Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

October 2018

Today Kate in her inoffensive blue dress warranted 100+ posts, and some are sure she must’ve had a boob job. She couldn’t be possibly breastfeeding. So, on one hand the posters are  “feminists” who think women should be in control of their bodies, on the other hand they make accusations and insinuations about plastic surgery? Why is plastic surgery bad if you think women should have freedom of choice?

On the Taylor’s post the discussion is again about the color of her eyes and whether it is natural, and possible plastic surgery, not her recent political activism. And I kept thinking -  who cares if it is contacts that make her eyes so blue? Do you really begrudge somebody looking well  because you don’t like that person? How bitter do you have to be?

Oct 31, 2018 7 notes
Believe me, there are plenty of Black, Biracial, and Asian etc women out here and we don't share similar views on the Duchess of Sussex. I know women who adore her, and I also know women who think she might not be as genuine as she portrays. Shrugs. But calling women extremely racist when they criticise Meghan for her outrageous spending, her love of non British labels, the fit of her clothes, inappropriate clothes for official engagements, or whatever else, is dangerous territory.
Oct 31, 2018 13 notes
2. We do pay for the Royals, so we should be allowed to share our thoughts. As long as the criticism is fair, there's nothing wrong with discussing DoS and pointing out things which could have been better. There are always going to be die hard DoS stans who can't take the slightest critique, but this comes with being Royal -they have all been called out. Celebitchy posters turn every comment into "they're nitpicking/complaining because they don't like the colour of her skin", which is wrong imo.
Oct 31, 2018 2 notes
It’s funny, I just came here to comment about NotASugarHere and the top post was about her! I ventured back onto CB briefly and while LAK seems to be gone (?), Nota is Nota-ing in full force. I’ve actually considered that she works for Charles’s office and suspect I know who she is on Twitter as well. She is far too militant in her comments to simply be a royal-watcher and she clearly has an agenda and A LOT of time to dedicate to this. Her posts are always praising Charles & Camilla. Thoughts?

But would Charles really put it with someone who hates his daughter-in-law so much? Charles might be a prat, but I don’t see him as being that devious.

Oct 31, 2018 1 note
One more quick observation about NOTA — she states her opinions, even about minor things, as fact. For example, she just said today that when Charles becomes King, he will “remain” at Clarence House and split his time between there and Windsor. How is this possibly something that an outside observer could claim to know? She is either employed somehow by Clarence House or she’s seriously disturbed (or both!).
Oct 31, 2018
It's really sad that NOTA talks all that shit about Kate, yet it seems she spends hours of her day hating her. I don't like to generalize, but from what I've seen, she seems to search the web for royal posts just to talk about Kate all day. That's a obsession. How does she find the time? At least Kaiser gets something out of hating Kate. Nota gets nothing. It's sad really. I hope people from CB see that they are enabling someone with a sick obsession. (At least I think)
Oct 31, 2018 1 note
NIC919: "Yep. Perhaps if she read the letters to children or something this may have more value as an engagement. This seems tacked on and pretty empty." Yep, this is me shaming...
Oct 31, 2018 1 note
BECKS1: "I agree that the nature of this event feels weird. I am hoping there is more involved than reading letters about her great-grandmother’s brothers. (I think that’s a nice thing to do in light of the 100 year anniversary of the end of World War I…but it def feels like a 'padding the numbers' event.)" Alas, what can be said. Someone should raise her awareness, just as persons' awareness re WWI was raised today... ;)
Oct 31, 2018
APRIL MAY: "I don’t see why she needed to have a public event to go see these letters. Reads more as a private event to me. Just feels like a way to boost her numbers." No words...
Oct 31, 2018
SLIGHTLYANONNY: "I’m neutral on Kate and this may be more on the PR office than her, but to position this as her just going to read the letters about her family is a little self-centered. Literally all they had to add was 'and others' and it would be fine. This just reads like she dressed up for a personal trip to a museum and got some photos taken." She's NEUTRAL people, okkkaaayyrrrlll?

