Banned From Celebitchy

Month
Filter by post type
All posts

Text
Photo
Quote
Link
Chat
Audio
Video
Ask

December 2018

Kaiser is alluding to the fact that the moon landing was fake. Again. Because her brilliant late father told her so. Has she ever mentioned her father being a brilliant nuclear engineer before? Does anyone else think Kaiser is a fantasist? Maybe that's why she's so anonymous. It also may be why she makes up wild stories about celebs (think Meghan/Kate Angelina/Brad) and spins them as the truth.

Kaiser seem to live  in her own bubble.

Dec 13, 2018
It's strange not visiting Celebitchy anymore. I used to go there multiple times a day for years, until I suddenly got banned over nothing (I didn't break any rules, and wasn't unpleasant to anyone, just disagreed). Still, I don't want to give them the clicks, so I am petty enough to enjoy reading here that they have to resort to Amazon ads now.
Dec 13, 2018 2 notes
Am I the only one who thinks people on CB get realllllly over invested in the BRF drama? I mean, they talk as if they know these people in real life. Sure, it's normal to gossip and to have favourite celebrities & Royals, but it seems sooo personal on CB. There's way too much projection going on, that cant be healthy. I can feel their anger and bitterness through the screen ha!

I’ve seen the same behavior in some other fandoms, Twihards come to mind. People create their own versions of their idols, and then act as if they know them. This acute stage passes for most people, in  a year or two. But some people never come out of their delusions,

Dec 13, 2018
Remember, they seem to think that if M/H "works" harder than W/K, then M/H deserves all the free taxpayer perks as a reward. This isn't the way things work at all. But that doesn't stop them from believing Duchess Meghan deserves millions of free money and Kate deserves nothing and should be criticised for every penny she spends because she is just a useless, lazy woman. 1/2
Dec 12, 2018 1 note
This is why the taxpayer, public money comments are so different on the MeghanHarry threads. They're always crazy frothing at the mouth when it comes to WK expenses but for MH the tone changes. It's like whatever, they can spend as much as they wish, and if you dare criticise them for spending your hard earned money, you're simply racist. Oh and this is also why Meghan won't be bashed for her maternity leave but Kate was thrashed for taking time to nurture her baby and heal from her pregnancy.
Dec 12, 2018
Pot meet kettle CBitches! "'Most of the harsh, pick-her-apart comments come from people who just don’t like Meghan. These people avoid logic, embrace hypocrisy, state rumor as fact and relish in disparaging her character for whatever personal issues they harbor." Kate Hating is a sport to them, the archive is full of it. They only dislike the rumours stated as fact business & the gossip when it comes down to their favourite Duchess. The posters are full of hypocrisy and double standards.
Dec 12, 2018 3 notes
The ask about Hollywood actors working 14 hour days, in the makeup chair by 5am so muas in for 4am: I work in TV/film in London and it's exactly the same here. Hollywood actors don't have longer days than British actors. British bankers work crazy long hours too. Yes there are massive differences but the idea that "Europeans" (which btw no Brit would say) are unused to long hours or the idea of a strong work ethic is ridiculous.
Dec 12, 2018 1 note
If they have leaner times (through their own fault of course), then why do Amazon ads? Was there really no other company willing to do ads? I guess not.
Dec 12, 2018

The site is getting downright ridiculous. All new posters too, the old and good ones are gone. Anyone who dares to criticize Meghan is either banned or called a racist. Meghan’s belly- cradling is a big FU to the establishment. Good luck with that.

Dec 12, 2018
And the battle of indignation over people criticising Meghan goes on on CB. A few posters, I noticed, tried without success to point out that Meghan owes her HRH, her status, what house she lives in, what patronages she can have, her "cottage" renovated by the UK taxpayer, and all her perks to the BRF, and that putting two fingers up to them is a tad, er, short-sighted. Those comments are gone.
Dec 12, 2018 2 notes

‘Methinks you are engaging in hyperpole…20 hour workdays? Really? Perhaps you would prefer the 35 hour French workweek…and their 70% tax rate. I have been an exempt worker thru-out most of my work life. In white collar, non exempt professional jobs, one gets comp time for overtime worked. You know, with the US economy doing so well, there are lots of other opportunities around. Look for something else.‘

Well, I am just one anonymous blogger talking to another. You don’t have to believe me, or agree with me. However, 20 hours a day is what investment bankers work, routinely. Of course, they are paid 300K a year for it and up, so nobody is shedding tears for them. They don’t have to do it.

