Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

February 2018

I was banned for not agreeing with Kaiser’s view on Sarah Jessica Parker. Serious ego trip? Hmm. I think Kaiser might be in the back pocket of Hollywood agents.
Feb 17, 2018
#ban #celebitchy
Since Kaiser had decided that Sarah Jessica Parker is the ultimate villain, the comment section on the SJP vs Kim Cattrall posts has become an echo chamber of people talking shit about SJP and anyone disagreeing is shut down/moderated out. Someone wrote a long thoughtful comment and was accused of being Andy Cohen. I think this whole 'fight' is just a childish scream for attention between two petty ladies. Cattrall is going through a tragedy though, so she just needs time to deal with that.
Feb 13, 2018
Chat Submission

I have been following CB for 12 years and commenting for the last 2-3. Kaiser moderates out comments that don’t fit her narrative even if nothing is improper or offensive. She wrote this post today that was really pinging on “blonde and blue eyed” women having all things easy in life. It was unfounded and borderline offensive. I made a comment saying that I didn’t understand the repeated emphasis on “blonde and blue eyed” and boom, I was out. And she is weirdly obsessed with hating Kate Middleton every single day. I don’t get it.

————————————–

I think I saw your comment and I agreed with you.

Feb 12, 2018 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy
I really do think Kaiser uses socks to agree with herself especially when it’s on an article about someone she’s still extremely bitter about for “stealing” her overrated and IMO kinda mediocre looking men. Erotomania at it’s finest with that one. My sister started posting “Hi Kaiser agreeing with yourself again. So transparent” on every single one of the influx of comments from new users on a post. She was BANNED worth it though. Hope the clueless jerk is aware people with brains are onto her.

LOL. Thanks for sharing. I had a good laugh.

Feb 12, 2018
1/2 I was banned from Celebitchy yesterday. They posted an article about an actor and said another actress in the attractive girl-next-door. I posted a comment that if that actress is attractive, Kaiser was under the influence of the same substance said actress loves so much to talk about. I had no idea they did that. I posted a comment in another article, with another user name and email and it was posted. The interesting is that other comments about the actress were worse and they are there.
Feb 10, 2018
2/2 I guess Kaiser likes to criticize and joke about actors but can't take small jokes on her? They lost a regular reader. Hypocrites.
Feb 10, 2018

Hi! Just was added to the banned group on Celebtichy and found your blog. I was reading your posts and came across one ask about Jenny Slate. She became a controversial point between Chris Evans’ fans. The timeline of their relationship changed many times and through checking SM posts and gossip, there is serious indication that Jenny cheated on her husband with Chris. After their relationship was announced, people checked her twitter and found tweets joking about gays, transgenders, overweight people, women and how they dress, suicide, mental issues. Those tweets were all deleted after she started to be called out for them, but there are screenshoots here on tumblr in a few blogs. In a stand up comedy in Boston, she made a joke about Shirley Temple and child abuse. She talked and wrote about shitting on her pants on purpose. As an adult. And her father, with who she wrote a book, said in an interview in NPR that Jenny tends to tell the facts not in the way they really happened (She lies). She said in the same interview that she was bullied and had no friends and her father said she was popular and a party girl. In the same book, she doesn’t keep the timeline of them end of her marriage. One page she says it ended 3 years before she separated, in another page she says 1 year. Because of all that, drama started between Chris Evans fans. They started to question the image he sells for the public and the fact he dated/ dates her. I understand if you don’t this because it is not the topic of your blog.

————————————

It is fine/ I have no opinion on this, since I don’t follow either of them. But you know what? But even if this is true, people don’t have to be perfect to be loved. Chris doesn’t have to be perfect and Jenny doesn’t have to be perfect. People  fall in love with flawed people all the time. If that wasn’t the case, the human race would go extinct -))

Feb 10, 2018
#ban #celebitchy #submission
I'm the anon who sent a submission about Jenny Slate. I forgot to add that she blocked many people who called her out on twitter, which is ok, but she blocked many people that didn't mention her name nor tagged her, but criticized Chris, which means she was keeping an eye on his hashtags. Some sock accts were created on twitter of people apologizing to her or people talking about seeing them together, but many of these accts are today inactive or were deleted. It's all really fishy.
Feb 10, 2018
Chat submission

So I must be a glutton for punishment, but I commented on their the past two days on my home computer (so different IP address) and hoo boy was it bad. Any comments on posts about the metoo movement, women’s issues and issues with children are a dumpster fire. 

