The political articles there are the worst. No discussion of what might’ve gone wrong and how the country could be improved is allowed. The posters turn on anyone daring question the official Democrats party line and start blaming that person for everything that is wrong under the sun.
I am not sure. I think it is because of the racial aspect. She is a “white feminist” and it is not good enough for the posters there.
This comment explains it :
“
She didn’t mean Spielberg she’s cast more roles for women. She meant for white women lol this is such white feminism. She dismissed the color purple bc it was a film of women of color.
“
And to add to this. I don’t find Banks likeable myself.But I see the point she is making, albeit she made it very badly and picked a really bad target. If you want to talk about misogyny in Hollywood you shouldn’t be making Spielberg your target, you should be making Spielberg your ally.
But you know what. Banks might be a “white feminist” and she might not be good enough, but if she is speaking for your cause, maybe hold your horses a bit with criticism. Don’t let the perfect to be the enemy of the good.
And I think that is exactly the problem with CB. Unless someone is pitch perfect, they get torn to shreds. And you get to the point where nobody is good enough. And that is very negative and soul destroying.
130 comments discussing every minor detail of Kate Middleton’s blazer and capri outfit. It is so strange. I’d understand if the posters were professional stylists. Then these things could be very interesting and important. But otherwise? It is just bewildering. Most people judge fashion in a passing manner - does it look good overall or not.
To me she always looks good and presentable. Maybe she is not a fashion icon, but she is inoffensive in her wardrobe choices. You have to look very closely to find something to criticize.
OMG. What an awful blog on Tinashe. I won’t go there because I am not qualified. But all those people denying her experience, it is just so hurtful.The Original TC and QQ are the worst.
Ha, Kaiser was just told ever so politely that Joe Alwyn is not getting work because of Swift but due to his own qualifications. We know nothing about this guy but Kaiser already hates him by association. She has really strong feelings about Swift.
“ Alba says:
I see, but this article sort of says Alwyn wasn’t getting work. I think thats a slight misrepresentation . He is a guy who graduated recently from a very distinguished drama school in London ( The Royal Central School-Judi Dench, Vanessa Redgrave and tons of great actors from that school, most recently Andrew Garfield who is earning rave reviews for Angels in America at The National Theatre ). He has already scored jobs with Oscar winning/nominated directors such as Lee and Lanthimos and worked with some stellar actors in that year since he graduated, so hes way ahead of the heap of recent graduates already. The fact that such good directors cast him as an unknown makes me think he must have something. Lee is an actors director.”
For what it is worth, I think Alwyn is very handsome, and if he has any sort of talent on top of it, he’ll go far.
He and Swift also seem to look strangely similar. This must be a real thing, if that is possible with Taylor Swift. I noticed that many people get really attached to people who look like them.
I just saw this comment under the Sessions article. What an excellent comment. Well said.
Manzur says:
There are SO many other things to comment on besides appearance. Can we just stop? It brings the discussion down to junior high level. And YES i KNOW Trump has picked on physical appearance but does that mean we ALL have to now too? Is that mature reasoning? I despise that. Who cares what Sessions looks like? Who cares what about his accent? Just because the mean kids on the playground throw insults about appearance around does not mean the entire school should start. It dumbs down the conversation. Ivanka sleeps with her father. Eric Trump is ugly. Melanie sounds funny. Trump is Cheeto. There. Now we’re all five years old. It’s like a bad Saturday Night Live skit. Funny for the first 10 seconds and then lame and groan worthy as it drones on. Let’s all rise above. We are too good for this.
I don’t get it either.You would think a self-proclaim feminist site would support a woman coming out and saying what she really thinks. Yes. monogamy is not for everyone. If it works for someone, great, if not, fine.
Also, relationships are hard work and there are enough people who feel that the benefits they get from stable relationships are not worth the work required to maintain them.
I think Kaiser always disliked ScarJo, but now she can openly dislike her because of the whitewashing controversy with the Ghost in a Shell.
On top of that there is a certain racial bias purposely cultivated on the site. You will see comments along the lines that so and so is white and pretty and skinny and for this reason doesn’t have to struggle like the others, and it is a strike against that person. And ScarJo happens to be white, pretty and skinny. The only women who seem to be exempt from this criticism are Angelina and Katy Perry. And possibly Naomi Watts. Naomi is so likeable, people just can’t find it in themselves to criticize her.
