The whole discussion was ridiculous. He cannot control whether he is bold or not, why is it even OK to be discussing it? People should’ve learned by now that it is not OK to discuss things that people cannot control such as looks, gender, race, ethnicity, one’s family etc.
But then Kaiser wouldn’t know what to write about half of the time.
Kaiser comes across as someone who haven’t really traveled or interacted with different cultures much. Her views are very American-centric. She doesn’t understand international perspective at all. She is not equipped to write for an international audience.
A few observations on the last weeks articles on CB:
1. People who keep talking about how awful Norman Reedus looks and how Joshua Jakson is so much better, just stop it. Happiness has nothing to do with looks. You can be with the most beautiful person in the world and still be unhappy if that person is not right for you and vice versa.
2.Aziz Ansari discucssion - whether it was an assault or not. It wasn’t an outright assault in my opinion, but that doesn’t make it somehow OK, or forgivable. He treated that young woman as a piece of meat. not a person. And he doesn’t even get it why it was wrong. Women shouldn’t have to accept that it is OK to treat them as piece of chattel. It is not OK to blame the woman for wanting and expecting more than just being a sex toy. Too many commenters sounded like it was the woman’s fault that she expected to be treated with more respect and consideration.
3. So, now that Meghan and Harry are proving to be Will&Kate #2, only without kids so far, I find it funny how their CB fans are coming up with excuses they never seems to think of in case of Wil&Kate - “ Harry is RICH! What else did people expect?”. I expected nothing different and this is why the monarchy needs to be abolished . What is the saying - none are so blind as those who refuse to see? That applies to the CB posters most of the time, so many of them have blinders on.
You can comment by adding notes under the posts or you can send your comment to me and I will publish it.
I agree with you there. It is not like people come to Celebitchy to have a serious political discussion. They come there because it became an echo chamber of Hillary’s supporters and her supporters get their validation there. I guess there aren’t many other places to get it .
Thank you for your kind words.
Today Kaiser decided to take an issue with Gal Gadot’s pink and red outfit. This is so petty, I just rolled my eyes.
Is Celebitchy a fashion blog now? That would be funny because Kaiser has no taste and no eye for fashion. Red and pink actually go well together and you’ll find this combination used by many designers.
One day Celebitchy is a progressive political blog ( see all Trump articles), or a champion for feminist issues (Harvey coverage), another day it is a trashy gossip blog ( various Swift, Kardashian and roayls articles) and other days it is just nasty pointless negative gossip that rips into people for superficial things like clothes and haircuts.
Does Kaiser even know who she wants to be when she grows up?
I don’t think she ever truly loved Meghan, I think it was a convenient narrative for her to compare Meghan to Kate and use it to bash Kate. And , well, now she got to criticize Meghan as well, and that means more clicks for Celebitchy and more money.
I said from the beginning that Meghan was entering into this to have a comfortable, secure life. And it seems that way more and more.
As for walking down the aisle and the “giving away” of the bride, I find this custom to be really questionable given its origins, sorry. We used to do that in my culture as well, but now the bride and the groom walk in together. I would love if Meghan and Harry did that. And that would end all the controversy right there.