Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

August 2018

Today’s post about Vincent Cassel is so lame. And right there you know that Kaiser has no convictions of her own. She doesn’t know what to say, how people will react, and so she hedges.

Let me tell you, Kaiser, how you should react when a powerful 51 y.o. man marries a woman 30 years his junior, whom he groomed since she was 18 y.o. You should be outraged, and the man should be “cancelled”.

And the same goes for the CB commenters, who also didn’t know how to react without Kaiser telling them, and chose to talk about how pretty the woman is , and how she looks older, and her dress, and anything else, other than the issue at hand.They were so pathetically avoided it, it was ridiculous.

Thankfully, towards the end some sane people showed up and put it to rights. I liked the post which reminded everyone about their reaction to Priyanka and Nick, and how everybody thinks 11 years difference is too much. But, here , apparently, 30 y.o. difference with a power imbalance is just OK.

Also, allow me to remind you about their reaction to Karlie’s engagement, and how people pointed out that she started dating her fiance when she was 18 y.o. and he was 26 y.o. People said it was gross, and I tend to agree. But, hey, that was easy, that was Karlie and Kushner, whom Kaiser doesn’t like, so it was easy for posters to know how to react. 

Aug 27, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
I'd like to see pictures of the women who bash Kate for her weight, hair, and her haggard appearance. Especially Nota! The amount of time that person spends hating on her makes me think she has no life.

For Nota it seems personal, as if she planned on marrying William herself.

Aug 25, 2018
I am the anon who said Duchess of Cambridge doesn't enjoy white privilege. I meant CB posters make up ridiculous things about her and say it's white privilege when it isn't. She doesn't get a pass from our Press when she doesnt "work". The media named her lazy/dolittle. They've called her out plenty. Where was her white privilege at play when they were harassing her on the streets? Or hacking her private calls, calling her family common social climbers, just to name a few.

What gets me is when people on CB bring up “Waity Katy”. It is so offensive. We don’t know what went on, but even if William did take advantage of her desire to marry him, then why is she shamed for it and not him? 

Aug 24, 2018 1 note
What Kate's Uncle did last year was all over our news! Sky, BBC, all of our papers. The story died down because the Middletons Stick Together. They didn't release a statement, they didn't release articles/photoshoots trying to sell their own side! Yes, certain media outlets are notoriously racist, but it did not start with Meghan. They have always been this way. It would help If thehorribleMarkles shut up and stop feeding stories because their crazy is making our tabs a lot of money thru clicks.
Aug 24, 2018
Example of Kate getting away with something? I'll happily change my opinion. She has been called out by media for everything: spending, work shyness, holidays, nude pics, being a doormat, fashion, gold digger, skirts flying up, etc even her toenails! Can you imagine Kate doing anything remotely like Will and Harry? The racist comments, Nazi dress, colonial parties. She would be crucified, but they are given passes, its all hushed up. That's my definition of white privilege in the BRF.
Aug 24, 2018 1 note
Wow, I was very surprised to see the stats you posted a couple of days ago! To me it seemed as if the number of comments on most posts there had been decreasing dramatically over the past few months.

I think there are less comments, and definitely less posters. But it is hard to tell whether there are less clicks.

Aug 24, 2018
Haha I just got banned (again) for saying it was weird Kaiser was so upset not to know how Meghan and Amal met considering we don't actually know celebrities and only see a tiny fraction of their lives.
Aug 23, 2018 2 notes
Is the 8/22 example of Kate Middletown's privilege really a good example of white privilege? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure there are plenty of examples of her receiving white privilege, I just don't think this is a good one. Neither Kate nor Meghan should be getting dragged for what someone else does, even if it's family. I would characterize it more as the British media being racist/sexist because I don't think those stories are newsworthy at all (unless either one of them is somehow complicit.)
Aug 23, 2018
Mia =I can only speak for me but I'd never ever bash another black women to make a point. Meghan is going through hell with the royal family, we know why Meghan is getting it harder through the press. It goes without saying. My point has always been the idolization that's fake and only at the expense of Kate Middleton for SOME posters. I feel like the people who don't down Kate every time they up Meghan are actual fans. In a perfect world neither woman should have to be judged for their families
Aug 23, 2018
I disagree, I think Kate Middleton definitely enjoys white privilege. Look how the media treats coverage of her family (her uncle was arrested for punching his wife unconscious in public while high on drugs literally less than a year ago and it got little media coverage) vs the way the media treats Meghan Markle's family problems (slavishly reporting on every word uttered by people she's not spoken to since childhood, and posting hinty racial slurs over photos of her).