I worked in management consulting, also with very good pay, 16 hour days were a norm. Again, sure you are “free” to quit, or to take a lower paying job with more reasonable hours, which I eventually did.

Also, if you are pregnant and don’t like the lack of maternity leave in the US, you are “free” to quit and starve, I guess.

As for hyperbole, 70% is the top tax rate in France, in the US it is 40%, plus all kinds of other taxes on top like property, sales, state etc, which also come up to a pretty high number if you are a high earner. For all the talk of Europeans paying too much in taxes, at least they get something in return. We pay high taxes too but have nothing to show for it. 

Dec 11, 2018 1 note
it is actually cringe-worthy and shows how crazy/delusional these posters must be if they really think we Brits are so influenced by the tabloids and see the Cambridge's as the big bad meanies trying to put Meghan and Harry in their place. Laughable and oh so childish. They Really think the public has turned on the Cambridge's! They need to go outside and breathe some fresh air. Their delusional narratives are really based on nothing except envy? Idk.
Dec 11, 2018 1 note

Here is something I was thinking about last few days. I was surprised by the Sussexes move to Forgmore announcement a week ago. No matter how they spin it, from what we’ve seen so far, there is no way Meghan is happy about the move to the country. She wants to be in the city where she can participate in the things, not drive 1 hour each way for every single meeting. To me this looks like Sussexes are being evicted into the country against their will.

And in response we have a rebellion by Meghan where she arranges her own events like the ones with Michele Obama and then the British Fashion Awards yesterday. I don’t think this is going to end well for Meghan. She is burning too many bridges,

Dec 11, 2018 3 notes
Things must be really lean if they are running multiple amazon affiliate ads every week. Their desperation is showing.
Dec 11, 2018
I had to do an outright facepalm at the part near the end of the Jana Kramer article that read “how did it become a thing for women to be criticized for looking too good after having a baby?”(!!) I cant decide if Celebitchy is blissfully or willfully ignorant, because she can look to her own damn site - literally every. Single. Article. Even remotely related to pregnancy or childbirth has to slam Kate and the Cambridge baby hospital photo ops. Stunned silent, I can’t with these people anymore. .
Dec 11, 2018 1 note
I think those leaner times are caused by two main things: 1. Banning lots of loyal readers who made several clicks a day an now don't come back. 2. Kaiser becoming increasingly hateful to white women. It went from calling out white privilege (which is fine), to Kaiser showing her anger towards white women in random, unrelated news stories. Seeing how a big part of her readership was probably white women, the leaner times are not a surprise.

It is definitely the banning of the posters and the censoring. I don’t know about open hatred of white women, I don’t see that specifically. I see irrational hatred of some white women, and it is very personal hatred. Kaiser feels safe doing that. If she did that to a WOC she’d be called out by her readership. That is true.

Dec 11, 2018 1 note
Holy cupping condundrum! Everyone getting so angry at people saying it was a bit much for Meghan to cup her belly for four minutes straight on stage. It’s a gossip site, don’t act all holier than thou when someone has an opinion. People are so defensive of Meghan it’s kind of scary. If this were any other celebrity or public person they would be all over her!

I personally don’t mind belly cupping. If that makes the woman more calm/ comfortable, I have no issue with it. I am in live and let live camp. Having said that, I first read all the comments and THEN looked at the picture. And, oh my, I almost fell out of the chair. That is not belly cupping. I don’t know what it was, but there is no way that was a natural pose. That was a performance. In my opinion, of course.

I really don’t know what Meghan is up to. But she is playing a dangerous game. There is no way the BRF is OK with all the unplanned hobnobbing with celebrities. She is not a celebrity, she is supposed to serve. She doesn’t seem to get it.

Dec 11, 2018 3 notes

After the “lean times” mention I decided to check CB’s traffic stats. There is a nosedive about 3 months ago. I wonder what happened. 

Though, honestly I don’t know how accurate this info is. Last year it was showing a dramatic increase in traffic but I didn’t really see it, based on comments.