Kaiser really shouldn’t talk about pregnancy, childbirth or raising children because she sounds ignorant. A commenter called Bridget went in on me on every article I commented on (specifically because I said no OBGYN would ever induce a woman before term just so she didn’t gain weight or to fudge her due date, I don’t care how corrupt they are

and also because I said that Quentin Tarantino and others defending Polanski or putting down victims and accusers didn’t get as much attention for those comments in pre social media days- but no apparently I’m super wrong). So that got me to thinking, what’s with their super old and outdated comment section. No Disqis? Is it because of Kaiser’s power trip or simply because is easier for the same person to leave multiple comments backing each other up? Also I truly think Kaiser is actually behind some of the regular commenters on there. As in, they aren’t real people, it’s Kasier with multiple personalities.

———————————————–

Quite a few people think that Kaiser posts under different names. I think it is likely.

Feb 6, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebichy
They are so ridiculous over there.

Just wanted to say thank you for creating this place for us in exile. I guess I’m still banned because my post about Kim Cattrall didn’t go through. I find it interesting that they are all Team Kim when she is pitted against Sarah Jessica Parker, but completely silent about how Kim worked with Roman Polanski in Ghost Writer. They call every other person out and expect other outlets to call actors out, but if you point this out, Banned. 


Also interestingly enough, they love Kim so much, but Kaiser said nothing, not even in Links about Kim’s brother being missing and then deceased just a couple days ago. Guess they only care about Kim when it’s her versus SJP. Kaiser has created a little cult over there, the regulars are just mini Kaiser’s. Its more toxic than fun if anything now.

—————————————————-

It is an echo chamber. It is very unhealthy to be inside it. People feel good when they are in agreement. But should they express a different opinion, they suddenly find themselves as targets from vicious attacks by the same people with whom they were having a nice chat just yesterday.

Feb 6, 2018
#ban #celebitchy #submission
Am I banned here too?

Why didn’t my post go through?

———————————————————–

You are fine -)). I just now logged on and saw it. I don’t have a ban list.

Feb 6, 2018
#ban #celebitchy #submission
How is CB doing, by viewership stats? I don't know how to look it up - is Alexa even a credible source?

Well, Alexa is an Amazon product, so it is credible enough, and the traffic stats are free. There are probably more sophisticated  services for money.

According to Alexa, traffic at CB has been at about the same level  since January 2017. That was when the Trump articles brought in a lot of traffic. it has been falling since then, but ever so slightly. The low was in April 2017 and then there was a pick up towards the elections.

Right now Celebitchy.com is ranked as # 23,715 site globally and #7,576 in the US. That is about the same position as when I started this blog a year ago. Bit it is much lower than in 2016, when they were almost twice as popular, they were number #14K globally, now #23K. I’ll try to post a screenshot tomorrow.

Feb 5, 2018
I am not a Kate fan by any means, but I could not *believe* the article yesterday about whether or not Kate donated hair to a charity that makes wigs for Cancer patients. First, I believe it was the charity who mentioned the donation, not Kate. Second, why would they lie about that? Piss off the BRF there goes any patronages or PR in the future. Then people nitpicking about how much hair she donated and couldn't possibly be 7 inches because? smh tearing a woman down for no reason, she's harmless
Feb 5, 2018
Haha, I was also recently blocked from celebitchy and I had to google to see if there were others. I have no idea why; I certainly didn't do anything to break the guidelines. I seriously posted one comment about how a certain outfit someone wore looked better in pictures on other sites, and another post correcting a factual error. Next thing I know I'm blocked from posting. And this was the same day they called Kim Kardashian "petty"....Oh well..

This must’ve been an outfit of a person you are supposed to hate -)). 

Oh, I know what it was, - Kate’s yellow Erdem dress! They have some irrational hate for Kate. I don’t know what is the root of it. Kate is harmless. But she can do no right in the eyes of the some CB posters. And Kaiser keeps the hate alive, because it means more clicks for CB.