Lol, I saw it too.

Oct 31, 2018 1 note
Btw, I'm pretty sure notasugarhere is posting on LipstickAlley in the Royal related threads. I won't name her handle on there, but she reposts the same hateful talking points over and over again. I think she copies and pastes from CB lmao. Nota and Nic919 (I think that's right) are on countless different royal blogs/forums spreading their Kate hate, and they have been doing this for yearssss. Can you say jealous, bitter, unhinged? They act like Kate murdered their animals or stole their BF!

I think they take the cake from the Twilight fans, who are generally considered the most out there. I think Nota has been at this for longer than Twilighters. It is sad when people dedicate their lives to hating somebody, what a waste. Though, you typically see this with fans hating wives of their crashes. 

Oct 30, 2018
f"or some time I've been worried that your blog was being co-opted by the Meghan Markle haters, many of whom are extremely racist" I completely disagree with this Ask. This is what CB does all day, every day - accusing others of being racist when they they try to voice their opinion. Not once have i seen anything racist against MM on this blog. This is not CB, every person does not have to like/love MM! Her success right now is through Harry. I don't see her as a role model either.
Oct 30, 2018 1 note
#ban #celebitchy
And this was neither to deny that racism exists and is prevalent nor was it to earase her experiences and struggles. This was to celebrate her as a woman. This was also to remind us that in her current position she affects the lives of others: our notions of femininity and measures of success.

That is one way to look at it. But another way to look at it  is -  why should I celebrate someone who got to the position of authority through marriage? This is not an empowering story for women. As I said earlier, I am fine with Meghan, she is perfectly nice, but to me she is not a role model. I meet role models every day -  they are working women who make their own destinies with their own hands.

I’ve had a brush with aristocracy, and it colors my opinion of all of them, including Meghan, and the rest of royals. Just to think that no matter how accomplished I may be (or my children) , what I achieve, they will never consider us  “good enough” for them. It burns. And , trust me, they might not show it, but many of them deep down think that way, they can’t help it.

Just like we don’t choose the color of our skin, we don’t choose the family of our birth, so why should be some considered above us just because they were born into the right family? No, royalty is nothing to celebrate. Having royalty in this day and age is offensive. And circling back to Celebitchy - how is a site, which claims to be progressive and feminist, doesn’t see the contradiction?

Oct 29, 2018 1 note
Those Nazis scientists should have been tried and executed - not brought into our space programs, etc. F*ck Nazis and the Aryan Nation/whatever they call themselves. (Part 2 of 2)
Oct 29, 2018
I also see someone undoubtedly referring to my asks as "Neo-Nazi"; this was the same crap I saw at Celebitchy. One can't express different ideas without being labelled "Nazi", "Misogynist", "White Supremacist", etc. It's ridiculous to call me that when I have criticised our government for Operation Paperclip -(part 1 of 2)

I just said pretty much the same, I know where you are coming from. My family was in Europe in the WW2, I know that a lot of things went on, even on the allies side which are “not good”, and then they were airbrushed from history. But Holocaust specifically is a very raw subject, let’s tread gently there. 

And I want to apologize to anyone of Jewish decent, there was no intent to upset anyone or question the suffering and prosecution that happened during the WW2 and before.

Oct 29, 2018
Omg, as a fellow Jew (Re whether or not Im a PoC: I'm not American so I cannot apply American categories to myself), I get your comment re Soros. But the "dont critique MM" point is non related. She is a strong, independent woman in a position of power. She is a civil servant. She can take being critiqued. I am sure she can. Let's acknowledge her as an agent. Let's not "orientalize" (for lack of a better term) her. As I see it, in a "safe space," everyone should be acknowledged as an agent.
Oct 29, 2018 1 note
Notasugarhere is truly vile. I notice that she has stopped posting on Meghan's posts as she turned out to be just like every other royal and not the game changer they were expecting her to be. But you can always find her staling Kate's posts complaining and whining and writing essays to people with different opinions than hers.
Oct 29, 2018 1 note
And I definitely don't think you're racist or misogynistic. I just hope you can consider how posting Asks from anons with a racist/Neo Nazi agenda affects how your blog is viewed and how your supporters feel. Ps I'm not the anon who sent the 'globalism is antisemitism' Ask. 3/3

That is the thing, though, isn’t it. If you just block people like Celebitchy does, do they start thinking differently? No, they just go somewhere else, and just get more entrenched in those views. While people sit comfortably in their echo chamber feeling good about being “on the right side of the debate”, those other opinions that got blocked, they don’t go away. it is much healthier to have everything in the open.