Discussions of Vilkander and Fassbender bring back disturbing memories of Hunterbatch 2015. That was my first encounter with so-called “fans” viciously attacking a woman for her relationship with their internet boyfriend, and idle bystanders cheering them on from the sidelines, just for the fun of it.
Now, the second time around, I recognize all the signs.
*Claims that he (the internet boyfriend) looks unhappy and is just not the same, not attractive anymore. Yes, Kaiser, that is in reference to your comment “ He just seems so neutered with Vikander. “.
*That she (the woman) has abuse issues, snobby, unfriendly, unaccomplished.
*That the relationship is fake.
*That something just seems off.
*Bystanders claiming that this is no big deal, this is just regular gossip. I remember how lilacflower’s “Comet Sophie” references used to drive me mad during Hunterbatch. She didn’t care about it one way or another, she is a Hiddleston fan, or should I say “stan”. But she still went on and continued pouring gas on the fire, just for the fun of it. With Vilkander the same thing is going on.
In fairness, there are a couple of posters with factual information who refute the made up stories. But they drown in the sea of awfulness.
*
I just noticed this comment by Skylark got deleted. I wondered how did it make it through -)).
—————————————————————-
Let’s not forget that the CB writer who used to wet her knickers over everything (single) Fassbinder did has actively encouraged this deeply unpleasant madness purely because Fassy has taken up with a woman who is not her.
Make no mistake, that’s at the absolute root of it. Click on ‘Michael Fassbender’ for a history.
—————————————————————
I think it is just a way to drive traffic to the site because traffic means more advertisement revenue for the site and more money for the owners. Trump posts are the ones getting the most comments. A lot of people hate Trump with passion. Though, I don’t know how they don’t get tired of talking about him every day for hours. It is the same thing over and over.
#ban #celebitchy
Why does Celebitchy have an issue with men talking about objectification of men? I remember Kit Harrington talking about it and the CB commenters ridiculing him for it. Now Sam Clafin talks about it and it is a similar reaction, though a milder one.
Just because women have it worse, it doesn’t mean men should just shut up and take it when it happens to them. When both men and women talk about it then it only makes it the cause stronger.
Maybe it is because CB itself loves to indulge into objectification of men and this hits a bit close to home?
Well, I’ve noticed Kaiser is trying to build up Taylor Swift to be the new Kate Middleton. It doesn’t seem to take. While there are a number of posters who seem to have irrational hatred of Swift, there aren’t enough of them. Swift posts can’t even break 100 comments.
I found it a bit surreal how in today’s comments people were blaming Swift for being immature and so on because she is still ‘beefing’ with Perry. Except Swift hasn’t said anything in years, it is all from ‘sources’. I guess it is fun, building a strawman and then pummeling it to death.
So I got banned and after getting banned, I decided to go on Twitter and ask Kaiser why.
Because I didn’t do anything wrong, I didn’t break any rules, I read the rules and I was following them.
And I came across a tweet of her saying “Swifty fans” were “butthurt” (her favorite insult) and basically pissed off. Because in today’s thread (the Katy Vs Taylor Thread) people weren’t on Kaiser’s side about the “dated” (another word K uses to death) beef that Katy keeps bringing up.
And it made me laugh because you’re butthurt that people aren’t here for petty old dusty beef? We get that you hate Taylor Swift, but really? Am I as a black woman, supposed to stand up for Katy who was accused by a black rapper of saying the N word (multiple times)? Or someone who made fun of someone having a mental breakdown?
But no, let’s get pissed at T Swift for making love/hate songs about boyfriends and that Kanye bullshit.
It’s stupid and I love how Kaiser is so bent out of shape that she went to Twitter to complain about her readers not agreeing with the pettiness between two petty women.
But that’s okay, stick up for problematic Katy because she hates Taylor Swift.
You are so basic Kaiser.
Honestly. I love how you can ignore things that go against the “beliefs” you so call hold, because you hate someone that much. Kaiser did bring up people saying Katy was “trash” but not why people were saying it. They were saying the song is trash, Katy’s is like Kaiser who says one thing and does another. I’m way more offended by the few things Katy’s done then anything TS has ever done.
