouldn’t even have been in the firing range, so to speak. She is not a public figure.It was forced on her, She didn’t run for a president. Politicians families should be out of limits.

And that cuts both ways, by the way. I also  despise politicians who drag their wives and children out to protect them, when they are accused of sexual misconduct. 

Politicians families shouldn’t be pawns or lightning rods in the political games.  Being a politician is a job, and the family should be left out of it.

Nov 30, 2018 1 note
It bothers me so much how Kaiser intentionally picks the most unflattering pictures of Kate on purpose. She touts herself as a feminist, but to be so juvenile and bully-like to another woman is just hypocrisy at its best. The amount of energy it must take her to be so petty 🙄

Kaiser does it with all celebrities she doesn’t like. She also misrepresents things on purpose to create additional controversy.

She was called out on it once by one of the regulars, and offered an unconvincing explanation as to why she chose the pictures she did, and then kept on doing it.

Nov 29, 2018 2 notes
So it's pretty pathetic over there now. The royal posts have a couple hundred or so comments and the rest don't even break 100. Honestly it is sad that a community that was smart and close knit was destroyed. It could have been so much more (yes I know it's just gossip but you do need a place to unwind), but for one woman's control freakery lol.

I noticed it too. Five royal posts a day, talking about the same thing, with hundreds of comments. And the other posts barely have any comments.

As someone said earlier, Celebitchy might as well rebrand itself as a royal blog. 

Nov 27, 2018 1 note
I have to agree about the office of FLOTUS. It is archaic. Maybe after the ridiculousness of Melania, who isn't even educated, the entire role will be eradicated. Sure a supportive spouse is good but if a woman were to become POTUS would anyone expect her husband to do the same tasks? All you have to do is imagine a man say Be Best it is clear how utterly absurd i is. Can you pictture a man with a soft porn past being the spouse of a woman president? She wouldn't even get elected.
Nov 27, 2018 1 note
"I feel like Celebitchy is dieing." They are now doing sponsored posts with amazon affiliate links. That could be a sign they need other ways to make money. It also looks like there are less comments on average.

I am pretty sure they also take money from some celebrities to promote them. They also have ads on their site, but maybe these are google ads, I am not sure.They can’t be making that much money from clicks. 

Only royal posts have any decent traffic from Meghan’s fans. Before Meghan appeared they spend half a year doing anti-Trump posts, but now it is over. In a few months they will have to find another hot topic or they will be in real trouble.

Nov 26, 2018 2 notes
Oh, I hope people don't start the rudeness with Meghan's maternity leave. The discussions surrounding Kate's maternity leave were awful, truly awful. Every mother deserves months and months off for maternity leave. It doesn't matter if a mum is a SAHM or works full/part-time. American maternity leave and the mindset it creates amongst women is dangerous. Funny how the CBitches talk so much about feminism but they get so viscous and envious of mothers when maternity leave is brought up!

I completely agree, but I already saw something on CB about Meghan’s case being different. 

Americans are raised to be workaholics, and for many the job is their raison d’etre. They work themselves to death and cannot understand why others think it is crazy. In fact, they tend to think that anyone no willing to work themselves to death is “lazy”. American corporations sure love this kind of mentality.

Nov 26, 2018 1 note

Here is a good article explaining why the first lady role and expectations that come with it is harmful for women.

“ Michelle ObamaMrs Obama made a great job of being first spouse. But why the need to play consort? “

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/25/michelle-obama-made-a-great-job-of-first-spouse