Dec 10, 2018
#celebitchy #ban
I wish that every Celebitchy poster who claims to be a "Feminist" yet makes comments freely about skinny women's bodies watched Sarah Hyland's Self interview. I haven't checked CB but if they did talk about it or if they do, how much do you want to bet they'll all circlejerk about how strong she is and how you neevr know what people are going through etc and yet they'll be the same people calling people "scary skinny" and body shaming Kate Middleton & Meghan Merkle.
Dec 10, 2018

“Ahoyoy says:

December 10, 2018 at 5:14 pm

Literally this. On what planet does staff think they have the right to do anything but say ‘yes, ma’am right away’. I have 2 secretaries, 3 younger associates and 5 interns on my team. Woe betide any one of them who would dare to pull any of the crap that the palace staff has done in the last month. Don’t like your boss? Quit. Spread gossip? You’re fired.
Meghan is in charge of her staff, she sets the culture. If she chooses to set an American work culture, that’s up to her. If her staff doesn’t like it, they can leave. Americans don’t tolerate disloyal staff. Breach trust and you’re out the door, whether the breach was accidental or intentional. We don’t mess around. These people are going to learn a nasty lesson.”

Wow, what a boss from hell! You would think somebody posting on a presumably progressive website would know that workers are not slaves, and that they have feelings. Somebody who treats workers like this will soon be left with no workers.

Dec 10, 2018

“ The U.S. does have labor laws protecting workers on overtime. “

There are no protections for so-called exempt, typically white collar, workers. Even if we work 20 hour days we get no overtime pay. Only hourly workers are paid overtime, but typically those jobs are low pay (at minimum wage) and without any benefits and health insurance, so nobody wants them.

Once I came to blows with my boss, who is probably the best boss I’ve had, and I love her dearly, over me having an issue with being asked to work on Saturday at a very specific time (11AM), not an hour earlier and not an hour later, all with 1 day notice. I was taking my daughter to a birthday party at that time. And my boss honestly couldn’t understand why I wouldn’t sacrifice my kid’s birthday party for work!

Dec 10, 2018 1 note

Will they stop already with Meghan’s “American work ethics”. I am not American by birth, I am naturalized citizen. And I think I can safely say, having lived and worked in several European countries, that what many Americans call “work ethics” Europeans call “exploitation”.  And if Meghan wants to fit in, she needs to come to grips with it.

There is nothing positive about spending 12-14 hours at work, for very little money, and thinking it is normal. But this is what Americans do, day in and day out, and many, not all, are proud of it, while their families suffer. And the rest, like myself, are not given any choice, so we have to do it because we have no rights. And it is not that I am lazy, I am valued and promoted regularly. But I just have a very different outlook on the work-life balance.

I’ve read enough interviews with Hollywood actors to know that they often work 12-16 hour days while shooting a movie, they are in make up chair at 5 AM.  Which means the make up artist and all the support personnel is probably at work by 4 AM and late into the night. And they are not paid that much. Now, coming from that world, if Meghan thinks this is how her staff is expected to work, and this is how Europeans work, oh boy, she is going to drive people up the wall big time.

Another big difference is the emphasis on self-marketing and self-promotion in the US, which in most countries is seen as shocking and completely unacceptable touting of your own horn.

Dec 10, 2018 2 notes

Yesterday I was looking at some recent royal bridal gowns. And I remembered how about a year or so ago Kaiser kept going about princess Sofia of Sweden, and how Sofia was so much better when compared to Kate. And then Meghan came around, and Sofia is completely forgotten. It just goes to show that Meghan or whoever else Kaiser gashes about, is just a tool for her to spread hatred of the “other princess”. Her adoration is not genuine. You can see the same pattern with other celebrities as well.

Dec 10, 2018
#celebtichy #ban
People say NOTA is crazy, it's true. But DigitalUnicorn is actually insane. Her hate for Kate, William and the Middleton is OTT, even for CB.

I seem to remember Digital Unicorn from a while back, I think she is an equal opportunity hater. ))) She does have a way of finding the most negative interpretation of everything.

Dec 10, 2018
Love this comment: And the Cambridges have been all over the news with their events. "The way the narratives are shaped by people who have absolutely no dog in this fight is unusual. It’s so silly when a platform essentially becomes the propagandist arm of one side of the BRF as if they have any influence over what’s unfolding but I guess shutting down dissenting opinions is the new way of doing business. So weird."
Dec 9, 2018
Kaiser identifying with Meghan makes sense. It's like she feels personally attacked when someone is saying something negative about Meghan. She also likes playing the victim and uses Meghan to do so. That's why she goes out of her way to constantly link to the Daily Mail (of all things) to find negative stories. Funnily enough, I don't think Meghan and Kaiser are alike at all. For one, I find Meghan very sympathetic and smart. Kaiser, not so much.
Dec 9, 2018
Kaiser seems to identify with Meghan too strongly. She is convinced that the whole of the UK is constantly talking and thinking about Meghan, probably because she wants to feel like she/Meghan is the centre of the universe. This while almost nobody in the UK talks about the royals at all, except when there's a wedding or a birth. And even then lots of people don't talk about it as they have their own lives to live.