Of course Kate benefits from white privilege. But it doesn’t mean it is OK to attack her individually for it. I don’t agree with this sort of collective punishment approach. Everyone should be judged on their own actions. 

And, of course, Meghan is judged harsher, just as I mentioned in the previous post. It is not only her race that is an issue for the British society, it is also her nationality and her class. And those things are very deep rooted, and people often are not even aware of them.

Ironically, the best way to make British society more equitable is to abolish roaylty. And yet, it is some of Meghan’s fans who’ve become very vocal defenders of the BRF, because they want the fairy tale to last.

Aug 22, 2018
I can tell you as a Brit, our media is incredibly racist, and racism is definitely at play with the Meghan Markle coverage. It disturbs me that some anons think just because CB bashes one woman and idolises another, that it's okay to bash the women they idolise and idolise the women they bash. Surely the lesson is not to arbitrarily bash/idolise women in the first place? Not 'solve' CB's problems by copying their behaviour but in reverse?

Sure, British society is racist, just like American, and on top of it, it is also obsessed with class and is very insular. In the US the other two things don’t matter nearly as much. Here money trumps both class and nationality.

So, Meghan has to deal with at least three things at once. She was familiar with racism, of course. But I don’t know if she was aware of the other two, and the degree to which they would affect her.  This is one of the reasons I ended up in the US and not in Western Europe. I worked there and I decided life was too short to deal with that kind of nonsense.I was never going to be good enough for some people, simply because I wasn’t born there.

As for comments, I judge people on their own merits, on their actions. It has nothing to do with who CB likes or dislikes. But I can’t speak for other people who comment here. And I am not going to ignore them, even if I disagree. Everyone can discuss their disagreements in the open. 

Aug 22, 2018
Stats

I’ve been promising to look at the stats. I use Alexa.com, which is a free tool. Last time I looked at the stats was a long time ago.  From what I am seeing since then Celebitchy.com rankings both in the US and globally are up about 2 thousand points, in comparison to other sites. Last time they were ranked in the 8th thousand and now they are in the 6th thousand in the US. 

So, what do I know . )))

The funny thing is their traffic pattern matches almost exactly with the Daily Mail. Maybe people are just reading more gossip.

Aug 22, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
Oh, one more thing, sorry hehe. I've noticed that the posters on CB demonize certain famous women (like the Duchess of Cambridge) and call the treatment of her white privilege which isn't even true.. but they never call out famous celebrity men for their obvious white privilege! It's excuse after excuse, coddling, and more excuses/passes when it comes to Prince Harry's past, or Ben Affleck, even Brad Pitt before the breakup! They pile on the women and protect the white men, always!

That is right, because despite their claims to the contrary, the reason they come to CB is not to better themselves (and who would come to a gossip site for that! ) but for distraction, at best, and at worst to spend their negative emotions there. In the past people used to come home and lash out at their family, and now people go to social media and do the same. It is a form of stress relief.

I was at CB originally for some light, snarky gossip. But outright bullying and over the top attitudes of some posters never sat well with me. So, I objected and got banned pretty quickly. Then I gave it another try, and that time was very careful to avoid certain hot button issue posts. but I got banned in a month again anyway.

Celebitchy has an identity crisis -  it cannot decide whether it wants to be a gossip site or a social justice site. And, frankly, Kaiser isn’t qualified to write for either one, anyway.

Now they seem to have abandoned all pretense and decided to become “influencers” for Kardashians. I imagine they weren’t making much money otherwise given that they have banned 90% of their active posters over the time, and got really aggressive with banning last 2 years. Their click count must’ve declined pretty badly.