Nov 25, 2018
I applaud all our first ladies in recent memory in that Hilary Clinton worked hard at trying to geta healthcare bill passed The Bush women fit a a certain more demure role but turns out Barbara Bush was the matriarch outside of the White House. Michelle Obama was too subdued as I wanted her to use all her brain power but I know she also had children to raise. Melania is a mother and is doing her best. If the roles were reversed, would these women have made better presidents? Food for thought!
Nov 20, 2018 1 note
Re: Melania post and FLOTUS office...but other first ladies did use this office well. Betty Ford brought the issue of addiction out of the closet; she also advocated for equal rights for women. Eleanor Roosevelt's accomplishments are too numerous to mention. Hillary wanted to function as a co-POTUS and that is another issue. Michelle may be very likeable,but she CHOSE long before Barack's election to be a "traditional" wife. I don't think she was" forced" to do so.
Nov 20, 2018
That Bill Maher/Stan Lee article and some of the comments were beyond insulting. The so called woke women talk about not stereotyping yet they love to stereotype. Adult men who like comic books and Star Wars are deadbeat dads who caused Trump to be the president? Lol what? That site is so freaking toxic and weird. I love how they add the caveat "don't get mad it's my opinion." Well most of their opinions are shit... not mad juts honest.
Nov 20, 2018
In response to the post about Melania. I admit to being more traditional and don't have an issue with the office of First Lady. I think the "soft approach" of this office can be useful in many ways. Re: her public call for the ouster of Mira Ricardel, I think this was acting out behavior on her part. Ricardel was Bolten's person and Bolten currently has Trump's ear. 1/2

I don’t really agree that the office of the First Lady is useful in any way, Smart and capable women like Michele and Hillary were forced to hide their true nature, and pretend to have little ambition. What is good about that? And those who are not qualified at all, like  Melania, shouldn’t be in the position to influence anything. Also,don’t forget Michele also didn’t want to the the first lady and had to sacrifice a lot for the sake of her husband’s career. I don’t think it is right.

Nov 16, 2018
2/2 Also, Kelly, the POTUS's Chief of Staff probably did play some games with the FLOTUS's office and this was Melania's means of going around him too...I don't think this showed sexism on his part. He just doesn't value the powerpuff issue that Melania is spending her time on. He does value very smart capable women like Kirsten Nielsen and will go to the mat for her. I would've loved to have been a fly in the room when he and Bolten went at it!
Nov 16, 2018

I’d like to thank Melania Trump  for demonstrating so well why the un-elected, archaic office of the US first lady shouldn’t exist.  The fact that the other first ladies wielded the power and influence behind the closed doors and more diplomatically doesn’t make it any better. None of them were elected and shouldn’t have been involved in the politics at all.

As for calling Melania silly names like Malaria, it is just silly. Here we have  a woman who never wanted to be the first lady, the position was foisted on her. And then people are unhappy with her?  What  they should be unhappy about is that in this day and age so many Americans still consider the wife just a free addition to her husband. Who should stand by his side, look nice and smile prettily.

Nov 14, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban

Gigi La Moore says:

November 14, 2018 at 9:26 am

I have had to rethink my opinion about W., especially since Trump. No, I don’t agree with him about everything and he authorized some things that were damaging and we are feeling the effects to this day. However, I have never questioned the man’s humanity, so I can see why Michelle likes him. It is crazy that Kanye could be so bold to call W. out yet be onboard with Trump. Sigh…what crazy times

——————————————————————————-

OK, what is WRONG  with some people? No, W. Bush is not better than Trump. W. Bush is directly responsible for millions of innocent civilians deaths. Trump, as awful as he is, cannot be accused of being responsible for millions of innocent people’s deaths yet.  So, even if you are using Trump is a measuring stick, W. Bush is a monster many times over.  If he wasn’t a monster, he wouldn’t be able to live with himself after what he’s done and would be doing everything he can to help civilians suffering from wars, like the one in Yemen, for example.

Nov 14, 2018 1 note
#Celebitchy' #ban
I was on the comment section for the post on Meghan today. There were some interesting comments which I responded too. Then when I went back, all the comments were gone! I was so surprised because nothing was vicious, mean spirited or hurtful. How often does this happen? Do these comments appear for an hour and people complain and then they are taken down? It seems so absurd.

Nobody complains, Kaiser moderates everything she doesn’t like, and usually it happens in 10-15 min, or even sooner.