You can’t ascribe intent to people, unless they declare it. 

And I don’t want to get carried away with branding people neo-nazi and shutting them down. This is what goes on Celebitchy every day -  everything is completely blown out of proportion. And then people accused of something are blocked and can’t even defend themselves.

Though, you are right, I don’t know how I ended up in a discussion where I have to take sides on George Soros. ))) This is way over my head, He is a very divisive figure.

Oct 29, 2018
but the fact at least one Neo-Nazi considers your blog a good place to spread antisemitic lies is worrying. Because none of that stuff has anything to do with the point of your blog, which is exposing Kaiser's hypocrisy and slagging off CB and its lame duck posters. Like I said this is NOTHING against you personally. But as a Jew and woman of colour some of your Asks are making me feel increasingly uncomfortable and unsafe here. I'm not trying to tell you what to do, because it's your blog. 2/3
Oct 29, 2018
Hi. I've been a huge supporter and fan of your blog for ages, and I absolutely despise Kaiser. And I don't have any issue with you personally. But for some time I've been worried that your blog was being co-opted by the Meghan Markle haters, many of whom are extremely racist, and that giving them a platform was dangerous ground. Hating CB shouldn't mean hating women CB worships, surely? I'm glad you've removed the Soros post (which was 100% well-known Neo-Nazi propaganda) 1/3

Well, I guess here you see what doesn’t make through moderation on Celebitchy. And you might realize that you actually like that they moderate with a heavy hand on some topics. )))

Though, there is no way of telling why some people don’t like Meghan. Are they really racist, or  they truly don’t like her as a person? As long as they stick to the facts, I think it is a fair game.

For example, one thing I agree with her critics is -  why does she not wear British brands? I think it is disrespectful, and she is unnecessarily pokes the Brits into the proverbial eye, so to speak, and it is completely unnecessary. She wears a lot of socially conscious brands, so it is pretty clear she does put thought into it. But she seems completely oblivious to the fact that if she wants Brits to adopt her as “their princess”, she needs to adopt them as well, and their ways. Sure, Americans adore her, she is an American princess, but Brits seem to see her as a foreigner and that is going to hurt her later.

Oct 29, 2018
#ban #celebitchy

I can’t understand what Celebitchy is getting at when they post these  “Jen and Ben were seen together” posts. So what? Why don’t they come out and say what is wrong with it? What is with all the pussyfooting around it?

Do they not like Jennifer Gardner? Do they not like that she is supporting her ex for the sake of her kids? What is it? 

And how typical is this of Celebitchy, -  the guy screws up, the woman gets all the grief and innuendo from other women.

Oct 29, 2018 1 note
#celebitchy #ban
And I bet it was one of the known Kate Haters who compared her to Trump LOL. They need to get a life.... They have a deep seated hatred for the Duchess of Cambridge and her family, the Middleton's. It's real for these people, not just harmless gossip, which makes it creepier. They take it way too far when they're mostly Americans and Canadians.
Oct 29, 2018
If Cb'rs can't call you a racist, they resort to calling you envious of Meghan, they say you're anti feminist, or some other pile of pooh. I saw this very conversation in the recent threads. Women had to state they were WoC before saying why they don't like the over the top fawning of Meghan. Crazy.
Oct 29, 2018 3 notes
I read CB article and posts this morning re: article in VF about Kate. I had to stop reading. I can’t believe how much Kaiser dislikes Kate and the posters just echo what she says. It’s quite scary. Meg can do no wrong even though she has spent thousands of $ on a wardrobe and constantly clings to Harry all the time. This is romantic but if Kate were to do any of this things, she’d be crucified. What is Kaiser’s problem with Kate? Any ideas b/c it’s legit crazy.