Aug 22, 2018 6 notes
Last part! LAK seemed to be the Only POC poster allowed to express her opinions. I don't know where she's gone. Maybe Kaiser banned her for something petty! They have no idea really about what POC go through and face. If you try to call them out on their ignorance, they will try and shut you down. It's just a yuck site overall.
Aug 21, 2018 1 note
Part 3. It doesn't take a genius to figure out they need a place to vent about their sad lives. They need a place to live vicariously through, Meghan Markle, Angelina Jolie, etc and CB is the perfect place for their herd like, echo chamber mentality. Not all of the posters are like this, but after reading for a while, you can tell which posters are just resentful, hideously jealous, and full of spite against certain women.
Aug 21, 2018 1 note
Part 2. I find it amusing how they try to demean Amal Clooney and trash her successful law career! They have absolutely No idea how hard it is to become a Barrister in the UK, it's even harder if you're a POC. I am convinced the majority of posters on Celebitchy are do nothing women who feel the need to put other women down because their lives are so damn miserable. I mean, look at the way they hate on Kate Middleton for breathing!

And when your last name is Alamuddin, on top of it.

Aug 21, 2018 2 notes
Part 1. Women of Colour, pls stay away from Celebitchy. That site and its comment section is not for us, at all. Whenever a WOC tries to voice her opinion on certain issues, they all rally around and attack the poster. Celebitchy is predominantly a site for White Women to feel good about themselves whilst trashing accomplished women. It's a place where They can pat themselves on the back for being so "woke" and "hip" to POC issues. In reality, they are full of ignorance and xenophobia.

Their true feelings make themselves known whenever they talk about Priyanka and Amal.

Aug 21, 2018 1 note

I was just reading the post on Amal vs. Angelina and kept saying to myself - what? what? in what universe does this make any sense? But one thing does make sense now -  the irrational dislike of Amal on Celebitchy. She is Angelina’s competition in their eyes!

It was also funny how posters kept addressing their posts to Brad, as if he reads Celebitchy, lol.

Aug 21, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
On Madonna

Wow they really like to go the ageist route when it comes to Madonna. I heard old while lady, hag, has-been, comments about her puffy face. Dang, the woman is 60 and in the worst industry that scrutinizes a woman’s appearance. Kaiser really doesn’t get the pressure of being in the public eye as opposed to sitting at home writing blog posts in sweatpants dragging women who achieved 100x what she has for stupid crap like fashion and hair choices.
Madonna was there as a fan of Aretha Franklin, so told her story from an inspired fan’s perspective. She didn’t break into a rendition of RESPECT or anything. And if you were outraged, blame MTV who chose her to do it. But don’t make awful ageist comments about her appearance and act like Madonna never did anything worth a damn.
I’m amazed these women who support women, these woke feminists are so ageist.
Also they seem to wait for a way the narrative is going to go in the comments to chime in, because days ago they were calling Madonna an icon. Depending on the day and the outrage about cultural appropriation, Madonna is either a washed up old hag or a pop icon. Ridiculous.

—————————————————————————————————

My first reaction was -  why Madonna? I mean, really, they could not find a respect black musician to do it? I have absolutely nothing against Madonna, but it just didn’t make any sense, even on the surface. But it is not Madonna’s fault, you are right about that. This decision is on MTV.

I also noticed that when CB commenters don’t like someone, they attack the person’s looks, even though they know better than that. I remember reading something really nasty about Ivanka’s looks a few days ago.And I thought - , really, is that is what important? It is so petty. Plus, what about people who resemble Ivanka’s looks? Her look is not that uncommon in Eastern Europe. Are we going to call all those women “strange looking” too, just because they look like Ivanka?

And, triple yes to the groupthink observation. Kaiser herself is like that. Half of the time she doesn’t know what to think on issues and takes lead from people she thinks are “woke”. Either people on other sites or on CB. On top of it the merciless moderating out of people with any kind of independent opinions also naturally leads to groupthink.

Aug 21, 2018 2 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission

Ha-ha-ha. I just read the post where Meghan’s father said that the BRF as like a secret cult, and then the comments below. Quite surreal, I must say.