Nov 13, 2018 1 note

In the Kanye vs. Lorde set design drama. whose side Kaiser automatically takes? Kanye’s, of course! Have to earn that Kardashian money.

Nov 13, 2018

Ocasio-Cortez post is such a trainwreck, You would think CB posters be supportive of a progressive WOC making name for herself and bringing up important issues, which matter to regular people. But, nope. Apparently her  “Bernie stench” ruins it for them. Un-freaking-believable. 

Nov 12, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
I simply posted a comment saying I hope Kaiser covers the recent gossip about Meghan having a tantrum over a tiara and my comment was deleted within minutes lol. Another person's comment about the tiara tantrum is still there though. I think the difference was that I said I prefer to hear about this gossip rather than the Saint Meghan stuff. So... I guess my comment implied a vague criticism of Kaiser's Meghan coverage so I was moderated? God is this chick thin skinned!

When I read the tiara gossip, I thought - is that the kind of ridiculous palace intrigue Meghan has to put up with now, and then keep on smiling and thanking everyone involved, including the back stabbers? Her acting skills sure will come handy. Hopefully she knew what she was getting into. 

Nov 11, 2018
I feel like Celebitchy is dieing. I wonder if the thing of blocking and deleting comments is one of the reasons? I've been reading the sites for a few years now and I never saw offensive comments and I noticed the ones deleted merely disagreed with them, principally with Kaiser and I wonder if she is the one responsible for blocking even on articles written by others. I used to like Hecate's sense of humor, but they rarely write for the site now.

It is a combination of blocking of long time readers, thus cutting repeating visits to their site and destroying the existing community, and Kaiser’s lazy writing,  which means it is hard to attract new readers,

Nov 10, 2018
I’m just a random anonymous internet commentator but I just want to Thank You for creating and taking the time out of your busy schedule to run this blog. I hope you continue *fingers crossed* and *fingers and legs crossed* that the garbage site Celebitchy and K@1$er really do “go down in flames” soon as Taylor Swift says in Blank Space. That would be some sort of poetic justice *evil laugh* Thanks Again for creating this Ban-Free Zone in the meantime here’s some e-flowers 💐🌷🌹🌺

Thank you for the kind words!

Nov 10, 2018 1 note
I'm not going to be posting anymore, but I wanted to thank you for having given me the chance to vent here away from the censorship and hyper-emotionality of CB. Good luck to you in all your future endeavors!

You are welcome! And thank you.

I was just thinking today that maybe my blog is not needed anymore. CB seems dead. A Tom Hiddleston post with only 30 comments? That never happened before. A Mary Poppins post got all of 2 comments. The only posts that get any attention is Meghan and Trump posts, of which there are 3 a day. But eventually people will move on.

Nov 9, 2018 2 notes
2) Kaiser is the last person who should address social issues about race or women. CB is not diverse. All of the women of color left a long time ago. She wants to appear woke and she isn't. BTW Ted Cruz is only half white Cuban, his mother is American. Marco Rubio is a white Cuban but he is fully Hispanic. No one I know in my community thinks of Cruz as a Latino. He does everything he can to distance himself from us and hurt us legislatively.
Nov 9, 2018 1 note
1)As to your comment about Kaiser being progressive. I don't think she is progressive at all. She was deleting comments from progressives or any criticisms about Clinton during the campaign even before the primaries. It steadily got worse. Her comments about the percentage of white women voting for GOP isn't totally wrong. She just isn't well enough informed and lacks the logic and ability to address the issue intelligently.