And I say this as a fan of neither, I’d take a immature, stunt queen, over a fake woke problematic Katy any day.
Because I don’t let hate overshadow my beliefs.
I’m sorry for the rant but it pissed me off and made me laugh.
I am quite sure this is how banning works on CB. Some other sites do it this way as well. They put your IP address or the name/ email on the blocked list. And your post just goes into limbo and never gets published.
I think on Disquis you do get a message that you are banned, but it is not the case with many other ‘comments’ applications.
Yes, you are banned if you type a comment and submit it, but it never shows up.
If you submit it and it shows up ‘in moderation’, then you are being moderated, i.e. your comments are only let through after a review.
For May 3rd the most commented articles were the one about Hiddleston vs. Fassbender and then Brad &Angelina. The usual click-bait.
o I am surprised so many poster there don’t think Fassbender is handsome. As far as looks go he has a strong jaw and a proportionate face. I am not one of his fans but I think Fassbender is better looking and a better actor than Hiddleston. At the same time Hiddleston’s fans were very amusing with their over-the-top defense.
o Brad vs. Angelina - I see Kaiser couldn’t find anything to spin in his interview so she just left it for posters to rip him apart. And rip him apart they did. I don’t dislike either Brad or Angelina. They both seem like good people, so I am just going to stay away from this one and not take sides.
Three Trump articles for the day, we are getting desperate, are we?
A Kate Middleton article. There was one comment that got under my skin. The one that slammed Will for bringing up Diana’s death in the paparazzi trial. Who are the posters to tell whether he should be still affected by his mother’s death and the paparazzi behavior or not? I don’t necessarily like him and I am against the monarchy, but I know that this kind of trauma stays with people for their whole lives and I am not going to deny how it affected him just because I don’t like him. And people twisting themselves into pretzels trying to make it look like the pictures taken in France by the paparazzi are somehow Will &Kate’s fault, just stop. Laws are laws. You don’t argue against the laws and common decency just because you don’t like somebody.
Netflix ’13 Reasons’ show sounds like a big and dangerous mess. But I don’t watch, so no opinion there.
Susan Sarandon article – Celebitchy posters are Hillary supporters and Susan Sarandon committed an unforgivable sin of disliking Hillary and supporting Bernie. That means it is an open season on Susan Sarandon on the site. I think Susan Sarandon probably knows Hillary personally and is a better judge of who Hillary truly is than Celebitchy posters who don’t know either woman.
My own opinion of Hillary is very much in line with the post below. The only thing I don’t agree with is that it calls Hillary’s followers ‘bots’. Everyone is entitled to support whoever they like, it doesn’t make them a bot. Though acting that it is impossible for a rational person to understand why people don’t support Hillary even though other posters explained it over and over again does come over as willful denial.

I don’t think it is Kaiser. I don’t think she would pay any attention to me, some obscure blog which posts once in a blue moon.
Also, the writing style of that anon felt like she was pretty young, in her early 20s.
Japanese and Chinese are the majority in their respective countries. And they also have their own entertainment and movie industries. They don’t view Hollywood the same way Japanese-Americans or Chinese-Americans do. This perspective is not understood at all by the Celebitchy posters and if anyone dares to voice it, they are quickly shut down.
I am not sure I understood you right, anon. I think all my posts have ‘Notes’ feature enabled where you can write comments. If that is what you are asking.
Or are you talking about the Celebitchy site?
OK.
I meant I wasn’t going to censor you.
I post this because I don’t believe in censoring. But I have nothing further to say on this. I am neither ignorant nor uneducated, I simply have a different frame of reference and different life experience. If you want to discuss facts, give me an example of cultural appropriation that you find so damaging, and we can talk about it. I’ll tell you what I think.
But I can tell you right away that I find impossible to understand the Celebitchy's outrage du-jour about Wes Anderson’s animation about dogs set in Japan being voiced by white actors. If we take it as one example.
I am sweetheart to you now, am I. You know that is a belittling term just like “boy”, correct?
You take an issue with me but you cannot keep your own prejudices in check.
I have no vendetta with Celebitchy. But our exchange here is quite illustrative. On Celebitchy all of my posts disagreeing with the approach to “cultural appropriation” would be moderated while yours would be allowed to stand. And this is why I created this blog.