You know what, he is right. The BRF, as an institution, is old, secretive, has many skeletons in the closet, and I am sure, is guilty of covering up many crimes. As recently as Andrew’s involvement with Epstein.

You can feel whatever way you want about Meghan, and her extended family, but let’s not whitewash the BRF, just because you like Meghan. Remember, this is the same family that Diana couldn’t wait to get out of. This is an institution which should’ve been gone 200 years ago, at least.

It is telling that the posters go on and on about how awful he is, but don’t address the core of this claim, which is actually true. They can’t bring themselves to admit that they were seduced by the Cinderella story to the point where they are willing to overlook quite the real harm that the BRF inflicts on the society.

Aug 20, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
Notice how CBer's are patting themselves on the back for believing Asia Argento's victim and still being good feminists? I think they're aware of this site...

Ok, that one is a shocker. I do think, though, that a victim of abuse can also become an abuser, as abuse gets internalized. Though, I would say it seems to be usually the case with abuse sustained over a period of time, such as domestic abuse. I was a bit taken aback that a couple of CB posters were  very offended by this observation.

In fact, this is why abuse is so awful -  it not only damages the direct victim, but also people close to the victim and also can create a cycle of abuse and many victims down the line.

Aug 20, 2018
The hypocrisy is rife over at CB, I recall a post maybe two weeks ago when it came out that Meghan Markel’s half sister was going to be on a UK reality show. Kaiser said she was being forced (ha!) to write these posts and blamed the people who read the site for “forcing” her to keep writing about Meghan’s relatives. Since then there has been a post almost every day about one of these people. I am trying to stop reading CB, but it’s hard, as it used to be fun. Have started reading pajiba instead
Aug 18, 2018
My first clue to GTFO of there was once, a long time ago, in an article about one of the royals, Kaiser was discussing a recently published book (which I had read and found to be fair, FWIW). She admitted to not having read the book, then went on to trash it and the author. I commented — very politely — that she might want to read it before writing about it and my comment was immediately deleted. I mean, COME ON. That’s pretty basic!
Aug 18, 2018
Part 2) How can she write about that reality TV family with a straight face and then turn around and bash people who have never done anything close to the crap they have pulled. They aren't that much better than Trump and in fact have associated themselves with him. I thought she hated Trump. She is a huge phony with a disturbed mind. Reading the comments on this Tumblr sealed the deal for me. I don't want to contribute to or support a blog that mistreats people and is full of hypocrisy. Bye CB.

Exactly. One can’t go much lower than making excuses for Kardashians. But then they turn around and rip to shreds women like Kate Middleton, Taylor Swift and Amal Cloonie.

Taylor Swift actually had the strength to go through an ordeal of standing up to the guy who groped her! For that alone she should have a free pass with feminists. She made a stand for all the women out there. But Kim Kardashian, who makes money on objectification of women gets better treatment than Taylor.

Aug 15, 2018 1 note
I am now officially embarrassed that I was ever a long timer at CB. Part 1) The Angie and Brad posts have taken on a new level of toxic insanity. She claims to be concerned for the JP kids but then writes unsubstantiated vitriol smearing their father. He was cleared by the FBI but she knows more? I am no fan of his but they go too far. They went too far with Jen and now they do it with him. She lets the stans attack fair people who aren't fans of other party when they try to post or she deletes
Aug 15, 2018
I am so glad I found this site!! I haven’t been banned but have cut way back on how often I go on CB and am trying to get out of the habit completely. Kaiser is INSANE and it’s not fun anymore. (First time on Tumblr so not sure if I’m doing this right...) I’ve found my people here!

You are doing it right. ))) Welcome.

Aug 15, 2018
I got banned today! I think most of the people posting there now are intellectually and emotionally stunted and lack any kind of critical thinking. They are very much a herd mentality.

They are there because they like to be in an echo chamber. 

Aug 14, 2018 1 note
So cb was deleting comments about Drake being friends with a sex trafficker. Their feminism is just a false cash grab. I wonder how many other celebs pay them to white wash their image.