I honestly don’t know. It seems it has gotten worse once Meghan came on the scene. I’ve seen some loonie fans and haters from some fandoms, who behave like Kaiser, and they can go on for years with their wild theories and hatred. It is irrational. They don’t want to give up their delusions.

Oct 29, 2018
You are wrong about the term globalist. It is frequently used as a euphemism for Jewish by the alt right. You are also wrong to print that foul post about survivor George Soros. It is factually wrong and IS Neo Nazi propaganda. It is very offensive especially in light of what has happened in the recent week. Anti semitism is hidden in accepted terms because most people don't know the origins of the term or understand antisemitism. I like what you do but you are wrong here. Please remove it.

I don’t know what kind of news you read, but no, a globalist is not the same as a Jew, unless you are talking about some far right sites, such as Breitbart, which I never visited in my life. So, I am just guessing.

A globalist is someone who supports globalization. There are arguments for globalization and against. Being against globalization is not the same as being against Jews as an ethnicity. People who oppose globalization tend to be against immigration and outsourcing, I have never heard an argument that Jews are responsible for globalization, this is completely bonkers,

It is you, not I, who gives credence to such outlandish theories. And I am not going to avoid the subject just because some far right people make crazy claims. Forcing people to be silent about them is what gives more power to the far right, denouncing their claims is what every sane person should do.

I have nothing against George Soros whatsoever. Well, other than the fact that he is a crazy rich hedge fund manger, who skims the wealth off the productive people. But that another topic. I have the same issue with the most of the financial industry.


P.S. I see the part you have a problem with, the one about George Soros. I also have a hard time believing that claim, so I will remove it. If it is factual, the original poster can send me a link.

Oct 29, 2018 1 note
Why are you posting Asks containing antisemitic/white supremacist propaganda?

I didn’t post any antisemitic propaganda. If you think I did, then you need to clarify your statement.

Oct 28, 2018
Why would they mention the cost? Kate is the she-devil sucking up taxpayer money, remember. She is the only one draining the public purse. Everyone else in the Royal family deserves taxpayer money - Kate doesn't, she should be constantly criticised because she's a lazy, useless, do nothing woman. sarcasm off! This how how they think,though, and it is absurd.
Oct 28, 2018 1 note
Someone has just compared kate speeches to donald trump

Really? Some people need to get out more.

Oct 28, 2018
Kaiser is now claiming no royal woman can do a soeech as good as meghan
Oct 28, 2018
Meghan wore a ten grand dress and no one mentioned the cost

The cost of that tour is going to be outrageous. And what does Australia get out of it?

Oct 27, 2018 2 notes
#ban #celebitchy
Woke white feminists my ass. I mean Cb'ers Lol.
Oct 23, 2018 1 note
Re microaggression, one poster said Kate being pregnant with Louis was a microaggression against Meghan Markle. I can't with them. Just another example of CB posters not having a clue about real racism, dog whistling - another term they like to throw around in the Royal section, and real microaggressions. They haven't faced this in their lives, but they think it's acceptable to call anyone a racist if they criticise/dont endlessly worship their fave famous person of the moment. Ridiculous.
Oct 23, 2018 4 notes
The double standards with Meghan and Kate are so obvious. They will slam Kate for just breathing, but Meghan walks on a beach and she's the best thing evaaaah, and everyone who doesn't praise her on CB is a racist hater lol!

They do like to throw the word micro-aggression around, whether it makes sense or not,

Oct 22, 2018 5 notes
Meghan markle did like five charity engaments before she was married but appartly shes such a humanatarian its ridiculas

Meghan seems nice enough, but the obsession with her at CB is ridiculous. A regular nurse or a doctor who works 12 hours days do more good for the humanity than any of the royals. Or teachers, who do such important work and are so underpaid. People need to keep remembering that. We get upset about our superficial celebrity culture, but often we are, ourselves, to blame for this. We don’t celebrate regular hardworking people enough.