It is a difficult issue to discuss. But I want to brag a little bit about my county, and the black girl magic and hopefully lighten the mood a little bit. ))) We did good -  19 black women elected judges out of 19 that ran in my county. Not all of Texas is deep red, and not all of it is hopeless.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/08/black-women-texas-judge-harris-county

Nov 9, 2018 1 note
So if Meghan gets a pass for everything.... why did they feel the need to rip Kate to shreds and constantly attack her on previous occasions - going back years? Isn't that a bit hypocritical? It just screams of envy, jealousy, and miserable bitterness towards Kate imo.
Nov 9, 2018
This is a total 180 from her previous stance - somebody called them out for their horrible stance on the maternity leave convo and she changed her view. Another example: Whenever posters rightly criticise MM for her excessive spending, they always flip flop, twist themselves into knots to try and justify, essentially, what they have been slagging off in Kate for a number of years.
Nov 9, 2018
I know ppl might get fed up of all the Kate asks, but this seems to be one of a few places where people can talk about the double standards and hypocrisy which run rife in the Royal comment section. For example, one of the "Kate does NOT deserve maternity leave - she needs to get back to work NOW" posters, is now flip flopping by commenting that she thinks every woman does deserve maternity leave/rest regardless of whether women work or not.
Nov 9, 2018
It's not only Celebitchy that goes with the speech "white women" are responsible for the patriarchy. This is a speech that is becoming bigger in every place and although there is responsability on white women that support a misogynistic system, that way of thinkingt take the attention from white men that created and keep working hard to keep the system.

I really don’t believe anybody should be held  responsible for other people’s choices just because they share the same skin color. But every decent person, regardless of their skin color, should be helping those who are oppressed or disadvantaged.

Nov 8, 2018 1 note

“A says:

November 7, 2018 at 3:34 pm

I really hate to be the ahole here, because I know that a great deal of you in Texas and in other parts worked very hard on these elections and with getting the vote out and educating people on issues. And far be it from me to bring race into this conversation so quickly, but exit polls indicate that roughly 60% of white women in Texas who voted, voted for Ted Cruz. The numbers are even worse for the governor’s election in Georgia, where 76% of the white women who voted voted for Kemp over Stacey Abrams.”

I really don’t understand how something like this is helpful, and this is peak Celebitchy right here. What is point of this comment? I am a white woman in Texas who voted for Beto, I knew it was a long shot, this is Texas after all. But I did my part in bringing the vote to only 3% difference between Beto and Cruz.  And, of course, I was disappointed that it wasn’t enough.

So, now let’s beat women like me, who are already facing the uphill battle in  Texas, over the head with the fact that Texas is a deep red state where a lot of people vote Republican. Because that is going to make me feel so much better! 

And this is not even about race. Beto is a white American, while Cruz is hispanic. Cruz is actually a minority here. This is about class  - rich vs. poor. Wealthy people vote Republican, evangelicals vote Republican, and yes, most of those people are white. 

Sometimes progressives in the US don’t see the forest for the trees. Some of them are conditioned to see everything in terms of racial or sexual discrimination and they are completely oblivious to the main societal struggle  -  the wealth inequality struggle. And this CB comment is a prime example of that.

Additionally, according to  the stats 71% of white men voted for Cruz, and 59% of white women, So, actually more men voted for Cruz , but in the usual Celebitchy fashion, it is only women who get grief.

Nov 7, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
Do you ever tire of all the questions being about Kate or Meghan? Lol. I sincerely don't know why anyone cares anymore. These two women lead pampered lives of luxury provided by the UK taxpayer. If I had to choose I guess I am partial to Meghan but it doesn't mean I dislike Kate at all. In fact I think royalty is a ridiculous institution in 2018. I really don't understand why so many come here and complain about CB and how they are about Kate. It has been years of this. It is nothing new.

The Kate hate is nothing new, but it did get more vicious since Meghan appeared.

I know why people come here -  they want to voice their opinion. And they are not allowed to do so on CB. Since this is why I created this blog to begin with, I am completely fine with that.

As far as royalty is concerned, I think it is an insult to all of us who are not aristo. I mentioned this before, - accepting aristocracy and royalty as normal means you accept that your station in life is lower than theirs simply because you weren’t born to the “right” parents, and that some people are simply better than others because of their genes. I will never accept that. It might upset some people, but this line of thinking is not far from racism and has no place in the modern world.

Nov 7, 2018
How is Kaiser dumb enough not to realise "people tell me to give the baby booze to get her to sleep haha" is a JOKE? Does she genuinely think Brits habitually get newborns drunk??