Discussion happens when both parties can express their opinion freely. It doesn’t happen when one party is shut out and is forced to accept the other’s opinion as the ultimate truth.
You see my earlier post as a rant. But I was actually trying to explain where I am coming from. You are not interested in understanding it. And that is fine. It is your right. But don’t expect me to change my opinion just because you think I should.
I am not going to argue. It is my opinion and my experience coming from a mixed ethnicity family and a multi-cultural society.
Not everybody looks at the world the American way or any other specific way. I live in the US now and I can see how often Americans think that their way is the only way. That their way is the only way and everybody else is wrong. It isn’t so.
You think your way is right. I think my way is right, more productive and less adversarial.
That is probably why I was banned from Celebitchy. I am not going to agree with something that in my experience is a negative/ unproductive approach, just because I am told that I am supposed to think a certain way.
What some people don’t seem to understand is that calling others names is not going to convince them to change their opinion. If you are certain you are right, then SHOW how you are right. That means - SHOW through your own experience and actions. Words are empty. Actions speak louder than words. That means you cannot say one thing one day and then act differently another day, that would be hypocrisy, something that Celbitchy is full of.
Oh my. All the race baiting going on in and under the Rachel Dolezal article. “Peak white supremacy”, really?
For example this part, what is that about?
“It is a bit extreme, but it is in no way new for white people to take what they want from other cultures in the name of love and respect, while distorting or discarding the remainder of that culture for their comfort”
Is that about so-called cultural appropriation? Cultures always borrowed from one another and adapted what they borrowed to their tastes. It makes cultures richer. I’ll go even further and say that this is how the human society progresses, through synthesis. It is not a bad thing.
And are some of the regular posters seriously arguing that race is a biological trait and not a social construct?
Melania Trump is another woman “Celebitchers” love to hate. I think they are so free with derision of her because she is a wife of “the enemy”. And they feel free to engage into some “therapeutical steam release” using her as a target dummy. There is nothing about Melania herself to justify this level of derision.
Almost every comment under the article starts with “ I don’t feel sorry for her”, “she made her choice” and so on.
As someone who grew up outside of the US I also find the US office of First lady to be archaic and patriarchal. And this is not a new position for me. I always thought so. For Europeans this concept of a whole family representing their country is too similar to monarchy. In addition, the office of the First lady is not official, unelected and is unpaid. The First Lady is treated as a property of her husband. And that is just not right. I don’t see how American feminists square the concept of the First Lady with women rights. No woman should be treated as a property or pressured into doing something she doesn’t want to just because of who her husband is. Again, for Europeans this is unthinkable.
Here is one of very few balanced comments on Melania I tend agree with. Especially about the bitchiness she provokes in others.

And here is another one, which is more representative of what you see BTL at Celebitchy.

Doesn’t any capitalist society operate on this principle? Especially one such as the US, which practices unrestrained laissez-faire capitalism? So it is OK that everyone else does it, just Melania is not allowed? Celebitchy is a wrong name for his site. It should be called Hypocrisy by any other name.
It’s funny how “white cis males/women” are the enemy over at CeleBITCHY, yet Kaiser writes a thread dedicated to picking at Kate Middleton’s accent and not even being clever about it, because they ALL HAVE SUBTITLES.
So you hate this woman so much or you love hate clicks so much that you have to make two posts a day just to trash her for no reason.
I love all the skinny shaming in the comments about KM (by Lainey no less) and I kept imagining, “if someone were overweight, would they allow anyone to talk about how unhealthy they are? That’s rude and wrong right?’
So why do they do it so freely to skinny women? As a overweight women myself I would never comment on another woman’s weight, because it’s a senstive topic.
I wouldn’t comment on anyone’s weight tbh.
I swear CeleBITCHY is one of the most backwards hypothetical websites I have ever been on.Writers who call themselves Feminist, but more often then not are more racists,sexist and judgemental than the people that are the so called enemy.
As a black woman, I find CeleBITCHY as a whole to be a negative counterproductive place.
On every level.
They are casually racists, sexist, shaming and often accuse men of being gay in a discriminatory way.
Backwards.