I agree. She takes it all very personally. The same with Jolie. It happens to some fans and it is not healthy. They start acting as if those people are a part of their lives, while the celebrities don’t even know this or that fan exists. It is a very sad, one-sided relationship.

Kaiser spent how many years writing for Celebitchy? 8 or so? And she is on the site constantly, it is her life.And this way it is also very easy to lose perspective if she is on the site whole day and doesn’t go out into the outside world.She lives in her own bubble.

I was just thinking the other day -  how sad is it that someone would dedicate their whole life to a toxic gossip site. There is no upside to it. At least entertainers can feel that they are doing something productive by helping people unwind, lifting their moods. But with a negative, toxic site like Celebitchy? There is no positive contribution, it is a waste of one’s life.

Dec 9, 2018 1 note

I’ve been reading celebitchy for about 8 years now and Kaiser has gotten progressively worse. She’s passive/aggressive, sheltered and rude to the commentors. So glad I found this blog!

Eta, I posted this message as a response to another poster, still learning to use this site, sorry!

———————————————————–

Welcome!

Dec 9, 2018 1 note
So, they say it's leaner and now have to do Amazon promos...how far they have fallen. They really don't see it wouldn't be so lean if they didn't ban so many people? I was banned for saying something that didn't break any rules. I didn't even attack anyone, just gave a different opinion on something without any negativity towards anyone (celebrities or people commenting). I am not going there anymore as I don't want to help them by clicking.
Dec 8, 2018 7 notes
So, Kaiser is getting more vicious to white women by the day and blames them for Trump (even though white men voted for him in bigger numbers). Yet, she worships several white men. How strange.
Dec 8, 2018 3 notes
I actually felt really sad to see all the comments saying that people were glad Celebitchy didn't sell the site because it is their favourite site and they love the community. I used to feel that way, but the crazy censoring and banning left a sour note. I think it is necessary to moderate in order to keep things sane and civil on any site, but just censoring whoever doesn't agree with Kaiser, yet has not actually broken community rules, is just really sad.

The first unwritten rule of the Celebitchy is to never disagree with Kaiser. There are several more. The environment does seem similar to high school, as others mentioned before, it is very cliquish.

Dec 7, 2018 2 notes
In reference to her Weird Al post..Poor celebitchy. Could have gotten 7 figures for the site 7 years ago apparently and now has to slum it with amazon posts because she didn’t want to “change their voice”. Should have taken the deal.

Ha-ha. that must really grate, all this money down the drain, thanks to Kaiser.

Dec 7, 2018 1 note
CB is admitting trouble with the site in the Weird Al post: "The last couple of years have been a little leaner than usual and we’re trying to supplement that by doing affiliate posts."
Dec 7, 2018 1 note
Celebitchy didn't just take an Amazon ad, they actually just wrote an affiliate post about Amazon stuff. It's getting more pathetic by the day. Wonder if those advertising know that they are chasing people away by banning them. Don't think they would be happy about it.
Dec 7, 2018 1 note
One of Kaiser's many "quirks" is that she likes to give nicknames to celebrity babies. She calls one of the Clooney twins Sascha (his name is Alexander), the youngest Cambridge is referred to as Prince Lou, which sounds awful, and of course the Jolie Pitt kids. Am I the only one finding this creepy? 1/2
Dec 7, 2018 2 notes
I think she's trying to get the nicknames to stick right, is that what gossip bloggers do? Some people think she's copied Michael K's writing style and I know he had some good nicknames, but for the celebrities, not their kids! And he is actually funny, unlike Kaiser. 2/2
Dec 7, 2018 1 note
I wonder how long this comment, on the Markle thread, is going to stay up! "These articles are starting to read like some paranoid conspiracy theory / fan fiction. I feel uncomfortable reading them. I have been reading celebitchy for a good while, and whoever believes (author included) this petty and unhinged fan fiction should take a long break from any gossip and engage with the real world. Too much engagement with gossip really can poison your mind!"

I saw it yesterday and loved it, especially the “author included” part. ))) I guess Kaiser was off duty at the time.