Yeah, I don’t know. It is obviously a joke.

Nov 7, 2018

What happened to the post where Kaiser said something along the lines that braids are inappropriate for Sam Johnson’s  age and statue? I wanted to check it out again, and I can’t find it. Is it gone? 

Anyway, I loved Sam’s braids and her dress. And, yeah. Kaiser your shouldn’t be telling women what is appropriate and what is not “for their age”. I also loved Emily Blunt’s dress -  it is comfortable and interesting at the same time. It is something I would wear.

Nov 6, 2018
PS. MM is one of only several "working royals". This means she is officially on the payroll, in a way, and is an agent of the Crown. She is not just a "royal".
Nov 6, 2018
Re MM voting. I 100% agree. It would be a PR nightmare if it turns out she did. The backlash will be strong. Also there would be some legal questions, as she now represents the British head of state! In other words, it is not just about US law; it is mostly about English law. For me, much of the current cult following is an expression of national pride and sentiment -- as she is seen as the American who "took over" the british crown. This is worrying, especially in the current political climate.
Nov 6, 2018

A couple thoughts on whether Meghan voted or not -  if she is still a US citizen then she technically could, but I don’t think she did. It just wouldn’t be proper.

As a naturalized US citizen I had to take an Oath of Allegiance, which is sort of assumed for people born in the US. Among other things it has a part which states “I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty “, and Meghan is literally married to a foreign prince.

I think Meghan’s American fans see her as an American, but Meghan is no longer an American, she gave it up.

Also, I think long-term Meghan will not be able to keep the US citizenship. Some people don’t realize but the US is different from all other countries when it comes to taxes and financial reporting. The US taxes worldwide income, which no other developed country does, so Meghan would have to declare all her income from the British crown, all the presents, all her foreign bank accounts, and then pay US taxes on that income. This is the reason so many Americans living abroad are renouncing the US citizenship. I am just not sure the BRF would like that long-term, I doubt they like the IRS having an inside look at their books and having authority to audit them through Meghan being a US citizen.  I am sure all of this had been discussed and agreed upon with Meghan before marriage. 

Nov 6, 2018 1 note
2/2 "If you prefer to embrace the bitch within where Kate's concerned, head over to Celebitchy then, where they're perfectly out n proud about ripping Kate to shreds for every single action, speech, hairstyle, accessory and clothing choice. You can rip right into her a feel nary an ounce of guilt nor the need to justify or apologise for your way of thinking. I'm not a Kate fan by any measure, but the level of woman hatred on sites like that are at Gilead levels."
Nov 6, 2018
1/2 I just wanted to share a comment from another site on here about the extreme Insane Kate Hatred on CB where everything she does is deemed terrible. "This site is one of the precious few that don't indulge in character assassinations of most of the subjects of the posts -Kate included. In this sense, it's a sanctuary for those of us who want to indulge in the glam/horror, without reading unnecessarily nasty, snarky comments below, those of us who just enjoy genuine observations and remarks."
Nov 6, 2018 1 note
I agree with your opinion on Disney movies. It took me too much time to realise the imprinted messages there and small girls get those messages from all the world around them. Family, school, comercials, films. That has to change. I believe they could watch it, but the parents should know how to show different point of views while that. I like Disney, but I don't get all the hype americans have for it and its films after I grew up.
Nov 5, 2018

I want to chime in on the criticism of Keira’s and her opinion  that Disney princess movies are damaging.

I grew up outside of the US, in a different culture, and I didn’t watch Disney movies until I was pretty much an adult. And …. I found them boring, silly and irrelevant. I do think they can be damaging to a young child who cannot process them critically.

Speaking specifically about Hans Andersen’s fairy tales, my favorite one is about the Ice Queen, Hans and Gerda. Gerda is the young girl who embarks on a journey through tundra and  through unknown lands to save Hans from the Ice Queen, and  when she finds him , she melts his frozen heart with love. This is a wonderful story where a girl has agency, she is brave, strong, capable and loving. She gets to ride a polar bear, how cool is that? ))) I wonder why Disney never thought of animating it?