Oct 22, 2018 4 notes
Hey, I sent this in before but got an error message, so apologies if you get this more than once. What's with Kaiser and her complete lack of fact checking? The Tom Hiddleston post got all the basic facts wrong (posted photos a week after the event then claimed that event had been the previous night, got the name and occasion of the event completely wrong) and when multiple people pointed out the errors, she ignored them. At least old Kaiser would update posts when mistakes were pointed out.

Sometimes Kaiser makes mistakes and misinterpretations on purpose to rile people up -  more clicks that way.

Oct 22, 2018 1 note
Kaiser actually responded to her own article when someone shaded her putting “rest” in quotes. She’s like a child trying to defend herself. And her article about Meghan’s buttons where she alluded that Meghan is probably shading Kate for wearing buttons? Holy cow that is just another level of crazy. I use to get angry at it but now it’s comical. Kaiser and the people who post there are completely off their rocker. How can they not see their own stupidity? Their behavior is kinda scary.

You are right. They are just pathetic.

Oct 21, 2018 2 notes
Anybody else out there find it frightening that Kaiser wanted to throw used tampons at all male Republicans and slash their tires? This was in reference to the Kavanaugh accusations, of which he has not been convicted. Throwing bodily fluids is NEVER okay, no matter who the target is.

I didn’t see that post but would I feel frightened? Not really. A dirty tampon will not cause any kind of bodily damage, though “technically” it would be considered an assault, and could lead to legal actions taken, so I would advise against it. In the past people used to throw rotten tomatoes and eggs at politicians. And I completely understand why.

Now, slashing tires is a different matter entirely. And I would not support this in any shape or form.

Oct 21, 2018 1 note
why is it that in a post yesterday about the royal Kate, who wore the comments are about how she is rapidly aging with the general thread agreeing that its due to her cigarette smoking, with comments like "I blame too much sun, cigarettes and small children." On the same page, Meghan is praised again for being professional and polished with comments like "Her work is much more important and should really overwhelm whatever she chooses to wear. " Just interesting.

The whole discussion about Kate (or any other woman for that matter) looking older is nonsense. On one hand, they judge women for having plastic surgery to look younger or prettier, on the other hand they judge women for looking older. They can’t help themselves, they are hypocrites.

Oct 20, 2018 3 notes
#celebitchy #ban
3) You should never stop what you are doing here as long as that blog is there. People who have been treated like crap by them need to know what is going on and others should avoid it. There was a time when it was a fun diverse community. Not anymore. That is what happens when a stan gets to ban and moderate. Celebitchy is lazy and let it happen so she is guilty too. Reading through Liana Thinks it has been going on for years. Finally they are getting what they deserve. Bye CB! I won't be back.
Oct 19, 2018 2 notes
2) Kaiser's obsessive unhinged feelings about certain women has become scary and I have seen people around the internet refer to her as psycho. It used to be just the Angie Jo articles but it is everything now. I am not a royal fan but she acts like commenters opinions are personal and then she moderates like she is invested in them. I have never seen such unhealthy behavior on any forum or blog I have ever visited. I would warn people who aren't mentally healthy to stay away from there.
Oct 19, 2018 2 notes
1)I took a look at the post counts at CB and they are lower than I have ever seen them. That is what happens when people are banned and moderated to death. Whether I agreed or disagreed with the regulars, they were the reason people came to the site. It wasn't for the shoddy journalism for sure. I was a long timer and I have no reason to ever go back. That site has been gaining an even bigger reputation for being toxic and notorious for Kaiser's behavior and banning innocent people.
Oct 19, 2018 3 notes
I hate Kaiser. She took a website that was once fun to read and turned it to absolute junk. Even if you didn't like or agree with what was being said, you still had an opportunity to say it. Now, if you don't agree with Kaiser or her idiot followers, you get pounced on and deleted. What happened to intelligent conversation? I don't care if people don't agree with me, I welcome opposing opinions because that's how I learn or consider something i hadn't before. Obviously not CB's credo.