That is what I suspect too. Some of these posts are paid for. This is why CB doesn’t feel the need to keep their readers. It is not where the money is coming from.

Aug 14, 2018 1 note
Why did this website (in reality just Kaiser) add a clause to their comment policy saying that commenters who write nasty personal attacks and overly long comments will be modded and then banned, knowing full well that’s what Angelina stans do and never get any repercussions? Cleo2- who I think is the newest reincarnation of Almond Milk- is writing paragraphs long comments and attacking other commenters. Why even bother trying to cover their butts when the hypocrisy is on full display daily?

I don’t have an answer to that. I guess it is OK when it is “their side”, whatever it is, doing it, because they think they are more moral and woke. Which is, of course, the definition of hypocrisy.

Aug 13, 2018 4 notes
Leave it to Kaiser to have the hots for a misogynist cheater like Ethan Hawke. Oh the hypocrisy.
Aug 11, 2018 1 note
Is Maya Kaiser? Or does this Maya person refresh Celebitchy all day until there is an Angelina post and then she spends all day controlling every comment to either agree och spewing hate on anyone who disagrees?

I don’t know. I stay away from Angelina posts. They are too much . ))) Maya seems to be over the top, even for Kaiser. But who knows. 

Aug 10, 2018 5 notes
I found it really embarrassing and cringeworthy that on the QEII thread Kaiser complained no one was praising her [bad] joke and then a bunch of commentors rushed to comfort her. Just so embarrassing...
Aug 10, 2018 2 notes
Kaiser thinks being a director at an art gallery (the Gladstone Gallery in NY; a respected institution) is some kind of vague nebulous “sketchy” job title. Gives a good idea of Kaiser’s poor level of education and world experience, doesn’t it? My partner is a curator at the British Museum, better go tell her people online think she’s a drug dealer so she can stop angsting over the correct translations of Aramaic!

Lol. Kaiser is really not well educated at all. Didn’t she claim to have philosophy degree? But it is not just the education itself, she is just narrow minded.

Aug 10, 2018 1 note

So, I visited CB today and my first thought after scanning today’s posts was -  what a sewer! It is a perfect reflection of Kaiser now. It used to be somewhat sophisticated. But today -  it is a gazillion posts about Brad and Angelina divorce, something about Bieber, something about Real Housewives,  Lohan, Omarosa, Di Caprio’s new girlfriend, a mandatory Meghan post ( I guess the royalty is cool now, that Meghan joined them, and let’s forget centuries of oppression)  and so on. Yuck.

Aug 9, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
The only people who believe Angelina Jolie at this point are Kaiser and her stans at CB.
Aug 9, 2018 1 note
I used to like Celebitchy but it is obviously turned into an asylum for the seriously disturbed.
Aug 9, 2018 2 notes
Maya is something alright, she is the person that handlers warn celebrities about with her obsession.
Aug 9, 2018
I love watching the Angeloonies at Just Jared and Celebitchy grasp for a new narrative to make their patron saint look even more saintly.If you listen closely upon the wind, you can hear their brains melting as they try to think up new excuses. This is soooooo great!!
Aug 9, 2018 2 notes
Kaiser faking sympathy for Jen Aniston

“One insider told E! News that ‘Brad always fulfills his commitments’."  Jennifer Aniston’s eye just twitched.

So now we acknowledge the betrayal of Jennifer in that marriage?  What happened to - the marriage was already dead because Jen selfishly refused to give him the children he deserved? And if simply divorcing means you’ve failed to fulfill commitments, does that mean Angie has failed three times?

Kaiser doesn’t believe any of this, it’s simply another way to slam Pitt.  I don’t even care for Brad and I actually really like Angie, but it’s so over the top.

Aug 9, 2018
Kaiser seems to be pretty pissed off that there might be a possibility for Jennifer Aniston to be dating a younger black man. Her hatred for that woman is legendary.

She is more invested in Angelina’s life than Angelina herself, I swear. It is weird.