Women who say that they grew up with Disney and  they turned out fine, in my opinion, don’t fully understand how young children learn. Children absorb what they see as sponges and what they see is  “normal” to them. You can’t really have critical conversations about  pros and cons with young children.  Sure, it is possible to overcome those messages we received as young children, but  why do it if  it is possible to avoid damaging messages?  As I said, I didn’t watch Disney as a child and I think I am better for it. So, I am with Keira on this one.

Nov 5, 2018 1 note
Omg first time posting on here. But Kaiser just posted about Rebel Wilson blocking people who disapprove and disagree with her!! HELLO pot meet kettle. We all know that she blocked black followers on celebitchy when they were getting on to her about not posting about the BET awards and now she has the audacity to get onto Rebel. I really can’t right now.
Nov 5, 2018 1 note
"Rebel Wilson blocked black critics on Twitter rather than apologize for a mistake" Kaiser is "Do what I say, Not what I do" personified.
Nov 5, 2018 1 note
Kate is pretty scandal free if that is really all they can say.... she doesn't bring the drama and the majority of Brits like her. Contrary to the opinions on CB, she is popular and fulfils her role quite well. The polls show it. In the CB universe, every Brit dislikes her, the RF members hate her, nobody respects her, they thinks she is incredibly lazy and doesn't work. Oh, and she purposely keeps her kids away from the wider Royal family. Reality vs fanfiction on CB is laughable.
Nov 4, 2018
All they can ever say about Duchess Kate is that she is boring, lazy, dresses matronly or dresses girly. Rinse and Repeat for 6+ plus years! Kate partying her 20's away is seen as scandalous hahah. oh, yes, their fave is her "inappropriate wardrobe choices for Duchessing" and also Kate spends the most amount of taxpayer money within the RF! Such a lie.
Nov 4, 2018

Ha! I liked that most posters disagreed with Kaiser’s assessment of the Gwyneth’s dress as “basic”. It is an elegant. classic dress,  well suited for the character of the wedding.

As I said earlier, Kaiser doesn’t really have fashion sense. She only pretends to be a fashion expert so that she can use it as a weapon in her “fight” against those she doesn’t like.

Nov 4, 2018 2 notes
Angelina Jolie fixation

I got banned twice because I don’t worship Angelina nor hate Duchess Kate. We all know how much Kaiser hates Kate for no reason, but I think her adoration of Angelia Jolie is way unhealthier. She is some kind of untouchable goddess there and Brad Pitt is more monster than Weinstein. Most commentors on all these Jolie-Pitt stories sound deranged: Maya!
Jolie posts are even more creepy than the royal posts.
Kaiser only cares for the unholy trio Jolie, Kate and Meghan.

Nov 4, 2018 1 note
Thank you to the anon who mentioned GoFugYourself. I just looked up their Royal posts and it was nice for the sites owners to tell people to simmer down! Their posters offer insightful posts. Nice commentary over there, I will have to check it out more often, they don't seem as angry/bitter as the CB lot!! Just regular balanced comments from each side. And the writer is much better than Kaiser hehe.
Nov 4, 2018
The entire Kate vs Meghan competition on CB is a huge circle jerk of posters claiming one is better than the other. If somebody compliments Meg, someone else has to chime in and tear down Kate in the next sentence. If one compliments Kate, someone else will butt in and tell you that Meg is far superior in every way - Kate is a useless human being and waste of space. Lol, they are unhinged. 1
Nov 4, 2018 1 note
Why can't people like both Duchesses without trying to put each one down in every breath? I realize liking both ladies isn't an option on CB because Kaiser leads the narrative.. K/W = bad, evil. M/H = good, genuine angels. She sets the tone, the posters continue on and there is no in-between to post different opinions. 2

Very true.

Nov 4, 2018 1 note
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December