Hate might be too strong of a word for this situation, but I am with you -  Kaiser ran that website into the ground.

Oct 19, 2018 2 notes
I have never seen the response numbers on celebitchy be so low. A few years ago there would be hundreds of posts but now even Royal (aka Meghan) posts are barely passing 150 on a good day. Is it b/c she's "banning" people or is it b/c people who used to go there are sick of her bullsh*t? Or maybe more competition? One thing for sure is Kaiser is unbalanced. I still can't figure out why she hasn't been fired from her "job". I think she's the reason the website is on the decline.
Oct 19, 2018 1 note
Kaiser should really not talk about things like childbirth or pregnancy, she sounds like an ignorant asshole. She offended me so much with her takes on morning sickness- have one of the writers who are moms do those stories. I had a 9 lb 9 oz baby, 8 lb 6 oz is nothing compared to mine! She is obsessed with talking about how painful women's labors must be with these so called huge babies. I'm sure her commentary on Meghan's baby will be cringe worthy.
Oct 18, 2018
Me again. All I am saying is that Harry has a role to play in the reconstruction of his mother qua image. This was not the case with Kate who projects a very different image. This is not to say this image cannit be critically assessed. Of course it can and should. But this resurection of Diana is...

I don’t really read much about Meghan anymore, I am on  Meghan overload. I don’t dislike her, but I feel I already know everything there is to know about her. 

Anyway, i haven’t seen comparisons to Diana yet. Diana had unique charisma, people either have it or not. Neither Kate nor Meghan have it , and I wish people would stop comparing them and setting them up for a fail.

On the other hand, Eugenie’s wedding was lovely. I never cared about the York girls because I can’t stand their father, but now I came to see them as persons apart from their family, and they are quite likeable. After all, they didn’t choose their parents.

Oct 17, 2018 1 note
I'm surprised that several die-hard Kate haters were banned. I guess they said something that was less hateful and Kaiser couldn't handle it.
Oct 17, 2018 1 note
Glad to see others here thought the post about Pippa crossed a line. I’m not even a fan of Pippa’s but FGS, bashing her for going to a wedding while pregnant?! Anyway I was coming here to see if anyone read the most recent post about Pippa — am I the only one who doesn’t even understand WTF Kaiser was saying? What is an “absolute unit?” And I’m sure Kate has seen the baby by now, she just didn’t publicize it. Give me a break.
Oct 17, 2018 2 notes
I wonder if they will shame Meghan Markle for taking maternity leave as they did with Kate? Their comments were appalling! "Kate doesn't work! She doesn't work 40+ hours a week like "regular" women. She doesn't deserve maternity leave! She needs to get back to work!" Don't they realise stay at home mothers need to rest and recuperate too? So much for being a feminist site! Somehow, I don't think they will say anything when Meghan takes months off after having her baby.
Oct 17, 2018 1 note
Just a thouggt as it will be censored anywhere else. Harry had this all thing about "protecting" his wife from the public and the press... So why is she "branded" (pun intended) as the new Princess Diana -- The great, children-loving humanitarian that challanges the whole institution. This is nothing about Meghan; we dont know her, just her public image, the image that is sold to us, and that image is a replication of Princess Diana. And dont tell me that it is the press that is responsible.
Oct 17, 2018
Have you seen today's post about Pippa M giving birth to a baby boy? Am I the only one uncomfortable? I don't know, it's a great news but Kaiser find a way to insinuate Pippa is thirsty because she went to a wedding a few days before she went into labour. No "congratulations to the couple", she's so distant and cold with women she doesn't like.

That post was just plain nasty and unkind. Though, luckily, most posters didn’t agree with Kaiser. She knows she stepped over the line when even her regulars don’t agree with her.

Oct 16, 2018 4 notes
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December