This is a familiar story. I think I read one on Amal and one on Chris Pine (even though he is not a woman) recently and I see there is another one on Mara today. I noticed Kaiser only writes those about people she doesn’t like.
Why is it even a topic of conversation? It is bewildering to me. Amal, for example, looked stunning. But people still have to find a fault with her. Her shoes were too sparkly for the dress, apparently.
Kate Middleton also can never dress right, according to CB. She looks fine to me most of the time. She looks definitely better than me every time. )) I noticed the commenters have this strange negative obsession with her nude shoes. You would think wearing nude shoes is a crime on the level of torturing pets.
The whole endless criticism of clothes is exhausting. Commenters on CB take it way too seriously. Why do they expect a celebrity have a perfectly put together outfit every time? It takes days to plan an outfit, and then it is only worn once. It is such a waste. Just judge the people for their actions, the end of.
Talking about clothes can be fun, but when it turns negative and toxic, people need to step back and really think about - why is it so important to them what shoes a celebrity wears?
Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find a non-bitchy celebrity gossip site with a good layout, as of yet. If anyone has recommendations, feel free to share.
Some people recommend D-listed, but I find their layout and comments sections to be badly organized.
A great comment by Lalu on the Chris Evans thread today. This is what I find to be toxic about so many posters on CB. Yes, you are progressive, and you are against Trump. That is fine. But why are you so negative and intolerant. The type of ideological purity required by people posting on CB is very reminiscent of communists - if you are not with us, you are against us.
This leads to infighting and destructions of your own supporters over small insignificant differences. It makes your side weaker, not stronger.

And here we have master troll Kaiser fishing for clicks by purposely misinterpreting what Kristen Stewart said and then topping it off by blaming Stewart for an affair with Sanders, while Sanders is not even mentioned.
“ Do you see why I’m irritated? “I don’t view the whole Twilight blow-up as being generally traumatic.” Yeah, that’s because you weren’t Liberty Ross. Liberty had two small kids and she had uprooted her life in London to come to LA so Sanders could fulfill his dream of being a Hollywood director. And then he cheated on Liberty with a younger actress. It was traumatic for Liberty. “
I don’t know, but it seems unfair to blame a single woman for an affair before the husband. Sanders was the one who was married, he was the one who knew the truth of his marriage. Not to mention that at my workplace the whole thing would fall under the definition of the sexual harassment. And it wouldn’t be the employee who would’be blamed for it.
Kaiser only remembers about being a feminist when it suits her.
Oh, wow. The posters on Celebitchy today seem especially toxic/ angry. This is from Susan Sarandon post. Every other comment there is like this. In the big scheme of things, Susan Sarandon is a decent human being and is harmless. So much anger towards a person for having a different political opinion is frankly scary.
Svea says:
She needs to STFU for a while.
MunichGirl says:
Why is she still talking about that? Just shut up. She’s the reason I don’t watch Feud.
Tate says:
Shut up Susan!!!! Just shut up!!!!
eggyweggs says:
She’s musty.
bap says:
Overrated celebrity.
Darla says:
Shut up Susan.
Jayna says:
Condescending, smug, and passive-aggressive remarks towards Hillary.
I want to smack her.
Does Kaiser do any research before she posts shit?
I feel like she saw some articles about Marion saw they were about something negative (injections) wrote about it, and not doing simple research and finding out where the fuck the pictures came from.
They are old pictures from a fucking movie her lips were fake.
Then she deletes a bunch of comments from a Angie thread, people notice and comment on it, and she deletes those comments as well.
————————————————–
I believe Kaiser is basically a professional troll. Even when she knows the facts, she choses to ignore them in favor of controversy, and clicks. She has been called out on this multiple times. Of course, if you ever do so, you get on her black list. to be banned at the first opportunity.
I am guessing Kaiser is not a fan of Marion, since she has an article today hinting ( hint-hint) that Marion has lip fillers. The headline is “ Did Marion Cotillard get lip injections or does she just have pregnant lips? ”.
The plastic surgery hints are usually reserved for those Kaiser doesn’t like but doesn’t have anything rational to justify it. She uses hints of plastic surgery to poison the well, so to speak.
Well, it turns out Marion’s lips were prostatic, , for a movie, which was shot a year ago, before she got pregnant.
Absolutely. Race baiting in Kaiser’s posts is very obvious. She is just trolling people for clicks.
And saying something nice about Aniston is one of the fastest ways to get banned. ))
So today we are discussing Susan Sarandon’s plastic surgery, apparently. Here is the thing I noticed about CB posters. When it is a woman they don’t like, who hasn’t done anything really bad for which they can crucify her, they start talking about the woman’s looks and all the plastic surgery she has supposedly done. All with that fake concern and fake compliments.
I thought feminists were above it ? Not to mention that at least half of the suspected plastic surgery is probably just a figment of their imagination.
From today’s article on Susan Sarandon by Kaiser:

I’ve noticed CB found a new reliable click-bait - Meghan, prince Harry’s girlfriend. Prepare to be trolled mercilessly by Kaiser )). She will write all those backhanded posts about Meghan to get people fighting over her,
I noticed that the posters who don’t like Kate seem to like Meghan and Harry. Why? Royalty is royalty. Harry doesn’t seem to be any more useful than Cambridges. But he is better looking. Is that it?
Since I am a Cumberbatch fan I read the article on Cumberbatch yesterday, the one about his new project portraying Melrose. It was full of nuggets of fun, for me at least, despite having under 20 comments. ))
Here are some thoughts.

What teacakes doesn’t realize is that while she might be happy about Cumberbatch fans and haters being banned ( yes, they were banned, they didn’t just “leave”) , this is not actually good for Celebitchy. Cumberbatch used to be a reliable click bait, just like HIddleston, with 100+ comments on any given article. Celebitchy is a business , the loss of so many easy click has to hurt.
It is not by accident Kaiser is constantly trying to bait readers with underhanded mentions of Sophie like this one.

And this one is just my personal pet peeve. Yes, lightpurple, formerly known as lilacflowers, there is only one perfect human being in the world, and that is Tom Hiddleston. ))
Though, I’ll say, I forgive lilac flowers some of it for her defense of Taylor when Taylor was attacked on CB during the whole Kanye-Swift drama. The attacks on Taylor were just vicious. And no matter how much you dislike her, I don’t get how can you ever take Kanye’s side. He put her naked body, and bodies of other women, on display without permission for financial gain, and he gets a pass?

I meant to post this a couple days ago. I came across this excellent comment on one of the daily Kate Middleton bashing articles. Or should I call them “therapy articles”? Some people seem to have so much rage and anger, they need to find an outlet to vent it out. I guess I can see the upside - posting on CB is free, unlike going to a therapist.
But know this, if you read and absorb and participate in this day after day, the negativity and anger will affect you. It is not harmless. I am talking about posters like Sixer.
Anyway, it is an excellent comment here by lala, which highlights the hypocrisy of CB.
