Today Kate in her inoffensive blue dress warranted 100+ posts, and some are sure she must’ve had a boob job. She couldn’t be possibly breastfeeding. So, on one hand the posters are “feminists” who think women should be in control of their bodies, on the other hand they make accusations and insinuations about plastic surgery? Why is plastic surgery bad if you think women should have freedom of choice?
On the Taylor’s post the discussion is again about the color of her eyes and whether it is natural, and possible plastic surgery, not her recent political activism. And I kept thinking - who cares if it is contacts that make her eyes so blue? Do you really begrudge somebody looking well because you don’t like that person? How bitter do you have to be?
But would Charles really put it with someone who hates his daughter-in-law so much? Charles might be a prat, but I don’t see him as being that devious.
Lol, I saw it too.
I think they take the cake from the Twilight fans, who are generally considered the most out there. I think Nota has been at this for longer than Twilighters. It is sad when people dedicate their lives to hating somebody, what a waste. Though, you typically see this with fans hating wives of their crashes.
That is one way to look at it. But another way to look at it is - why should I celebrate someone who got to the position of authority through marriage? This is not an empowering story for women. As I said earlier, I am fine with Meghan, she is perfectly nice, but to me she is not a role model. I meet role models every day - they are working women who make their own destinies with their own hands.
I’ve had a brush with aristocracy, and it colors my opinion of all of them, including Meghan, and the rest of royals. Just to think that no matter how accomplished I may be (or my children) , what I achieve, they will never consider us “good enough” for them. It burns. And , trust me, they might not show it, but many of them deep down think that way, they can’t help it.
Just like we don’t choose the color of our skin, we don’t choose the family of our birth, so why should be some considered above us just because they were born into the right family? No, royalty is nothing to celebrate. Having royalty in this day and age is offensive. And circling back to Celebitchy - how is a site, which claims to be progressive and feminist, doesn’t see the contradiction?
I just said pretty much the same, I know where you are coming from. My family was in Europe in the WW2, I know that a lot of things went on, even on the allies side which are “not good”, and then they were airbrushed from history. But Holocaust specifically is a very raw subject, let’s tread gently there.
And I want to apologize to anyone of Jewish decent, there was no intent to upset anyone or question the suffering and prosecution that happened during the WW2 and before.
That is the thing, though, isn’t it. If you just block people like Celebitchy does, do they start thinking differently? No, they just go somewhere else, and just get more entrenched in those views. While people sit comfortably in their echo chamber feeling good about being “on the right side of the debate”, those other opinions that got blocked, they don’t go away. it is much healthier to have everything in the open.
You can’t ascribe intent to people, unless they declare it.
And I don’t want to get carried away with branding people neo-nazi and shutting them down. This is what goes on Celebitchy every day - everything is completely blown out of proportion. And then people accused of something are blocked and can’t even defend themselves.
Though, you are right, I don’t know how I ended up in a discussion where I have to take sides on George Soros. ))) This is way over my head, He is a very divisive figure.
Well, I guess here you see what doesn’t make through moderation on Celebitchy. And you might realize that you actually like that they moderate with a heavy hand on some topics. )))
Though, there is no way of telling why some people don’t like Meghan. Are they really racist, or they truly don’t like her as a person? As long as they stick to the facts, I think it is a fair game.
For example, one thing I agree with her critics is - why does she not wear British brands? I think it is disrespectful, and she is unnecessarily pokes the Brits into the proverbial eye, so to speak, and it is completely unnecessary. She wears a lot of socially conscious brands, so it is pretty clear she does put thought into it. But she seems completely oblivious to the fact that if she wants Brits to adopt her as “their princess”, she needs to adopt them as well, and their ways. Sure, Americans adore her, she is an American princess, but Brits seem to see her as a foreigner and that is going to hurt her later.
I can’t understand what Celebitchy is getting at when they post these “Jen and Ben were seen together” posts. So what? Why don’t they come out and say what is wrong with it? What is with all the pussyfooting around it?
Do they not like Jennifer Gardner? Do they not like that she is supporting her ex for the sake of her kids? What is it?
And how typical is this of Celebitchy, - the guy screws up, the woman gets all the grief and innuendo from other women.
I honestly don’t know. It seems it has gotten worse once Meghan came on the scene. I’ve seen some loonie fans and haters from some fandoms, who behave like Kaiser, and they can go on for years with their wild theories and hatred. It is irrational. They don’t want to give up their delusions.
I don’t know what kind of news you read, but no, a globalist is not the same as a Jew, unless you are talking about some far right sites, such as Breitbart, which I never visited in my life. So, I am just guessing.
A globalist is someone who supports globalization. There are arguments for globalization and against. Being against globalization is not the same as being against Jews as an ethnicity. People who oppose globalization tend to be against immigration and outsourcing, I have never heard an argument that Jews are responsible for globalization, this is completely bonkers,
It is you, not I, who gives credence to such outlandish theories. And I am not going to avoid the subject just because some far right people make crazy claims. Forcing people to be silent about them is what gives more power to the far right, denouncing their claims is what every sane person should do.
I have nothing against George Soros whatsoever. Well, other than the fact that he is a crazy rich hedge fund manger, who skims the wealth off the productive people. But that another topic. I have the same issue with the most of the financial industry.
P.S. I see the part you have a problem with, the one about George Soros. I also have a hard time believing that claim, so I will remove it. If it is factual, the original poster can send me a link.
I didn’t post any antisemitic propaganda. If you think I did, then you need to clarify your statement.
Really? Some people need to get out more.
The cost of that tour is going to be outrageous. And what does Australia get out of it?
They do like to throw the word micro-aggression around, whether it makes sense or not,
Meghan seems nice enough, but the obsession with her at CB is ridiculous. A regular nurse or a doctor who works 12 hours days do more good for the humanity than any of the royals. Or teachers, who do such important work and are so underpaid. People need to keep remembering that. We get upset about our superficial celebrity culture, but often we are, ourselves, to blame for this. We don’t celebrate regular hardworking people enough.
Sometimes Kaiser makes mistakes and misinterpretations on purpose to rile people up - more clicks that way.
You are right. They are just pathetic.
I didn’t see that post but would I feel frightened? Not really. A dirty tampon will not cause any kind of bodily damage, though “technically” it would be considered an assault, and could lead to legal actions taken, so I would advise against it. In the past people used to throw rotten tomatoes and eggs at politicians. And I completely understand why.
Now, slashing tires is a different matter entirely. And I would not support this in any shape or form.
The whole discussion about Kate (or any other woman for that matter) looking older is nonsense. On one hand, they judge women for having plastic surgery to look younger or prettier, on the other hand they judge women for looking older. They can’t help themselves, they are hypocrites.
Hate might be too strong of a word for this situation, but I am with you - Kaiser ran that website into the ground.
I don’t really read much about Meghan anymore, I am on Meghan overload. I don’t dislike her, but I feel I already know everything there is to know about her.
Anyway, i haven’t seen comparisons to Diana yet. Diana had unique charisma, people either have it or not. Neither Kate nor Meghan have it , and I wish people would stop comparing them and setting them up for a fail.
On the other hand, Eugenie’s wedding was lovely. I never cared about the York girls because I can’t stand their father, but now I came to see them as persons apart from their family, and they are quite likeable. After all, they didn’t choose their parents.
That post was just plain nasty and unkind. Though, luckily, most posters didn’t agree with Kaiser. She knows she stepped over the line when even her regulars don’t agree with her.