Dec 7, 2018 1 note
I knew it was gonna get me in trouble with that nut job Kaiser but I couldn’t resist. Made a comment on today’s Amal post that it’s off-color to nickname other people’s children (K insists on calling Alexander Clooney ‘Sascha’ and Prince Louis ‘Lou’) and bam! Gone. Gonna migrate over to GoFugYourself with the rest of the exiles.
Dec 7, 2018
Lol, what? Celebitchy is taking Amazon ads now? You only have to do a split second Google search to know that Amazon is absolutely shitty to their employees. They complain about Trump, which is fair, but then do that? Bizarre.
Dec 6, 2018
Thanks to the person who suggested Gofugyourself. I'm not interested in clothes, but there are some articles about other things too.
Dec 6, 2018
I don’t even bother posting on CB since my dislike of Meghan Markle goes back to Suits. Could not stand Rachel and that passed onto the actress herself. Same thing happened to Mike and Patrick J. Adams, to me they were waste of screentime on an otherwise enjoyable show. It’s hilarious seeing the fauxmenists @ the site/Twitter fawn over the newest royal. If you don’t like her, it’s racism 🙄 Those same people have no qualms spewing vitriolic lies via Blind Gossip when it comes to other females.
Dec 6, 2018
"Is Pryianka Amal Clooney’s friend?" Haha, good one! No, she isn't.. but the new saint on CB, Meghan, *is* a close friend of Amal's. I wonder how the comments will go when it's revealed they keep on spending so much time together.. Meghan and Harry were invited to the Clooney home in Berkshire for dinner with Michelle O. CB hates Amal but loves Meghan. Amal will be seen as the "social climbing, attention loving user".
Dec 6, 2018 3 notes
Have had your site bookmarked on all my devices ever since my equally bored with Kaiser & her Krazed Kronies friends repeatedly sent me links. So glad that there’s a blog where we all can vent our frustrations at the crazed dictator-shit writer & her delusions of grandeur. Is MM-Duchess of Sussex the newest precious on the site deserving of “sainthood” ala Jolie? Reading the asks sure seems that way. Glad I haven’t given them clicks in over 4 years. Not Team KM or MM. Monarchy is outdated IMHO.
Dec 5, 2018
"Celebitchy used to be my favorite website, but Kaiser and her crazy banning has destroyed it. What is a good alternative?" I like Gofugyourself. Not only for the items written by Jessica and Heather, but also for the discussion in the comments. It is as much a part of the item and the writers often engage with the comments in a very respectful way.
Dec 5, 2018
They don't see anyone as a WOC on CB except for Meghan Markle and maybe a few other female WOC celebs, including Serena and Priyanka. Not once have they ever referred Amal as a WOC. Same goes for Asians.. remember Naomi Osaka? Nope, they are not woke, they are not feminists, and they show their xenophobia through their comments. They're all bloody ignorant of different cultures to boot. I call it the Female DailyMail because it's true... CB posters are no better.
Dec 5, 2018 1 note
What is with them running a promo for Amazon? For a site that is supposed to be so woke, that would be about the last company they want to be associated with, seeing all the shit Amazon pulls. Maybe they would still be getting more clicks if they didn't ban everyone left, right and center.

It seems they are desperate financially. I hope the site goes kaput. It is toxic.

Dec 5, 2018
Celebitchy used to be my favorite website, but Kaiser and her crazy banning has destroyed it. What is a good alternative?

I haven’t found an alternative. And it seems to be the case with most others as well. Anyone wants to recommend something -  please chime in.

Dec 5, 2018
Y'all want some tea? Go to Celebitchy's Twitter timeline around Thanksgiving day. She says something about how it's ironic an actress is complaining about clickbait when she sent an long dramatic and threatening email telling CB to pull a story where they used her own words from an interview. So Kaiser chimes in and says, and I quote "that bitch needs to shut her f-cking mouth" Someone asked CB oh you guys really get contacted by celebs and CB said not as much anymore knock on wood. Part 1 of 2
Dec 5, 2018 1 note
Pt 2. So then Kaiser chimes in and says "yeah usually publicists get involved and it's a pain in the f-cking ass." Realll professional. I think it's Amanda Abbington. Lainey Gossip & Celebitchy put too much conjecture in their gossip & I'm not surprised they get contacted and I bet you it taints their view and causes them to say nasty things about those celebs (I bet Leo hit Lainey with a C&D). Now Kaiser is saying that W&K smeared Meg like it's a fact. She's totally insane.
Dec 5, 2018
Where I used to read Celebitchy because of the different views, it's now become the Kaiser show. She blocks anyone who doesn't agree with her increasingly nutty narratives. This site has gone downhill. I used to recommend it to others, but now won't be giving it clicks anymore.
Dec 5, 2018
Next page →
20172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
201620172018
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
20162017
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December