——————————-
It is clear that Kate Middleton is a pure click-bait. Just like Tom Hiddleston. The only difference is that Tom Hiddleston is a click-bait for his fans and Kate Middleton is a click-bait for people who love to demean her and I am actually not sure what they find in it.
I am against the monarchy myself. But that is what I would talk about. Not the color of Kate’s shoes.
No, these women derive some sick pleasure in ripping someone apart. And I guess they don’t feel guilty about doing it to Kate Middleton because she is privileged. Privileged or not, it is still very wrong. She is still a human being. Not to mention that everyone in the royal family is privileged but Celebitchy only loves to hate Kate.
ha ha! i can’t believe how ultra sensitive kaiser is regarding Angelina Jolie.
twice i submitted this in response to the AJ and Tom Ford post:
can he teach her how to use HD makeup?
she needs help.
REJECTED. TWICE!
i took a screen cap of it the 2nd time because i had the sneaking suspicion she just didn’t care for the joke and everything else i posted today went through after moderation.
I see Melania Trump won her defamation case against Daily Mail. The news was in all major newspapers yesterday. But Celebitchy is mum on this.
They sure loved dragging Melania through the mud when Daily Mail printed their story about her being an escort. But now that it is retracted all you hear from Kaiser is crickets.
This is just another instance of faux-feminism.
I checked Celebitchy.com latest stats, They are doing much better last 2 months. I don’t really see the reason, but I am guessing it is all those Trump articles that attract people. Expect more of the same then. If it is working for them, they are going to continue.

A couple more thoughts.
* Celebitchy is so repetitive, they are just going through motions. You almost know what you are going to see every day - Royals, Trump, Hiddleston, some random 3rd tier celebrity clickbait. This is usually a sign of a site on life support where the writers (in this case the writer, I guess) spend no time on new research, just automatically going through motions. I haven’t looked at their traffic stats in a while. I need to do that.
* If you are supposed to be an entertainment / celebrity blog and you are short on topics to cover how about you cover Olivier Awards, for example? This is a pretty high profile event.
Here is the scoop on today’s visit to CB
· Daily clickbait articles on Tom Hiddleston are just lame. It is obvious CB is catering to Tom Huddleston’s fans who are the biggest contingent of loyal readers remaining on CB. It is not CB, it is HiddlestonDaily now. I don’t hate Hiddleston, I am neutral on him. But I don’t consider him to be a great actor. He is a good actor, one of hundreds other good actors. Brits are blessed with having so many good actors to pick from. Nevertheless, the conspiracy theories trying to explain why Hiddleston wasn’t nominated for BAFTA were fun to read.
· Janelle Monae is talking about denying sex to men until they show women respect. I don’t know even where to start on this. If someone doesn’t respect you then you shouldn’t even socialize with that person, never mind having sex. But if you think that using sex as a carrot will make anyone respect you more, the truth is very much the opposite. People should respect us for who we are, regardless of whether they get sex or not. To their credit many CB posters did see how wrong this idea is and did speak up. But some instead decided to talk about how nice Monae looks because they didn’t want to openly criticize her. If it was almost anybody else they would’ve torn her to shreds, though. This kind of hypocrisy I cannot respect. Speak your mind and don’t be so partisan.
· So many posters who are still not willing to give up the conspiracy theory that Trump is a Russian agent truly scare me. This kind of willful denial and ignorance is not rational. So many still claim that Trump is a Russian agent because he warned Russians about the strike but not the Congress. Let me put it this way - the Congress doesn’t have missiles that could kill Americans, Russians do. If Russians weren’t warned they could’ve considered the airstrike an attack on them and retaliated. And this is not something anyone wants, including Trump. I am very much in the “pox on both of their houses” camp when it comes to Trump and Clinton. But I have no desire to goad Trump into yet another war we don’t need.
· Kaiser is talking about how Justin Trideau looks so much more princely than William. Harry, of course, gets a pass. First, monarchy is archaic. Both William and Harry should stop playing princes, abdicate and go live normal lives. Neither of them deserves our adoration. As for Trideau, he is a leader of a country. And hopefully he is doing his job well. He is not in his position for his good looks. Or, at least, he shouldn’t be
Ah, the smell of the WW3 with the morning coffee. No, I don't like it.