Aug 7, 2018 2 notes
I agree with the commenter below, I'm trying to look at how I talk online period and about this as well. I've came off a bit assholish. I don't like CB but...eh, I'm not about to stoop to their level.
Aug 7, 2018
Another gripe-Instead of looking at their declining numbers they play games. They unwrap responses so they are counted as comments. How pathetic is that? If I started losing friends I might take a moment to look in the mirror and change. At the rate their dropping they will be lucky to have any comments above 20 or 30 per article in a year. I won't be sad. I might even laugh at their stupidity. For years people have warned them and they don't listen. Thank G for you and others calling them out.

I haven’t looked at their web traffic in a while. I’ll try to do it this week. 

Aug 7, 2018
She did it again! Kaiser erased all comments that didn't praise Saint Angie or called out commenters for being batshit crazies. The entire thread is the same 5 unhinged stalkers. I have never seen anything as toxic as AJ/BP threads. They act like Brad turned into a serial killer. These same psychos loved and adored him before the divorce. He was perfect. It would be funny if they weren't so insane. Kaiser lets their comments stand! She has to be posting in those threads. She needs therapy. ASAP
Aug 7, 2018
(Continued) that comment would never been allowed in the single-opinion celebitchy echo chamber! :) personally though I don't think it's necessary that the accomplishments of one woman means a bad week for another. I always liked both JA and AJ (although I did prefer Angie, it's true). The lawyer thing though was definitely bad for sure.
Aug 6, 2018
(Continued) And why would AJ have a grudge against JA? Brad didn't leave AJ for JA. Then the comment about when was the last time Angelina made a movie ignores not only the fact that she's been filming the Maleficemt sequel, but more importantly that she's clearly transitioning out of acting in order to do much more of the humanitarian work that she finds rewarding. I understand the poster's desire to post her pro-Aniston, anti-Jolie thoughts here of course because
Aug 6, 2018
I have to disagree with the poster who said AJ's week was tragic in part because JA had a flattering magazine spread. I have to agree with you that the gossipmongers have annoyingly made too much of this rivalry. I've always wanted them to make an appearance together for charity just to shock everyone. I think they're both over it. Neither of them is even with Brad anymore, and in any case it with Angelina's choice to end things. Not to say it's not hard, but still...
Aug 6, 2018
Haha, I knew the Angelina stuff would piss off the Kaiser & the dictatorial CB'ers! BTW, people need to be careful what they wish for. Alex Jones' YouTube channel has been terminated. Say goodbye to free speech. Folks still think Trump is Joseph Goebbels, Hitler, etc.?
Aug 6, 2018 1 note
This has been a tragic week for Angelina Jolie. First, Jennifer Aniston gets that great spread in InStyle mag, is getting papped all over Italy looking fabulous, while making a movie, (when was the last time AJ made a movie?), then Jolie's lawyer dumps her like last weeks tuna sandwich. I can’t wait to hear how Kaiser spins this one. Jolie is exactly the horrible witch everyone, except those stans, thought she was.

Jolie is not the most stable of people. The divorce must be very difficult for her. Being her lawyer must be hell.

Imo, I don’t think she cares about Jennifer Aniston. And why should she, she should be living her own life as happily as she can. She has plenty of accomplishments to be proud of, and doesn’t need to compare herself to others.

It is really the stans, and not celebrities themselves, who create those fake wars between the two camps. That is because they see those celebrities as some sort of two-dimensional cartoon characters, archetypes, so to speak, and not real people.

Aug 6, 2018
Kaiser is one of the worst when it comes to interpreting gossip and stories, but passes herself off as some sort of expert. Instead, she’s some random person who compiles daily celebrity stories and writes crappy predictions like they’re fact.

Yep. She comes across as a fairly sheltered middle class woman, who has no idea what is going on or how the entertainment world operates. But hey, it is a job! Who sad you had to be qualified to run a gossip blog? It is not the Guardian, it is not even the Daily Mail! 

If Kaiser really wants to do this, she should take some journalism classes.

Aug 6, 2018
Is 'Maya' Jolie herself?

Lol, some people have said so. I doubt it , honestly. I am sure Angelina has better things to do.

Aug 6, 2018
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December