This is not the only time she has done it too. She did the same with Sophie Hunter, and Alicia Vilkander. She nurtured the hate and then pretended she had nothing to do with it.

The other day the CB posters also went to town on Melania’s ankle pants. And I remember thinking - aren’t these all the rage in London? Sure enough, the next day Meghan wore ankle pants and they were all singing her praises.  So petty.

Feb 4, 2018

I thought this was supposed to be about celebrity bs–a place for some lighthearted fun and distraction–but reading the comments i feel like i’ve just huffed toxic waste or watched a puppy get ripped apart by hyenas. It’s honestly the most vicious, negative forum i’ve ever seen. If i had a time machine I’d nominate Celebitchy for a cameo in Ghostbusters 2 as the byproduct of that pink rage-sludge. Do these people watch undercover PETA videos to unwind or what? It’s quite a feat when a celebrity gossip site is more stressful to read than the actual news. 

—————————————

Lol, true that. They are so negative. Reading CB is like watching FOX News,  they are a mirror image. They think they are woke, but they use the same tactics.

Feb 1, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban #submission
Horrible site...

Celebitchy is a disgusting site. All it is is a group of white women circle jerking about how woke and feminist they are, the comments are heavily moderated yet every article is full of double standards,sexism and subtle racism.

The RBF posts are disgusting,sexist and the same 15 people just bully one person and jump on anyone who dares say something nice about the devil that is Kate Middleton. Someone said they thought Kate was taking a “fashion risk” and was quickly laughed at and told they were wrong.

How are you wrong about YOUR OPINION? Something that you subjectively think? Then the outright racism in the Beyonce posts. Every single one of them are in my opinion at one time or another, racist,hypocrital and bullies. No one on that site is woke. I’m starting to believe that Kaiser isn’t an WOC. What kind of WoC mods out people for opinions they don’t agree with, yet would allow the outright racism that was in the Bey post? Wouldn’t she be modding out all that? No. Instead she’s busy modding the Kate posts making sure no one says nothing TOO nice about her.she hates someone that has literally no effect on her more than racism.

Celebitchy is what happens when you have a bunch of white women who got woke in 2014 and a writer who is probably unattractive and unstylish herself but constantly thinks she has some authority on someone  else fashion. 

 They all think their opinions are more important then actual WOC,Moc, people of the lGBTQ+ community, so whenever we have someone come in and give thier experience, they are shut down by the white feminism and racism. Or Kaiser mods them out .

I’m not even the type to do the whole “white folks are the devil” but CB is full of fake feminist. All the way.

—————————————–

They need to give Kate a break. I just can’t believe it -  do they get a special kick out of dissing a pregnant woman’t fashion choices daily?  It is disturbing.

And even if Kate didn’t have any fashion sense, so what? Is is a crime? In the 21th century a woman should be judged by her character, not her clothes.

I think Helena Boham Carter has no fashion sense, so what? What does it matter? She is still adorable.

Feb 1, 2018 3 notes
#ban #celebitchy #submission

January 2018

The latest post about Will getting his hair cut to upstage Meghan and Harry is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on there.

The whole discussion was ridiculous. He cannot control whether he is bold or not, why is it even OK to be discussing it? People should’ve learned by now that it is not OK to discuss things that people cannot control such as looks, gender, race, ethnicity, one’s family etc.

But then Kaiser wouldn’t know what to write about half of the time.

Jan 22, 2018
Kaiser is the worst. On the post about Princess Charlotte learning Spanish she made some ignorant comments about langauges, the British royal family and their supposed 'tolerance' of certain languages. She implied that the family must surely see Spanish as ''less than'' French, which is ridiculous. It showed how little she knows of European attitudes. Spanish is highly valued here. I asked a critical question and wrote of my own bilingual upbringing but the comment wasn't approved of course.

Kaiser comes across as someone who haven’t really traveled or interacted with different cultures much. Her views are very American-centric. She doesn’t understand international perspective at all. She is not equipped to write for an international audience.

Jan 20, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

A few observations on the last weeks articles on CB:

1. People who keep talking about how awful Norman Reedus looks and how Joshua Jakson is so much better, just stop it. Happiness has nothing to do with looks. You can be with the most beautiful person  in the world and still be unhappy if that person is not right for you and vice versa.

