I know. Being banned is a good thing in a way, otherwise I’d be tempted to say something, but in reality these posters chose to see things that way because that is how they like it. it is no use trying to reason with them.
Celebitchy.com website traffic stats for 12/28.

I checked out the last week posts on Celebitchy.com. It has now basically three major categories of articles - Jolie/Pitt divorce, Trump hate and Kate Middleton hate. There are other articles here and there with about 20 comments because pretty much all regular people have been banned and only the devotees of the party line remain.
Ivanka Trump’s article about the incident on Jet Blue has 400+ comments. And since even the regulars have hard time justifying what happened they resorted to conspiracy theories, saying that it was all set up. Others are saying that it is justifiable because they are Trump’s kin. Yeah, no way it is justifiable.
Here is a post I agree with myself. Notice that the poster knows that she is likely to get banned for going against the party line.

And here is a reply to this post from one of the “approved” posters on the site. Judge for yourself.

Celebitchy.com website traffic stats for 12/15.

Ah, well. I don’t see the posters I liked the other day anymore. I guess they were banned after all.
There are three articles from Celebitchy as well today. Not at all articles are bad. Kaiser’s articles are the most insipid, though. She can’t even state her opinion clearly. Every article is a question - is it this or that?
I don’t care for that site either, really. It is mostly just morbid curiosity at this point. I can no longer see even harmless articles about fashion in the same light because of the unbelievable hypocrisy of many posters there. If they like a woman, all is forgiven. If they don’t, then they will find a reason to tear her down.
#ban #celebitchy
Anon:
Kaiser is the downfall of that site. She is a bully and ALL if her views are one-sided.
Everyone in that sites talks about being feminist yet they constantly pick apart women they don’t like.
For example,you can’t say anything negative about Angie Jolie, yet ever Kaye Middleton post is only.there to be mean and pick apart everything about her.
Talk about her body and everything.
She is a big bully. Period.
———————————————————————————————————-
Completely agree with you. Kaiser found another easy target - Melania Trump. Kaiser likes to post about her because an article about Melania will for sure get 100+ comments without Kaiser having to do any work, other than posting a Melania's picture. All the speculations about Melania’s son were also pretty disturbing.
People on Celebitchy justify their nastiness towards Melania, the criticism of her looks and clothes, by saying that she signed up for it. But to me it is just pure hypocrisy. There was also an article about Brisol Palin yesterday where the same thing happened. The posters feel free to denigrate a woman just because she has different political view from them. That is not feminism.
It seems Celebitchy owners have noticed that not all is well. Today on the site there are three articles written by Celebitchy herself, she usually writes one, two by Corey and two by Hecate and numerous by Kaiser, as usual.
Yesterday I noticed an anti-Hillary poster who was openly trolling, and also a couple of reasonable posters who pointed out that Hillary lost because of her own mistakes.
So I guess that means that Celebitchy has figured out that banning everyone who doesn’t toe the party line is not a good business strategy. We shall see whether these posters disappear or not.
I still think Celebitchy is going to fail despite all of this. The site became too toxic and these half-hearted measures will not save it.
Web traffic stats for Celebitchy.com for today 12/08

Oh the irony. The Celebitchy.com has an article “ Madonna’s theory about why Donald Trump won: ‘Women hate women “
And below there are hundreds of comments by women about how awful “the other” women are. Of course, the posters think themselves perfect and it is lost on them that they engage exactly in the same behavior they criticize.