And all the people posting about Trump being a Russian agent and the Syrian air strike being a PR move for Trump with Russians being in on it, and everything is choreographed. Stop, I beg you. Ask any Russian what they think and I am pretty sure they will tell you that this is not how Russians operate.
You will sleepwalk into the WW3 all the way believing that this is all planned by Trump and Putin. It will be too late when you finally realize it is not a game, and there is no devious plan, but two nuclear powers on a brink of a confrontation. Are you willing to take the chance?
Thank you for the kind words. I am glad to hear this.
Somehow little by little CB descended from being fun and snarky to outright negativity. Being snarky is ok, as long as it is done in a lighthearted manner and is not malicious, but the line is pretty thin and is easy to cross.
Agree with you there. CB is extremely negative now. It is really not a healthy place. But it was different 2-3 years ago when I started reading it. For one, there were 3-4 regular writers, not only Kaiser. Kaiser is the most negative one. And I almost always disagree with her, so that got me banned pretty quickly.))
I rarely bother going there, maybe once a week, just to keep this blog afloat. But when I was banned for the 2nd time I felt like I needed a place to speak up because what Kaiser does with manipulating the posts and censoring of any opposing opinions is not right.
Thank you for asking. )) I started this blog so that I could post what I think since I am not allowed to do that on Celebitchy. They banned me for disagreeing with “the party line”.
I am not someone who you can just tell to shut up and I will comply. I stand behind the things I say. If I say something it usually means I believe it. To be shut down and not allowed to speak and defend my point of view is offensive to me.
it is interesting that you think I am negative because one of my main disagreements with Celebitchy is that they are too negative. I am not negative enough for them, apparently. I don’t immediately jump on somebody for a slight misstep. I prefer to give the benefit of a doubt. I don’t willfully misinterpret other people’s world or omit fact to construct a narrative for which to criticize them.
As for why I don’t I start my own site. Well, for one thing I already have a full time job. And it pays much better than a job of a gossip writer. I am also very good at it what I do for a living and I enjoy it.
This is a familiar story. I think I read one on Amal and one on Chris Pine (even though he is not a woman) recently and I see there is another one on Mara today. I noticed Kaiser only writes those about people she doesn’t like.
Why is it even a topic of conversation? It is bewildering to me. Amal, for example, looked stunning. But people still have to find a fault with her. Her shoes were too sparkly for the dress, apparently.
Kate Middleton also can never dress right, according to CB. She looks fine to me most of the time. She looks definitely better than me every time. )) I noticed the commenters have this strange negative obsession with her nude shoes. You would think wearing nude shoes is a crime on the level of torturing pets.
The whole endless criticism of clothes is exhausting. Commenters on CB take it way too seriously. Why do they expect a celebrity have a perfectly put together outfit every time? It takes days to plan an outfit, and then it is only worn once. It is such a waste. Just judge the people for their actions, the end of.
Talking about clothes can be fun, but when it turns negative and toxic, people need to step back and really think about - why is it so important to them what shoes a celebrity wears?
Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find a non-bitchy celebrity gossip site with a good layout, as of yet. If anyone has recommendations, feel free to share.
Some people recommend D-listed, but I find their layout and comments sections to be badly organized.
A great comment by Lalu on the Chris Evans thread today. This is what I find to be toxic about so many posters on CB. Yes, you are progressive, and you are against Trump. That is fine. But why are you so negative and intolerant. The type of ideological purity required by people posting on CB is very reminiscent of communists - if you are not with us, you are against us.
This leads to infighting and destructions of your own supporters over small insignificant differences. It makes your side weaker, not stronger.

And here we have master troll Kaiser fishing for clicks by purposely misinterpreting what Kristen Stewart said and then topping it off by blaming Stewart for an affair with Sanders, while Sanders is not even mentioned.
“ Do you see why I’m irritated? “I don’t view the whole Twilight blow-up as being generally traumatic.” Yeah, that’s because you weren’t Liberty Ross. Liberty had two small kids and she had uprooted her life in London to come to LA so Sanders could fulfill his dream of being a Hollywood director. And then he cheated on Liberty with a younger actress. It was traumatic for Liberty. “
I don’t know, but it seems unfair to blame a single woman for an affair before the husband. Sanders was the one who was married, he was the one who knew the truth of his marriage. Not to mention that at my workplace the whole thing would fall under the definition of the sexual harassment. And it wouldn’t be the employee who would’be blamed for it.