2.Aziz Ansari discucssion -  whether it was an assault or not. It wasn’t an outright assault in my opinion, but that doesn’t make it somehow OK, or forgivable. He treated that young woman as a piece of meat. not a person. And he doesn’t even get it why it was wrong. Women shouldn’t have to accept that it is OK to treat them as piece of chattel. It is not OK to blame the woman for wanting and expecting more than just being a sex toy. Too many commenters sounded like it was the woman’s fault that she expected to be treated with more respect and consideration.

3. So, now that Meghan and Harry are proving to be Will&Kate #2, only without kids so far, I find it funny how their CB fans are coming up with excuses they never seems to think of in case of Wil&Kate - “ Harry is RICH! What else did people expect?”. I expected nothing different and this is why the monarchy needs to be abolished . What is the saying - none are so blind as those who refuse to see?  That applies to the CB posters most of the time, so many of them have blinders on.

Jan 16, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
How can I comment here?

You can comment by adding notes under the posts or you can send your comment to me and I will publish it.

Jan 16, 2018
Oh dear. Just had a comment deleted for very politely suggesting it might be time we stop looking at dysfunctional politics potentially affecting billions of lives as a source of entertainment. Actually that might have been enough to get me banned. I've been on thin ice before. :(

I agree with you there. It is not like people come to Celebitchy to have a serious political discussion. They come there because it became an echo chamber of Hillary’s supporters and her supporters get their validation there. I guess there aren’t many other places to get it .

Jan 16, 2018
Holy crap! I just discovered this through a google search but I was banned too for basically saying to stop pitting women against each other for the millionth time, if you are so-called feminist.
Jan 12, 2018
I can’t beljeve this is my first time finding your blog but WOW, I’m so glad I did. I’ve been a longtime CB reader (I rarely comment, when I do it’s pretty useless input) and have wondered where lots of the regular commenters have gone. Thank you for putting this together and allowing us to communicate in an open and honest environment!

Thank you for your kind words.

Jan 9, 2018 1 note

Today Kaiser decided to take an issue with Gal Gadot’s pink and red outfit. This is so petty, I just rolled my eyes.

Is Celebitchy a fashion blog now? That would be funny because Kaiser has no taste and no eye for fashion. Red and pink actually go well together and you’ll find this combination used by many designers.

One day Celebitchy is a progressive political blog ( see all Trump articles), or  a champion for feminist issues  (Harvey coverage), another day it is a trashy gossip blog ( various Swift, Kardashian and roayls articles) and other days it is just nasty pointless negative gossip that rips into people for superficial things like clothes and haircuts.

Does Kaiser even know who she wants to be when she grows up?

Jan 4, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
So Kaiser’s Meghan Markle love has worn off and she’s being as harsh on her as she has been Kate... her latest post has a subtle bit of misogyny, like Meghan will be crazy if she has her mother walk her down the aisle instead of her father. Kaiser is really backwards and hates when daughters and mothers are close.

I don’t think she ever truly loved Meghan, I think it was a convenient narrative for her to compare Meghan to Kate and use it to bash Kate. And , well, now she got to criticize Meghan as well, and that means more clicks for Celebitchy and more money.

I said from the beginning that Meghan was entering into this to have a comfortable, secure life. And it seems that way more and more.

As for walking down the aisle and the “giving away” of the bride, I  find this custom to be really questionable given its origins, sorry. We used to do that in my culture as well, but now the bride and the groom walk in together. I would love if Meghan and Harry did that. And that would end all the controversy right there.

Jan 3, 2018

December 2017

For a site which comments on everything about Kate Middleton, from her shoes to her knickers, facial expressions to her hand placement. They have pretty much ignored the hefty price tag of Meghan Markle's tacky engagement dress with the Hollywood Harry. Double standards. That site is absolutely scary just like Breitbart.

The mental gymnastics they use trying to explain away the price of the dress are pretty amusing.They keep claiming that it must’ve been gifted or sold at a discount, even though it has been stated over and over that the royal family cannot accept clothes for free or at a discount, they pay full price.

It is really simple. Meghan is out of touch, and is not a humanitarian hero they created in their minds.

Dec 22, 2017 2 notes

So, today Kaiser called Oscar Isaac’s partner his baby-mama. Some feminist she is … Someone needs to explain to her why this is a sexist term just like “knocked up”.

