13 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Kaiser is alluding to the fact that the moon landing was fake. Again. Because her brilliant late father told her so. Has she ever mentioned her father being a brilliant nuclear engineer before? Does anyone else think Kaiser is a fantasist? Maybe that's why she's so anonymous. It also may be why she makes up wild stories about celebs (think Meghan/Kate Angelina/Brad) and spins them as the truth.

Kaiser seem to live  in her own bubble.

13 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: It's strange not visiting Celebitchy anymore. I used to go there multiple times a day for years, until I suddenly got banned over nothing (I didn't break any rules, and wasn't unpleasant to anyone, just disagreed). Still, I don't want to give them the clicks, so I am petty enough to enjoy reading here that they have to resort to Amazon ads now.

13 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Am I the only one who thinks people on CB get realllllly over invested in the BRF drama? I mean, they talk as if they know these people in real life. Sure, it's normal to gossip and to have favourite celebrities & Royals, but it seems sooo personal on CB. There's way too much projection going on, that cant be healthy. I can feel their anger and bitterness through the screen ha!

I’ve seen the same behavior in some other fandoms, Twihards come to mind. People create their own versions of their idols, and then act as if they know them. This acute stage passes for most people, in  a year or two. But some people never come out of their delusions,

12 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Remember, they seem to think that if M/H "works" harder than W/K, then M/H deserves all the free taxpayer perks as a reward. This isn't the way things work at all. But that doesn't stop them from believing Duchess Meghan deserves millions of free money and Kate deserves nothing and should be criticised for every penny she spends because she is just a useless, lazy woman. 1/2

12 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: This is why the taxpayer, public money comments are so different on the MeghanHarry threads. They're always crazy frothing at the mouth when it comes to WK expenses but for MH the tone changes. It's like whatever, they can spend as much as they wish, and if you dare criticise them for spending your hard earned money, you're simply racist. Oh and this is also why Meghan won't be bashed for her maternity leave but Kate was thrashed for taking time to nurture her baby and heal from her pregnancy.

12 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: Pot meet kettle CBitches! "'Most of the harsh, pick-her-apart comments come from people who just don’t like Meghan. These people avoid logic, embrace hypocrisy, state rumor as fact and relish in disparaging her character for whatever personal issues they harbor." Kate Hating is a sport to them, the archive is full of it. They only dislike the rumours stated as fact business & the gossip when it comes down to their favourite Duchess. The posters are full of hypocrisy and double standards.

12 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: The ask about Hollywood actors working 14 hour days, in the makeup chair by 5am so muas in for 4am: I work in TV/film in London and it's exactly the same here. Hollywood actors don't have longer days than British actors. British bankers work crazy long hours too. Yes there are massive differences but the idea that "Europeans" (which btw no Brit would say) are unused to long hours or the idea of a strong work ethic is ridiculous.

12 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: If they have leaner times (through their own fault of course), then why do Amazon ads? Was there really no other company willing to do ads? I guess not.

12 12 / 2018

The site is getting downright ridiculous. All new posters too, the old and good ones are gone. Anyone who dares to criticize Meghan is either banned or called a racist. Meghan’s belly- cradling is a big FU to the establishment. Good luck with that.

12 12 / 2018

Anonymous asked: And the battle of indignation over people criticising Meghan goes on on CB. A few posters, I noticed, tried without success to point out that Meghan owes her HRH, her status, what house she lives in, what patronages she can have, her "cottage" renovated by the UK taxpayer, and all her perks to the BRF, and that putting two fingers up to them is a tad, er, short-sighted. Those comments are gone.