Kaiser only remembers about being a feminist when it suits her.
Oh, wow. The posters on Celebitchy today seem especially toxic/ angry. This is from Susan Sarandon post. Every other comment there is like this. In the big scheme of things, Susan Sarandon is a decent human being and is harmless. So much anger towards a person for having a different political opinion is frankly scary.
Svea says:
She needs to STFU for a while.
MunichGirl says:
Why is she still talking about that? Just shut up. She’s the reason I don’t watch Feud.
Tate says:
Shut up Susan!!!! Just shut up!!!!
eggyweggs says:
She’s musty.
bap says:
Overrated celebrity.
Darla says:
Shut up Susan.
Jayna says:
Condescending, smug, and passive-aggressive remarks towards Hillary.
I want to smack her.
Does Kaiser do any research before she posts shit?
I feel like she saw some articles about Marion saw they were about something negative (injections) wrote about it, and not doing simple research and finding out where the fuck the pictures came from.
They are old pictures from a fucking movie her lips were fake.
Then she deletes a bunch of comments from a Angie thread, people notice and comment on it, and she deletes those comments as well.
————————————————–
I believe Kaiser is basically a professional troll. Even when she knows the facts, she choses to ignore them in favor of controversy, and clicks. She has been called out on this multiple times. Of course, if you ever do so, you get on her black list. to be banned at the first opportunity.
I am guessing Kaiser is not a fan of Marion, since she has an article today hinting ( hint-hint) that Marion has lip fillers. The headline is “ Did Marion Cotillard get lip injections or does she just have pregnant lips? ”.
The plastic surgery hints are usually reserved for those Kaiser doesn’t like but doesn’t have anything rational to justify it. She uses hints of plastic surgery to poison the well, so to speak.
Well, it turns out Marion’s lips were prostatic, , for a movie, which was shot a year ago, before she got pregnant.
Absolutely. Race baiting in Kaiser’s posts is very obvious. She is just trolling people for clicks.
And saying something nice about Aniston is one of the fastest ways to get banned. ))
So today we are discussing Susan Sarandon’s plastic surgery, apparently. Here is the thing I noticed about CB posters. When it is a woman they don’t like, who hasn’t done anything really bad for which they can crucify her, they start talking about the woman’s looks and all the plastic surgery she has supposedly done. All with that fake concern and fake compliments.
I thought feminists were above it ? Not to mention that at least half of the suspected plastic surgery is probably just a figment of their imagination.
From today’s article on Susan Sarandon by Kaiser:

I’ve noticed CB found a new reliable click-bait - Meghan, prince Harry’s girlfriend. Prepare to be trolled mercilessly by Kaiser )). She will write all those backhanded posts about Meghan to get people fighting over her,
I noticed that the posters who don’t like Kate seem to like Meghan and Harry. Why? Royalty is royalty. Harry doesn’t seem to be any more useful than Cambridges. But he is better looking. Is that it?
Since I am a Cumberbatch fan I read the article on Cumberbatch yesterday, the one about his new project portraying Melrose. It was full of nuggets of fun, for me at least, despite having under 20 comments. ))
Here are some thoughts.

What teacakes doesn’t realize is that while she might be happy about Cumberbatch fans and haters being banned ( yes, they were banned, they didn’t just “leave”) , this is not actually good for Celebitchy. Cumberbatch used to be a reliable click bait, just like HIddleston, with 100+ comments on any given article. Celebitchy is a business , the loss of so many easy click has to hurt.
It is not by accident Kaiser is constantly trying to bait readers with underhanded mentions of Sophie like this one.

And this one is just my personal pet peeve. Yes, lightpurple, formerly known as lilacflowers, there is only one perfect human being in the world, and that is Tom Hiddleston. ))
Though, I’ll say, I forgive lilac flowers some of it for her defense of Taylor when Taylor was attacked on CB during the whole Kanye-Swift drama. The attacks on Taylor were just vicious. And no matter how much you dislike her, I don’t get how can you ever take Kanye’s side. He put her naked body, and bodies of other women, on display without permission for financial gain, and he gets a pass?