Dec 14, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
Did you read the Al Franken article? I found it funny how so many people thought his accusers were lying. What happened to their “believe every woman” stance? It’s because Franken is a Democrat. I feel like if it had been a Republican in that situation, they would never accuse the women of lying. I am a democrat who despises Trump and his ilk, by the way. I just find the hypocrisy amusing.

Absolutely, hypocrisy is the way at CB.

I was pretty impressed, though, that  democrats made Franken resign and didn’t fall victim to the political expediency, which is often the case. To be honest, I fully expected them to sweep it under the rug.

Dec 13, 2017 1 note

LAK and NIcole really went after each other on the Lupita’s article today. And it made me sad, because they are both right, they both have valid points, but that is the nature of Celebitchy -  people get too self-righteous, too absolute in their views and refuse to accept more nuanced views.

if you haven’t seen Lupita’s Vogue cover - take a look. It is absolutely gorgeous. I spent full 5 minutes just staring at it. It is so beautiful.

As for her point that colonialism causes an identity crisis, I don’t fully agree . I think colonialism impedes the development of the cultures that are colonized  and it tries to subsume them but I think colonized people are still very clear about who they are.

Dec 12, 2017
#celebitchy #ban

I have to say, I very much enjoyed reading all the regulars on Celebitchy trying to reconcile the irreconcilable. 

In their heads they created this image of Meghan Markle as a forward thinking progressive feminist, and now she is going to have to curtsy to Kate.

Apparently, Meghan can still remain a progressive feminist while doing so because it was her choice -  their words , not mine. 

I also felt quite a bit of disbelief  about just how much people know about the rules of the royal family. Some people take the monarchy way too seriously. The monarchy should be abolished, and its archaic , sexist rules should be abolished with it.

SoulSPA poster went into great lengths to talk about people who know how to curtsy properly, as if it is some kind of a great accomplishment and not a sexist anachronism. But I am repeating myself ….

Dec 12, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

I just want to point out one thing on the Meghan Markle comments. She will have to give up her American citizenship. She cannot marry into the British Royal family and keep it. This type of divided loyalties will never be allowed, even if allowed by law.

In fact I remember seeing an article talking about the exit taxes and such she would have to pay to give up her American citizenship.

So, if the things go south, she will not be able to go back to the US as an American citizen. For the same reason, she will not have protection of American laws in such matters as prenup agreements.

Dec 6, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy

On the article “ Lena Dunham casts herself as the only person with foresight on Harvey Weinstein “  there is a lot of criticism of Lena Dunham, which I have no problem with. 

But it is very noticeable how everyone studiously avoiding the subject of Hillary Clinton knowing the truth about Harry Weinstein, because I have no doubt she knew, but she didn’t care enough to forgo hie influence and his donations.

Or maybe people did point it out but their comments their deleted. That blog post is supposed to have 76 comments as per the front page, but only 36 are published.

Dec 6, 2017
#celebitchy #ban

What is Kaiser’s problem with men saying that they are objectified as well? It is not either/or. Women are objectified, men are objectified. Both men and women feel diminished and disrespected when it happens.They are people and want to be seen as persons, not bodies.

I am talking about this post

Matt Smith is #MeToo-ing: Men are objectified too, ‘it’s not exclusive’ to women

Kaiser says

“ I have an honest question: when men start #MeToo-ing in this particular way, does it ever feel like they’re derailing the conversation? Does it ever feel like someone saying “all lives matter” to Black Lives Matter? We know men and boys are victimized, and they have every right to tell their stories and be believed, the same as women. But… the patriarchy is real, you know? “

As I said, it is not either/ or. Patriarchy doesn’t make it OK to silence men. Just support both men and women. Simple. 

It is like Kaiser doesn’t know what to do when things are not black and white. 

Kaiser mercilessly mocked Kit Harrington when he talked about it. And that has been a sore point with me since then because Harrington was absolutely right. He was being an ally and he was trying to relate to women’s experiences and for that he was mocked. Matt got a slightly better treatment because Kaiser seems to like him more.

Dec 6, 2017 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
Did you see the comments on the Apu (Simpsons) thread? That was a dumpster fire of racism. I was surprised that Kaiser didn't handle that story, but it might have hit close to home for her. I can respect that, actually. Also, I've noticed after a lot of us have been banned or had comments deleted for being critical of popoholic, the site has quietly stopped linking to them. So that's a good thing!

I am glad to hear that at least something good came out of it. I checked the popoholic site once because somebody asked me about it, and I never went back.

I remember a similar thing with the “knocked up” expression Kaiser used to love. I took an exception to it because I think this expression is disrespectful of women. It sounds like getting pregnant is not something a woman chooses to do, but she just gets pregnant because she doesn’t know where babies come from.

I was put into moderation for saying it. But I kept saying it. Finally, a few months later one of the regulars made the same point and finally it got through to Kaiser and she stopped saying “knocked up”.

Dec 6, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
The Time POTY post comments are, as expected, a total disaster. People twisting themselves in a knot trying to be simultaneously woke and feminist, while also saying how Taylor Swift isn't a real victim (or at least not deserving of recognition) because she just sued that DJ for her own reasons or something equally insane.

I just read it … As much as I could take that is. By the time I got to Taylor’s “problematic feminism” I was DONE.

I simply don’t believe it is her feminism they have an issue with, I think they don’t like her and that is that. She cannot do anything right in their eyes.

Dec 6, 2017 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Are people getting banned? I think I got banned hallway through the morning for defending Taylor Swift. Not even defending her but just commenting that we should celebrate the Times cover and not use it to trash particular women we don't like. The rest of my posts after that did not appear despite being along the party line.

Yes, you probably were banned. Saying anything positive about Taylor Swift would definitely put you on the side opposite to Kaiser. So you would be banned for any perceived infraction.

Dec 6, 2017
MM anon, I just discovered I'm not banned and that they're moderating the MM comments
Dec 4, 2017

My friend who reads CB & Loved it, just told me that an few months back she got banned on an RBF post.
She was first put in moderation for the first time after agreeing with someone standing up for Kate, then she was put on moderation again and her comment was deleted in an JenAnniston post.
Finally, she was banned outright. She said she wrote CB an email 2 days in a row and got no response. Then the next RBF post she said that Kaiser made references to her email in the actual article.Mocking her.

No surpise that my friend was an black regular on CB. They seem to have no issue just disgarding us.

————————————————————————————————

Oh, that is the worst when Kaiser uses insider information to mock people over very real issues they bring up. This is hitting below the belt. When people send private messages they expect their privacy to be respected.

I remember her doing it last year during Taylor Swift vs. Kanye West drama. She made references to some people sending emails and dismissed anyone who was defending Swift as her fangirls, while she was making excuses for Kanye. But the thing people took issue with was Kanye’s misogyny. and it had nothing to do with being a fan of Taylor.

Dec 4, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
So I just posted that I was getting burnt out on MM stories and guess what it was taken down. As this is my first offence, i.e. being deleted, I don't think I've been banned. But kaiser herself on an earlier story said she worried about people burning out on her. As for MM if I were her I would worry about people burning out on stories about me.
Dec 4, 2017

300 comments discussing Meghan Markle’s coat -  too long, too short, not tailored enough or whatever. Who cares? Even for a gossip site this is too much. Is that all there is to Meghan? Her coat and her hair? She is going to be just another person to take apart -  her clothes, her hair, her looks. 

How does this compute in people’s heads? First, they are excited about a bi-racial American entering the Royal family and then they basically reduce her to a cloth hanger. She is starting to get the same treatment as Kate. I think it is not Kate who is the issue here,or Meghan or any other woman with whom CB posters take an issue, it is the posters. They are unable to see a person as a person. Everyone is dehumanized and dissected.

Personally, I think it is such a dull, fake life - forever smiling, shaking hands, being judged, being an ornament or a token at endless ribbon-cutting ceremonies. I would never want that life for myself. I’d run away screaming after 15 min of that. And I feel a bit sorry for both Kate and Meghan.

Dec 2, 2017
#ban #celebitchy

November 2017

QQ commented on the Jay Z post and it was up for an few hours before it was deleted.

Nov 30, 2017
Nov 30, 2017

I have a couple things on my mind today in light of the Lauer’s debacle.

First, his co-hosts were crying about it and then I saw an article in the Guardian about how we have to reconcile horrible actions by a well loved man. And I thought -  give me a f*ing break! I don’t need to reconcile anything. The guy is a dirtbag and that is that. The fact that he worked for an organization you approve of doesn’t make him more palatable. In fact, the said organization (NBC) clearly enabled him, because there were enough warning signs.

In connection to this I came across the Lauer’s interview with Anne Hathway from 2012 where he pestered her about inappropriate photos of her taken by paps and he was clearly set to humiliate and diminish her. How was that ever considered to be an acceptable behavior by an interviewer? 

Anne handled it like a professional that she is, and kudos to Anne. Yes, kudos to Anne,  who Kaiser also tried to diminish so many times. And you know what, Anne comes out of this looking like a queen. And all her critics look petty and immature.

Nov 29, 2017
#celebitchy #ban
GossipBucket

If anyone is interested in gossiping about the site or just gossip in general about the topics on CB, without it getting modded out, I think it’d be really cool if all the ex readers could come to GossipBucket and comment under the stories where they can’t be deleted or modded out.

here’s an link for an example, http://gossipbucket.com/celebitchy/1247644/duchess-kate-stepped-out-for-a-keen-visit-to-a-london-school-this-morning/

Nov 29, 2017
#ban #celebitchy #submission
follow up on Malia post: two comments criticizing the coverage were deleted! I was wondering how they got through in the first place.
Nov 28, 2017
The post about Malia Obama today was insane. The title was “Malia Obama smokes and has a douchebag boyfriend, and it’s none of our business” while the post proceeds to detail the photos and pictures people are leaking of her. Including TMZ videos. Wtf?! If it’s nobody’s obusiness, don’t cover her!

I didn’t read that post exactly for this reason - none of my business.

Nov 28, 2017
The worse commenters on celebitchy seem to be not a sugar and princesss k who tryed to justify harrys racist comments in the past a just wanting to fit in with friends

Notasugar is Kate’s hater and by some bizzare logic she now likes Harry because he is with Meghan Markle and Meghan is not Kate.

Nov 28, 2017
I made what I thought was an innocuous comment about what happened with certain posters (someone suggested they had been pushed out) and my comment was deleted. Not banned as yet, but as I'm reading your site, I see there's a systemic problem.
Nov 28, 2017
Joining your club

So I’ve been banned from Celebitchy several times over the years, sometimes I know why. This time I’m pissed at the hypocrisy. On a post the other day about the Marvel covers for Vanity fair, by Kaiser. She goes off on how Marvel has disregarded black women and are sexist for not giving Black Widow her own movie. Then at the end she figuratively throws the whole MCU at bottom dwelling basement livers by saying ‘the fanboys will be happy with the covers’. 

So I agree with a poster who is an adult woman and likes those movies that I don’t understand why fans of a huge franchise get reduced to fanboys when you know we are not, moreover how can you care if black women are disregarded and if Black widow gets her own movie if it’s a sexist vehicle for more racism and sexism? Banned. Open discussion is all I would like, I don’t mind being on the wrong side but let each side have their piece. Thanks for the space to rant, just found you:)

———————————————————————

Marvel just spent gazillion dollars to make The Black Panther, which was a huge risk. And Scott Derrickson was one of the first Hollywood people who came out against Harvey Weinstein.  In the world of the Hollywood Marvel is not a problem, they are at least trying. But Marvel is a huge business and they have to make sure their projects are profitable. If The Black Panther does well then they will invest more money into movies with POC leads. So go out and spend the dough. It is all in your hands. -))

Nov 28, 2017
#celebitchy #ban #submission
Kaiser is really a pill. I think I just became a super fan of both Jenny Slate and Chris Evans and am now rooting for them to be together and maybe get married when before I was just indifferent towards them and their relationship just because of her biases against them. Who went and made her Cupid? Lady find your own man and maybe then you won’t be such a Bitter (Hateful) Betty. Tried to say I really don’t mind them together, if they’re happy good for them. Now on moderation. Maybe banned too.

Jenny is a bit extra, but she is very likeable. If the girl is in love, why not wish her the best? Why make fun of her? I don’t get it.

I am rooting for her -)).

Nov 13, 2017
#ban #celebitchy
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December